On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 08:59:53PM -0500, John B. Reynolds wrote:
>
> Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> > So, Mr Sondow, you claim you worked with those people who signed up
> > with you. Do you have an archive of the mailing list where you
> > discussed this stuff, so we can all examine your open and t
On Sun, 30 May 1999 21:24:58 -0700, "Roeland M.J. Meyer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That's not quite the complete story William. The issue was exactly
>"aol.com.br".
Yes, that is what it was aboutI don't think I implied or stated
otherwise. I made a one line quote from the article about a
Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> So, Mr Sondow, you claim you worked with those people who signed up
> with you. Do you have an archive of the mailing list where you
> discussed this stuff, so we can all examine your open and transparent
> processes? Could you point us to the web pages of REDI? A cyberl
From:
http://www.wired.com/news/news/slashdot/politics/story/19918.html
"the court didn't think America Online's trademark gave the company a
legal right to any domain with "aol.com" in it"
--
William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Fax:(209) 671-7934
Whoever you really are, please point out a SINGLE thing I said that
was false.
Nothing I said in my email was false in any way.
Prove it or shove it, you phoney liar (as you have been proven to be)
http://www.dso.net/wwalsh/jeffw/
On Sun, 30 May 1999 17:22:03 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PRO
All,
You are now seeing yet one more of many attempts and one of many reasons
that it is so insane to have constituency model as part of the DNSO
Folks like William X. Walsh (AKA Willie the Whiner, the WWW boy) amongst
a few others attempt to falsely accuse others and make inappropriat
On Sun, 30 May 1999 19:05:38 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>While I'm not altogether certain that the recently formed gTLD
>constituency is an appropriate place for prospective registries to
>find a voice in the DNSO, since their voice in it might easily be
>subsumed to that of
Christopher Ambler a écrit:
>
> It is the position of Image Online Design, Inc. that the refusal to
> admit prospective registries to the gTLD constituency, the very
> group formed to represent its interests, constitutes a deliberate
> attempt to exclude prospective registries from participation
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
> It would beoove Sondow a this point to draft a new position paper
> where ICIIU stands, as it's changed.
I have taken your advice and modified the ICIIU proposal and
definition, which I had planned to do in any case. I have not,
however, changed it so much as to allo
On Sun, 30 May 1999 18:32:27 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The ICIIU has modified its proposal for guidelines of the
>Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency in accord with
>popular sentiment regarding a too-restrictive funding-based
>definition and in agreement with a
The ICIIU has modified its proposal for guidelines of the
Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency in accord with
popular sentiment regarding a too-restrictive funding-based
definition and in agreement with a compromise tentatively arrived at
in Berlin. The modified proposal and definition
On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 09:02:38AM -0400, Michael Sondow wrote:
> Kent Crispin a écrit:
>
> What I stated in my post is precisely what occurred in Berlin. You
> were not there.
I stayed up all night two nights watching it over the web; I watched
the entire DNSO general assembly meeting, and the
Chris and all,
Mr. Ambler makes a very good point and this point was elaborated
to a degree
at the Berlin meeting, but as usual Esther Dyson attempted to sweep
the idea of any gTLD constituency under the rug with here comment to
Riceard Sexton, "Esther Dyson: would prefer to see constituencies
Although ICANN hadn't asked the Berkman Center to record meetings of the
DNSO Constituency Groups, we had a bit of audio recording equipment with us
in Berlin, so on the morning of the DNSO Constituency Meetings, we attempted
to record those meetings as staff time and equipment availability allowe
P Brewster, presumably, wrote,
> >The Initial Board noted that a uniform dispute settlement mechanism was a
> >necessary element of a competitive registrar system. The Initial Board noted
> >that the scope of this policy should be wider than the cases of abusive
> >registration with which the WI
It is the position of Image Online Design, Inc. that the refusal to
admit prospective registries to the gTLD constituency, the very
group formed to represent its interests, constitutes a deliberate
attempt to exclude prospective registries from participation in
the DNSO. Policy decisions reached b
On Sun, 30 May 1999 12:19:07 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The Sondow plan however is flawed at its most basic levels in being
>>overly exclusive. even though the so called justification for it is
>>important. By going so far in its exclusions, it simply cannot mee
Richard and all,
Well I don't believe that michael has "Pissed allot of people off" just
a few whining few (The WWW boy Willie the Whiner Walsh the most
vocal of them). On the other hand Don Heath has pissed allot of people
off, and has done so for a couple of years at lease, so has the the
I
William and all,
Whining again Willie. Well nothing new there.. At any rate it appears
that a significant number of folks (Majority?) would disagree with your slanted
and unsubstantiated assertion here as is evident in Reichards earlier
post (See below) and from the published minuets at the B
>The Sondow plan however is flawed at its most basic levels in being
>overly exclusive. even though the so called justification for it is
>important. By going so far in its exclusions, it simply cannot meet
>the mandate it is seeking to fill.
>
>It has numerous other flaws as well.
>
>The ACM plan
On Sun, 30 May 1999 11:52:40 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>United we stand divided we fall. I represent two non-commercial organizations
>(1200 people) that in the last two days ratified support for the ICIIU. I have long
>counted myself as one of it's supporters, a
On Sun, 30 May 1999 11:52:40 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 01:21 PM 5/30/99 GMT, you wrote:
>>On Sun, 30 May 1999 09:02:38 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>No one takes you seriously, Kent, except perhaps on technical
>>>issues. On anythin
Richard and all,
Good point here Richard. the WWW boy (Willie the whine Walsh) just
can't seem to curb his bad habit of casting false aspersions on others.
I believe that it is likely that his medication if not of the proper dosage...
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 01:21 PM 5/30/99 GMT, you wr
At 01:21 PM 5/30/99 GMT, you wrote:
>On Sun, 30 May 1999 09:02:38 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>No one takes you seriously, Kent, except perhaps on technical
>>issues. On anything concerning process, you are an uneducated if not
>>demented personality. Your best option woul
On Sun, 30 May 1999 09:02:38 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>No one takes you seriously, Kent, except perhaps on technical
>issues. On anything concerning process, you are an uneducated if not
>demented personality. Your best option would be to stay out of
>politics altogether,
Kent Crispin a écrit:
>
> On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 04:10:22PM -0400, Michael Sondow wrote:
>
> > It was finally accepted by Don Heath (who seemed to have grown tired
> > of Maher/POC/CORE shenanigans) but was rejected by David Maher. The
> > only thing Maher would accept was the immediate designa
All,
FYI, See:
http://technews.netscape.com/computing/technews/newsitem/0,290,37201,00.html
Excerpts:
But those trying to form the most closely
watched group--which will represent regular
online users and noncommercial
intere
All,
Is ICANN just incompetent or just stupid?
See: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-37064,00.html
Is this more evidence that the ICANN Interim board is involved
in questionable favored friends practice in their selection of
their Test Bed registrar's.
Question: How could the ICANN In
Michael and all,
Again the call made here by Michael Sondow that has been repeated
over and over again sense the beginning of this ICANN process ring
out clearly and concisely. The PROCESS must have a method of
quantification. This has been missing from the beginning of the
ICANN and White Pa
29 matches
Mail list logo
