Ben wrote:
http://www.datapower.com/products/xa35.html
XML is *sooo* 20th century.
Parrot in hardware. Now that's something to look forward to... :-)
A
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
the hatter sent the following bits through the ether:
Yes, a parrot microcontroller stamp, I've suggested this before. Imagine
parrot in your washing machine, your toaster, even under the bonnet of
your car.
But where would you keep the nuts?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:07:10AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Anyone think it would be nice is Sys::Hostname did this itself?
$ perl -MSys::Hostname -le 'print join ., unpack C*, (gethostbyname
hostname)[4]'
195.82.114.220
$
perlfaq9, consulted belatedly,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:34:02AM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Um, perhaps I'm missing something, but by definition a hostname is a name
which translates directly (via A, or A6) records to an IP address, or
indirectly (via a CNAME to another hostname which then resolves to an
IP). How
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Joel Bernstein wrote:
No. Why does a hostname need to have an associated IP address?
Um, perhaps I'm missing something, but by definition a hostname is a name
which translates directly (via A, or A6) records to an IP address, or
indirectly (via a CNAME to another
I won't be doing YAPC::Eu this year, I'm doing YAPC::NA - TPC via the
Appalachians, DC, NW, Boston, Vermont, Michigan, Chicago, Minneapolis,
North Dakota, the Rockies.
Which section of the Apalachans? Going anywhere near NC?
Joel Bernstein wrote:
Um, perhaps I'm missing something, but by definition a hostname is a name
which translates directly (via A, or A6) records to an IP address, or
indirectly (via a CNAME to another hostname which then resolves to an
IP). How could a hostname /not/ have an IP address?
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2 CPU's, but I wondered if anyone was doing
it seriously on more than 4.
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2 CPU's, but I wondered if anyone was doing
I have a LaCie 6*9Gb SCSI Raid Tower (with drives and dual psus) + PCI
RAID controller. Whilst it's nice and stuff it's also a little large and
heavy.
Would anybody be interested in swapping it for a more conventional HD or
something like a CD-RW/DVD drive?
You'd probably have to come pick it up
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:35:44PM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
I have a LaCie 6*9Gb SCSI Raid Tower (with drives and dual psus) + PCI
RAID controller. Whilst it's nice and stuff it's also a little large and
heavy.
Would anybody be interested in swapping it for a more conventional HD or
the hatter wrote:
I beleive the fortran and basic ones both did ok. Though java ones never
got anywhere,
It was when a cow-orker proudly showed me his Java Ring[1] that I finally
realised that Java was nothing more than a huge April Fool joke that had
got out of hand.
Originally
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2 CPU's, but I wondered if anyone was doing
it
I'm getting this (below) from mysql on solaris and something
disturbingly similar from php, which means I have done something stupid
or the time libraries are wrong.
I'm sure we can guess what is more likely, also below is the contents of
the timezone file which look correct.
mysql SELECT
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:25:55PM +, Tony Kennick wrote:
TZ=GB
LC_COLLATE=en_GB.ISO8859-15
LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO8859-15
LC_MESSAGES=C
LC_MONETARY=en_GB.ISO8859-15
LC_NUMERIC=en_GB.ISO8859-15
LC_TIME=en_GB.ISO8859-15
Can you make MySQL use GMT/UT rather than British Time?
R
Tony Kennick wrote:
I'm getting this (below) from mysql on solaris and something
mysql SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01');
+--+
| UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01') |
+--+
|-3600 |
+--+
1 row
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Kennick wrote:
I'm getting this (below) from mysql on solaris and something
disturbingly similar from php, which means I have done something stupid
or the time libraries are wrong.
I'm sure we can guess what is more likely, also below is the contents of
the
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:25:55PM +, Tony Kennick wrote:
mysql SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01');
+--+
| UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01') |
+--+
|-3600 |
+--+
1 row in set (0.00
On 30/01/2003 at 16:25 +, Tony Kennick wrote:
I'm getting this (below) from mysql on solaris and something
disturbingly similar from php, which means I have done something stupid
or the time libraries are wrong.
The time libraries are right, but not what you expect.
In 1970, Britain
(Sorry, correcting/elaborating on my earlier post. And I've corrected
the subject. Sorry if your mail client is crap enough to break the
thread on that.)
On 30/01/2003 at 17:17 +, Paul Mison wrote:
On 30/01/2003 at 16:25 +, Tony Kennick wrote:
I'm getting this (below) from mysql on
From: Lusercop `the.lusercop'@lusercop.net
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won't be doing YAPC::Eu this year, I'm doing YAPC::NA - TPC via the
Appalachians, DC, NW, Boston, Vermont, Michigan, Chicago, Minneapolis,
North Dakota, the Rockies.
Which section of the Apalachans? Going anywhere near NC?
Um... most of them. Where's NC?
--
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:01:23PM +, Piers Cawley wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won't be doing YAPC::Eu this year, I'm doing YAPC::NA - TPC via the
Appalachians, DC, NW, Boston, Vermont, Michigan, Chicago, Minneapolis,
North Dakota, the Rockies.
Which section of the
On Thursday 30 January 2003 5:44pm, Paul Mison wrote:
Something that came up at work this week was that whilst in the US
time zones have either S or D in the middle (eg EST and EDT- Eastern
Standard/Daylight Time), and Europe has CET which is the current
timezone regardless of DST status (so
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 05:53:49PM -, Steve Mynott wrote:
Although I think a lot of current linux development work is on SMP and multi
processor scalability so if you were brave enough to run a bleeding edge
kernel with dodgy patches you might get better results.
The sparc-kernel list has
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Piers Cawley wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won't be doing YAPC::Eu this year, I'm doing YAPC::NA - TPC via
the Appalachians, DC, NW, Boston, Vermont, Michigan, Chicago,
Minneapolis, North Dakota, the Rockies.
Which section of the Apalachans? Going anywhere
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 13:18, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2 CPU's, but I wondered if anyone was doing
it seriously
please stop emails
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:55:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please stop emails
Sorry, only the Internet Controller can do that, and he's very busy right
now.
--
$x='4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c'#Earle Martin
.'206861636b65720d0a';for(0..26){print #
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone using Linux on anything with lots of CPU's? Attempt to do
searches for 'linux smp' on google tends to get me documents last
updated in 1997.
I used to run it happily on 2 CPU's, but I wondered if anyone was doing
Someone posted the following regex on another mailing list. Bonus points if
you can work out what it does. (I expect someone will)
[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\
xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xf
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:01:18AM +, Earle Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Someone posted the following regex on another mailing list. Bonus points if
you can work out what it does. (I expect someone will)
[snip]
It's Jeffery Friedl's regex for checking a valid email address.
32 matches
Mail list logo
