Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 21:27 schrieben Sie: I am attaching the output from both commands, any guidance is appreciated. Right now I'm building on OS X, next windows. autogen.out

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
have resources for at the moment. Thanks On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 19:04 schrieben Sie: 1 - Despite the command line options it will not build a static library. I've tried

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
support the project by providing my updates (assuming they work, of course). On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 20:17 schrieben Sie: Sounds like ant won't work for me. How are the release

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 21:11 schrieben Sie: Ha, that's right, isn't it. I didn't want to be rude, I'll only had in mind that there was a new team forming around Log4cxx and I simply really don't know if there are any official binaries out there. :-) I do recall

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Lucas Vickers
this is right? thanks much On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.de wrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 18:12 schrieben Sie: What I'm trying to do now is create a way to alert myself when there are error level logs. I know I can use

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Lucas Vickers
: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 18:36 schrieben Sie: https://github.com/apache/log4cxx/tree/trunk This is not the official repo, use the following: http://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/source-repository.html Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten

Re: Question regarding the technical details of a log rollover

2014-05-22 Thread Lucas Vickers
tschoen...@am-soft.dewrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2014 um 19:56 schrieben Sie: I'm pretty sure the answer is that it must be actively logging, and that does in fact make sense since I doubt you are trying to actively parse log files. No we don't, but the more

Re: Question regarding the technical details of a log rollover

2014-05-21 Thread Lucas Vickers
, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Lucas Vickers lu...@localprojects.netwrote: Hello, I'm using log4j.appender.rotating=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender on three machines, all set to rotate the log at midnight. Two of the machines (Windows) restart at 4am daily, and they are rotating the logs without

Directing windows logging data to the active app console

2014-02-26 Thread Lucas Vickers
Hi All, I know this is a very basic question but I'm unable to find a solution. I'm using LOG4CXX in a Microsoft application, and I'm unable to get access to the output via the standard application console. In Unix and OS X environments, stdout is sufficient. I know it's different in MS, so I

Defining logstreams in a header

2014-01-13 Thread Lucas Vickers
Hi All, I'd like to avoid having to create a logstream definition in every function that needs it. Is there any way to create a logstream in the header and then attach it to a logger in the constructor? based on what I'm seeing there is not. thanks, Lucas

Re: Defining logstreams in a header

2014-01-13 Thread Lucas Vickers
Given those comments (thanks for pointing them out), I definitely will not define logstreams in my headers. The style of code that I prefer uses iostreams, so for example this type of log statement: logstream Level::getInfo() Player started with SYPHON SYPHON , FBO FBO , DEMO DEMO

Re: Defining logstreams in a header

2014-01-13 Thread Lucas Vickers
LOG4CXX_INFO(logger, Player started with SYPHON SYPHON , FBO FBO , DEMO DEMO); This would be exactly the type of syntax that can save me from using logstreams. Didn't realize I could macro like that. thanks On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rhys Ulerich rhys.uler...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Defining logstreams in a header

2014-01-13 Thread Lucas Vickers
:) RTFM I guess On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.dewrote: Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Montag, 13. Januar 2014 um 23:03 schrieben Sie: Didn't realize I could macro like that. It's one of the documented suggested solutions: Logging requests are made