Itamar, when you're happy with the tests and code, let me know, I'll re-cut the
RC for core and contrib
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:05:39 +0300
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1375282 -
> /incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/core/Util/Parameter.cs
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13437943#comment-13437943
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Alright, last ques
or TwitDeck and create your own Twitter account while at it :)
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > I'm terrible with social media- is there any way to have tweets directed
> > at @LuceneDotNet sent to one of our mailing lists? Or sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13437739#comment-13437739
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Also help me understandi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13437732#comment-13437732
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Could be me - but I'
Up to you :)
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
> > Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we
Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it to
the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want
Hey Zach - thats excellent. If you want to consider it start by creating a jira
issue and attaching your patch.
Well take a look at it for possible inclusion -
Prescott
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Zachary Gramana
Sent: 8/17/2012 4:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@l
Hey All -
Just an FYI, the board voted unanimously to allow us to graduate. I will push
forward with the various tasks in the next week.
Congrats to everyone who has helped us get this far -
~Prescott
It'd be nice to understand where this issue is coming from as it wasn't in
2.9.4 rather than jumping to a quick fix imo. I'll dig a bit myself
~P
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:32:29 +0200
> From: si...@devhost.se
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene.Net 3.0.3 and medium trus
;
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/zainnab/archive/2012/06/05/visual-studio-2012-compatibility-aka-project-round-tripping.aspx
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I think it's usu
Aug 8, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date.
> Anything in trunk should be there
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Christopher Currens
> Sent: 8/8/2012 1:
I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date.
Anything in trunk should be there
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Christopher Currens
Sent: 8/8/2012 1:35 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues
T
I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility - hopefully
that gets some people excited
> From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
>
>
Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene
Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and
Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test
drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Presc
o: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Prescott - we could make an RC and push it to Nuget as a PreRelease, to get
> real feedback.
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > I don't think we ever fully adopted the style guidelines, probably not a
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene.Net+3.0.3
Please update the wiki and the changes.TXT file with any changes you're aware
of - I will take some time this weekend to comb through everything and add
whatever is missing
> From: ge
Did I miss the email where Itamar actually said "And for heaven's sake, can we
move to git when graduating?" I think I did. I'll add it to the list of things
to discuss as we progress. I believe we discussed this in the past and at the
time we had a lazy consensus to stick with svn.
> Subject:
> > work
> > > > just the same when we work towards 3.6, so I won't hold you off anymore
> > > >
> > > > Up to Chris - he wanted to do some tests cleanup
> > > >
> > > > Also, I'll be updating the Spatial contrib during the next w
ork
> > > just the same when we work towards 3.6, so I won't hold you off anymore
> > >
> > > Up to Chris - he wanted to do some tests cleanup
> > >
> > > Also, I'll be updating the Spatial contrib during the next week or so
> > with
>
> >
> > > > Where do we stand on the clean up now? Is there anything in particular
> > > > that you're doing that you'd like help with? I have some free time
> > today
> > > > and am eager to get this version released.
> > > >
> &
Stefan or Benson, if you could sign off on the report - due tomorrow. Thanks,~P
> From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Incubator Report
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:34:49 -0700
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2012
>
> I'll also be progressing
There are two packages Lucene packages on nuget that are depreciated. With some
updates nuget made a while ago, we have the ability to remove those packages.
Do we want to?
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2012
I'll also be progressing us through the graduation process in a day or two. Our
vote passed, but I have left it open for over a week.
~P
ually there was some clean up work I started doing and would want to
> complete, and also sign off on the suspected corruption issue we raised.
> I'm afraid I won't have much time this week to properly do all that, but
> I'll keep you posted.
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012
I've called a vote on the general incubator for our graduation:
> From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:40:53 -0700
>
>
> Hey all,
>
> Th
projects, one for
> > > .NET 4 and the other for 3.5. To aid me, I wrote a small tool that
> > creates
> > > copies of all of the 4.0 projects and solutions to work against the 3.5
> > > framework. Anyone have experience with multi-targeting like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13419915#comment-13419915
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-446:
---
I changed most of thes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-446:
--
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.6
Assignee: Prescott Nasser
> M
There was a commit for updating the build scripts - is there a command I can
run to output both 4.0 and 3.5 binaries of everything?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13414471#comment-13414471
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Chris if you have the
Hey All,
Just as an FYI, I've proposed our resolution to the general incubator list for
feedback. I didn't cc the devs and users because it was creating too much spam
and confusion over which list was getting appropriate replies.
If you do have feedback, preferably you can respond on the thread
ing like this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Have at it.
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:20:06 -0700
> > > Subject:
From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> What's the status on the failing tests we had?
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Three issues left that I see:
> >
> >
> >
> > Fixing the
ctures that ASF uses.
>
> -T
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Prescott Nasser
> wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea why I thought we were using Nant.
> > I think it's just "our release structure". I figured a little out this
> > weekend, spl
Hey All,
This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project
(incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to
see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project.
Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406106#comment-13406106
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-498:
---
Marcelo - have you t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406105#comment-13406105
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-498:
---
Google Translate:
I emba
an add would be great
~P
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:21 -0400
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > &g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400113#comment-13400113
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-456:
---
'build copy-release al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-497.
-
Assignee: Prescott Nasser
> misspelling of sound-alike word on h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-497.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done, thanks for the heads up
> misspelling
I just named it 3.5 becuase that's what we have on our roadmap. I believe
you're right though, we should just target 3.6
> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:15 +0300
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1353075 -
> /incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev
> -- Task 470, a non-serious one, is listed only because it's mostly done and
> just need a few loose ends tied up. I'll hopefully have time to take care
> of that this weekend.
How many GetX/SetX are left? I did a quick search for 'public * Get*()' Most of
them looked to be actual methods - p
eturn one of those if it's running on WP8.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> looks like the same .net runtime will be in windows phone 8 and windows 8
> - might save us porting issues for mobile..
>
>
looks like the same .net runtime will be in windows phone 8 and windows 8 -
might save us porting issues for mobile..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393683#comment-13393683
]
Prescott Nasser edited comment on LUCENENET-480 at 6/18/12 6:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393683#comment-13393683
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
I agree, I'd prefer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-480:
--
Attachment: SortedSet.cs
> Investigate what needs to happen to make both .
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393447#comment-13393447
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-337:
---
Is this still wanted in 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393437#comment-13393437
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
ISet set = new HashSet(x
ene.NET. It doesn't seem much different from the role he's already
been involved in. Any objections?
Thanks,
Christopher
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template
> Stefan, I think you've more than proved your value.
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295406#comment-13295406
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Yes I think we should do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295135#comment-13295135
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Attempting to compile the t
g the index corruption issue, and it is
> probably best for Chris to wrap up the work he has started
>
> Anyone else on board to close some tickets?
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Agreed -
> > JIRA for 3.0.3
> > h
I think with the addition of two new committers we've made some progress in
community growth. I think we'll have 3.0.3 out the door soon - are there any
other items we think we need to address before looking to graduate?
~P
Agreed -
JIRA for 3.0.3
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316215#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
We should evaluate all of these - fix them, mark as won't fix, or move them to
another release version. I think the biggest h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-491:
--
Description:
Ensure that Lucene.Net library can run in Metro
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13285755#comment-13285755
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-484:
---
Has anyone had any luck
Prescott Nasser created LUCENENET-491:
-
Summary: Win 8 Metro Limitations
Key: LUCENENET-491
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-491
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-488.
-
> Can't open IndexReader, get OutOFMemory E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-488.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Intended - see comments by Sven for more details
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-483.
-
> Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, anot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-483:
-
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> Spatial Search skipping records when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-483.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved per comments
> Spatial Sea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-489:
-
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> New spatial mod
Does anyone have a good reference for the limitations this will have? What
libraries won't be accessible, etc?
> From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Metro port of Lucene.net
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:34:05 -0700
>
>
> I haven't taken too much ti
I haven't taken too much time to look into the limitations, but this should
definitely be on the list of things to do.
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:18:33 -0700
> Subject: Metro port of Lucene.net
> From: a...@kno.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Wonder if there are plans to port Lu
> my intentions to move this code into contrib, which brings the first of
> many questions; should it be added to Contrib.Analyzers, or a new project?
Analyzers sounds like the right space for it.
> I'm currently experimenting with the build environment and making sure
> that all tools work p
Hey All, Our roster is growing a bit, I'd like to welcome Simon as a new
committer. Simon has been quite active on the user mailing list helping answer
community questions, he also maintains a C# port of the lucene-hunspell project
(java: http://code.google.com/p/lucene-hunspell/, Simons c#
Itamar - I'm terrible with git, the last two weekends I tried cutting out and
making a patch of the work you've done with spatial with no luck (I do like
learning new things so I wanted to give it a shot before reaching out). Do you
know how to do that? Or some way to see all the changes files
I'll try to give you a hand this weekend great work ~P
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 05:48:51 +0300
> Subject: Re: Spatial4n
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Status update:
>
> The Spatial4j project is completely ported to .NET, including tests, all of
> which gre
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2012 I've updated it - feel free to adjust
it (or if you don't have access, let me know, I'm happy to make changes) ~P
Itamar, have you filed an ICLA? If so we are good to go on this, and I'll put
this in place of the current spatial code in contrib
> From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Spatial4n
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:46:05 -0700
>
>
> Hey Stefan - can you co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264017#comment-13264017
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-487:
---
LongParser and DoubleParser
Hey all, We've had a community member port a library for Lucene.Net that we'd
like to include in our contrib packages. The package is under the apache 2.0
license, so we think we are in the clear to include the code into our contrib
package - but we weren't sure and just wanted to double che
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13263979#comment-13263979
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-484:
---
I cannot reproduce any of
Prescott Nasser created LUCENENET-487:
-
Summary: Remove Obsolete Members, Fields that are marked as
obsolete and to be removed in 3.0
Key: LUCENENET-487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET
I'm looking at some of the tests failing. I think it would be worthwhile having
them figured out prior to a pre-package. Figured out could just mean we know
under what conditions they fail and we can document that for now, but not yet
fixed. But I think right now they are failing and we aren't
Hey Stefan - can you confirm that porting Spatial4n is ok to include in our
contrib? It is also under the apache 2.0 license, but we wanted to be 100%. ~P
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:45:48 +0300
> Subject: Spatial4n
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi again,
If anyone is familiar with the CMS, something happened to the download page
(formatting is screwed up), but it's exactly like the other pages. I could use
another pair of eyes on it. ~P
loads page
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > 3.0.3 started as a branch while we were releasing 2.9.4. But it was since
> > merged into the trunk. Where is the link? we should update it to point to
> > the trunk.
> > >
3.0.3 started as a branch while we were releasing 2.9.4. But it was since
merged into the trunk. Where is the link? we should update it to point to the
trunk.
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:09:18 -0400
> Subject: broken link to 3.0.3 on website.
> From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net
ut a comment giving reasons. I was wondering
> if there's anyone who could answer a few questions there, instead of me
> changing things back and forth?
>
> Git history (I use the Git mirror, yes) tells me Prescott Nasser is behind
> porting this - maybe he will have the answers?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Itamar.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13258600#comment-13258600
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-486:
---
We could potentially a
Could you attach your patch to this issue? I dont mind looking at potentially
adding the ability for a developer to set a flag that would make it behave as
you seek.
But that would be an enhancement - as this is now, its intended behavior
Sent from my Windows Phone
lol
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:41:32 -0400
> Subject: Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
> From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> silly question. I script my tweets using powershell and my RMS-styled text
> only browser built using C# where all the strings are UTF-
I ran the full suite of tests against core with the following results. Can
anyone confirm they are seeing similar? or is this particular to my system? I
failed test, 3 ignored, looks like two where intential ignores and I can't tell
about the first one. Should we remove the intentially ignor
t; >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On 27 February 2012 17:26, Simone Chiaretta > >wrote:
> >
> > > The Nuget pkg is still missing. Currently I'm at the MVP Summit in
> > > Bellevue. I'll do the release when I go back home after the 11 of March
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-482.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
It's unclear if this is a bug in 2.3.2 or speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228918#comment-13228918
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-167:
---
I did a ton of work on
> > If I take out the test folders from the conversion it only gets to 300MB.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 8:45 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE:
does get up to about 500MB but I got 12GB in my system and it
> finishes in a minute flat.
> If I take out the test folders from the conversion it only gets to 300MB.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday,
; Are you sure built it and exported to the correct folder?
> The line numbers in the stack trace don't match up to the latest version.
>
> Alex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 4:57 PM
New thread.. Alex any thoughts on how I could solve the error below? The java
files copied over to the new workspace, but I think that's as far as it got.
I'll dig around myself, just asking in case you've encountered this. Thanks~P
!SESSION 2012-03-03 16:51:41.229
Should we remove this? It looks like it's not part of the contrib for Java
3.0.3 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/contrib/ and
we have no tests for it.
mean to be a bother to anyone, but I'd like to continue
> > work on this. I feel that until I can get a better sense of how the group
> > feels about this, I can't make much progress. Perhaps this radio silence
> > is just because this email thread got lost in among the o
Thanks Stefan!
> From: bode...@apache.org
> To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:23:01 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
>
> On 2012-03-01, Christopher Currens wrote:
>
> > I agree with Prescott. Make a patch for that sucker! :)
>
> Done
trouble getting cms content to work correctly
>
> Is it safe to add content to the site through the CMS again? Anything to
> be wary of or not explicitly do?
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Took all day, but Joe was there baby
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
