Re: HD question

2003-11-20 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/20/03 14:21, Rick Sivernell wrote: Lonnie You do have a point here, I did try a 2nd hd on the laptop, it worked as it should, it was a small drive. The original will not boot, but fdisk can read the partition. grub will start then hang. Can not put this drive in to older laptop as it has

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > FYI. > > >From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually > degrades rapidly to "my fs is better than your fs"). > > I just happened to be reviewing the current Gentoo Handbook - a work in > progress, and I noted the follo

Re: HD question

2003-11-20 Thread Net Llama!
What makes you so sure that the HD is bad? Can you put it into a different box and mount any of the partitions? On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote: > list > >My laptop system has gone down while I was using it. When I tried to get it to > reboot, it stuck in grub. I used the gentoo l

Re: COpying to Same Inode ....

2003-11-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Ben Duncan wrote: > Is there a way to copy a file from on file system to another and keep the > inode number(s) the same on that particular file. I know the inode(s) will > have to be free on the receiving file system. I don't know the answer, but i'm curious why you'd want to

Re: sendmail won't start

2003-11-19 Thread Net Llama!
acing it. Joel On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:35:33PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit foolish. I'm trying to get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my ancient Caldera box. There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I&

Re: Apache log probe?

2003-11-19 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/19/03 21:07, Collins Richey wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:56:39 -0800 Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Collins Richey wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:37:56 -0800 "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/19/03 17:07, Ken Moffat wrote: Anyone have

sendmail won't start

2003-11-19 Thread Net Llama!
I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit foolish. I'm trying to get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my ancient Caldera box. There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I've been upgrading it piecemeal to assorted Redhat RPMs for a while now, but it was last an amalgam

Re: Apache log probe?

2003-11-19 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/19/03 17:07, Ken Moffat wrote: Anyone have a clue ? What is this, from my apache/access.log? 217.210.77.107 - - [19/Nov/2003:02:07:29 -0800] "SEARCH /\x90\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02 \xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x0

Re: html and web application

2003-11-17 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/17/03 08:01, dep wrote: a couple of weeks ago, when the textmaker sale was coming up, there was some discussion here of a wysiwig program to make html editing easier. while poking around today, i found this, which looks promising, and which appears to be free: http://www.nvu.com/ That's

Re: laptop screen blanking wont stop!

2003-11-17 Thread Net Llama!
Ya, i'm pretty sure that its a BIOS setting, if its the thinkpad that your employer gave you ;) On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote: > Perhaps a BIOS setting? > > On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 12:47, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I've got a th

Re: xfce4 build error

2003-11-17 Thread Net Llama!
Are you using the official source, or a gentoo build? I've built xfce-4.0.1 on a few boxes and never run into anything like that. I don't even have a sn.h on any of my boxes. On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote: > List > > Trying to upgrade xfce to xfce4 on gentoo, I get the following e

Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Myles Green wrote: > My hardware: > Athlon 1800+ > 1.5GB PC2700 DDR RAM (Samsung) > nVidia Geforce2 MX 400 (using nvidia drivers) > PS/2 keyboard > USB wheel mouse (Logitech) using IMPS/2 protocol > > I've run Memtest86 on the RAM, one stick at a time and al

Re: A First Look: Next-Generation Debian Installer

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
This is actually redhat's text based installer, anaconda that Debian is using. Its worth noting that it does not include Redhat's kickstart functionality. On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > FYI > > Some "Breaking News".. > A First Look: Next-Generation Debian Installer > > http://www.l

Re: way

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > I'm too much of an email/etc youngster to understand shortcuts like > > :-) and ;-) > > My google searches have produced no results. > > Where are these defined? rotate your head 270 degree, and look at them again. -- ~

Re: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:05:05 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Consuming 0.8K bytes, Net Llama! blathered: > > > On 11/13/03 17:04, dep wrote: > > > > > > >quoth Kurt Wall: > > > &g

Re: rms: "i'm clueless, dammit!"

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jack Berger wrote: > Good analogy on the sears tools bit, but we do use a lot of the gnu tools on our > solaris systems. That's cause Solaris is almost unusable with the tools that are native to the OS. I"m still baffled to this day why anyone voluntarily uses Sun hardware o

Re: tar + bunzip2

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > how to decompress file.tar.bz2 with tar and bunzip2? > > `bunzip2 -dkc file.tar.bz2 | tar xvf` didn't work. Define "didn't work". -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EM

Re: FW: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > > > > What last time? Let's not play revisionist historians, ok? > > > > But there IS a history, dating back to April, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=884

Re: FW: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-13 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/13/03 17:04, dep wrote: quoth Kurt Wall: | Consuming 2.3K bytes, Net Llama! blathered: | > I can vouch for this. My RH9 box is trashed as a result. | | [badly borken glibc] | | Whoops! leave it to redhat. what was it last time? gcc-2.7.6 or something? What last time? Let's

Re: FW: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-13 Thread Net Llama!
Redhat did re-release the packages about an hour ago. Fixed my problems on RH9. On 11/13/03 14:32, Michael Hipp wrote: For once I'm glad I procrastinated about installing a security update. Thanks, Michael Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote: Folks, Since we've been talking about updates, I got this

Re: FW: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-13 Thread Net Llama!
I can vouch for this. My RH9 box is trashed as a result. On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote: > > Folks, > > Since we've been talking about updates, I got this today from the Emperor > Linux folks, who installed RH on a couple of work laptops. > > > -Original Message- > > > >

Re: Fedora getting some bad reviews

2003-11-13 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > This is one reason I prefer the gentoo model - incremental releases (that > usually aren't too painful) over a long period. Unlike the RH approach, gentoo > doesn't mark a new compiler release as stable for common use until most all > packages work with

Re: Matrix III

2003-11-12 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/12/03 19:32, Joel Hammer wrote: Just in case you've read the bad reviews and got turned off, Matrix III is at least 2x as good as Matrix II. The reviewers must like mindless, repetitive kung fu and must not like interesting dialogue that probes the meaning of the human experience, heavily in

Re: Problem booting from disk

2003-11-12 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Tom Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 13:31, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote: > > [snip of tales of woe] > > In a previous message I mentioned that it also balks on booting from the > > previous HD, claiming problems with the ReiserFS partition (which should > > have been fine a

Re: ReiserFS Problem

2003-11-12 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote: > > Folks, > > I've been running SuSE 8.0 on my home system (primary > desktop/mail-reader/web surfer) for some time. My boot and / disk is a 20GB > EIDE disk (master on 1st IDE). I decided to upgrade to SuSE 9.0 while > adding an additional NIC an

Re: OSS Alternative to RealPlayer

2003-11-12 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > Can anyone point me to an OSS alternative to RealPlayer for streaming > audio. (If it had both Linux and Windows versions would be even better.) Can't help with the windoze side, but mplayer can do realaudio & realvideo. __

Re: pictures from the desert

2003-11-11 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/11/03 17:06, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth burns: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 20:39, Net Llama! wrote: On 11/09/03 16:12, burns wrote: Nice pics, Lonnie. What are the 'beehive' buildings? Charcoal Kilns: Ahhh. I was afraid you were going to tell me they were ancient Druid dwellings. Presum

Re: SBC Yahoo DSL

2003-11-10 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/10/03 19:25, Matthew Carpenter wrote: Anyone have any experience with SBC Yahoo DSL and Linux? I believe it's PPPoE setup but I can't figure out how to generate or find a username and password... Then, I'm attempting to use an ethernet card to plug into the DSL Modem. So far I've seen noth

Re: pictures from the desert

2003-11-09 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/09/03 16:12, burns wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 12:07, Net Llama! wrote: If anyone is interested, i just returned from a trip to the deserts of California & Nevada (specifically the area in & around Death Valley). I've got alot of pictures posted here: http://netllama.linu

Re: KDE 3.2.0 beta and XMMS problems

2003-11-09 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/09/03 09:04, Jerry McBride wrote: MPG123 or MPG321 both still work, if only I could find a decent GUI/Frontend for them. I've been using & loving playmp3list for years: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~urban/projects/playmp3list/ -- ~

pictures from the desert

2003-11-08 Thread Net Llama!
If anyone is interested, i just returned from a trip to the deserts of California & Nevada (specifically the area in & around Death Valley). I've got alot of pictures posted here: http://netllama.linux-sxs.org/pix/ -- ~ L. Frie

Re: PHP configure with mhas

2003-10-31 Thread Net Llama!
Ever hear of Google? http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq=too%20few%20arguments%20to%20function%20%60ap_register_output_filter%27&safe=images&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&lr=&hl=en On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: > Hi > > >Our server is redhat8.0 with kernel kernel-2.4.18-14. The /PHP/ was >

Re: Motherboard advice

2003-10-30 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Harry G wrote: > I am about to build another PC to be used as a workstation. I picked up a > box of 5 new Seagate SCSI 3 50 gig drives for $250.00 total, so I am > thinking of using some them for this. > > Since SCSI controller boards are about $100.00 or so, I was thinking of

Re: Moving to London

2003-10-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Federico Voges wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to let you know that I've accepted a job in London (UNIX > Admin). This is a big change (and challenge) for me (I'm from > Argentina). > Luckily I have a friend (he's the one who recommended me for the job) > and my sister living ther

Re: linux-2.6.0-test8 compile - How do I change the default compiler?

2003-10-28 Thread Net Llama!
Set the environment variable CC equal to the path to the gcc that you want to use. On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote: > Hi Y'all, > > I'm running RH9.0 with a > > gcc --version > > output of > > gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) > > and a > gcc296 --versio

Re: Well somewhat

2003-10-26 Thread Net Llama!
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Susan Macchia wrote: > Win4Lin only support Windows 98, not 2k, etc, the last I heard. Other than > that there is VMware (which works very well, unless you upgrade the kernel). VMWare works fine with every 2.4.x kernel, up to & including 2.4.22. 2.6.0 is another story, howeve

backwards

2003-10-25 Thread Net Llama!
http://www.linux-sxs.org.mirror.sytes.org/ -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___

Re: xfs_check permission denied.

2003-10-25 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > > > I booted my system with Knoppix 3.3 and attempted to xfs_check a xfs > partition on the harddisk. it reported an error "permission denied". > > what could possibly caused that? Are you doing this as root? Knoppix, by default, doesn't make you root. --

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and htdig-3.1.6

2003-10-24 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > I updated the gcc to 3.2.1 (following the gcc notes). When I tried to > compiled htdig, it complained about missing libstdc++ libraries. How > could that be possible? I checked that the gcc source tree had a > subdirectory libstdc++. What was the exact err

Re: database of rcs and rpm

2003-10-23 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > that shoudl be covered when I backup /home/* > > > RCS doesn't use central databases, but an RCS directory under each > > directory where RCS is used. > > where is the CVSROOT? what did you mean by one or more? Depends on how you set up the repository. I s

Re: database of rcs and rpm

2003-10-23 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > in openlinux, rpm-3.0.6 uses /var/lib/rpm to store her databases. > what about rcs-5.7? what does rcs have to do with this? > and does it apply to other distro? Does what apply to other distros? -- ~~~

Re: Linux users' mailing list down? (fwd)

2003-10-23 Thread Net Llama!
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:35:21 -0600 From: Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux users' mailing list down? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Susan Macchia wrote: | For the last s

Re: strange cd problem

2003-10-23 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, dep wrote: > quoth Net Llama!: > > | A bad CD, or failing HW. Something is failing when attempting to > | read or write the data. How are you copying the data? If not with > | the command line, then i'd suggest trying that, and checking dmesg or >

Re: strange cd problem

2003-10-23 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, dep wrote: > greets, folks! > > this one is kind of weird. i have a cd, burned by a friend, containing > data in mbox format that i really need to get to. > > i can open the cd in, say, midnight commander, and can view the files, > no problem. but if i try to copy those files t

Redhat Enterprise Linux 3

2003-10-22 Thread Net Llama!
Anyone have a copy, or know where I can acquire a copy of RHAS-3.0? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com __

Re: Using the bigmem kernel

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote: > I am using Red Hat Linux 9. Under what circumstances does the bigmem > kernel get loaded and used by the install program? I had heard it was > used if you got more than 4 GB of memory but I was wondering if anyone > had any experience with using it.

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Leon Goldstein wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > >No. You're not removing glibc-2.2.1, you're just adding glibc-2.2.4. > > > > > > > Have you tried the old symlink trick? Which trick is that? -- ~~~

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: > On Monday 20 October 2003 05:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > > > I've got an app that wants libc.so.6 (which I have) but it tells me > > > that i

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: > Hi; > > I've got an app that wants libc.so.6 (which I have) but it tells me that > it wants the version from glibc-2.2.4, while I have something a little > older, like glibc-2.2.1. glibc-2.2.4 and all its parts is a big thing > (maybe over 10 MB) and I see

Re: yet another .pdf question

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
You could always print the pages to postscript, and then open it with ghostview. On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, dep wrote: > i have a very long pdf file, several pages of which i would like to be > able to save to a separate pdf file. i can find no way of doing this > without buying very expensive software

Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote: > > 1. Mozilla -- If you want the latest, you will have problems with > > Flash (the one from Macromedia did not work when I tried it some > > months back. May be fixed by now though) and Java (Using Sun, > > Blackdown or IBM? Remember that for the Plug

Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > Lycoris (Debian based) is supposed to be good also, but once again not free. Unless they really changed direction, Lycoris is based on Caldera, not Debian. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman

Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: > A prime candidate for Lindows? > Perhaps Xandros... There's also Redmond Linux, or whatever they're calling it now. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Has open software gone nuts?

2003-10-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > > > http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html > > > > > >

Re: Has open software gone nuts?

2003-10-14 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html > > This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its > brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS. I see nothing wrong with it. How would you propose that the GP

Re: 'nice' or something like it

2003-10-13 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > Is there any way to tell the system to give a certain process no more > than x% of the CPU? > > 'nice' seems to only change the scheduling priority, but a single > process can still use 100% indefinitely if there is no competition. I > have an app I want t

Re: SMPEG

2003-10-11 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote: > I've been trying to compile smpeg-0.4.4 and it keeps crapping out with > the following message. > I'm runing Slackware 9.1 (upgraded from 9.0 to 9.1 using swaret) No > matter what I try, I get this same ending. Any ideas? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ted/smp

Re: httpd process is becoming *zombie*

2003-10-11 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: > Yes i have checked the apache error log.. But i am not gettung any clue there > for the processes which are becoming *zombie* under httpd . Here is the version > of apache and kernel of our server. > > server [root /root]# rpm -q apache > apache-1.3.20-Ra

Re: httpd process is becoming *zombie*

2003-10-11 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: >Our server is Cobalt raq4r.Last few days I am noticing that sometimes > the process under httpd is being killed. And the process becoming *zombie*. I > checked all the cron jobs but did not find any clue which is to be the cause of > httpd *zombie

Re: X won't start

2003-10-10 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: > > I had this same problem (the error, not the solution proposed above), when > > i had improperly restored a RH9 install from backups, and the > > perms/ownership of alot of stuff was horked. Check the list archives, > > cause i'm pretty sure that i posted

Re: X won't start

2003-10-10 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ian Stephen wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 05:49, Allan Rabenau wrote: > > I've done that (at least in the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts directory). Each > > subdirectory now has a new fonts.dir file. No luck. > > Is not the "unix/:7100" error relating to a URL:port notation? If

Re: X won't start

2003-10-10 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Allan Rabenau wrote: > I've done that (at least in the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts directory). Each > subdirectory now has a new fonts.dir file. No luck. > Is not the "unix/:7100" error relating to a URL:port notation? If so, that > would lead me to suspect a net communication

Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote: > To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting > libraries that came standard with Mandrake. That wasn't my experience. mplayer build on both of my RH9 systems without a single problem. > So my opinion is that Redhat, in the quest f

Re: X won't start

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
Which distro is this? I managed to cause similar horkage when i mesed up permissions/onwership on a bunch of directories. if you've got sshd running on th ebox, you can try running _any_ X app remotely, which should help to determine whether its X that is brooken, or something else. On Thu, 9 Oc

Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > > > >>Net Llama! wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes,

Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > > Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit > > has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X > > text editor. Anyone know why RH9 doesn

RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit has started to annoy me a lot. I like xedit, because its a bare bones X text editor. Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought was part of XFree86)? Anyone know how i could get xedit without building XFree86

Re: Maximum Memory in Linux

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > are these options available from make menuconfig? Yes. I'm not aware of any options that aren't. > > James McDonald wrote: > > # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set > > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y > > # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set > > > > The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-

Re: Maximum Memory in Linux

2003-10-08 Thread Net Llama!
2GB > this guy's using... > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:15 PM > Subject: Re: Maximum Memory in Linux > > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D

Re: Maximum Memory in Linux

2003-10-08 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote: > > Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a > Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command > stubbornly says: > > # free > total used free sharedbuffers > cached > Mem

Re: FrontPage 2002 extension and Redhat 9

2003-10-08 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Vu Pham wrote: > I am installing Frontpage extenstion on Redhat 9 with apache 1.3.28, and get > the following error: > > Creating web http://. > ./fp_install.sh: line 2237: 5544 Segmentation fault > ${FPDIR}/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -p $port $web $config -u $admin $chown -m >

Re: error compiling lilo from source

2003-10-08 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote: > what did I miss? is there a how-to on this? > > cc -c -O2 -Wall -g -DLILO=0x489b `( if [ -r $ROOT/etc/lilo.defines > ]; then cat $ROOT/etc/lilo.defines; else echo -DBDATA -DDSECS=3 -DEVMS > -DIGNORECASE -DLVM -DONE_SHOT -DPASS160 -DREISERFS -DREWRITE_TABL

Re: Oops! (different machine)

2003-10-08 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote: > Testing new backup procedures on one of my machines, I kept locking up half-way > through, consistently. This last time, I got a kernel Oops (happened to be watching > it through a serial connection so I was able to save it). > > I'm pretty sure it'

Re: Stupid RPM, or just me???

2003-10-07 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > Michael Hipp wrote: > > # rpm --rebuilddb > > error: db4 error(16) from dbenv->remove: Device or resource busy > > "ps ax | grep rpm" is clean. And the above command was even issued from > a fresh reboot. Looked for a lock file, couldn't find one. Anyone k

Re: Sun Netra question

2003-10-05 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Chong Yu Meng wrote: > I know what you mean ! In my recent project, I had 3 different Sun > servers requiring 3 different console cables. The Netra console cable is > the most easily acquired, because it is the same as the Cisco console > cable. The other 2 had to be fabricated

Re: Sun Netra question

2003-10-05 Thread Net Llama!
and press several > times to get the "lom>" prompt. If you need the documentation for LOM > port operations, you can look for it on the Internet, or email me. I > might have it handy. > > Regards, > pascal chong > > > Ted Ozolins wrote: > > > Net Lla

Re: Sun Netra question

2003-10-05 Thread Net Llama!
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > > Its some kind of RJ45 (8 pin, i guess). There are two ports, one is LOM, > > the other is just an ordinary RJ45. > > > PIN SIGNAL DB25 > 1 --- DTS --- 4 > 2 --- DTR ---20 > 3 --- TXD

Re: Sun Netra question

2003-10-05 Thread Net Llama!
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > Anyone here ever had to admin a Sun Netra? I've recently inherited a few > > (against my will), and discovered that they don't have the DB25 serial > > port that i'm accustomed to on other Sun har

Sun Netra question

2003-10-05 Thread Net Llama!
Anyone here ever had to admin a Sun Netra? I've recently inherited a few (against my will), and discovered that they don't have the DB25 serial port that i'm accustomed to on other Sun hardware. Anyone know what kind of cable is needed to setup serial console on these beasts (and where I could ob

Re: Laptop suggestions

2003-10-04 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Joel Hammer wrote: > Thanks for all the suggestions. I will look into them. > > One point, maybe a sore one. Consumers Report recommended laptops with > centrino chips because they get longer battery life and fit into a smaller > case. I haven't used a laptop before, so I don't

Re: Laptop suggestions

2003-10-04 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Chong Yu Meng wrote: > I'm using a Thinkpad R40. Got it for SGD$1,600, which equates to > slightly less than USD$1,000. Brand new. A few caveats though : > > I'm running very happily on RH9 + XFCE4 with 2 Apache web server yea, Thinkpads are very nice, and are virtually indestr

Re: Laptop suggestions

2003-10-04 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote: > > I too am thinking about a laptop and you might take a look at: > > www.emperorlinux.com > > > They load linux on their laptops... although you pay highly for that I > suspect. > > But what I did was to go there and get an idea of which laptops are > co

Re: Laptop suggestions

2003-10-04 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Joel Hammer wrote: > I need to buy a laptop in the next week for a trip. I don't think I can > get a laptop loaded with linux during that time so I will likely just get > an XP machine and either remove XP or dual boot it sometime down the road. > > So, my question, any laptop s

Re: Clock Sync in RH9

2003-10-03 Thread Net Llama!
all the answers are in /etc/ntp.conf On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > > It uses ntp. > > Okay, I figured that. But what initiates the sync? And how often? And > does it have an "agression" algorithm if it's not had a good sync i

Re: Clock Sync in RH9

2003-10-03 Thread Net Llama!
It uses ntp. On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote: > RH9 gives the option to have the system clock automatically synced to > clock.redhat.com or clock2.redhat.com . I've observed it attempt to do > this on boot-up. But does it also sync at regular intervals? And what > controls this? Can't find

Re: Mozilla Java Plugin

2003-10-03 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Allan Rabenau wrote: > I have installed RH 9, and am using Mozilla 1.2.1. I have downloaded > Java j2re-1_4_2.01 and would like to add it as a plugin to the Mozilla, > but I can't find any instructions. There is an sxs addressing this > idea, but it refers to files that are no

Re: question

2003-10-02 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote: > List > >I have created a website for a college project. The site is at the Univ. of > Tulsa, as we are in a virtual bussiness enviroment. The web pages themselves are > ok. But the problem is the background jpeg and some other jpegs screw up the > wh

Re: Networking / security problem in gentoo

2003-10-02 Thread Net Llama!
Stupid question. Is whatever printing daemon you're using even listening on the port its supposed to listen on? (netstat -an) On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote: > also, what printing system are you using? CUPS? CUPS-LPD (usually port 515 > through inetd or the like and then accessin

Re: recording wavs (or aiffs)

2003-10-01 Thread Net Llama!
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:34:08 +0100 > Squabsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Quoting Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > Should I need to do a HD install of knoppix to get it work

Re: from an sco press release today

2003-09-30 Thread Net Llama!
HITLER. HITLER HITLER HITLER. Now can we stop this entire thread, please, or at the very least move it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Joel Hammer wrote: > Actually, it was worse. It seems they asked for recounts without any > clear criteria for recounting ballots. That was the famous

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-30 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:35:46 -0500, "Alma J Wetzker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > > I propose yet another test. Use knoppix and try recording again. I am > > not ready to retire my col or SuSE systems but I kinda like the way > > knoppix works. > > > Ha

Re: from an sco press release today

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, dep wrote: > quoth burns: > > | Ballocks > > i pretty much agree with you, but what i thought was significant was a > company, in court, saying that the gpl won't hold up. this is what > we've been waiting for and to some extent feared (court is always a > crap shoot, usually w

Re: Related to cron.daily

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: > Hi > > >>Pointer to what? You haven't said what the problem is. You did alude to > >>something about webalizer.pl, but there's no information on what is wrong. > >>Is webalizer.pl not running per a cronjob? If so, then say so. Of couse > >>the fact th

Re: Related to cron.daily

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: > Hi > >In our /etc directory I am seeing there are two directories > > 1. cron.daily > 2. cron.daily2 > >Under cron.daily2 the *webalizer.pl* is mentioned. But in > /etc/logrotate only cron.daily is mentioned to be executed. But someho

Re: SUSE vs Knoppix

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > >>Gotta ask. What is so stupid about what I consider the best > >>packaging/updating scheme out there. (sorry, haven't tried gentoo) You > >>can keep debian updated using only a couple of command

Re: SUSE vs Knoppix

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote: > >>KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery > >>purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire > >>religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry combined with what i feel is completely > >>stupid packaging give me a bad

Re: SUSE vs Knoppix

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:18:00 -0400 (EDT) > Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote: > > > I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well > > > documented p

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:20:08 +0100, "Squabsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > OK with ulimit -a I get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ulimit -a > > core file size(blocks, -c) 0 > > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > > file size (blocks,

Re: SUSE vs Knoppix

2003-09-29 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote: > I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well > documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably > ok with it. > I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and > wondered if anyone would care to c

Re: duh

2003-09-28 Thread Net Llama!
All you need to edit is a single file for each interface: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 Remaining determined to depend on a gui will always leave you stuck when the GUI isn't available. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, koko wrote: > They are important to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >