for a
"Lucene.Net.Extensions" for the core.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andy Pook [mailto:andy.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:26 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-469) Convert Java
Iterator class
Welcome Simon
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Welcome Simon Svensson as a new committer
Hey All, Our roster is
Welcome Itamar!
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Welcome Itamar Syn-Hershko as a new committer
Hey all,
I'd li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13257792#comment-13257792
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-486:
bq. Of course I have solved the problem for my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-486.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Wildcard queries are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13257778#comment-13257778
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-486:
Björn,
Lucene(java) had decided not to use anal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-486.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Are_Wildcard.2C_Prefix
GetPrefixQuery doesn't use analyzers, and it is a well known issue of
Lucene.
Suppose a hypothetical analyzer(with stemming) which stems 'went' as 'go'
and you want to search 'wentworth miller'.
A search like 'went*' would be converted to 'g
+1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 Release
(take 2
Hi Chris,
There are many methods of IndexReader you can make use of.
For ex, to get the field names in the index "GetFieldNames" or to get the
terms "Terms".
I posted here (http://pastebin.com/aiCy26mj) a simple example to get all
terms in the field "myfield".
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13180965#comment-13180965
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-463:
My guess:
Either it is not widely used as you t
3
But I didn't think it as a separate branch to evolve on its own path. It
is(or I think it is) the final version of 2.9
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:20 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-412.
Resolution: Fixed
2.9.4g is ready to go
DIGY
> Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13175117#comment-13175117
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-459:
Fixed in 2.9.4g branch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-459:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
> Italian stemmer (f
... and it was related with CloseableThreadLocal (fixed in 2.9.4(g)) which
now creates
compilation problem against .Net20 :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:09 AM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
S
If I recall it correctly, last memory leak problem for 2.9.2 was reported in
~August from RavenDB, and it was fixed in 2.9.4(g)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:33 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
OK, here is the code that can be compiled against .NET 2.0
http://pastebin.com/k2f7JfPd
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:26 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Re
FYI, 2.9.4 can be compiled against .Net 2.0 with a few minor changes in
CloseableThreadLocal
(like uncommenting ThreadLocal class and replacing extension-methods
calls
with static calls to CloseableThreadLocalExtensions)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens
My english isn't enough to understand this answer. I hope it is not related
with
employee-employer relationship as in the past.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:08 AM
To: lucene-ne
I am also not sure but, "they had been neglected" since people tried to cope
up with the core. Contribs was thought (At least I did) as a "nice to have"
feature but not "must". Only exception for this is FVH which I use in my
projects very often:) (IIRC, it is beyo
Chris,
Sorry, if you took my comments about "pain of porting" personally. That
wasn't my intension.
+1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, No
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-443.
Resolution: Fixed
> SpellChecker finaliser calls close regardless of if closed alre
What do folks think about including LUCENENET-427, LUCENENET-431,
LUCENENET-433 & LUCENENET-443 fixes in that release and removing
Similarity.Net?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:19 PM
To: lucene-net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-448:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.4)
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix
Not that old :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Punch cards or bust!
Sent from my Windows Phone
I am not against it, but personally think it as a toy.
I am from the generation where people used vi to write codes.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE
>
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-e
xcerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx
Yes, this is the trick some obfuscators use.(they use also some scrambling
fxns to hide the code in resource)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hern
I reconsidered it and there is no race condition. A new slot will be
created for each thread.
But NullReferenceException bug is still there.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:16 AM
To: lucene-net
You are right in "race condition" & "NullReferenceException".
but
"static SupportClass.WeakHashTable slots = new
SupportClass.WeakHashTable();"
wouldn't work since it is intented to be created in all threads not once.
Would you patch it or leave it to m
est cases.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:09 PM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
On 20.09.2011 23:48, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Hey all seems like we are set with
> Similarity was include, though are there any tests for this project ?
Similarity is obsolete (Queries.Net replaces it & has test cases). It has
already been removed in 2.9.4g
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Wednesday, Se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-443:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> SpellChecker finaliser calls cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-444.
Resolution: Fixed
> Snowball stemmers (Portuguese, Hungarian, Romanian, Turk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13105418#comment-13105418
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-444:
committed to trunk & 2.9.4g branch.
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-444:
---
Attachment: PortugueseStemmer.cs
TurkishStemmer.cs
RomanianStemmer.cs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-444:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 3.x)
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
> Snowball stemm
Feature
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x
Some missing stemmers + a modified portuguese stemmer.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Good news. Thanks Itamar.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
We have been running
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Ok, core compiles, and all te
System.Collections.ICollection interface does result in Hashtable's
GetEnumerator() being invoked. So an explicit typecast is needed for
invoking CharArraySet.GetEnumerator()
(As a result, a bad (but *almost* working) implementation. It is rewritten
in 2.9.4g)
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Pre
gning.
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB
To avoid misunderstanding...
Community==all Lucene.Net users
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not bad idea, but I would prefer c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097325#comment-13097325
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-414:
I think the simplest solution for 2.9.4 wil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097312#comment-13097312
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-442:
The critical case in .NET is that a not-han
There is an issue still open(LUCENENET-414) related with StopWords.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-442.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
Fixed for 2.9.4 & 2.9.4g
> ParallelMultiSearcher thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-442:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-442.patch
Thanks Andy.
Nice catch.
I prepared a patch for 2.9.4g and will commit to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-442:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> ParallelMultiSearcher thre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-358.
Resolution: Fixed
> CloseableThreadLocal memory leak in LocalDataStoreSlot (with workaro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092541#comment-13092541
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-358:
New CloseableThreadLocal implementation and its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092399#comment-13092399
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-358:
Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092392#comment-13092392
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-358:
New CloseableThreadLocal implementation committe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-358:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-358:
---
Attachment: TestMemLeakage.zip
TestMemLeakage.zip shows that bug.
> CloseableThreadLocal memory leak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy reopened LUCENENET-358:
Memory leak in ClosableThreadLocal.
See the discussion
http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/browse_thread
A "Some useful links" section?
like
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ScoresAsPercentages
and some other links to external sources about Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message
Get *invovled* to help shape our future
-Original Message-
From: pnas...@apache.org [mailto:pnas...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:50 PM
To: lucene-net-comm...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] svn commit: r1150205 -
/incubator/lucene.net/site/trunk/content/lucene.net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-437:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
> Port Contrib.Shingle from J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13067409#comment-13067409
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
Already fixed in 2.9.4g
> Port Contrib.Shing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13067389#comment-13067389
]
Digy edited comment on LUCENENET-437 at 7/18/11 11:28 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy reopened LUCENENET-437:
> Port Contrib.Shingle from Java
> --
>
> Key: L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066717#comment-13066717
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
Using HashCode for equality comparison is not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-437:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
> Port Contrib.Shingle f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13062351#comment-13062351
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-434:
very nice.
> Remove Anonymous cla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-172.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy (was: Scott Lombard)
Fixed in 2.9.4g. No fix for 2.9.4
> T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-433:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-433.patch
Patch for 2.9.4g
> AttributeSource can have an invalid computed st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061214#comment-13061214
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-433:
Here is the test case
{code}
[
: Bug
Reporter: Digy
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
If you work a tokenstream, consume it, then reuse it and add an attribute to
it, the computed state is wrong.
thus for example, clearAttributes() will not actually clear the attribute added.
So in some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061125#comment-13061125
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
It works! Thanks.
DIGY
> LuceneTestCase sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-430.
Resolution: Fixed
Instead of creating a small project, I put it into Contrib.Analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-432.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Lucene.Net 2.9.2
Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: Digy
Attachments: SegmentInfo.patch
The multi-threaded call of the files() in SegmentInfo could lead to the
ConcurrentModificationException if one thread is not finished additions to the
ArrayList (files) yet while the other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-432:
---
Attachment: SegmentInfo.patch
All tests pass.
> Concurrency issues in SegmentInfo.Files() (LUCENE-2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13060571#comment-13060571
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-431:
Hi Olle,
{code}
static double Transfor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059624#comment-13059624
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
Sorry, my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy reopened LUCENENET-418:
> LuceneTestCase should not have a static method could throw excepti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059621#comment-13059621
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
Lucene.Net.Index.TestParallelReader.TestDocument
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059616#comment-13059616
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
Hi Michael,
When I run unit tests, I get
Contrib.ChainedFilter
-
Key: LUCENENET-430
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: Digy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-430:
---
Attachment: ChainedFilterTest.cs
ChainedFilter.cs
> Contrib.ChainedFil
And just for this hard work I removed the obsolete Similarity.Net.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:53 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I&#
No no. It was just an example. As you already know, there are a lot of changes
in contrib codes related with those API changes in Lucene.Net.2.9.4g core.
Therefore, I see no option like merging other that copying.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com
OK. Maybe I asked wrong question, Suppose I committed IsolatedStorageDirectory
only to trunk. How would you merge this branch & trunk?
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 12:28 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache
a 2.9.4 tag and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait
> I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util folder
Since it is a Lucene.Net specific code, may "Support" be a better place?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:53 PM
I can not say I like this approach, but till we find an automated way(with good
results), it seems to be the only way we can use.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
not exist in the
collection whereas .NET throws exception". A better way may be used.
* missing IEquatable's
* making Iterators as real .NET Enumerators
etc. etc. etc.
It seems to be a never ending story.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.
ne answers in a reasonable time(mostly), then commit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Troy
.9.4g? It is a *branch* and has
nothing to do with the trunk. It need not be an offical release and can live in
branch as a PoC.
As a result, I got bored to listen to "this should be done that way". What I
want to see is "I did it that way, should we continue with this&q
Hi Rory,
I agree with you in theory. But collecting people to work on a project is
not easy as giving advise.
Till now, line-by-line port have seemed to be the best with a limited human
source.
Would you be willing to work on your approach and maintain newer Lucene.Net
releases?
DIGY
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-429.
Resolution: Fixed
committed to 2.9.4g
> Corrupted segment file not detected and wipes index conte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-427.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed
> Provide limit on phrase analysis in FastVectorHighlighter (LUCENE-3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-427:
---
Attachment: FastVectorHighlighter.patch
> Provide limit on phrase analysis in FastVectorHighligh
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3234
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053722#comment-13053722
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-426:
10 min. work done.
DIGY
> Mark BaseFragments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049906#comment-13049906
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-417:
OK, File System Indexer is a good example.
Have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049397#comment-13049397
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-425:
Seems that Lucene's BufferedIndexInput is mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049377#comment-13049377
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-423:
I don't think there is an inconsistency be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049322#comment-13049322
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-425:
I would like to compare search speeds of "FS
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
