t; Regards,
>
> André
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Patrick Reynolds
>> Sent: 03/06/14 08:00 AM
>> To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP server on external network
>>
>> ---
ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP server on external network
>
> --
> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free
Can Kiwi-ltsp be set to use
a DHCP server on the external network and how do you do it?
Many thanks
Patrick
--
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversi
All:
We had been sporadically running into issues whereby our clients were not
releasing leases when we expected them to, and were stubbornly refusing to
accept the new IP offered by the DHCP server (in most cases, the IP was
actively leased by a Windows client, resulting in IP conflicts.
Beli
Anyone have experiences with a setup where you have a Windows 2000
server providing DHCP?
Thanks!
Tim
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Pe
Hello Peter,
> On May 30, 2003 12:26 pm, you wrote:
>> With two dhcp servers, how do you control which one answers requests?
> Well...that is a good question. According to my DHCP server logs, they both
> answer DHCP requests, but the terminals "use" the IP address from the LTSP
> DHCP server.
On May 30, 2003 12:26 pm, you wrote:
> With two dhcp servers, how do you control which one answers requests?
Well...that is a good question. According to my DHCP server logs, they both
answer DHCP requests, but the terminals "use" the IP address from the LTSP
DHCP server. I have yet to have a te
On May 29, 2003 08:47 pm, Brian Johnson wrote:
> You're setting yourself up for a world of headaches
Why is that, Brian? What sorts of headaches? My network is configured that way
and I don't have any (apparent) headaches.
--
Peter Pankonin, digitalcrucible
Registered Linux User 246938
There a
You're setting yourself up for a world of headaches
>On Thu, 29 May 2003, Oren Levy wrote:
>> Thanks all. Just to be clear, I want to keep the router DHCP running, for
>> all the other PCs, while I fiddle around with LTSP. Thus, I wanted to add a
>> linux DHCP server to run in parallel with the ro
Why?
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Oren Levy wrote:
> Thanks all. Just to be clear, I want to keep the router DHCP running, for
> all the other PCs, while I fiddle around with LTSP. Thus, I wanted to add a
> linux DHCP server to run in parallel with the router. LTSP clients would
> speak to the linux DHCP
Title: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP server is Netgear router
No prob...
Good Luck!
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 16:11, Oren Levy wrote:
Cool, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Hoopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:07 PM
To
On May 29, 2003 03:09 pm, Oren Levy wrote:
> Thanks all. Just to be clear, I want to keep the router DHCP running, for
> all the other PCs, while I fiddle around with LTSP. Thus, I wanted to add a
> linux DHCP server to run in parallel with the router. LTSP clients would
> speak to the linux DHCP s
Title: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP server is Netgear router
Thanks all. Just to be clear, I want to keep the router DHCP running, for all the other PCs, while I fiddle around with LTSP. Thus, I wanted to add a linux DHCP server to run in parallel with the router. LTSP clients would speak to the
On Tue, 27 May 2003 08:36:57 -0700
Oren Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My DHCP server is a Netgear router, not a linux box. So, is it possible to
> still use LTSP? How?
Sure. Simply disable dhcp server on netgear box and set dhcp server up on
linux box.
Use a range of IP's for your non-ltsp w
Title: DHCP server is Netgear router
My DHCP server is a Netgear router, not a linux box. So, is it possible to still use LTSP? How?
(Linux newbie here; handholding appreciated.)
Thanks.
--- Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Matt Johnson wrote:
>
> --- Snipped ---
>
>
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I think I'm right in saying K12LTSP distro somehow
> > gets around the need for putting in MAC addresses.
> I
> > may have misunderstood but I'm sure that when I
> tried
>
>
>Folks,
>
>I think I'm right in saying K12LTSP distro somehow
>gets around the need for putting in MAC addresses. I
>may have misunderstood but I'm sure that when I tried
>out K12LTSP I didn't have to put the addresses in the
>dhcpd.conf. Anyone know how _they_ get around it?
>
>--
>Matt 'Newbi
Matt Johnson wrote:
--- Snipped ---
>
> Folks,
>
> I think I'm right in saying K12LTSP distro somehow
> gets around the need for putting in MAC addresses. I
> may have misunderstood but I'm sure that when I tried
> out K12LTSP I didn't have to put the addresses in the
> dhcpd.conf. Anyone k
>
> Folks,
>
> I think I'm right in saying K12LTSP distro somehow
> gets around the need for putting in MAC addresses. I
> may have misunderstood but I'm sure that when I tried
> out K12LTSP I didn't have to put the addresses in the
> dhcpd.conf. Anyone know how _they_ get around it?
>
> --
> Matt
--- John Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >littlebig wrote:
> >> if my workstations are all the same in hardware,
> how to set up the
> >> dhcp.conf for not assigning the MAC and ip for
> each WS?
> >> I ask this because if I have 20 WS, I have to get
> the MAC of 20 WS.
> >> thanks
> >
> >i made
>littlebig wrote:
>> if my workstations are all the same in hardware, how to set up the
>> dhcp.conf for not assigning the MAC and ip for each WS?
>> I ask this because if I have 20 WS, I have to get the MAC of 20 WS.
>> thanks
>
>i made a little script that reads the output of dhcpd -d
>an genera
littlebig wrote:
> if my workstations are all the same in hardware, how to set up the
> dhcp.conf for not assigning the MAC and ip for each WS?
> I ask this because if I have 20 WS, I have to get the MAC of 20 WS.
> thanks
i made a little script that reads the output of dhcpd -d
an generates a dh
littlebig a écrit :
>
> if my workstations are all the same in hardware, how to set up the dhcp.conf
> for not assigning the MAC and ip for each WS?
> I ask this because if I have 20 WS, I have to get the MAC of 20 WS.
> thanks
>
looks like something easy as you may already have somtehing like
if my workstations are all the same in hardware, how to set up the dhcp.conf
for not assigning the MAC and ip for each WS?
I ask this because if I have 20 WS, I have to get the MAC of 20 WS.
thanks
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.
Tim,
I'd suggest trying a different hub, or a cross-over cable directly
betwen the server and workstation,
just to rule out any negotiation problems between the Linksys card and
the hub.
Other things worth trying are:
1) Try a different slot in the computer
2) Try the Linksys card in a diff
Hello all,
Problem:
Cannot connect to the DHCP server. Receiving the following error message:
"TX Timeout!"
""
My setup:
Hardware:
Using a diskless IBM PC 300GL w/16MB ram
disklessworkstations Linksys LNE 100TX nic (Tulip ADMtek AN985 chipset)
3com office connect
26 matches
Mail list logo
