On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:40:36AM +0200, Zoki wrote:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-08-23-014-20-NW-MS
An excerpt from the CD:
Reliability
Linux is being used for simple tasks such as file/print and static web page
serving. Microsoft customers are using Windows NT Server for
oh no.. I introduced my colleage to visit your site.
He's using Chiense Windows 98.
He cannot see a thing...
software. I know it's not optimal, but at least it gets us a non-english
speaking person some content if they need it.
_
Do
Security issue is not 100% related to reliability.
If your sql server is behind a good firewall, everything should just be
fine.
We really need some big linux shops that runs mission-critical apps.
Google.com is a good example, but it's not doing accounting kind of
stuffs which required
I am reading an old book called UNIX for Super-Users by E.Foxley.
The chapter was about filestore.
I think core meant memory, right? sticky-bit... hmm...
Chang wrote:
% 1. what's the standard method to list ALL 1-bit flags of a inode
% (file/dir...)?
Eh? I'm not following you here. Is ls -il
Chang wrote:
% I am reading an old book called UNIX for Super-Users by E.Foxley.
% The chapter was about filestore.
%
% I think core meant memory, right? sticky-bit... hmm...
Yup. Sticky bit these days locks data into memory, which might be
paged or swapped out.
Blessed be,
Kurt
--
Advice
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:25:46 -0600
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did compile KDE2.2 with it. I have a feeling that it worked better than
2.95.3, which I used with kde2.2.1.
Note one thing: gcc 3.0 added a new runtime library to the picture:
libgcc.so
Or some similiar name.
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
% On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:25:46 -0600
% Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% I did compile KDE2.2 with it. I have a feeling that it worked better than
% 2.95.3, which I used with kde2.2.1.
%
% Note one thing: gcc 3.0 added a new runtime library to the picture:
%
%
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 03:55:30 -0600
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
| % On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:25:46 -0600
| % Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| %
| % I did compile KDE2.2 with it. I have a feeling that it worked better than
| % 2.95.3, which I used with
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:50:14 -0600 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stayler wrote:
% Is it still stylish to embargo gcc v3 or has that tide subsided?
Grab it and see for yourself. It's easy to build, although
time-consuming. I'm using it here and having no problems. I haven't
built the
Just a side note, question here...
I just compiled 2.4.10 for running on my test client/server setup, no problems.
I enable MTRR in the kernel this time around on the client machine, as X
supposedly those registers for faster screen updates if it is available.
Running xfree 4.10... how does
Chang wrote:
[schnipp]
We really need some big linux shops that runs mission-critical apps.
Google.com is a good example, but it's not doing accounting kind of
stuffs which required extreme precision and reliability.
[schnipp]
IBM converted the whole Swedish, I beleive, or maybe it was
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:12:29 -0400
Tom Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Chang wrote:
| [schnipp]
| We really need some big linux shops that runs mission-critical apps.
| Google.com is a good example, but it's not doing accounting kind of
| stuffs which required extreme precision and
Good to know. I have a buddy who is running an Athlon. He seems to
feel that 3.01 would fix his not being able to target Athlon on
builds
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:20:04 -0400, Jerry McBride wrote:
It works. I just compiled 2.4.10 with it and so far so good. I don't know if
the
embargo is
Ah. Very interesting. Thanks!
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:38:20 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Note one thing: gcc 3.0 added a new runtime library to the picture:
libgcc.so
Or some similiar name. Programs compiled with 3.0 will need to have this
library installed on the machines
14 matches
Mail list logo
