> -Original Message-
> From: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:59 AM
> To: 'Liron Himi' ; lng-odp-forward o...@lists.linaro.org>
> Subject: RE: PKTIO hash capability
>
> > I have a platform that doesn&#x
> I have a platform that doesn't support hashing on input queues, only
> classification.
> I think it be good to add the below to the PKTIO capabilities.
> As currently in the capabilities I declare to have several input queues but
> application has not idea it cannot activate hash on those queues.
Hi,
These calls have been implemented by the API spec. So, you can use those in
your application. Lock_start() hints implementation that a lock_wait() will
follow, but implementation is free to ignore the hint (if there's nothing it
can do as preparation for lock_wait()). Lock_wait() is the one
ut_data, 9, 0x);
if (result_u64 == 0xcbf43926) {
// Correct CRC32 ...
}
-Petri
From: Daniel Feferman [mailto:dlfefer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 4:32 AM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp_hash_crc32() vs p
Hi,
Did you give 0x as the init value for zlib call? CRC32 algorithm is
defined with that as the init value. Also, you can check correct operation by
trying to hash "123456789" (the common check string), which should result
0xcbf43926 as output for CRC32.
See e.g. http://reveng.source
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Feferman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 8:10 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] odph_chksum vs odp_chksum_ones_comp16
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was using odph_chksum on odp v1
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Maxim
> Uvarov
> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:26 PM
> To: Maxim Kuvyrkov
> Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
> Subject: [lng-odp] armv8 gcc lock free instructions
>
> Hello Maxim,
>
> we have discuss
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Feferman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 7:52 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] odp_hash_crc32 support
>
> Hi All,
>
> I saw on this link:
>
> https://www.opendataplane
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 4:00 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Bill Fischofer
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp_packet_data
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 2:49 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov ;
lng-odp-forward
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp_packet_data() considered harmful
We already have such a routine
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:46 PM
> To: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: [lng-odp] odp_packet_data() considered harmful
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to PR #470 I've stumbled
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Oriol
> Arcas
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 7:12 PM
> To: LNG ODP Mailman List
> Subject: [lng-odp] RSS in ODP
>
> Hello and happy new year,
>
> In our company we are looking into scaling
We should not deliberately break process support. Since ODP and OFP are
libraries, it's the application (e.g. NGINX) that creates the threads and it
may have historical or other valid reasons to fork processes instead of
creating pthreads. Processes may be forked at many points. If we target for
th no name.
Lookup is useless in the first case anyway so why bother? Is it useful to have
both scenarios allowed?
--
Best Regards,
Stanisław Kardach
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>> wrote:
> -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Stanislaw Kardach
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 6:03 PM
> To: LNG ODP Mailman List
> Subject: [lng-odp] odp_shm_reserve() with same block name
>
> Hi all,
>
> While rebasing on top of late
Is the DPDK version 17.08 ? Other versions might not work properly.
-Petri
From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 1:10 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Bogdan Pricope ; lng-odp-forward
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp dpdk
313 does not
Maxim, try https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/313 It has been tested to fix
checksum insert for 10/40GE Intel NICs.
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Bogdan Pricope
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 12:21 PM
> To: Maxim U
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Liron
> Himi
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 3:13 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] L4 offset
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand when pktio implementation should set t
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 10:24 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] Github shows commits in wrong order
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 1:36 PM
> To: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: [lng-odp] ODP vs Protocol headers
>
> Hello,
>
> Historically ODP helper provided protocol-re
> -Original Message-
> From: Liron Himi [mailto:lir...@marvell.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 1:32 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Bala Manoharan
> Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org; Liron Himi
> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [lng-odp] cla
To mix things, api-next introduces queue hashing *within* a CoS. But also there
you use odp_cls_cos_queues() to get the implementation created queue handles,
not odp_pktin_event_queue().
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Friday,
later odp_queue_deq() call will find the packet from the queue (not
necessary q, but the destination queue of the CoS)
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: Liron Himi [mailto:lir...@marvell.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 12:23 PM
> To: Bala Manoharan ; Savolainen,
odp_pktin_event_queue() is used when ODP creates the event queues == when
hashing is enabled. When classifier is enabled, application itself creates
event queues and links those to CoS. So, application knows which event queues
to poll.
Classifier can be used with both types of event queues, bu
Weekly ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 9:51 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Suspected SPAM - Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH AP
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 3:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v3 0/3] api: ones complement metadata
>
> Added packet metadata
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 11:00 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v4 0/8] api: pool subparameters
>
> Added packet pool parameters
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 3:45 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Github ODP bot ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 12:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v4 1/3] api: ipsec: rework
> ODP_IPSEC_SA_DISABLE into packet error
ceived packets.
> - An application receives all incoming traffic locally, but drops
> some of it before it event wants to check the checksum (e.g.
> QoS filtering, one fragment lost, packet to wrong TCP port).
>
> Janne
>
> > -Original Message-----
> &g
rsday, October 26, 2017 10:30 AM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Bill Fischofer ; Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
; lng-odp-forward
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] API-next branch
1. we have api-next branch to collect all api changes with implementation in
tests in one places. A lot of people said
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 3:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v3 0/8] api: pool subparameters
>
> Added packet pool parameters
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v2 0/3] api: ones complement metadata
>
> Added packet metadata f
We need one branch that holds all new API changes before those are released (>
4 months currently): either it's master or api-next. If we change API
development to master, then applications would need follow the latest release
branch instead of master. At least previous there was resistance to c
that has to be odp helper, not need for that in odp api
—
Helper is not API, in general all applications cannot rely that. Out
validation/example/etc apps can rely on helpers, but not all. This solves a
very common debug need for data plane application - print a received packet on
the screen.
Hi Petri there's no check on snprintf regarding the returned len. Is there any
possibility in this code that the final buffer will be bigger than max_len?
—
I calculate max string len from number of bytes to print:
int num_rows = (byte_len + bytes_per_row - 1) / bytes_per_row;
int max_len = 256
> -Original Message-
> From: Bogdan Pricope [mailto:bogdan.pric...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 11:26 AM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 5:55 PM
To: Linaro/odp
Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Mention
Subject: Re: [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api: pktio: clarify
odp_pktio_config() restrictions (#247)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1 1/1] api: pktio: clarify
> odp_pktio_config() restrictions
>
> From
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:59 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api: pool
>
> typedef struct odp_pool_param_t {
> /** Pool type */
> @@ -192,17 +193,34 @@ typedef struct odp_pool_param_t {
>
> /** Parameters for packet pools */
> struct {
> - /** The number of packets that the pool must provide
> -
From: muvarov [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:01 AM
To: Linaro/odp
Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Author
Subject: Re: [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api: pool subparameters (#234)
From: Bill Fischofer
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM
Received mail through Github ... and in HTML format of course.
From: muvarov [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:01 AM
To: Linaro/odp
Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Author
Subject: Re: [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api: pool subparameters (#234
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:20 AM
To: Linaro/odp
Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Author
Subject: Re: [Linaro/odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1] api: pool subparameters (#234)
@Bill-Fischofer-Linaro requested changes on this pull
Git log entry is missing. Update with some rationale why this change is needed.
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 9:00 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp]
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 5:53 PM
> To: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Suspected SPAM - [lng-odp] Code review and discussion on m
odp_pktin_queue_config() creates all queues for the interface, except when
classifier is used. That's why the classifier config is there.
odp_pktin_queue_config() is an interface level call (there are no queue level
config calls).
Parser is not classifier. Parser config tells which metadata ap
> > No, I'm pointing that the more there's common core SW, the more there
> > are trade-offs and the less direct HW access == less performance. For
> > optimal performance, the amount of common core SW is zero.
>
> Yes this is sort of the ideal but I doubt this type of installation
> will be accep
Hi,
I propose that we'd remove the odp_packet_unshared_len() call.
The rationale is:
* Application rarely needs this to be maintained by ODP (never ?)
* Application may maintain offsets/lengths e.g. in packet user area
* Application may utilize knowledge about the context:
e.g. in this pi
No HTML mails, please.
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 3:55 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Andriy Berestovskyy ; Ola Liljedahl
; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
On
> -Original Message-
> From: Andriy Berestovskyy [mailto:andriy.berestovs...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 8:22 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Ola
> Liljedahl ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] generic core + H
From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 12:50 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: lng-odp-forward
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] Code review and discussion on mailing list only
On 2 October 2017 at 17:53, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 11:00 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH v1 1/1] linux-gen: User /proc/cpuinfo, if sysfs
> is not available. Fixes http
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ola
> Liljedahl
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:47 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] generic core + HW specific drivers
>
> olli@vubuntu:~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep xor
Hi,
Let's stop using Github for code review and design discussions. Mailing list is
far more flexible and robust for human-to-human interaction than a web-based
tool. We can continue to use Github for sending/bookkeeping pull requests (and
run Travis on those), but all discussions should happen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Andriy Berestovskyy
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 2:08 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] Compiler Barrier API
>
> Hey Maxim,
> There is a use case in the ODP code
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v2 1/1] api: event: add documentation
>
Looks like it's missing from the event.h documentation. It's defined by
implementation (and crypto.h spec file), so code compiles OK, but doxygen may
not show it
https://github.com/Linaro/odp/blob/api-next/platform/linux-generic/include/odp/api/plat/event_types.h
> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: shally verma [mailto:shallyvermacav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:26 AM
> To: Narayana Prasad Athreya
> Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Github ODP bot ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org; Narayana,
> Prasad Ath
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:16 AM
> To: Bill Fischofer
> Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Suspected SPAM - Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v5 1/1
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 4:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v8 1/1] comp: compression spec
>
> From: Shally Verma
>
> Signed-off-
This is an API change, that I did oppose on June 16th. Why it's now merged?
What is the requirement ("All threads that have joined the group must leave
before destroying the group") ? A thread may be in a group due to automatic
group (no create/join called), being part of thread mask in a create
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 4:40 PM
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Cc: Petri Savolainen ; lng-odp-forward
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] api: ipsec: add warning status event
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenik
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Balasubramanian Manoharan
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:12 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [RFC/API-NEXTv3 1/3] api: classification: add support
> for packet hashing in
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Vamsi
> Attunuru
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 1:05 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: mcha...@cavium.com; pathr...@cavium.com; vattun...@cavium.com;
> sve...@cavium.com
> Subject: [lng-odp] [
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
Maxim, could you merge this ASAP since patch 1/4 fixes broken api-next build
(when using gcc 4.8.4)
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 1:00 AM
> To: lng
OK. Yes I think 10x should be conservative enough. Make it a #define so that
it's easy to update if needed.
-Petri
From: Kevin Wang [mailto:kevin.w...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:31 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Kevin Wang ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 3:18 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: Maxim Uvarov ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 0/3] Change buffer handle to
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Vamsi
> Attunuru
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:54 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: macha...@cavium.com; pathr...@cavium.com; vattun...@cavium.com;
> sve...@cavium.com
> Subject: [lng-od
Dmitry, Maxim,
I think it's OK to merge v1 of this ASAP since it fixes e.g. api-next build
break. I did send my review yesterday. V2 just adds 4/4 patch on top.
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v2 4/4] api: crypto: revert deprecation
> of crypto completion API
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Wang
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:47 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: Kevin Wang
> Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv6 2/4] linux-generic: timer: implement
> odp_timer_capabil
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Wang
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:47 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: Kevin Wang
> Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv6 1/4] api: timer: add
> odp_timer_capability() api
>
> C
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v4 1/1] api: ipsec: add retain header
> c
> -Original Message-
> From: shally verma [mailto:shallyvermacav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:43 AM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp-forward ; Shally Verma
>
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] Regarding odp_pktin_rcv() packets
>
Ping.
I think it's better to modify only this application now, and update other apps
once the new API is released into master. Otherwise, we would increase diff
between api-next vs master. Most apps do odp_init_global(&instance, NULL, NULL)
today, so there's no performance difference. This chan
; Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 7:18 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: Maxim Uvarov
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 0/3] Change buffer handle to pointer
>
> For this series:
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Bill Fischofer
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> shally verma
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 3:36 PM
> To: lng-odp-forward ; Shally Verma
>
> Subject: [lng-odp] Regarding odp_pktin_rcv() packets
>
> I have a question on odp_pktin_recv(odp_p
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:00 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1 1/1] Adding additonal capability
> options to IPSEC APIs.
Typo: add
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 3:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v1 0/3] Crypto API updates
>
> Updates
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 11:53 AM
> To: Petri Savolainen ; lng-
> o...@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/9] api: ipsec: add salt parameter
>
> On 11.07.2017 1
This change is included in my latest IPsec API patch set.
-Petri
> diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h b/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> index 454855ea..27b12c89 100644
> --- a/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> +++ b/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include
>
> #include
> +#include
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> @@ -27
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Github ODP bot
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v8 3/10] api: crypto: drop async mode
> support
>
> From: Dmitry Eremi
> -Original Message-
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 9:28 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/4] linux-gen: sched: remove
&g
From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 8:28 PM
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Github
ODP bot ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v4 3/9] linux-gen: stop poisoning
CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS with
This is the first step to clean up queue / scheduler dependencies. Could we
merge this now and continue towards the next steps. Master and api-next should
be synced soon otherwise the code base delta just increases for no real reason
(API is the same).
-Petri
> -Original Message-
> Fro
> >> typedef struct schedule_fn_t {
> >> + int status_sync;
> >
> > this structure should contain functions that are provided by scheduler
> > to other components of ODP. 'status_sync' seems to be an internal
> > mechanism between the default scheduler and default que
> -Original Message-
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 11:07 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/4] linux-gen: sched:
> -Original Message-
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 11:00 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 2/4] linux-gen: sched: use co
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Matias Elo
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 5:23 PM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Suspected SPAM - [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2 1/3] api:
> system_info:
> -Original Message-
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 6:31 AM
> To: Brian Brooks
> Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Joyce Kong ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp
> > platform/linux-generic/include/odp_schedule_if.h | 7 +--
> > platform/linux-generic/odp_queue.c | 21 +
>
> > platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule_iquery.c | 4 +---
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/platform
> > diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h
> b/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h
> > index 3cff0045..469396df 100644
> > --- a/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h
> > +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/odp_config_internal.h
> > @@ -2
> -Original Message-
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 7:04 AM
> To: Petri Savolainen
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/4] linux-gen: sched: remove
> schedule interface depedency to qentr
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 3:16 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> Github ODP bot ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v4 3/
> diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h b/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> index 454855ea..9dd60749 100644
> --- a/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> +++ b/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include
>
> #include
> +#include
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> @@ -27
> diff --git a/test/Makefile.inc b/test/Makefile.inc
> index 1ef2a92c..bf31b374 100644
> --- a/test/Makefile.inc
> +++ b/test/Makefile.inc
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ LIB = $(top_builddir)/lib
> #in the following line, the libs using the symbols should come before
> #the libs containing them! The include
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Bogdan Pricope
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:56 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXTv2] api: ipsec: reorganize
> odp_ipsec_sa_param_t structure based on SA directio
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Brooks [mailto:brian.bro...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 5:17 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: Joyce Kong ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2] linux-gen: scheduler: modular sch
1 - 100 of 1311 matches
Mail list logo
