Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/13/2011 06:30 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: We do have a read-only git version at git://git.apache.org/log4net.git http://git.apache.org/log4net.git/ mirrored at github as well https://github.com/apache/log4net Didn't know that. :-) Since that repository is read-only, it is not exactly a

Discussing the existing patches

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
Can we start a discussion on the existing patches? Primary targets of discussion are the ones I applied here: https://bitbucket.org/NachbarsLumpi/log4net-patches/ This includes the unresolved issues containing a patch file: * LOG4NET-190 * LOG4NET-108 * LOG4NET-270 -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-108) [PATCH] add support for multiple evaluators in BufferingAppenderSkeletan

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13084561#comment-13084561 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-108: - Applied the existing patch here:

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-190) [Patch] Need true asynchronous appender

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13084565#comment-13084565 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-190: - Applied the existing patch here:

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-271) [Patch] Bump trunk version to 1.2.11

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13084567#comment-13084567 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-271: - Applied the existing patch here:

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-235) IP Address Pattern Converter

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13084598#comment-13084598 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-235: - Applied the existing patch here:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-221) Store log in database usinglog4net

2011-08-13 Thread Javier Sanchez
I Agree. Enviado desde BB -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner (JIRA) j...@apache.org Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:04:27 To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Reply-To: Log4NET Dev log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-221) Store log in database using

RE: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Roy Chastain
Who are those people? Maybe they should comment on this? I am one of those people. At this point I have minimal (if any) understanding of the actual patch insertion process, but given I don't have write privileges that is okay. I also have minimal/no understanding of how to apply patches that

Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: There are 9 open issues targeted for 1.2.10. They should probably be rescheduled to be included in 1.2.11? I'm not even sure whether some of them still are relevant. They certainly need to be rescheduled. My preference would be to have some release like

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: On 08/13/2011 06:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: For each of them we have to: * see if the patches are not fixed already * see if they fit into the current latest tip (trunk) * revise if they include sane changes * determine if they should be included

Re: Discussing the existing patches

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: Can we start a discussion on the existing patches? Absolutely. I'm running out of time right now, but will focus on the three issues you've mentioned soon. Stefan

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Roy Chastain wrote: Who are those people? Maybe they should comment on this? I am one of those people. At this point I have minimal (if any) understanding of the actual patch insertion process, but given I don't have write privileges that is okay. I also have minimal/no

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote: svn is pretty similar to TFS The version control part of TFS that is. There are differences but both have similar (limited) support for merge tracking, perform branching in the file-system space (i.e. copy a trunk dir to a branches/X_Y_Z dir) and both are

RE: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Roy Chastain
Thanks Stefan. My immediate takeaway is that by using a distributed VCS we have the capabilities that I am more used to in that we are working connected instead of disconnected with the connection blocker being someone who can commit in SVN on ASF. Once we agree we have something that fits

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-13, Roy Chastain wrote: My immediate takeaway is that by using a distributed VCS we have the capabilities that I am more used to in that we are working connected instead of disconnected with the connection blocker being someone who can commit in SVN on ASF. Yes, BUT. But once the