On Feb 14, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Miro Max wrote:
actually i'm using standard analyzer during my index
process. but when i browse the index with luke there
also numbers inside.
which analyzer should i use to eliminate this from my
index or should i specify this in my stopword list?
Don't use a stop word
hi,
actually i'm using standard analyzer during my index
process. but when i browse the index with luke there
also numbers inside.
which analyzer should i use to eliminate this from my
index or should i specify this in my stopword list?
thx
miro
___
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Paul Jans wrote:
Hi again,
So is SqlDirectory recommended for use in a cluster to
workaround the accessibility problem, or are people
using NFS or a standalone server instead?
Neither. As far as I know, Berkeley DB is the only viable DB
implementation currently.
NFS
I would not recommend doing this because absolute score values in Lucene
are not meaningful (e.g., scores are not directly comparable across
searches). The ratio of a score to the highest score returned is
meaningful, but there is no absolute calibration for the highest score
returned, at least at
On Monday 14 February 2005 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on application using Lucene 1.3 , and have to improve
> the current indexation/search methods with the 1.4.3 version.
>
>
> I was thinking to use the FilteredQuery object to refine my chained queries
> but
Hi again,
So is SqlDirectory recommended for use in a cluster to
workaround the accessibility problem, or are people
using NFS or a standalone server instead?
Thanks in advance,
PJ
--- Paul Jans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've already ordered Lucene in Action :)
>
> > There is a LuceneRAR pr
Does anyone have an example of limiting results returned based on a
score threshold? For example if I'm only interested in documents with
a score > 0.05.
Thanks,
-Jay
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jim Lynch wrote:
I was trying to write some documentation on how to use the tool and
issued a search for:
contact:DENNIS MORROW
Is that literally the QueryParser string you entered? If so, that
parses to:
contact:DENNIS OR defaultField:MO
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jim Lynch wrote:
I was trying to write some documentation on how to use the tool and
issued a search for:
contact:DENNIS MORROW
Is that literally the QueryParser string you entered? If so, that
parses to:
contact:DENNIS OR defaultField:MORROW
most likely.
I was trying to write some documentation on how to use the tool and
issued a search for:
contact:DENNIS MORROW
And sure enough I got 647 hits. Then I changed the searc to:
contact:DENNIS MORRO?
And now I get 648 hits, but in some of them the contact doesn't even
remotely resemble the search pat
Otis and Erik,
Thanks for the info. That's a great reference.
Jim.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jim,
The Lucene website is transitioning to the new top-level space. I
have checked out the current site to the new lucene.apache.org area
and set up redirects from the old Jakarta URL's. The source code,
Jim,
The Lucene website is transitioning to the new top-level space. I have
checked out the current site to the new lucene.apache.org area and set
up redirects from the old Jakarta URL's. The source code, though, is
not an official part of the website. Thanks to our conversion to
Subvers
Hi,
lucene.apache.org seems to work now.
Here is the query syntax:
http://lucene.apache.org/queryparsersyntax.html
[] is used as [BEGIN-RANGE-STRING TO END-RANGE-STRING]
Otis
--- Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First I'm getting a
>
>
> The requested URL could not be retrieved
First I'm getting a
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL:
http://lucene.apache.org/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/TestQueryParser.java
The following error was encountered:
> DateField has a utility method to return a String:
>
> DateField.timeToString(file.lastModified())
>
> You'd use that String to pass to Field.UnStored.
>
> I recommend, though, that you use a different format, such as the
> -MM-DD format you're using.
Well, I read -MM-DD format
Hi,
I'm currently working on application using Lucene 1.3 , and have to improve
the current indexation/search methods with the 1.4.3 version.
I was thinking to use the FilteredQuery object to refine my chained queries
but, after some tests, performances are worst :(.
The chained queries were li
hi
is it possible to show a tf idf score beside each hit
Eg i type in a word as a query for example the word
"free" and each file with the word free is named but i
would like the tf idf score to appear beside it?
like this
0. file1.txt tf idf score = 2.16543
is it possible??
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:27 AM, Sanyi wrote:
However, DateFilter will not work on fields indexed as "2004-11-05".
DateFilter only works on fields that were indexed using the DateField.
Well, can you post here a short example?
When I currently type "xxx.UnStored(.." I can simply type
"xxx.DateField(..
> Following up on PA's reply. Yes, DateFilter works on *indexed* values,
> so whether a field is stored or not is irrelevant.
Great news, thanx!
> However, DateFilter will not work on fields indexed as "2004-11-05".
> DateFilter only works on fields that were indexed using the DateField.
Wel
19 matches
Mail list logo
