A small patch to handle characters with diaeresis (as ä and ö) where
" is part of the ERT expression.
Anders
new-patch
Description: Binary data
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
A simple fix, as \ack does not use a counter (it uses \section* internally)
and is output in plural form in DVI.
This could also go in branch. OK?
Jürgen
Index: lib/layouts/elsart.layout
===
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 17:21 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Darren> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:16 +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >> {Ge}^3 is different to
> >>
> >> Ge^3 and G^3 and e^3, which have all the same vertical height.
>
User guide section 5.7.2 Math Text Mode.
Footnote reads: "Moreover, math text mode outputs its contents inside a
\textrm{}, whereas and \mbox (or AMS-LaTeX's \text) might have been a
better choice"
This is wrong because LyX now uses \mbox{}.
Have fun,
Darren
Richard Heck wrote:
> > "Use this paragraph's default alignment (Justified)"
>
> That's fine with me, though I'd suggest "the" instead of "this", as that
> is OK for the multi-paragraph case, too.
Oh no, please don't. Use tooltips for verbose hints (you can't imagine how
long this label will be i
Hi all,
I just added a fresh BibTeX database to a document and found the file
selection dialogue to be utterly baffling.
Is it meant to be like that??
Have fun,
Darren
Hi all,
I just imported a Word document and am now cleaning it up.
I found a curiosity for you: after a subsection heading, there was a
blank line before the next paragraph. I only noticed it because of the
wrong indenting of the next paragraph.
I can't create such a blank line so it's obviously
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 17:01 +0200, Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> I have a feature request: Would it be possible to perform output
> generation in a different thread so that LyX wouldn't freeze while
> compiling? This would be particularly appreciated with big documents
> which take a long time to c
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:44:12AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday 20 June 2007 00:00:06 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>
> >>> The attached patch fixes it. José, OK to commit?
> >>>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:19:47PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
> > > >
> >
> > When I google, I see a lot of
> >
> > defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (__OpenBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
>
> Of c
An update to the previous patch, incorporating a check for a
multi-paragraph selection. I'll commit after rc2, if there is no
objection. I go away Thursday morning on vacation, though, so if rc2 is
not out by then, someone else will have to do it for me
Richard
The attached patch deal
An update to the previous patch, incorporating a check for a
multi-paragraph selection. I'll commit after rc2, if there is no
objection. I go away Thursday morning on vacation, though, so if rc2 is
not out by then, someone else will have to do it for me
Richard
The attached patch
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even mor
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, after rereading your previous mail I got it. Would be good to put a
better documentation there like:
// Spaces at line breaks in bidi text can appear visually in the middle
// of a row and must be skipped during painting:
// * logically "abc_[HEBREW_\nHEBREW]"
//
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> José Matos wrote:
>> Yes.
Jürgen> Thanks. I'm done with my patches now (I wait witth the one for
Jürgen> bug 3915 unless Jean-Marc and I have come to a conclusion).
I think the latest patch is better than what we had previo
Am 26.06.2007 um 21:25 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
+// If the last logical character is a separator, skip it,
unless
+// it's in the last row of a paragraph
+if (end > 0 && end < par.size() && par.isSeparator(end - 1))
+skipped_sep_vpos = bidi.log2vis(
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Is it correct that this line remains untouched?
Peter> #if SIZEOF_WCHAR_T != 4 && defined(__GNUC__) &&
Peter> defined(__GNUC_MINOR__) && __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 4
No, and I do not know how I missed it. I think it should b
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Here a updated patch with the scons changes. Should I apply? Or
Peter> comes JMarc back before RC2?
I was waiting for a confirmation that the patch works for FreeBSD...
Now I guess LyX will not configure itself correctly with cmake.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dov Feldstern schrieb:
Thanks for taking care of the lyx2lyx stuff! I added the requisite
comment to the FORMAT file --- could you just check your name (I'm not
sure my accents are correct) and email?
The name is fine there.
Btw. Why do you have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] email ad
José,
(when) should we update all LyX files to the latest file format?
Michael
Le 26 juin 07 à 17:55, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:15:32 Richard Heck wrote:
May I file an enhancement at bugzilla? (I didn't find any
dealing with
this)
Of course.
This subject has been discussed here before I would be surprised
if this is n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: spitz
Date: Mon Jun 25 15:49:51 2007
New Revision: 18885
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18885
Log:
Fix bug 1749. CAUTION: lyx2lyx not fully working yet (see FIXMEs).
José, isn't lyx2lyx your hobby-horse :-)
Michael
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:44:12AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 00:00:06 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The attached patch fixes it. José, OK to commit?
The patch seems right. If you someone to test this and guarantee that it
works (
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Here's another RTL regression --- I think this should be really easy to
solve for anyone familiar with the painting code. I'd be happy to try
and help out if necessary.
http://bugz
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
+// If the last logical character is a separator, skip it, unless
+// it's in the last row of a paragraph
+if (end > 0 && end < par.size() && par.isSeparator(end - 1))
+skipped_sep_vpos = bidi.log2vis(end - 1);
I thought it's about the visually last
On 6/26/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
> >
When I google, I see a lot of
defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (__OpenBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
Of course I meant FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Bo
> Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
>
When I google, I see a lot of
defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (__OpenBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
so I guess we should use these forms. Also, has anyone checked open bsd?
Bo
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>>> According to http://www.netbsd.org/about/roadmap.html, this is also
>>> true for NetBSD, so I would also add "&& !defined(__NetBSD__)" there.
>> Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
>>
>> Bo
>>
>
> Seems he is right:
> http://predef.sourceforge
Bo Peng wrote:
>> According to http://www.netbsd.org/about/roadmap.html, this is also
>> true for NetBSD, so I would also add "&& !defined(__NetBSD__)" there.
>
> Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
>
> Bo
>
Seems he is right:
http://predef.sourceforge.net/preos.html#sec23
And th
According to http://www.netbsd.org/about/roadmap.html, this is also
true for NetBSD, so I would also add "&& !defined(__NetBSD__)" there.
Are you sure about the name here? Not __NETBSD__?
Bo
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:38:01PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> >On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
> >
> >So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem?
> >;-)
>
> none
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 04:46:39PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>> AFAIR one proposed solution implied the use of boost support for threads.
>> This would hide the platform specific details.
>
> Do boost threads work nowadays on Windows?
Yes, also on Windows CE ;)
>
> I wa
On 6/26/07, Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>> On 6/26/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
>>>
>>> The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>> On 6/26/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
>>>
>>> The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit
>>> configure.ac. I have
>>> all other the changes com
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 04:46:39PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> AFAIR one proposed solution implied the use of boost support for threads.
> This would hide the platform specific details.
Do boost threads work nowadays on Windows?
I was under the impression that they use pthreads there, which "wo
José Matos wrote:
> Hi all,
> as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
>
> The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit configure.ac. I
> have
> all other the changes committed.
>
> In normal conditions I will release rc2 in less than 3 hours I am
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even more verbose:
"Use thi
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
none really, i just thought i noticed some inconsistency between this
mail and a pre
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
--
José Abílio
Bo Peng wrote:
> On 6/26/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
>>
>> The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit
>> configure.ac. I have
>> all other the changes committed.
>>
>
> OK. I have co
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
Richard Heck wrote:
changes the label to "Default for Current Paragraph"---I think that
> makes it a little clearer to users what this does---and makes some
> space for adding "(Justifed)" without alignment issues.
May I suggest to name it
Built-in Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justifie
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
--
José Abílio
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some sugg
José Matos wrote:
> Yes.
Thanks. I'm done with my patches now (I wait witth the one for bug 3915 unless
Jean-Marc and I have come to a conclusion).
Jürgen
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:31:48 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> Can I commit my patches where you gave your OK today?
>
> Jürgen
Yes.
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> > Jürgen
>
> OK.
Done as well. Now only the patch for bug 3915 is missing. But this can also be
committed after rc2.
Jürgen
José Matos wrote:
> > Approved by Uwe. OK to commit?
>
> OK.
done.
Jürgen
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 04:47:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> +/*
> + * the FreeBSD libc uses UCS4, but libstdc++ has no proper wchar_t
> + * support compiled in:
> + * http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html#3_9
> + * And we are not interested at all what libc
> + * does:
I'm not sure I'll be able to follow closely in the next days, so unless
someone else wants to take care of it I prefer to leave it for 1.5.x (soon
I hope ;-))
I agree. Let us just push 1.5.0 out...
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that this will fail if the commands already contain quotes. You
> may want at least to add a FIXME in the code to this effect. It would
> be possible to use LyXLex::quoteString to produce properly quoted
> commands, but then FuncRequest::split would have to use Le
José Matos wrote:
> In normal conditions I will release rc2 in less than 3 hours I am just
> waiting for replies to this message before going gold.
Can I commit my patches where you gave your OK today?
Jürgen
On 6/26/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit configure.ac. I
have
all other the changes committed.
OK. I have commit the scons part of the configure
José Matos wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2007 19:50:41 Bo Peng wrote:
>>
>> Then you have a combined OK from Abdel and me, you need to wait for
>> Jose's.
>>
>> Jose: This looks like 1.5.x stuff but showing where the cursor is in
>> the view source window is a nice thing to have.
>
> I was tempted
Le 26 juin 07 à 17:15, Richard Heck a écrit :
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
I have a feature request: Would it be possible to perform output
generation in a different thread so that LyX wouldn't freeze while
compiling? This would be particularly appreciated with big
documents which take a long tim
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:11:26 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Fixed in r18741.
> Fixed in r18774.
> Fixed in 18742.
> Fixed in 18737.
>
> Stefan
OK. Nice to know. :-)
--
José Abílio
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> José Matos wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:15:32 Richard Heck wrote:
> >>> May I file an enhancement at bugzilla? (I didn't find any dealing with
> >>> this)
> >> Of course.
> > This subject has been discussed here before I would be
> > surpri
Hi all,
as discussed in this list I would like to release rc2 today.
The only thing that needs to be done now is to commit configure.ac. I
have
all other the changes committed.
In normal conditions I will release rc2 in less than 3 hours I am just
waiting for replies to
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some suggestions of Helge's. A screenshot is attached.
This separa
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Yes and at least two preliminary implementations exist:
> - one from Peter K. using threads with possibly the shortcomings
> described below by Richard.
Mmmm...
> - one from myself using the same forked controller as the one used for
> graphics conversion.
I like this
Am 26.06.2007 um 16:18 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
Fixed in r18741.
* [patch] Up/down cursor in ma
Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:47 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> would find something there, it was a funny thing to do. Remember that
>> at that time, the whole unpacked source was 700k (now: 55M), and there
>> was only one documentation file :)
>
> Also only one develop
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:15:32 Richard Heck wrote:
May I file an enhancement at bugzilla? (I didn't find any dealing with
this)
Of course.
This subject has been discussed here before I would be surprised if this is
not on bugzilla, or at at least in the wiki.
Yes and
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:04:31PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
> > whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
> > For sure this affects Windows syst
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:15:32 Richard Heck wrote:
> >
> > May I file an enhancement at bugzilla? (I didn't find any dealing with
> > this)
>
> Of course.
This subject has been discussed here before I would be surprised if this is
not on bugzilla, or at at least in the wiki.
> This is not di
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
I have a feature request: Would it be possible to perform output
generation in a different thread so that LyX wouldn't freeze while
compiling? This would be particularly appreciated with big documents
which take a long time to come up.
May I file an enhancement at bugzil
I have a feature request: Would it be possible to perform output
generation in a different thread so that LyX wouldn't freeze while
compiling? This would be particularly appreciated with big documents
which take a long time to come up.
May I file an enhancement at bugzilla? (I didn't find a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I like it (fixes a bug, does useful cleanup). You should probably remove
> the // finally, invoke the DEPM
> comment which looks a bit strange in such a small method.
Done.
> OK
I commited it.
A/
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Yes. But I think that a comment should be added in configure.ac
Georg> why FreeBSD is excluded, probably pointing to the libstdc++ bug
Georg> report (or the lyx-devel thread). Then it will be easy to check
Georg> whether the FreeBSD ex
If the patch works, similar changes should be done to cmake and scons.
The scons part is easy:
Index: development/scons/SConstruct
===
--- development/scons/SConstruct(revision 18892)
+++ development/scons/SConstruct
Le 26 juin 07 à 14:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mael> I attached a patch for that. It adds some definitions for
Mael> '\listXXXname' and '\listofXXXs' in the preamble (with 'XXX' for
Mael> every non builtin float), and generates a '\li
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
> why not:
>
> * [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
> * [patch] Up/down cursor in math-macro jumps out of the macro, #3830
> * [patch] fixing
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
> whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
> For sure this affects Windows systems with a Portuguese locale and
> maybe others. The patch is pretty
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> >
> >> --- src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.h(revision 18812)
> >> +++ src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.h(working copy)
> >> @@
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:18:37PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
> > fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
> > Jürgen's current fixes are in (bu
> I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
> Georg.
>
> Also as far as I understood, the fix can be committed after 1.5.0. This is a
> sensitive area and I want to play safe here. If for any reason I am mistaken
> please let me know. :-)
i guess this one's for
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:39:05 Georg Baum wrote:
> Yes. But I think that a comment should be added in configure.ac why FreeBSD
> is excluded, probably pointing to the libstdc++ bug report (or the
> lyx-devel thread). Then it will be easy to check whether the FreeBSD
> exclusion can be removed or
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:26:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
> >
> > Annoying? Yes. Should be fixed? Yes. Unusable? No. It will simply
> > translate captions to ERT, that is all.
>
> wan't there a patch by hangzai ?
I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
Georg.
Als
Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 14:17 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3537
>
> This bug comes from the fact that FreeBSD (in it current incarnations
> at least) does not have proper support for wchar_t.
>
> I did not rename LIBC_WCTYPE_USES_UCS4 to something
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > > Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
> >
> > This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
> > unusable:
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > > Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
> >
> > This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
> > unusable:
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Sorry, accidental key press sent message before complete. See below
On 6/26/07, Alexander Streit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know it was pointed out that 1.5 RC1 had some bugs with pressing
enter, but as of this writing 1.5 RC2 hasn't been released yet and so
I'm reporting this in case it is un
How many serious bugs are left? Glancing at the wiki page, I see the
following:
* 4 critical issues
* 32 regression issues
* 14 major issues
* 32 other issues
Any comments on these?
I guess Jose can look through the list and identify must-fix ones so
that people can have a look. If these bugs c
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
> fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
> Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753)).
I agree. I have committed the bugfix to 33
I know it was pointed out that 1.5 RC1 had some bugs with pressing
enter, but as of this writing 1.5 RC2 hasn't been released yet and so
I'm reporting this in case it is unfixed. Previous crashes on pressing
enter didn't give me any error messages, but this time I do have some
errors:
wrong pos 7
On Thursday 31 May 2007 22:02:17 Anders Ekberg wrote:
>
> Nice!
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Anders
I have committed this.
--
José Abílio
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Looks good Alfredo but one question: why don't you just move
>> deleteEmptyParagraphMechanism() to paragraph_funcs as well? Same
>> thing for Text::fixCursorAfterDelete(), this has nothing to do
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mael> I attached a patch for that. It adds some definitions for
Mael> '\listXXXname' and '\listofXXXs' in the preamble (with 'XXX' for
Mael> every non builtin float), and generates a '\listofXXXs' in place
Mael> of the '\listof{XXX}{}'.
D
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Looks good Alfredo but one question: why don't you just move
deleteEmptyParagraphMechanism() to paragraph_funcs as well? Same thing
for Text::fixCursorAfterDelete(), this has nothing to do with Text
AFAIS...
I see your point. However, I think
Le 25 juin 07 à 18:50, Mael Hilléreau a écrit :
Le 23 juin 07 à 22:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be
Mael> something like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'.
I just double checked that here it outputs
\listof{algorithm}{Li
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3537
This bug comes from the fact that FreeBSD (in it current incarnations
at least) does not have proper support for wchar_t.
I did not rename LIBC_WCTYPE_USES_UCS4 to something more readable like
USE_WCHAR_T. Should I?
Koji, does the patch work for you?
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753))
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Looks good Alfredo but one question: why don't you just move
> deleteEmptyParagraphMechanism() to paragraph_funcs as well? Same thing
> for Text::fixCursorAfterDelete(), this has nothing to do with Text
> AFAIS...
I see your point. However, I think they don't belong to
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> The problem has nothing to do with env depths, just with cut/past
>> of empty paragraphs. The problem is that Text::acceptChanges on the
>> internal cut/paste paragraph list calls DEPM and this
> "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:47 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> would find something there, it was a funny thing to do. Remember
>> that at that time, the whole unpacked source was 700k (now: 55M),
>> and there was only one doc
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
The problem has nothing to do with env depths, just with cut/past of empty
paragraphs. The problem is that Text::acceptChanges on the internal
cut/paste paragraph list calls DEPM and this removes an empty paragraph at
the beginning.
The fix i
On 6/26/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So now we have patch in one place and the explanation in another
place...
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=1927&action=view
;-)
If only the list wouldn't take 1 hour to get my message in...
A/
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Seems DEPM was not called after insertion, the following
Alfredo> change to pasteParagraphList (included in the patch) seems to
Alfredo> fix it:
Alfredo> - text->setCursor(cur.top(), ppp.first, ppp.second); +
Alfredo> text
On Monday 25 June 2007 19:50:41 Bo Peng wrote:
>
> Then you have a combined OK from Abdel and me, you need to wait for Jose's.
>
> Jose: This looks like 1.5.x stuff but showing where the cursor is in
> the view source window is a nice thing to have.
I was tempted to say yes, but then I saw Alfre
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:47 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> would find something there, it was a funny thing to do. Remember that
> at that time, the whole unpacked source was 700k (now: 55M), and there
> was only one documentation file :)
Also only one developer, minimum inline documentation
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo