Thanks.
It would be best to start with VID functions first... and not the control panel.
There are various bugs in the control panel, but my priorities are VID first (because
everything else is built on it, including our Express product).
At this time, many VID styles are done, and should
Newby question...
Can anyone tell me what is going on here? The following output is produced by
the script below
one
(
two three
)
four
(
five
(
six seven
)
eight
)
Why do "two" and "three" appear as one string (same with "six" and "seven")
and not split up at the space between them like
kind of a forth-compiler with some steps more in the
interpreter could do it, except of "one time bindings"
like objects (a/b , find the b). should be as fast
as bytecode?
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 29-Ago-00, you wrote:
p Is REBOL interpreted or byte-compiled?
It is interpreted.
I'm a REBOL newbie so forgive me for breaking any unwritten rules.
For me, REBOL has massive advantages over any other language particularly
for web-mining tasks such as scaping information out of web pages. The
trouble is I need this information in Java not REBOL (massive existing
source base
- Open Your Mind -
[[[ MY-MESSAGES-TO-FEEDBACK-KEEP-BOUNCING-BACK MODE ON ]]]
I've been going mad due to a malfunctioning CGI script. It wouldn't even tell me what
the error was, I just got a generic error page.
I've spent many hours trying to understand what the problem was, then I used a
All
Does any have a set of string functions that are similar to basic or
rexx?
Larry
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I only wish I had more time to play around with REBOL :(.
On 29-Aug-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The corrected version:
ideal-looper: func [
[throw]
'element [word!]
'index [word!]
series [series!]
code [block!]
/local f i
] [
f: func
Is it possible to design a rebol function that takes a variable number of
arguments, ie:
va-func 1 2
va-func 1 2 3
va-func 1 2 3 4
What immediately comes to mind is to use a block for the varargs part of the
call, ie
va-func 1 [2]
va-func 1 [2 3]
va-func 1 [2 3 4]
But I thought I would just
I see the point about how difficult it would be with
Rebol, but in other languages, no, it's not that
difficult - and in fact using Rebol to analyze another
programming language would probably make it a lot
easier. I used to do this using Rexx on IBMs to
analyze C and assembler programs -
Passing in a block would probably be the best (most generic) solution. If
you have a fixed number of parameters that you could receive, but at times
you don't need to pass them all in, you could surround your parameters with
parenthesis (in the function call) then check for values of the dummy
Hi Alex:
I'm a rebol newbie, but have done a lot
of CGI programming, and have had to resolve
a lot of headaches myself. One of the things
that I do is build in switches to send my
content to a physical file if necessary. Often
times that is helpful, other times, one may actually
want to
Actually, the ()'s are not causing the results you're getting. For rule-based
parsing, spaces are ignored unless you use the /ALL refinement.
To get the results you want try:
parse/all str [some rule-block]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newby question...
Can anyone tell me what is going on
Looks like an encryption program I wrote a few years ago, but with some much needed
enhancements. It will keep most
people out, but it is still quite crackable. Basically all you need to do is try every
password--automatically of
course. Even easier is if someone sends a two files of the same
I'm only a newbie, but according to the REBOL official guide you can
selectively disable proxies for each protocol by doing
/system/schemes/smtp/proxy/host: false
/system/schemes/smtp/proxy/port-id: false
/system/schemes/smtp/proxy/type: false
This worked for me as I had the same problem (I
Hi:
You wouldn't need to pass the number of args:
Just get the length of the block from within the function body
i.e:
test: func[args[block!] /local num-args]
[
num-args: length? args
print num-args
foreach arg args [print type? arg]
]
test ["one" 2 3:00]
After dealing with my own
Rebol does do all that you expound on. Check out http://www.rebol.com/docs/network.html
Every protocol can have its own, proxy :: port :: type ::
userid:: password :: bypass rules.
It appears that you are just setting your
system/schemes/default/proxy settings and not
defining any of the
Most of us are aware of the work around for this behaviour but I believe
what Greg was actually suggesting is that it would be more useful for
REBOL to set up it's proxy configuration more correctly for the selected
proxy type. That is go ahead and load the defaults perhaps for cern or
socks, but
Ryan, thank you for your response. I have a few comments/questions however...
(let me preface all of this with the fact that I am not an encryption expert, or even a novice, I am going by my understanding of the info from the sites listed in the script and links therein. I am genuinely interested
Do you mean these string functions?
mid: func [a b c] [ copy/part skip a b c ]
left: func [a b] [ copy/part a b ]
right: func [a b] [ copy/part skip a ((length? a) - b) b]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All
Does any have a set of string functions that are similar to basic or
rexx?
Larry
best bet was starting the thing as a cron
thanks for the help!
Jeff Rubin, CTO Co-Founder
Audiopia
Shutup and Listen...
http://www.audiopia.com
also check out my personal site Brainbyte!
http://www.brainbyte.com
Thank you Stephen for putting it so well.
If a proxy is specified in 'set-net', Rebol
should only 'turn it on' for HTTP, FTP, and
Gopher. All other services should remain false.
This scenario would cover 90+ percent of
proxy users. It would also make distribution of
Rebol apps easier as less
Hey All,
I got Core running on MuLinux from a single floppy all in RAM. Its got
networking, ppp (though not currently working?), NFS, UMSDOS, smb
client, and few other tricks. Much of course thanks to M. Andreoli for
creating the MuLinux distribution, currently my favorite linux
distribution
Can you post a disk image of your floppy?
Hey All,
I got Core running on MuLinux from a single floppy all in RAM. Its got
networking, ppp (though not currently working?), NFS, UMSDOS, smb client,
and few other tricks. Much of course thanks to M. Andreoli for creating
the MuLinux
Hey All,
I got Core running on MuLinux from a single floppy all in RAM. Its got
networking, ppp (though not currently working?), NFS, UMSDOS, smb
client, and few other tricks. Much of course thanks to M. Andreoli for
creating the MuLinux distribution, currently my favorite linux
distribution
Possibly, but I would have to disagree to a point. I have friends and
family that work for Intel, Microsfot, IBM, Cisco, HP, and Fujitsu. And
even though a lot of originizations have a standard proxy that handles
HTTP, FTP, GOPHER, there are many that do not.
Three friends I have at Intel all
Hi Jamie,
an option would be to use Java's socket (under MS Windows Winsock)
functions and connect to a function server written in REBOL (which could be
as small as four or five lines of code).
Send a character sequence consisting of the REBOL functions you want to
invoke including filenames or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to design a rebol function that takes a variable number of
arguments, ie:
va-func 1 2
va-func 1 2 3
va-func 1 2 3 4
This method would break the REBOL syntax, which depends on
functions having a fixed number of arguments. This is so
that we don't need to
Just can't believe this is happening! Thank you Carl and others! Great job
is prebeta 5. Congratulations!
Carlos Lorenz
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Quinta-feira, 31 de Agosto de 2000 01:12
Subject: [REBOL] View/VID prebeta 5 is worth trying
Hi Galt,
it appears I didn't got all the emails in this thread. So the problem may
already be solved.
you wrote:
Ladislav,
That is an impressive For function!
your example of using
a: [1 2]
for s a tail a 1 [print s]
as a test is very amusing bug, looks
like an infinite loop on windows, just
The subject says it all. :) I'm using BeOS at home and at work and it would
be great to be able to start coding REBOL/View scripts.
Did you guys managed to fix the network-related problems under BeOS?
Thanks.
-Bruno
--
Bruno G. Albuquerque [EMAIL PROTECTED] BeDevId #15362
It will keep most
people out, but it is still quite crackable.
Basically all you need to do is try every
password--automatically of
course...
True, but that is true of _any_ encryption. If you choose a
significantly long and random passphrase, then the time required to
try every
Just created (and attached) a newer version of my HTTP
server object.
Instead of directly overriding the method handlers during object creation
you can put a handler in a %handlers directory. Upon start-up the server
scans that directory looking for %init.r,
Carl,
new /View is not good - it's much more, it's fantastic. Very nice design. Still can't
believe the change.
few comments (should I send them to feedback?):
- when moving in rebol editor by keyboard, it doesn't update slider
- typing 'demo in console quits rebol ...
My thanks go to
33 matches
Mail list logo
