-Message d'origine-
À : LuteNet list
Objet : [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
and the sound is very likely what you would have heard 15 feet from the
lute (or what one of Marco's contemporaries would have heard him playing
from down the banquet table).
I'm not sure about what
Sauvage Valéry wrote:
'm not sure about what you said above, because halls at that time had
tapestry
All of them? Without exception? How do we know this?
and people during banquet were making
much noise... so I believe the result of reverb would have been very
different... ;-)))
I
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
To: LuteNet list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Wednesday, 8 September, 2010, 5:37
On Sep 7, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Narada wrote:
Yes Howard, you are right, I didn't read the notes.
That's what happens with a lot of lute players who get
a
little 'wetness' to the sound, not drowned it.
Very dissapointing.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Ed Durbrow
Sent: 04 April 2010 00:16
To: LuteNet list
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
On Apr 3
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Narada wrote:
I recently purchased this CD.
..but didn't read Paul's insert notes?
The sound quality is awful, it is completely
washed out with 'Hall Reverb' The individual notes can hardly be seperated
in some of the faster passages. This recording needs
, September 07, 2010 1:43 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Narada wrote:
I recently purchased this CD.
..but didn't read Paul's insert notes?
The sound quality is awful, it is completely
washed out with 'Hall Reverb' The individual notes can hardly
-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of howard posner
Sent: 07 September 2010 21:44
To: LuteNet list
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Narada wrote:
I recently purchased this CD.
.but didn't read Paul's insert notes
To: LuteNet list
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Narada wrote:
I recently purchased this CD.
.but didn't read Paul's insert notes?
The sound quality is awful, it is completely
washed out with 'Hall Reverb' The individual notes can hardly be
seperated
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Narada wrote:
I recently purchased this CD.
.but didn't read Paul's insert notes?
The sound quality is awful, it is completely
washed out with 'Hall Reverb' The individual notes can hardly be
seperated
in the booklet exactly the sources..
Greetings
W.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Im
Auftrag von Denys Stephens
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. April 2010 15:08
An: 'lute-cs.dartmouth.edu'
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Marco dall'Aquila / O'Dette
Dear All
Two Schoeps omnis, either the MK2s or the MK2H, depending on the date
of the recording and when the MK2H was available.
Just a guess :)
d
At 01:06 PM 4/3/2010, you wrote:
Not to beat this issue of recorded sound to death, but I just listened
to a CD I'd forgotten I had: The Renaissance
Thanks for that informatinon, d.
Ned
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Dear All,
My apologies for digressing from the interesting discussion on the use of
microphones.
My copy of the Marco CD arrived this morning, and having listened to it
intently,
I agree with many of the sentiments expressed here about the sound,
particularly
when played through a speaker system,
For sure many good recordings have come from the Decca tree set-up (I'm
not sure if I've heard any other than orchestral). I hope d will have
time this summer to put some mixes on line - I'd like to compare them.
Ned
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
Not to beat this issue of recorded sound to death, but I just listened
to a CD I'd forgotten I had: The Renaissance Lute, by Ronn Mc Farlane
on Dorian. To me this is one of the better recent (well, 1994) lute
recordings I've heard. I'm familiar with Dorian as a company well
On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:55 AM, [1]nedma...@aol.com wrote:
I'm sceptical that - assuming the positioning of a
main pair of mics is very good but not perfect - that adding in other
pairs that are necessarily even less well placed will provide
improved
sound.
Like DT said,
Well, the sound is different, that is for sure.
The sound signature is due to multiple reflections and positioning
the mics such that the reflected sound is as strong or stronger than
the direct sound.
However, because it does not sound quite like sitting at the back of
the church, I supect
Well, recorded sound is a matter of taste, to be sure (it seems clear
that there is no reference for good recorded sound). But I would be
curious as to why dt feels so many - 6 or more - mics are necessary for
recording a single instrument. Whether it's multi-micing or too
much
I totally concur, Ned ! 2 excellent mics and proper acoustics are largely
sufficient for a lute !
Jean-Marie
=
== En réponse au message du 02-04-2010, 16:55:11 ==
Well, recorded sound is a matter of taste, to be sure (it seems clear
that there is no
So do I. Generally there are 2 schools of recording: 1/with lots of mics
to catch various plans of the room acoustics which gives later bigger
choices in mixing 2/purist - just pair of stereo mics to sound as
natural as possible. I prefer the latter. Please have a look at the
spacing of mics
Did anyone else have a problem bringing up the site Jaroslaw provided?
I would like to see his microphone set up.
Regarding dt's reasons for using several mics, the ones regarding
malfunctions or surround sound recording make perfect sense (though I'm
sure that any engineer would
P.S. Just to offer a bit of perspective to my previous comments: I've
done quit a number of recordings of violinists, pianists, and chamber
groups (string quartets, piano trios, etc.) with two good (not super)
quality mics and unsophisitcated electronics that resulted in
The additional mics will make it sound better AND more natural, if
used skillfully.
But, as I said before, you can turn them off in post, so you have it
both ways. Why not have it both ways? There can be no good reason to
not put them up, then remove them later if not needed.
Anyone who has
23 matches
Mail list logo
