Just in case this helps
I had Mandriva 2007 and ltsp 4.2 but do not remmenber the Firefox version. I
replaced (just the software) with Mandiva 2009 and LTSP 4.2 which comes with
Firefox 3.08 and the only thing people complained was a Slow Right Click on
Firefox too compared to mandriva 2007 an
Just in case this helps
I had Mandriva 2007 and ltsp 4.2 but do not remmenber the Firefox version. I
replaced (just the software) with Mandiva 2009 and LTSP 4.2 which comes with
Firefox 3.08 and the only thing people complained was a Slow Right Click on
Firefox too compared to mandriva 2007 an
Anton Vaaranmaa kirjoitti:
> I have experimented with local apps. For some reason client applications
> could not print. The print dialogue shows the printers, but the "print"
> button is gray. There is a thread of this subject on this list dating
> back a few weeks.
To me printing works just fin
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:57:12PM -0500, Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Stefan Below wrote:
Ok, as a follow-up to this, I just had a palaver with otavio, Gadi, johnny,
alkisg, et al in #ltsp.
Otavio's posted some of his goodies (not in any working state) her
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Stefan Below wrote:
> I know that this discussion is coming up every few month, but the
> problem is that you need for ltsp5 much stronger hardware to get the
> same user experience than with ltsp4 due to the fact that ltsp5 is using
> the standard comp
My Solution:
for firefox : ppa -> xcb
for wine: FreeNX + NoMachine client
Is good for me!
2009/9/25 Oliver Grawert :
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
>
>> I dont't blame or call any developers 'silly'. what i tried to say is
>> that the comparison lacks a bi
hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
> I dont't blame or call any developers 'silly'. what i tried to say is
> that the comparison lacks a bit. Yes, the nx package uses _old_ libs ,
> but they do the same like the new ones (what we need for ltsp/nx).
if they would do
hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 09:11 -0400 schrieb Gerald Drouillard:
> Anton Vaaranmaa wrote:
>
> >
> > I for one am grateful this thing was fixed. My only complaint is about
> > the fixed stuff not making the mainstream update repository.
> >
> > Wishing a nice weekend to all,
> >
> Here, he
hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 08:55 -0400 schrieb Jim McQuillan:
> As for Oliver's comments, I agree with everything he said except the
> part about "ltsp developers had to drop the ball"
>
well, i should have been more specific ...
what i indeed meant is: drop the ball on the concept of mainti
Anton Vaaranmaa wrote:
>
> I for one am grateful this thing was fixed. My only complaint is about
> the fixed stuff not making the mainstream update repository.
>
> Wishing a nice weekend to all,
>
Here, here. The slowness has been since the Hardy release. Seems
strange that this serious per
It also helps to keep in mind that ltsp is merely a framework to network
boot a computer. You don't HAVE to use ldm (X-over-ssh), it is merely
the default session type. If you prefer, install nxclient in the
chroot, and create a screen script to run it, and set SCREEN_07 = nx
Use LTSP AND make y
I think NX is a great piece of technology that helps in many cases, but
it's not the magic bullet for all cases.
NX runs an Xserver on the server for every user. It's kind of like a
proxy for X11. Applications communicate with this in-memory Xserver.
The instructions for drawing then get rela
Oliver Grawert schrieb:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
>
>> Oliver Grawert schrieb:
>>
>>> comparing the speed of NX with its insecure and outdated snapshot of the
>>> old included xlibs with recent implementations of xcb is somewhat like
>>> comparing
Oliver Grawert kirjoitti:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
> the xlibs in NX are several years old and lack security updates, they
> wree written in a time where hardware was a lot less powerfull, how is
> it wrong to compate these libs with a browser that was
Stefan Below kirjoitti:
> Oliver Grawert schrieb:
>> comparing the speed of NX with its insecure and outdated snapshot of the
>> old included xlibs with recent implementations of xcb is somewhat like
>> comparing netscape 2 with firefox 3.5 :)
> I have the same speed issues. Scrolling in OO and
hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
> Oliver Grawert schrieb:
> > comparing the speed of NX with its insecure and outdated snapshot of the
> > old included xlibs with recent implementations of xcb is somewhat like
> > comparing netscape 2 with firefox 3.5 :)
...
> And
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
> Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
>> Anton Vaaranmaa kirjoitti:
>>> Right now we have a group of people who do real work on some pretty
>>> robust (2 Ghz CPU, 2 Gbytes RAM) clients, but despite that their user
>>> experience is terrible and frustrating.
As I mentioned earlier S
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
> Anton Vaaranmaa kirjoitti:
>
>> Right now we have a group of people who do real work on some pretty
>> robust (2 Ghz CPU, 2 Gbytes RAM) clients, but despite that their user
>> experience is terrible and frustrating.
>
> If you got that fast pc's why not use them as a f
Oliver Grawert kirjoitti:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:34 +0300 schrieb Anton Vaaranmaa:
With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
>> Whatever issues there are that causes rejection of NX better be dealth
>> with instead of keeping the status quo. NX works - and works fast - day
>> in and
Oliver Grawert schrieb:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:34 +0300 schrieb Anton Vaaranmaa:
>
>
With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
>
>
>> Whatever issues there are that causes rejection of NX better be dealth
>> with instead of keeping the status quo. NX works - and wor
Anton Vaaranmaa kirjoitti:
> Right now we have a group of people who do real work on some pretty
> robust (2 Ghz CPU, 2 Gbytes RAM) clients, but despite that their user
> experience is terrible and frustrating.
> Some are beginning to question if LTSP and Linux was the right
> choice, and if the
hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:34 +0300 schrieb Anton Vaaranmaa:
> >> With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
> Whatever issues there are that causes rejection of NX better be dealth
> with instead of keeping the status quo. NX works - and works fast - day
> in and day out - and that's what matters
Scott Balneaves kirjoitti:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:55:03PM -0300, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
>> Any one has solved this problem?
I also have this problem. We have an AMD 64 bit LTSP server and Intel 32
bit clients.
>> With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:55:03PM -0300, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> Any one has solved this problem?
>
> With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxcb/+bug/277069
Please install Stephane's patch from his ppa.
Scott
--
Scott L. Balneaves | The point is, n
Any one has solved this problem?
With NX (FreeNX) this not occurs!
2008/12/30 Stéphane Graber :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Graham Innes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm experimenting with LTSP 5 on Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) using whatever
>> version of LTSP comes with it. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Graham Innes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experimenting with LTSP 5 on Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) using whatever
> version of LTSP comes with it. I'm using my desktop as the server and an
> Intel Atom-based thin client.
>
> Performance on the client is general
Maybe it is like me and hates the menu popping up. I have never used the
menu and would hate to have to start. Too windows like to me.
Anyway hope it gets figured out.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Graham Innes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experimenting with LTSP 5 on Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) us
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with LTSP 5 on Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) using whatever
version of LTSP comes with it. I'm using my desktop as the server and an
Intel Atom-based thin client.
Performance on the client is generally excellent, including browsing the web
with Firefox. However, performing a ri
28 matches
Mail list logo
