Newton, Philip wrote:
> Hello, this is just a test of the announce list.
>
> Let's see whether it's still allowed to post its
> announcements to the normal list.
Did any who are subscribed only to the normal list, not the announcement
one, see the parent of this messag
> -Original Message-
> From: Newton, Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 April 2002 14:49
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test Test...
>
>
> Newton, Philip wrote:
> > Hello, this is just a test of the announce lis
number2
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
It seemed appropriate to raise an issue which recently came up.
I was trying to do some tests using Test::More on a 'strict' and simple
package, using Test::More, when I discovered a strange bit of behaviour.
I'd included a line which called a method on an object, which I'd
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
the addresses and re-mail the message):
SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.
test
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
just seeing if penderel is playing nice since its downtime
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
test!
btw, isn't there some mechanism for mailing lists that allow you to
send a test message ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or some such) that
would facilitate this sort of thing without plauging the list with
this stuff?
s
sorry :(
I have been asked at work, to come up with a Unix technical test for use in
interviewing prospective candidates, and I was wondering if there already
was such a test in existence. To search the list, I tried a google advanced
search on pm.org - without any avail.
I did ask whether there was
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:13:32PM +, martin bower wrote:
> number2
I'm sure I've asked people on mailing lists before not to "test" to mailing
lists. It really is unbelievably rude. Please don't do it.
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 2002
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Lusercop wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:13:32PM +, martin bower wrote:
> > number2
>
> I'm sure I've asked people on mailing lists before not to "test" to
> mailing lists. It really is unbelievably rude. Please don't do
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:18:02PM +0100, Lusercop wrote:
> I'm sure I've asked people on mailing lists before not to "test" to mailing
> lists. It really is unbelievably rude. Please don't do it.
This sounds regurgitated. I have always managed to believe how
HI,
I'm currently working on a code generator that creates tests.
Ideally I'd like each individual unit test to be run standalone but I'd
also like the tests to be run collectively by a cron job.
There seems to be two schools of thought: Test::More, and
T
On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 02:53:58PM +0100, Lee Goddard typed:
>This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
>
>The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
>the addresses and re-mail the message):
>
>SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Please reply to [EMAIL PROTEC
On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe typed:
>But this looks like a DNS problem doesnt it ?
Probably, yes... it's still a failure message going to the list though...
nah, I'm just feeling bloody tired and hot and in a bad mood today. Find
me a java programmer or a per
quot;
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Burton West
> Sent: 22 June 2001 15:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Test
>
>
> On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe typed:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:40:06PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe typed:
> >But this looks like a DNS problem doesnt it ?
> Probably, yes... it's still a failure message going to the list though...
> nah, I'm just feeling bloody
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Byng-Maddick
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:40:06PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe typed:
> > >But this looks like a DNS problem doesnt it ?
> > Probably, y
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 10:28:55AM +0100, Lee Goddard wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Byng-Maddick
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:40:06PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > > On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe type
* Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> test
and with that test, Greg returns from upgrade hell were he has lived
for the last 18 hours.
Greg
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
> and with that test, Greg returns from upgrade hell were he has lived
> for the last 18 hours.
... and increases his lead in the london-list scoreboard in one
easy step ;-)
Leon
--
Leon Brocard...
* Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> test!
>
> btw, isn't there some mechanism for mailing lists that allow you to
> send a test message ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or some such) that
> would facilitate this sort of thing without plauging the list with
> this stuff?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:49:11PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > would facilitate this sort of thing without plauging the list with
> > this stuff?
> >
>
> but what about the posting stats?
That was a mistake posting that wasn't it.
Sorry all,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> sorry :(
http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Sue Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > sorry :(
>
> http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Thanks. That cheered me up no end.
--
David Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hirehttp://www.davehodgkinson.com
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://ww
> http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Lovely. Me like.
Cheers,
Philip
(and me hope the page makes the weekly summary and be preserved for
posterity.)
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the pr
Newton, Philip sent the following bits through the ether:
> (and me hope the page makes the weekly summary and be preserved for
> posterity.)
Look, I'm sorry okay. The summary would have been out already but I,
um, saw Legally Blonde (yes, I want to be blonde too) and have been
Out Partying. Oh,
one two, one two
haven't seen any list mail since friday, was wondering what broke :o
--
S. Joel Bernstein :: joel at fysh dot org :: t: 020 8458 2323
"Nobody is going to claim that Perl 6's OO is "bolted on". Well, except
maybe for certain Slashdotters who don't know the difference
between
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ivor Williams wrote:
> I have been asked at work, to come up with a Unix technical test
As in an exam, where you give a sheet full of questions & ash the
candidate to respond? If so, then how about coming up with say 6 or 10
typical scenarios (general usage, prog
Ivor Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been asked at work, to come up with a Unix technical test for use in
> interviewing prospective candidates, and I was wondering if there already
> was such a test in existence. To search the list, I tried a google advanced
>
At 07/10/2002 13:20 [], Ivor Williams wrote:
>I have been asked at work, to come up with a Unix technical test for use in
>interviewing prospective candidates, and I was wondering if there already
>was such a test in existence. To search the list, I tried a google advanced
>sear
-Original Message-
From: Chris Devers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:41 PM
To: London Perl Mongers
Subject:Re: Unix test
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ivor Williams wrote:
> I have been asked at work, to come up with a Unix technical test
As in
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ivor Williams wrote:
> It's not that I intend to crib the entire test, more that it will give me
> ideas as to the kind of questions to ask.
I tend to ask the same question multiple times, once using a kiddie
algorithm, once using an undergraduate algorithm an
to scripting, depending on the client, something to add a user, and a
segment of an apache conf (at the same time) might be an idea, a sort of
mass hosting. Suggest that this script might be used for 10's of thousands
of users, and see what optimisations they come up with.
This doesn't giv
Do you like pie ?
Do you like kittens ?
Do you like Buffy ?
Do you like beer ?
I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
-CT
meone (the first one) asked
me to email him. Now I'm cautious of writing an email that will do no
good if he runs out of tuits, so I'm sending this to the list.
What I'd like to see is a "Tested with Test::More" button sized
image. And i'd like to see apps/modules tha
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> There seems to be two schools of thought: Test::More, and
> Test::Unit. Any thoughts on which approach is better for
> combining standalone testing and cronjob tests?
To be honest, there's not that much difference. You run the
Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
>
> > There seems to be two schools of thought: Test::More, and
> > Test::Unit. Any thoughts on which approach is better for
> > combining standalone testing and cronjob tests?
>
> To be honest, there's not that much difference. You run the script and
> run the results though Test::Harness which works out if they passed or
> not. Or you run each test manually and look at the output.
This may be different now, but, I found Test::Simple and Test::More to
b
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 01:32 pm, Peter Sergeant wrote:
To be honest, there's not that much difference. You run the script
and
run the results though Test::Harness which works out if they passed or
not. Or you run each test manually and look at the output.
This may be differen
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:05:27PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> I beg to differ! There's a substantial difference between Test::More
> and Test::Unit. Test::Unit is best when you have a huge test suite to
> run on a huge OO code base
I'd say Test::Class is best for thist :)
> The 3-voice sound chip was coverted by us BBC types - and the C64 colour
> was good, but hey, bloatware, it had 64k compared to a B's 32
I dunno, us hard core speccy programmers can to wiggle the speaker
directly to get more than one note out of it. The only problem is
that if you didn't
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> In my bookmarks I keep a set of folders for all the people I know,
> linking in them to pieces of information about that person
As is my right under the 1984 data protection act I demand a copy of all
information that you have pertaining to me in elec
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:57:27AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
>
> As is my right under the 1984 data protection act I demand a copy of all
> information that you have pertaining to me in electronic form.
As I understand it, Greg is allowed to charge a reasonable admin
fee for this. About 4 pints
* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > In my bookmarks I keep a set of folders for all the people I know,
> > linking in them to pieces of information about that person
>
> As is my right under the 1984 data protection act I demand a copy of a
> (As an aside has anyone actually done this is real life? Does it work?)
Yes and yes. I have DPA'd the police.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Nick Cleaton wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 04:01:58PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> > > There was only one game, Elite.
> > Llamatron.
>
> The best game ever is the one I haven't written yet.
>
I did write on
On 17 Oct 2001, Steve Mynott wrote:
> I wrote my first computer
> program on a Commodore PET (the original one with the calc-type
> keyboard).
>
Same here - I wrote a theatre booking system that used some awful metal
bashing pokery straight into the displ
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Greg Cope wrote:
> Dave Cross wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Candidates who learned how to program on their Commadore
> > > 64, Apple, etc. when they were 12 years old are likely to
> > > be what we are looking for.
> >
> >
>
> Rules me out then, what about BBC B's - C64's are for
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 02:57:53PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> You can never have too many obsolete puters!
Damn straight!
dha, has a Digital MV2000 mini sitting around here somewhere...
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
A London.pm thread topic is like a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:53:55PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out
> of Meat. - Phillip, Goats, 20sep99
"If the Juju had meant us not to eat people
He wouldn't have made us of meat"
(from a Flanders & Swann song, 1950s)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 06:04:45PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:53:55PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out
> > of Meat. - Phillip, Goats, 20sep99
>
> "If the Juju had meant us not to eat people
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:04:46PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > (from a Flanders & Swann song, 1950s)
> Funny. Jon and Phillip never struck me as F&S fans... *shrug*
Maybe they picked it up from Diabolo... I can imagine everyone's
favorite satanic chicken liking them.
Alex
--
"Four pints
David H. Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out
>> > of Meat. - Phillip, Goats, 20sep99
>> "If the Juju had meant us not to eat people
>> He wouldn't have made us of meat"
>> (from a Flanders & Swann song, 1950s)
>Funny. Jo
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 07:39:36PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Nick Cleaton wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 04:01:58PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> > > > There was only one game, Elite.
> > > Llamatron
On 17 Oct 2001, Steve Mynott wrote:
>
>does anyone also remember 380Zs?
>
Big black buggers, with 64K of RAM running CP/M ? Yeah.
Made me a CP/M convert the year after the XT came out :)
/J\
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:17:04AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Jon Nangle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > "Sue" == Sue Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Sue> Heh. "Must possess strong CVS". Sounds like a white collar ditch
> > Sue> digging job to me (albeit well-paid).
Just seeing if I can make mail on pendral
work quicker, just altered the /etc/resolv.conf
tell me if it blows anything up
Leo
Experience in packaging perl modules from CPAN , suggests that most CPAN
authors are woefully ignorant of copyright and licensing issues.
Unfortunately I have been provoked into attempting to do something about
this. I present Test::Copyright. I would appreciate feedback not least
on the idea
I simultaneously started this debate on perlmonks:
http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=909453 and exactly the same points came up
there so I am just posing my response.
--
Nicholas Bamber | http://www.periapt.co.uk/
PGP key 3BFFE73C from pgp.mit.edu
Interesting question from a training client:
"Do you know of a general Perl skills test (on-line or paper) that we could
give to our Perl developers before you turn up.
The idea is that the output could feed into the training you are doing for
us."
I don't[1]. Does anyone else
Anyone done this lately? Still as useful as it used to be?
e turns up
nothing.
Simon.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:16:34 +0100 (BST)
From: Simon Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: xxx
Subject: Memoize test failure
Hi,
Memoize's test fail in tie_ndbm.t on my machine. Switching on $Verbose and
runn
(I changed the subject line because I have a feeling people might have
ignored the original post because of it.)
On Wed 09 Oct 2002, Rafiq Ismail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to do some tests using Test::More on a 'strict' and simple
> package, using Test::Mor
What is perl ?
Ducks!!!
-Original Message-
From: CyberTiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you like pie ?
Do you like kittens ?
Do you like Buffy ?
Do you like beer ?
Anadarko Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings
are int
From: CyberTiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2/27/03 2:25:14 PM
> Do you like pie ?
>
> Do you like kittens ?
>
> Do you like Buffy ?
>
> Do you like beer ?
Hmmm. 2 out of 4. That's not very good. I'm sure I'm more than
50% suited to be in london.pm. You
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Dave Cross wrote:
> > Do you like pie ?
> > Do you like kittens ?
> > Do you like Buffy ?
> > Do you like beer ?
> Hmmm. 2 out of 4. That's not very good. I'm sure I'm more than
> 50% suited to be in london.pm. Your test must b
7;m more than
> 50% suited to be in london.pm. Your test must be broken.
Perhaps he should use Test::FlavourOfTheMonth.
--
David Cantrell | Looking for work | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/cv
It would be reasonable to judge cannabis less of a threat to health than
alcohol or tobacco
On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:25, CyberTiger wrote:
> Do you like pie ?
>
> Do you like kittens ?
>
> Do you like Buffy ?
>
> Do you like beer ?
>
> I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
Do you like ponys?
Cheers,
philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mmm. 2 out of 4. That's not very good. I'm sure I'm more than
> 50% suited to be in london.pm. Your test must be broken.
>
which two of the 4 do you not like? i note that choosing not to
indulge in something doesnt mean you don't like it.
--
***
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Richard Clyne topquoted thus:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CyberTiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Do you like pie ?
> >
> > Do you like kittens ?
> >
> > Do you like Buffy ?
> >
> > Do you like beer ?
>
> What is perl ?
>
> Ducks!!!
Do you like ducks?
Funny, I
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:27:59PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:25, CyberTiger wrote:
> > Do you like pie ?
> > Do you like kittens ?
> > Do you like Buffy ?
> > Do you like beer ?
> > I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
> Do you like ponys?
Do you p
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: CyberTiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Do you like pie ?
> > >
> > > Do you like kittens ?
> > >
> > > Do you like Buffy ?
> > >
> > > Do you like beer ?
> >
> > What is perl ?
> >
> > Ducks!!!
>
> Do you like ducks?
>
> Funny, I don't remember that
tens ?
>> >
>> > Do you like Buffy ?
>> >
>> > Do you like beer ?
>>
>> Hmmm. 2 out of 4. That's not very good. I'm sure I'm more
>> than 50% suited to be in london.pm. Your test must be
>> broken.
>
> which two of the 4
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Chris Devers wrote:
> > Ducks!!!
>
> Do you like ducks?
>
> Funny, I don't remember that one ever coming up before...
In a pancake with spring onions, cucumber and hoi sin sauce. Yum!
Jason
--
UKFSN.ORG Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net
http://ww
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, David Wright wrote:
> Ducks are edible and rather delicious. Therefore infinitely preferable to
> kittens, which are a bit scrawny.
I suspect kitten may have about as much edible meat as duck.
I regularly cook duck and it's bloody hard to get them with a decent
amount of ea
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:57:14PM +, David Wright wrote:
>
> Ducks are edible and rather delicious. Therefore infinitely preferable to
> kittens, which are a bit scrawny.
I'd say that neither was particularly delicious, but I'm a veggie.
>
Spoilsport.
MBM
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Luse
On 27 Feb 2003 at 15:58, David Cantrell wrote:
> Do you prefer Willow?
Good one.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:27:59PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:25, CyberTiger wrote:
> > > Do you like pie ?
> > > Do you like kittens ?
> > > Do you like Buffy ?
> > > Do you like beer ?
> > > I'm sure I missed a few things, fe
On Thursday 27 February 2003 15:58, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:27:59PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> > On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:25, CyberTiger wrote:
> > > Do you like pie ?
> > > Do you like kittens ?
> > > Do you like Buffy ?
> > > Do you like beer ?
> > > I'm sure I missed a
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, CyberTiger wrote:
> Do you like pie ?
Yes.
> Do you like kittens ?
With orange sauce.
> Do you like Buffy ?
I like Willow more but yes she'll do.
> Do you like beer ?
Is that a question?
> I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
Do you use perl?
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:27, Philip Newton wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:25, CyberTiger wrote:
>
> > Do you like pie ?
> >
> > Do you like kittens ?
> >
> > Do you like Buffy ?
> >
> > Do you like beer ?
> >
> > I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
>
> Do you like pon
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> Not doing very well here methinks...
Well, that depends on whether it's better to be closer to or
further from the London.pm party line, doesn't it? :)
--
Chris Devers[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Chris Devers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>
> > Not doing very well here methinks...
>
> Well, that depends on whether it's better to be closer to or
> further from the London.pm party line, doesn't it? :)
Then let us add "Will you drink beer with l.pm'ers
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
>
> That & I'm on a different continent, but nobody's perfect...
Well, I've certainly never let the whole "different continent" thing
bother *me*... :_)
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"Dir-ty
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:25:14PM +, CyberTiger wrote:
>
> Do you like pie ?
>
> Do you like kittens ?
>
> Do you like Buffy ?
>
> Do you like beer ?
>
> I'm sure I missed a few things, feel free to add some more :)
>
> -CT
Okay so I'm a little behind reading *grin*
Do you like camels
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:51:43PM +1030, sue gray wrote:
>
> Do you like camels as much as greg does?
*no one* likes camels as much as greg.
[also ducks]
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"It was failure proof technology"
"What happened?"
"It failed"
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:08:09AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:51:43PM +1030, sue gray wrote:
> > Do you like camels as much as greg does?
> *no one* likes camels as much as greg.
> [also ducks]
Greg likes ducks?
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 200
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:09:29AM +, Lusercop wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:08:09AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:51:43PM +1030, sue gray wrote:
> > > Do you like camels as much as greg does?
> > *no one* likes camels as much as greg.
> > [also ducks]
>
> G
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:09:29AM +, Lusercop wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:08:09AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:51:43PM +1030, sue gray wrote:
> > > > Do you like camels as much as greg does?
> > > *no one*
- Original Message -
From: "Greg McCarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:24 PM
>
> I think this would give a good start page for applications that use
> Perl and at the very least are aware of Test::More. I know this is
> only a mere f
uldn't be that much energy but I take your point.
Any activity needs to be backed up with some sort of marketing if I dare
use that word ;-)
> What I'd like to see is a "Tested with Test::More" button sized
> image. And i'd like to see apps/modules that use Test::More
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +, Simon Wilcox said:
> CPAN does have a reputation as a module repository. A concerted effort
> to push applications wouldn't be a bad thing.
>
> Playing devils advocate, why would it be cool ? Are you pitching this at
> perl community people or the "outside
> > What I'd like to see is a "Tested with Test::More" button sized
> > image. And i'd like to see apps/modules that use Test::More or
> > Test::Simple to display it via a link. The link would go to a cgi/m_p
> > script that also generated a referer list
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Simon Wistow wrote:
> o More likely (probably) that a new backend for CPANPLUS
> could be written that would allow you to just type
>
> % perl -MCPANPLUS -e'installapp perlMyAdmin'
>
> And it would work out what distribution you're using and install
> things in the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:31:22AM +, Mark Fowler said:
> I personally have high hopes for things like PAR. Just a "drop this
> archive here and it works" thing would be great.
But doesn't that suffer from the same problems that statically linking
all your libraries does?
On the other hand
ite about cool or new perl
projects, kind of like freshmeat but without all the python and php
crud" or Greg's idea of a Test::More branding plan.
> One of the problems we had way back in the day with Acmemail was that
> installing it was an arse for several reasons, namely that it
> o More likely (probably) that a new backend for CPANPLUS
> could be written that would allow you to just type
>
> % perl -MCPANPLUS -e'installapp perlMyAdmin'
>
> And it would work out what distribution you're using and install
> things in there.
You might want to take a look at
Simon Wilcox wrote:
Indeed but if you look at something like OpenInteract, it has a
completely different installation/configuration to something like RT.
I'm not sure how you would standardise that.
One way would be to look at all that they do, normalise it, write a package that
makes those tasks
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
