Re: geek movie _Center of the World_ (was Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-29 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Paul Mison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *>On 29/05/2001 at 18:04 +0100, Yeoh Yiu wrote: *>>So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ? *> *>Nah, 'cos it's not out here yet. No release date is listed on IMDB. *>Salon didn't like it, though: Salon has good taste too. Sucked harder than watching the

geek movie _Center of the World_ (was Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-29 Thread Yeoh Yiu
So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ? YY duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > see i dont mind 'lad's' magazines being covered in naked women, > because i mean thats kinda what makes up the content of the magazine. > but im very irritated by the fact that technology magazines are using

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-23 Thread David H. Adler
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:18:07AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > > > > > > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands! > > > > Your hands *think*??? > > > > in fact, it was a recent Ange

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-23 Thread Greg McCarroll
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > > > > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands! > > Your hands *think*??? > in fact, it was a recent Angel episode -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinu

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-23 Thread Greg McCarroll
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > > > > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands! > > Your hands *think*??? > > dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere... > that ones been done to death -- Greg McCarroll

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:33:04AM +0100, James Powell wrote: > So you don't fancy organizing a LPM Top 100 (well, maybe 25) then? A friend of mine and I were thinking of setting up a amIwroxornot.com site with all the Wrox authors (and their huge mugshots) on a voting site. I reckon this is Simo

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread David H. Adler
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands! Your hands *think*??? dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere... -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only prove

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Barbie
From: "Cross David - dcross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:58 AM > > > From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about > > > a women are their eyes. And women say

RE: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Matthew Jones
> >> See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come > >> across too well in glossy magazine. > > > >Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n? > > Mills and Boon. Well, no, I just had this conversation offlist. I'd say that personality pr0n is an oxymoron. YMMV. -- ma

RE: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 11:06 21/05/01 +0100, you wrote: >Dave Cross: > >> See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come >> across too well in glossy magazine. > >Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n? Mills and Boon. -- Jonathan Peterson Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Mon, 21 May 2001, James Powell wrote: > So you don't fancy organizing a LPM Top 100 (well, maybe 25) then? .. err .. well theres ... ugh . and .. arr ... and we could always get .. shudder nope .. don't reckon that ones a winner. I know some Womens Institute in Yorkshire made it bigtime wi

RE: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Matthew Jones
> I seem to recall some comic giving a rant to the effect of "Used to be > just the magazines on the top shelf, everyone knew where they were, > everyone knew what they were for. Then these FHM, Loaded, etc though - > huh? What are they, for blokes who "aren't sure" if they want to > masturbate?"

RE: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Matthew Jones
Dave Cross: > > > And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a > > > woman (or man) was simply by looking at a photo. > > > >Its in the eyes, Dave, its in the eyes. > > See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come > across too well in glossy magazine. Hmmm. I wonder how you

RE: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Cross David - dcross
From: Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:58 AM > From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about > > a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about > > men are: they're a bunch

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Barbie
From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about > a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about > men are: they're a bunch of liars." That's not quite true. Women initial assume that all men are autom

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread Simon Wistow
Robin Szemeti wrote: > I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the > crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will > settle down eventually. If you see it lying around the reading 'Getting away with it - the story of Loaded' by Tim Southwe

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread James Powell
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:26:51PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > >On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote: > > > > > I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who > > > finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've n

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-21 Thread robert shiels
- Original Message - From: "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 9:17 PM Subject: Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women > At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote: > >Sunday,

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Mike Jarvis
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:17:03 PM, Dave Cross wrote: DC> At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote: >>Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote: >> >>DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was >>DC> simply by looking at a photo. >> >>This is really two quest

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Dave Cross
At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote: >Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote: > >DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was >DC> simply by looking at a photo. > >This is really two questions: >1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someo

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Mike Jarvis
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote: DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was DC> simply by looking at a photo. This is really two questions: 1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someone you'd like to have a relationship with? (N

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Piers Cawley
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote: > >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list... > > > > > > > > The i

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Dave Cross
At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: >On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote: > > > I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who > > finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've never really > > understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to o

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Martin Ling
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the > crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will > settle down eventually. I don't particularly care that much about it. The > wome

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread duncan
>I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the >crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will >settle down eventually. [snip] > I do find it rather objectionable is >having them learing off the counter of every petrol station and >newsagent y

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote: > At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote: > >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list... > > > > > > > > The in

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote: > At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote: > >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list... > > > > > > > > The i

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only > one who finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've > never really understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to > objectify women in this way. Just 'cause no one w

Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-20 Thread Dave Cross
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote: >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list... > > > > > > The interesting bits are as follows; > > > > The really int

Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women

2001-05-19 Thread James Powell
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list... > > > > The interesting bits are as follows; > > The really interesting bit was Mr Ford dancing around in his living