re to help us.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Network Admin
San Jose, CA
, and register.com sells domain names.
Would someone have a case to take these domains away from register.com
under the UDRP? What are the implications should the arbiters decide
that register.com deserves to keep these names?
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Network Admin
San Jose, CA
r and pull than those of us who
are simply private citizens who, for whatever reasons, threw ourselves
into the crossfire. The longer this goes on, the more difficult it will
be to undo the damage.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Network Admin
San Jose, CA
olved over the past
20 or so years.
And that list is at least somewhat dated, since DefCon V was in 1997.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Network Admin
San Jose, CA
, those
opposing the WTO provide an activist pool from which to draw support
against ICANN's attempts to do on the net what the WTO wants to do in
other commerical sectors.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
(Keep in mind, when I say "multiple roots", I mean
a small number [5 or so] of mutually-exclusive roots.) Let's avoid
politics entirely, and let me ask the question this way: Is there
a good technical reason why com, net, and org couldn't be broken up
into three seperate roots?
--
Mark C.
ssues preventing the existence of
multiple, competing roots. If there are genuine technical reasons
why it can't be done, I would like to know. If it's an issue with
resolver, it might be interesting to see if it can be recoded to
deal with it.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
pa delegation scheme, for roots. An AXFR from this domain
would yield the list of valid roots. In this way, you could potentially
have a managed set of multiple competing roots.
If I'm rehashing old arguments, please let me know, but point out a
reference to them so I can go over them.
--
Mar
maintainer.
...and, according to a speech he gave at LISA this week, will be stepping
down once v9 is out the door.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
://www.llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwantysiliogogogoch.co.uk/
since July 1997 (which coincidentally is two characters longer than the .com
version ;-)
Mark..
The 63-character limit is inherent in the DNS packet structure, and is
a limit per label.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
ust a mass ankle inspection
whose announcement I missed.
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
their lives. And the people in power remain blind
to that fact, preferring to remain ignorant than to move ICANN to
a position where it would be a truly open entity.)
--
Mark C. Langston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA
--- Blind-Carbon-Copy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rick White's nomination -- Newsbytes report
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 13:41:53 -0700
From: "Mark C. Langston" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsbytes is reporting that at least 5 of the people supporting Rick
White's nomination as a
--- Blind-Carbon-Copy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: H.R. 3028 and ICANN UDRP
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:19:19 -0700
From: "Mark C. Langston" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few items that are gnawing at me:
What will be the result if the current H.R. 3028 (Rogan's
anti-cybersquatting bil
, there will be
confusing, misleading, and/or meaningless .com entries, all in an effort
to avoid the gTLDs created specifically to be filtered out.
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to consider application for http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin
time. The agenda for the call will be to update the Board on
discussions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and Network
Solutions, Inc., and to consider possible related actions."
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to consider a
On 25 August 1999, Planet Communications Computing Facility
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look William. A skinner reaction is normal. Alot of people have them,
conditioning starts at birth. It's either that or your a fag like my
ol'uncle walt. He says it's a fag's business to be a busy body -
Ben -
I may need to take you up on that offer of the dial-in. I'm trying to
listen to the archive of the ccTLD meeting from yesterday, and getting
the same firewall issues I usually have (not available via http).
Of course, I'll only need the dial-in for certain if the other webcasts are
admittedly just my personal
impression.
But that limit can be adjusted as the speaker stands. There is no
such analogue for the word-limit on remote submissions. Remote
participants are forced into this limit, with no hope of reprieve.
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let you
Again, I ask you publically to stop posting in MIME-encapsulated HTML.
Thank you.
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to consider application for http://www.idno.org
Systems AdminConstituency status from organized http
I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without
the prior written consent of the author.
However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well,
I'll go ahead and point out that where I said MTA I of course meant to
say MUA.
--
Mark C. Langston
that sitting in silence (no network), waiting for ICANN
to deign to bring their travelling roadshow to their host country is
sufficient as a method of inclusion, you're very, very wrong.
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to consider application
n San Jose?
I certainly hope not, because that pretty much eliminated the weight
of comments from anyone not in the room.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Sys
on the
Names Council, participation within the Working Groups is meaningless.
Give us a seat at the table.
Sincerely,
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin
his salary for
one year, that alone would give ICANN over half of what it is seeking.
I heard it was IBM and MCI/WorldCom, not Cisco.
Either way, MCI should be more worried about keeping its ATM clouds
functional than keeping Esther Dyson in the public eye.
--
Mark C. Langston
trademarked at least once, and often several times over
with one or more of the 48 different types of trademarks.
[...] 'idea' appears in 195 registered trademakrs. The word 'idea'
itself is registered 22 times."
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL
; and
- Review of public comments and action on proposed amendments
to the Bylaws relating to DNSO Names Council representation.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems
.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org
Apparently Paul Vixie sent mail to a mailing list of RBL subscribers and
interested 3rd parties, is seriously considering blackholing NSI for
spamming its customer base.
I don't want to get into whether the RBL is a good or bad thing. I've
used and recommended it in the past, and I understand
On 30 July 1999, "Richard J. Sexton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is probably your best bet, and then use a Java client on the
website to access it.
It you want to stage WW III, IRC is probably the place to do it.
So you're in agreement then, Richard? :)
--
Mark C
or all the myriad GUI clients.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org
minute but
fatal flaws in the transoceanic fiber! Didn't you get the memo?
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San
and administering such a system?
From a purely technical perspective, this sounds like it would evolve
into something resembling Usenet distribution. This may not be a bad thing.
Perhaps we could explore this avenue a bit?
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice
consensus, you lose accountability.
What may be 'obvious consensus' to some is split opinion to others.
Unless there's some way to tally who agrees with what, today's
consensus becomes history's hand-waving.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be hea
open roll-call votes, I'll point out that
many of us sat and watched a fiasco of "open roll-call voting" during
the 6/25 San Jose meeting. No actual roll was called, and Michael
miscounted the vote no fewer than 3 times, as I recall.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet
ch in favor of using an outside
arbiter, such as the AAA, or any other nonpartisan, professional
third party. At this point, it's the best solution I've heard.
Anything less will only lead to dissatisfaction and recriminations from
one side or another.
--
Mark C. Langston
On 19 July 1999, Kent Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 07:16:28PM -0700, Mark C. Langston wrote:
[...]
This is a little far-fetched Kent. First of all, it does NOT happen
"ALL THE TIME, IN THE REAL WORLD." And if you'd like to debate this
particular p
ch attempt as an effort
to exclude the individual in favor of commercial interests.
Unfortunately, I can't think of any method to implement a slding
scale that would work.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but I'll bet that ICANN claims this wouldn't be
enough to support them. If this happens, ICANN itself would be arguing
in favor of commercial interests who could afford to pay.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL
as already been compromised, and is
just running an incredibly convincing trojanned version of the shell,
OS, scheduler, etc.
Now, if you'd like to debate security matters in a more realistic
world, I'm more than willing.
--
Mark C. LangstonL
for your abilities, Kent.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA
On 17 July 1999, Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:33 PM 7/17/99 , Mark C. Langston wrote:
Would this be your day job with a company that was rife with Chinese
spies?
I wouldn't exactly trot that out as support for your abilities, Kent.
Nor, Mark, should you lay claim to any
the impression it would be passed on
by the registrars, and therefore be made part of the contract between DN
owner and registrar. Thus, it's not an optional thing.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http
On 15 July 1999, Diane Cabell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark C. Langston wrote:
Oh, we will get a choice? I was under the impression it would be passed on
by the registrars, and therefore be made part of the contract between DN
owner and registrar. Thus, it's not an optional thing.
Did I
chairs. To impose your own choice of
chairs on the WGs via a decision made during a closed teleconference
would be a travesty.
--
Mark C. LangstonLet your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin
45 matches
Mail list logo
