Hello. I'm using Lucene for an application and I want to boost the title of
my documents.
For that I use the setBoost method that is applied on the title field.
However when I look with luke(1.6) I don't see any boost on this field and
when
I do a search the score isn't change. What's wrong?
Here
Claude Libois writes:
Hello. I'm using Lucene for an application and I want to boost the title of
my documents.
For that I use the setBoost method that is applied on the title field.
However when I look with luke(1.6) I don't see any boost on this field and
when
I do a search the score isn't
I use MultiFieldQueryParser(search only done on summary,title and content)
with a FilteredQuery.
Claude Libois
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical associate - Unisys
- Original Message -
From: Morus Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Users List lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday,
Use the IndexSearcher.explain() feature to look at how Lucene is
calculating the score.
Erik
On Feb 28, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Claude Libois wrote:
I use MultiFieldQueryParser(search only done on summary,title and
content)
with a FilteredQuery.
Claude Libois
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical
Claude Libois writes:
The explanation given by the IndexSearcher indicate me that the boost of my
title is
1.0 where it should be 10.0.
I really don't understand what it's wrong.
AFAIK you cannot get the boost of a field from the index because it's
not stored as such.
It's calculated in the
Follow Up to the article from Friday
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:30 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Search performance with one index vs. many indexes
Jochen Franke writes:
Topic: Search performance with large
Hi All,
Sorry about that please disregard that last email. I must not be fully
awake yet.
Sorry,
Kevin Runde
-Original Message-
From: Runde, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:34 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Search performance with one index vs.
just retrieve Documents from 567100 to 567200 from Hits class you got
while searching.
Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
Guys,
my private investigation already left me sceptic about the outcome of this
issue,
but I've decided to post it as a final resort.
Perhaps the gurus know the right answer :-)
On Feb 28, 2005, at 6:00 AM, Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
my private investigation already left me sceptic about the outcome of
this
issue,
but I've decided to post it as a final resort.
What did you do in your private investigation?
Suppose I have an index of about 5,000,000 docs
and I am running a
On Feb 28, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
What did you do in your private investigation?
1. empirical tests with an index of nearly 75,000 docs (I am attaching
the test source)
Only certain (.txt?) attachments are allowed to come through on the
mailing list.
Sorted by descending
Hello.
I have Dual CPU's box with RH Linux. I run two processes on this box.
1. IndexWriter which adds new documents into index constantly 24/7/365
:)
2. IndexSearcher, which perform searchers from this index.
Sometimes writer begins to merge index (this caused by mergeFactor
and structure of
Chris Hostetter wrote:
1) If making it mutatable requires changes to other classes to propogate
it, then why is it now an instance variable instead of a static?
(Presumably making it an instance variable allows subclasses to
override the value, but if other classes have internal
Just came across this interesting webcast. Check it out.
-- Chakra
Google: A Behind-the-Scenes Look
Search is one of the most important applications used on the internet
and poses some of the most interesting challenges in computer science.
Providing high-quality search requires understanding
13 matches
Mail list logo
