On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:19, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> John Cuzzola wrote:
>
> >*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client
> >and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through the
> >VPN.
> >
> A very good solution and one that is not too hefty to i
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 19:34, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:19:52AM -0600, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> > John Cuzzola wrote:
> >
> > >*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client
> > >and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through t
What's the use of doing that? I must be missing something somewhere.
Jo
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP h
My workstations are no longer displaying the XDM login dialog. They only
have
the grey x-server screen and X cursor. If I init 3 then init 5 the server
the
XDM login comes back but as soon as a user logs out of the workstation the
grey x-server returns but no XDM login dialog.
If I frop the wo
Thanks I will try that out!
Matthew S. Vesperman
StarSoft Computer Systems
http://www.sscompsys.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew S. Vesperman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 08:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discus
Hello Matthew,
You need an Etherboot floppy bootable image. Go to
http://www.Rom-o-matic.net and generate one. I think
it was pcnet32 that I used.
Once you get that image, store it in your vmware directory
and when you setup the vmware session, tell it you have
a floppy drive, but you need to
How do I configure VMware 3.0 so I can use it as an LTSP diskless
workstation?
Matthew S. Vesperman
StarSoft Computer Systems
http://www.sscompsys.com
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
Hey,
I sure could use those docs. Are they here yet?
Michael
--
Michael Williams Instructional Technology
Haywood County Schools 216 Charles St. Clyde, NC 28721
http://www.k12linux.org (828) 627-8314
Hello ltsp-discuss,
I am trying to set up a Point Of Sale system on LTSP 3.0, RH 7.0. The
POS requires that I load a keymap before running the software on the
console at the workstaion. When I run loadkeys KEYMAP.MAP i get the
message "failed to bind string xxx to function yyy" quit a few times
Il giorno Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Alexander Perry così ha scritto:
|From: Alexander Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 08:43:59 -0800
|Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] can't ls in directory >90,000 files
|
|There is a "-U" option on 'ls' that disables the sort and may be muc
"Michael H.Collins" wrote:
> David Johnston wrote:
> "Michael H.Collins" wrote:
>>>What is that user doing in the building, and or how is he allowed to
>>> bring a laptop in from the outside and plug it in. This is the bad
>>> security i see.
>>Michael, you are right that there is no substitute f
There is security and then there is security I guess.
The military tried to teach me that an evolution is either secure or it
is not.
In your scenario there a complete lack of security as I see it. I know
what you are talking about even if I cannot call it secure.
On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:30:52
"Michael H.Collins" wrote:
>
> What is that user doing in the building, and or how is he allowed to
> bring a laptop in from the outside and plug it in. This is the bad
> security i see.
>
> Homie don't play dat.
Michael, you are right that there is no substitute for physical
security. Howeve
* Bill Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07.03.02 18:41]:
> 1. Dumb question: I was trying to answer a question on the list, but I can't
> figure out how to reply without cutting and pasting manually into Outlook
> and sending a fresh message. I get the digest version so this is painful.
> What do you all
Jason,
Mail=mail and web=web.
Therefore, no HTML in a mailing list ... please
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:41:26 -0800
"Bill Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Dumb question: I was trying to answer a question on the list, but I
> can't figure out how to reply without cutting and pasting manually into
> Outlook and sending a fresh message. I get the digest version so this is
>
When I setup Xaccess on the server to do indirect X queries using
xchooser and do a indirect X session on the thin client.
I get a message that I don't have permission to use the display.
I can however still get an XDM session even though I am getting this
error. I am using SuSE 7.3 with KDM.
Pff it's really as far to simple as Tokyo is from New York ... (I
know this sentence does not make much sense butt bear with me ...)
(Doesn't really matter, in fact never been to either place anyway ;-)
Started by a real need to find a way to give my daughter a cheap
computer to play some gam
Hi,
1. Dumb question: I was trying to answer a question on the list, but I can't
figure out how to reply without cutting and pasting manually into Outlook
and sending a fresh message. I get the digest version so this is painful.
What do you all use to reply to messages?
2. Perhaps dumb question:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:19:52AM -0600, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> John Cuzzola wrote:
>
> >*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client
> >and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through the
> >VPN.
> >
> A very good solution and one that is not t
> On a more general note, I have a directory on my linux server which has
> over 90,000 files. when I do a dir | wc -l I receive a number of >46,000
> (which I take to be >90,000 files since dir gives me 2 columns of file
> names.
> However, I can't ls. I have waited for up to 15 minutes. C
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> John Cuzzola wrote:
>
> >*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client
> >and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through the
> >VPN.
> >
> A very good solution and one that is not too hefty to implement
>>After contemplating the matter for a while, I still think it is a
>>serious security risk. As far as I know there is no password
>>authenication involved with NFS, so you only have to a) bind to a low
>>port and b) use the same UID on the client as the user that has files
>>on the NFS share that
John Cuzzola wrote:
>*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client
>and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through the
>VPN.
>
A very good solution and one that is not too hefty to implement.
However, how to you store "securely" the secret keys f
Does this help, maybe?
http://freshmeat.net/projects/tcppipe/
Jason Bechtel wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:57:35 -0600 (CST)
>> From: Lachlan Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Before moving my application to ltsp thin clients, it has been working
>> great! With the touchscreen connected to
Hans Ekbrand wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:34:43AM +0100, Romme wrote:
>
>>Some of the security risks described can be managed
>>by keeping a list of 'known' mac-adresses on the
>>server.
>>This list can then be used by dhcpd, but also by
>>iptables to filter on mac-address.
>>
>
>That's a g
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Writing to named piped over NFS
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 06:25:35 -0700
From: Dave Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Lachlan Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lachlan Dunlop wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Well my touch
> After contemplating the matter for a while, I still think it is a
> serious security risk. As far as I know there is no password
> authenication involved with NFS, so you only have to a) bind to a low
> port and b) use the same UID on the client as the user that has files
> on the NFS share that
Title: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] can't ls in directory >90,000 files
I have a system running on RH 7.1 that is a monitoring station for 12 network video cameras. Each of the cameras uploads a jpg image every 2-3 seconds to their own directory on the server. On the server itself, I have a kylix cgi
Hans,
you are not wrong. if security is a very big concern, use samba
instead of nfs. samba will do just about any authentication you want since
it can be compiled to use PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module). julius
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:02
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:41:33AM -0600, Michael H. Collins wrote:
> What is that user doing in the building, and or how is he allowed to
> bring a laptop in from the outside and plug it in. This is the bad
> security i see.
You probably missed the beginning of this thread. It was about using
L
What is that user doing in the building, and or how is he allowed to
bring a laptop in from the outside and plug it in. This is the bad
security i see.
Homie don't play dat.
$Now, consider a malicious user, who has prepared his laptop at home,
$plugs it in to the local network, uses the same i
LTSPers,
Following up the discussion on rw NFS and security issues...
If you must use remotely-mounted/centrally-located directories in a
hostile environment, might I recommend AFS instead of NFS. AFS allows
for user-level authentication using Kerberos. It was formerly
proprietary, but afte
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:34:43AM +0100, Romme wrote:
> Some of the security risks described can be managed
> by keeping a list of 'known' mac-adresses on the
> server.
> This list can then be used by dhcpd, but also by
> iptables to filter on mac-address.
That's a good idea. It makes the descri
> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:57:35 -0600 (CST)
> From: Lachlan Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Before moving my application to ltsp thin clients, it has been working
> great! With the touchscreen connected to the serial port on the
> server (but it is very limiting).
>
> So I have connected my tou
I'm interested to use some ltsp client as windows terminal using
rdesktop.
I looked for wilisystem patch but it's for ltsp 2.x.
Any suggest about where do modifications in rc.local and what kind of
modifications? Structure of rc.local is modified in ltsp 3.0.
I think about a flexible solution: usi
Check if you have installed the XFree86-xfs package (rpm -q XFree86-xfs) and if
so make sure if you have in your /etc/X11/fs/config a line like the following
"alternate-servers = yourserver:7100". This will set your xfs to listen to
tcp/ip clients.
morten a écrit :
> I have installed LTS that i
Some of the security risks described can be managed
by keeping a list of 'known' mac-adresses on the
server.
This list can then be used by dhcpd, but also by
iptables to filter on mac-address.
grtx,
Johan Romme.
At 10:00 7-3-2002 +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
>After contemplating the matter for a
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:02:04AM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:26:58PM -0500, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > > I was not thinking on system security, but the security you would want
> > > to grant the *users*, e.g. that no cra
39 matches
Mail list logo
