Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> >> The current status is now (see the docs list for details): >> >> - Pedro Neves proposed some different

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > >> > >> Unfortunately I overlooked

Re: [patch] update layout for acmsiggraph

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:11:56AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > This decision is not forever, I mean we can switch to another one in case > problems arise during the 2.2.x life cycle. Yes we have a good foundation for future discussion. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Layout Files for Incompatible Class Files

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:37:00PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a > clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago, > discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in > Development.lyx,

Layout Files for Incompatible Class Files

It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago, discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in Development.lyx, namely: > Every now and then, there are changes to LaTeX document classes

Re: po-files with trailing

Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2016 um 23:58:20, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system. > > Yes, this was me. > as described in our file README.localization I did: > > " > - on Windows:

Re: [patch] update layout for acmsiggraph

Am 06.04.2016 um 00:27 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: 1. discussion This is where we are at now. We are discussing a topic that is at least 5 years old. Yes, and we are now already discussing this for more than 2 months. I don't understand why so much time is necessary to come to a decision.

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not personal anymore. Just move them to lib/doc, don't be shy. OK. Since I am a bit out of the development project I fear I can break something in Git short before a release.

Re: po-files with trailing

Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko: Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system. Yes, this was me. as described in our file README.localization I did: " - on Windows: either build the update-po target in MSVC or run the command: msbuild

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

On 2016-04-06, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> There was well based objection to the proposal of a new version-layout by >> Georg in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/161202 from >> 28 March: >> Before discussing the case of incompatible versions with the same name

Re: possible tag and tar of 2.2.0rc1 on Tuesday

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> >> Unfortunately I overlooked something in the portuguese translation, I >> hope I'll get an answer today, so

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

Guenter Milde wrote: > There was well based objection to the proposal of a new version-layout by > Georg in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/161202 from > 28 March: > > Before discussing the case of incompatible versions with the same name > further, I'd like to see an

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

Dear Scott, On 2016-04-06, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-04-06, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> > The only question would be whether it is >>> > allowed to change translatable strings (we are past string freeze). Below is a minimal patch for the acmsiggraph template that incorporates changes for

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

On 2016-04-06, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/05/2016 01:06 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-04-05, Richard Heck wrote: >>> On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> +1 no new document class cluttering the selection list >>>(especially as this is an "exotic" class (not on CTAN, not in

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version? (was: patch for aastex6)

On 2016-04-06, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:15:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > The only question would be whether it is >> > allowed to change translatable strings (we are past string freeze). >> What have

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

Dear all, On 2016-04-06, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/05/2016 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Guenter Milde wrote: This point (do we allow a new layout version when there is no change in the *.cls file name) was still

Re: po-files with trailing

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO. > > Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent > to po-upda...@lyx.org and care for them in the long term fashion... > Pavel Yes, fixing the python script