Net Llama! wrote:
I personally think that Redhat is doing a smart thing. They've finally
split their offerings so that one focuses on the enterprise where the
real revenue comes from, and the other focuses on the random home user
where all the word of mouth comes from.
Thanks for the info. I
Unfortunately I can't post to the xfce list, so I will ask my question here,
since I know that several of you are xfce users.
I've downloaded the 4.0.0 final version, but there are no instructions (that I
can find) about the order of making the various components. Does anyone have
this
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:00:07 -0500
Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
I personally think that Redhat is doing a smart thing. They've finally
split their offerings so that one focuses on the enterprise where the
real revenue comes from, and the other focuses on the
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
Unfortunately I can't post to the xfce list, so I will ask my question here,
since I know that several of you are xfce users.
I've downloaded the 4.0.0 final version, but there are no instructions (that I
can find) about the order of making the
Collins Richey wrote:
Unfortunately I can't post to the xfce list, so I will ask my question here,
since I know that several of you are xfce users.
I've downloaded the 4.0.0 final version, but there are no instructions (that I
can find) about the order of making the various components. Does
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Campbell shocked and awed us all by speaking:
It would probably be a Good Idea(tm) then if they had geographically
separated name servers instead of only two which are on the same network.
As it
- Severen as a community project could very well devolve into being
little better than the other dozens (nay, hundreds) of half-baked
homegrown distros. Of interest only to the hobbyists.
Quite true, but it's not intended for anyone else so that's OK.
- They are leaving a portion of the market
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
Unfortunately I can't post to the xfce list, so I will ask my question here,
since I know that several of you are xfce users.
I've downloaded the 4.0.0 final version,
Keith Morse wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
I just did a clean install of RH9 on a server that was running RH8,
everything is working great except that ipop3d won't authenticate any
users. Just says Bad authentication. This was working fine on RH8 and
I don't remember putting
I have a network of WinXX PC's with a single Linux box
acting as the gateway/firewall/dhcp server/e-mail
server/etc. My Linux box connects to the ISP via 128K
ISDN dial-up line (too far away for DSL and cable is
N/A).
When I first connect the Linux box to the ISP, I can:
1) Use the Linux box to
--- Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Morse wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
I just did a clean install of RH9 on a server that
was running RH8,
everything is working great except that ipop3d
won't authenticate any
users. Just says Bad authentication. This was
Some kind of crazy arp poisoning maybe?
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brad De Vries wrote:
I have a network of WinXX PC's with a single Linux box
acting as the gateway/firewall/dhcp server/e-mail
server/etc. My Linux box connects to the ISP via 128K
ISDN dial-up line (too far away for DSL and cable
--- Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some kind of crazy arp poisoning maybe?
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brad De Vries wrote:
I have a network of WinXX PC's with a single Linux
box
acting as the gateway/firewall/dhcp server/e-mail
server/etc. My Linux box connects to the ISP via
128K
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
WAG here. Take a look at /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3 and/or /etc/hosts.allow.
Thanks. The xinetd.d/ipop3 file is clean and exactly the same as the one
that worked in RH8. The hosts.allow is empty meaning, I assume, allow
everyone.
And I can telnet
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
WAG here. Take a look at /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3 and/or /etc/hosts.allow.
Thanks. The xinetd.d/ipop3 file is clean and exactly the same as the one
that worked in RH8. The hosts.allow is empty meaning, I assume, allow
everyone.
And I can telnet into
Brad De Vries wrote:
What e-mail clients are you using? Some have the
ability to send user/passwd in clear text or
encrypted. Have you tried both?
I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird on a W2k box. But I've also tried the
direct method of telnet straight to port 110 and entered the auth stuff
myself.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
And WAGs are definitely appreciated.
I have no idea which ipop3 daemon I'm using. Actually it's worse - I
didn't know there was more than one. I'm using the one that comes in Red
Hat 9. I even tried starting it with --help and --version and it
Keith Morse wrote:
and chances are it'll be imap-2001a, which is the default. Never seen
this problem and I've been using the wu-imap package for quite awhile now.
Yes; imap-2001a-18 to be exact. So now I at least know to look at
http://www.washington.edu/imap/ might be a possibility. Thanks.
Keith Morse wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
WAG here. Take a look at /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3 and/or /etc/hosts.allow.
Thanks. The xinetd.d/ipop3 file is clean and exactly the same as the one
that worked in RH8. The hosts.allow is empty meaning, I assume, allow
everyone.
And I
Bill Campbell wrote:
I suggest you look in your /var/log files to see if there's a clue there.
Doesn't seem to be much help ...
Sep 26 07:32:10 linux ipop3d[13043]: pop3 service init from 192.168.0.152
Sep 26 07:35:10 linux ipop3d[13043]: Autologout user=??? host=michael
[192.168.0.152]
Sep 26
On 26 Sep 2003 07:14:54 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Doesn't SuSE have a ulimit command? It can be used to get and set file
size limits.
OK with ulimit -a I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
test 1
echo $?
0
Kurt
--
One difference between a man and a machine is that a machine is quiet
when well oiled.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
Quoth Sys Admin:
testing mailman. ignore
Fat chance.
Kurt
--
Fourth Law of Thermodynamics: If the probability of success is not
almost one, it is damn near zero.
-- David Ellis
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Sys Admin:
testing mailman. ignore
Fat chance.
I thought the correct phrase was slim chance.
Michael
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://mail.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Oh, this is just *too* ridiculous. I log my spam rejections and keep a
graph of rejected connection attempts to my SMTP server. Thanks to
Swen, on 24 September, Postfix rejected 4628 attempts just from hosts
lacking hostnames that resolve to known IP address.
Kurt
--
Whenever people agree with
Quoth Bill Campbell:
Sounds good so long as it's not someplace where the choices of ``beer'' are
Miller Lite, Bud Lite, and Coors.
That's not beer. It's refrigerated horse piss.
Kurt
--
Chicken Little was right.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
