Re: towards the release of LyX 2.1

Op 19-2-2013 10:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 19/02/2013 08:01, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Of course, I did not disappear without a trace.. Oh, look, a trace! JMarc Hmm.. I didn't mean to say that I disappeared with a trace, either. Vincent

Re: towards the release of LyX 2.1

Op 18-2-2013 8:17, Pavel Sanda schreef: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Pavel, would you again like to take care as release maintainer? My private thought is that releasing 2.1 before meeting will hurt its stability due to the time left. My official statement is here

Re: towards the release of LyX 2.1

Op 18-2-2013 8:17, Pavel Sanda schreef: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Pavel, would you again like to take care as release maintainer? My private thought is that releasing 2.1 before meeting will hurt its stability due to the time left. My official statement is here

Re: make initial configure part of install (esp. Windows) ?

Op 21-1-2013 23:42, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 21.01.2013 04:12, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: LyX is already configured even twice during the installation. Good to hear. Is this new or has it always been like this? This is new since January 3 this year. Before that day the installer suffered from

Re: make initial configure part of install (esp. Windows) ?

Op 21-1-2013 23:42, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 21.01.2013 04:12, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: LyX is already configured even twice during the installation. Good to hear. Is this new or has it always been like this? This is new since January 3 this year. Before that day the installer suffered from

Re: [LyX master] Adapt format to lyx-files in tex2lyx-tests

Op 31 dec. 2012 18:51 schreef Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org het volgende: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 297d534fdda7b497b8a0a3362f20bc1b7ac86808 Author: Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Date: Mon Dec 31

Re: [LyX master] Adapt format to lyx-files in tex2lyx-tests

Op 31 dec. 2012 18:51 schreef "Kornel Benko" het volgende: > > The branch, master, has been updated. > > - Log - > > commit 297d534fdda7b497b8a0a3362f20bc1b7ac86808 > Author: Kornel Benko > Date:

Re: [LyX master] Split roundtrip tests (at least on cmake build) to show better grained output

Op 14-12-2012 19:08, Kornel Benko schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 2b66f1b1aca8661d9aca0adca1f5db769c8dc9eb Author: Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Date: Fri Dec 14 19:07:28 2012 +0100 Split

Re: [LyX master] Split roundtrip tests (at least on cmake build) to show better grained output

Op 14-12-2012 19:08, Kornel Benko schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 2b66f1b1aca8661d9aca0adca1f5db769c8dc9eb Author: Kornel Benko Date: Fri Dec 14 19:07:28 2012 +0100 Split

Re: [LyX master] apa6 layout: update format, categorize properly, and whitespace.

Op 29-12-2012 11:09, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 592a7d2144a6e56de50b9de352e907565bb7c18f Author: Juergen Spitzmueller sp...@lyx.org Date: Sat Dec 29 11:09:10 2012 +0100

Re: [LyX master] apa6 layout: update format, categorize properly, and whitespace.

Op 29-12-2012 11:09, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 592a7d2144a6e56de50b9de352e907565bb7c18f Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Sat Dec 29 11:09:10 2012 +0100

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

Op 27-12-2012 23:27, Nico Williams schreef: On Dec 27, 2012 3:07 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org mailto:v...@lyx.org wrote: You can correct almost everything with git. Just don't push a wrong tag, ... Right, because deleting a branch or tag, or making a branch name refer

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

Op 27-12-2012 23:27, Nico Williams schreef: On Dec 27, 2012 3:07 PM, "Vincent van Ravesteijn" <v...@lyx.org <mailto:v...@lyx.org>> wrote: > You can correct almost everything with git. Just don't push a wrong tag, ... Right, because deleting a branch or tag, or m

Re: Faithful LyX2XML conversion

We are on completely different ground if we start discussion about using XML as native format. I'm sceptic that your approach would be used, but that was just IMHO, we use pythonic lyx2lyx creature right now after all. At the moment there is no one who really works on this goal and as you could

Re: [LyX master] Do not force latex_language in arguments (bug #8471)

Op 27-12-2012 11:05, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 258280cecf0cf2e1f31e7f9136165a7dc494192d Author: Juergen Spitzmueller sp...@lyx.org Date: Thu Dec 27 11:05:39 2012 +0100

Cross-referencing ?

We already support some form of cross-referencing, but AFAICS this only works for documents that are included in the same master document. However, the cross-references dialog box allows to select any other document. It looks to me that we either have to disallow to refer to a label in a

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

Op 27-12-2012 16:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 26/12/12 13:13, Alessandro Di Federico a écrit : Our plan is to make the user conference on Monday 13th of May, in the afternoon. So we could have the dev meeting the previous day, on Sunday 12th of May. Rough plan: - Saturday May 11th:

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

Yes, that is what I am trying to achieve, but I was worried that deleting the 2.0.5.1 branch would invalidate the tag. I guess not? I'm definitely not a git expert. Considering this, there is not much difference between a branch and a tag. git prune will prune all unreachable objects using

Re: Faithful LyX2XML conversion

We are on completely different ground if we start discussion about using XML as native format. I'm sceptic that your approach would be used, but that was just IMHO, we use pythonic lyx2lyx creature right now after all. At the moment there is no one who really works on this goal and as you could

Re: [LyX master] Do not force latex_language in arguments (bug #8471)

Op 27-12-2012 11:05, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 258280cecf0cf2e1f31e7f9136165a7dc494192d Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Thu Dec 27 11:05:39 2012 +0100

Cross-referencing ?

We already support some form of cross-referencing, but AFAICS this only works for documents that are included in the same master document. However, the cross-references dialog box allows to select any other document. It looks to me that we either have to disallow to refer to a label in a

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

Op 27-12-2012 16:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 26/12/12 13:13, Alessandro Di Federico a écrit : Our plan is to make the user conference on Monday 13th of May, in the afternoon. So we could have the dev meeting the previous day, on Sunday 12th of May. Rough plan: - Saturday May 11th:

Re: Git Procedure for 2.0.5.1

Yes, that is what I am trying to achieve, but I was worried that deleting the 2.0.5.1 branch would invalidate the tag. I guess not? I'm definitely not a git expert. Considering this, there is not much difference between a branch and a tag. "git prune" will prune all unreachable objects using

Re: Impending String Freeze

Op 22-12-2012 17:40, Richard Heck schreef: I am intending to release 2.0.6 as soon as we can, due to bug #8423, now fixed in branch. If you have any string-changing commits you'd like to make, please make them as soon as possible. I'll announce the string freeze around Christmas. I know

Re: [PATCH] move row for tabular

Op 22-12-2012 7:05, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 12/21/2012 03:11 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Wrong patch. Sorry about that. Correct patch attached. Thanks, Scott diff --git a/lib/bind/cua.bind b/lib/bind/cua.bind index

Re: Impending String Freeze

Op 22-12-2012 17:40, Richard Heck schreef: I am intending to release 2.0.6 as soon as we can, due to bug #8423, now fixed in branch. If you have any string-changing commits you'd like to make, please make them as soon as possible. I'll announce the string freeze around Christmas. I know

Re: [PATCH] move row for tabular

Op 22-12-2012 7:05, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 12/21/2012 03:11 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Wrong patch. Sorry about that. Correct patch attached. Thanks, Scott diff --git a/lib/bind/cua.bind b/lib/bind/cua.bind index

Re: [LyX master] Make the \item command in lists customizable

Op 19-12-2012 16:55, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit c3aa7181517fc7fe6c8a4cdd8e0b96c033ed64ee Author: Juergen Spitzmueller sp...@lyx.org Date: Wed Dec 19 16:55:22 2012 +0100

Re: [LyX master] Make the \item command in lists customizable

Op 19-12-2012 16:55, Juergen Spitzmueller schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit c3aa7181517fc7fe6c8a4cdd8e0b96c033ed64ee Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Wed Dec 19 16:55:22 2012 +0100

[PATCH 1/3] Add custom target to run tests

--- CMakeLists.txt | 11 +++ src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt |1 + src/tex2lyx/test/CMakeLists.txt |1 + 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 7d1992d..4616ba8 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++

[PATCH 0/3] Proposal for changes in the test framework

, the tests are scattered throughout the tree. Any comments ? Vincent van Ravesteijn (3): Add custom target to run tests Change style of tests Fix filetools test for Windows CMakeLists.txt| 11 +++ src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt | 13 +--- src/support/tests

[PATCH 2/3] Change style of tests

--- src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt | 12 +--- src/support/tests/check_convert.cpp | 128 src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp | 11 ++-- src/support/tests/check_lstrings.cpp | 23 +++--- src/support/tests/regfiles/convert| 49 -

[PATCH 3/3] Fix filetools test for Windows

--- src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp | 21 ++--- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp b/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp index e4e895a..f641fad 100644 --- a/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp +++

Hint on applying patches send to the list

Hi all, Just a little hint if you want to try out patches that are sent to the list. [Thunderbird on Windows] Drag and drop the e-mail containing the patch to the explorer. Thunderbird will save the message as an .eml file. Then, git am filename.eml will apply the patch. [GMane and Linux]

[PATCH 1/3] Add custom target to run tests

--- CMakeLists.txt | 11 +++ src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt |1 + src/tex2lyx/test/CMakeLists.txt |1 + 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 7d1992d..4616ba8 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++

[PATCH 0/3] Proposal for changes in the test framework

, the tests are scattered throughout the tree. Any comments ? Vincent van Ravesteijn (3): Add custom target to run tests Change style of tests Fix filetools test for Windows CMakeLists.txt| 11 +++ src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt | 13 +--- src/support/tests

[PATCH 2/3] Change style of tests

--- src/support/tests/CMakeLists.txt | 12 +--- src/support/tests/check_convert.cpp | 128 src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp | 11 ++-- src/support/tests/check_lstrings.cpp | 23 +++--- src/support/tests/regfiles/convert| 49 -

[PATCH 3/3] Fix filetools test for Windows

--- src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp | 21 ++--- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp b/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp index e4e895a..f641fad 100644 --- a/src/support/tests/check_filetools.cpp +++

Hint on applying patches send to the list

Hi all, Just a little hint if you want to try out patches that are sent to the list. [Thunderbird on Windows] Drag and drop the e-mail containing the patch to the explorer. Thunderbird will save the message as an .eml file. Then, "git am .eml" will apply the patch. [GMane and Linux] "wget

Re: Where to use qt4 (Re: Export-to fails for xhtml)

Op 11-12-2012 13:09, Pavel Sanda schreef: Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Yes, everything compiles fine. Also ColorCache.h was not giving any trouble, till I included it in graphics/PreviewLoader.cpp, because then gcc complained it cannot find QColor nor QPalette (and I had to add the QtGui/). Yes I

Re: Where to use qt4 (Re: Export-to fails for xhtml)

Op 11-12-2012 13:09, Pavel Sanda schreef: Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Yes, everything compiles fine. Also ColorCache.h was not giving any trouble, till I included it in graphics/PreviewLoader.cpp, because then gcc complained it cannot find QColor nor QPalette (and I had to add the QtGui/). Yes I

Re: Export-to fails for xhtml

Op 12 dec. 2012 20:45 schreef Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de het volgende: Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: As in the prior patch, an alternative to this problem at all is the one to simply remove the --fg and --bg options to the command-line invoking the external command. Someone

Re: Export-to fails for xhtml

Op 12 dec. 2012 20:45 schreef "Georg Baum" het volgende: > > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > As in the prior patch, an alternative to this problem at all is the one to > > simply remove the "--fg" and "--bg" options to the command-line invoking > > the external

Re: Expected behavior of set bottom line in tabular?

Op 8-12-2012 8:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Below I describe two situations which surprised me and I'm not sure what the expected behavior should be. Situation 1: - Start a new table, say 4x4. - Click on a cell in the second-to-last row. - Click the set bottom line button in the toolbar.

Re: Expected behavior of "set bottom line" in tabular?

Op 8-12-2012 8:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Below I describe two situations which surprised me and I'm not sure what the expected behavior should be. Situation 1: - Start a new table, say 4x4. - Click on a cell in the second-to-last row. - Click the "set bottom line" button in the toolbar.

Re: an idea to improve lyx

Op 6-12-2012 17:23, Bruno schreef: Hi, I had been using latex for a while but I switched to lyx because of its interesting features. Being able to see mathematical expressions you write is really practical. And I had an idea which could I think make it even much faster and user-friendly. Now,

Re: an idea to improve lyx

Op 6-12-2012 17:23, Bruno schreef: Hi, I had been using latex for a while but I switched to lyx because of its interesting features. Being able to see mathematical expressions you write is really practical. And I had an idea which could I think make it even much faster and user-friendly. Now,

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

Op 21-11-2012 15:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Hi there, A month ago, when Alessandro Di Federico mentioned that he was doing a LyX user conference on LyX in April at the Politecnico di Milano, I foolishly answered that it would be great to do a developer meeting at the same time. One

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

Op 21-11-2012 15:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Hi there, A month ago, when Alessandro Di Federico mentioned that he was doing a LyX user conference on LyX in April at the Politecnico di Milano, I foolishly answered that it would be great to do a developer meeting at the same time. One

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.0.5

Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef: We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Why is the Windows release a rar file ? Vincent

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.0.5

Op 12-11-2012 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef: We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Why is the Windows release a rar file ? Vincent Something went awfully wrong

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.0.5

Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef: We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Why is the Windows release a rar file ? Vincent

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.0.5

Op 12-11-2012 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef: We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Why is the Windows release a rar file ? Vincent Something went awfully wrong

Re: Windows Binaries?

Op 8-11-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But I used the meantime to iron out some issues users reported to me. Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the

Re: Windows Binaries?

Op 8-11-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 08.11.2012 00:49, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But I used the meantime to iron out some issues users reported to me. Below is the changelog since LyX 2.0.4. I followed most of the

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

- to be able to run the executable, it should be installed along with the necessary dlls, *This point still remains. Either: - I have to copy the dlls manually to the bin directory, - or I have to call check_convert.exe from the directory where the dlls are. This is the same as for

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

> - to be able to run the executable, it should be installed along with the > necessary dlls, > *This point still remains. Either: - I have to copy the dlls manually to the bin directory, - or I have to call check_convert.exe from the directory where the dlls are. This is the same as for

Re: Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

Yes, but nonetheless I'd like to have it resolved. I would like to know: Is the problem in * Compiling: maybe a missing include reference (something not defined?) * Linking: maybe missing needed library (which externals are not resolved?) Kornel Last time I checked I had the

Re: Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

> > > > > Yes, but nonetheless I'd like to have it resolved. > > I would like to know: > > > > Is the problem in > > * Compiling: maybe a missing include reference (something not defined?) > > * Linking: maybe missing needed library (which externals are not resolved?) > > > > > Kornel > Last

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct .vcxproj for the frontend_qt4 project. The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are being included twice. The solution is to not include the header files.

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct .vcxproj for the frontend_qt4 project. The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are being included twice. The solution is to not include the header files.

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help About LyX Version

Op 11-10-2012 23:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 11/10/12 12:46, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I'm still not sure what should be done here. I don't see the point of having it for developers only -- can't developers always just run --version? Maybe having it available in the build info tab is

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help > About LyX > Version

Op 11-10-2012 23:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 11/10/12 12:46, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I'm still not sure what should be done here. I don't see the point of having it for developers only -- can't developers always just run --version? Maybe having it available in the build info tab is

Re: Re: Tests in src/support/tests

These tests do not work on Windows (AFAICS). Could you disable them then in the CmakeLists ? Vincent Yes, of course. Wouldn't it be better to try to make them work? I didn't follow the mailing list last few months, so I don't know exactly what the purpose of those tests are.

Re: Re: Tests in src/support/tests

> > > These tests do not work on Windows (AFAICS). > > > > > > Could you disable them then in the CmakeLists ? > > > > > > Vincent > > > > Yes, of course. Wouldn't it be better to try to make them work? > I didn't follow the mailing list last few months, so I don't know exactly what the purpose

Re: Tests in src/support/tests

Op 5-10-2012 12:39, Kornel Benko schreef: Hi, I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build. But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would like to omit in cmake build. Could they please be rewritten to work in build-tree? Kornel Hi Kornel, These

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help About LyX Version

Op 3-10-2012 12:10, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 01/10/2012 08:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : This might encourage users to post this

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

Op 7-10-2012 1:39, Sebastian Audet schreef: On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct .vcxproj for the frontend_qt4 project. The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are being included twice. The solution is to not include the header files. A

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help About LyX Version

Op 8-10-2012 21:07, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I would prefer to have this tab only visible when DEVEL_VERSION is set. This doesn't provide much help in the released version. Multiple times we had bug reports where users were not able report Qt libs used. IIRC

Re: Tests in src/support/tests

Op 5-10-2012 12:39, Kornel Benko schreef: Hi, I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build. But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would like to omit in cmake build. Could they please be rewritten to work in build-tree? Kornel Hi Kornel, These

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help > About LyX > Version

Op 3-10-2012 12:10, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 01/10/2012 08:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : This might encourage users to post this

Re: Error in build process on Windows 7, using Visual Studio 2012

Op 7-10-2012 1:39, Sebastian Audet schreef: On Windows 7, the cmake build process fails to generate a correct .vcxproj for the frontend_qt4 project. The problem is that Visual Studio decided that the header files are being included twice. The solution is to not include the header files. A

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Make text selectable in Help > About LyX > Version

Op 8-10-2012 21:07, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I would prefer to have this tab only visible when DEVEL_VERSION is set. This doesn't provide much help in the released version. Multiple times we had bug reports where users were not able report Qt libs used. IIRC

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 25-9-2012 10:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 25-9-2012 10:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 24/09/12 19:33, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of communication. It is Stephan's code, which you committed.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] Fix bug #8349: Cannot compile 2.0.x: unresolved external symbol

Op 24-9-2012 16:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: That's amusing. This is a patch from Stephan that I backported, and it looks like Stephan did the backport, which does not help communication. Just get used to a more advanced form of communication. It is Stephan's code, which you committed.

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Even if we add an option Surpass the LaTeX package installation what do you expect a new user who has never worked with LaTeX nor know what LaTeX is will do? Surpass? A nice combination of bypass and suppress. Yeah.. cool huh. The reason why I don't accept this installer now is that:

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0 used on branch, -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1 used in trunk. Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to avoid

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Even if we add an option "Surpass the LaTeX package installation" what do you expect a new user who has never worked with LaTeX nor know what LaTeX is will do? "Surpass"? A nice combination of "bypass" and "suppress". Yeah.. cool huh. The reason why I don't accept this installer now

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0" used on branch, "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1" used in trunk. Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 1-7-2012 2:12, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Verb is such an exceptional case that it might deserve its own function in which this exception is made instead of adding more if-clauses. Verb is special in that it treats the backslash as a normal character; outside verb this exception should not be

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 1-7-2012 2:12, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Verb is such an exceptional case that it might deserve its own function in which this exception is made instead of adding more if-clauses. Verb is special in that it treats the backslash as a normal character; outside verb this exception should not be

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 30-6-2012 3:25, Uwe Stöhr schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 80884330d1221a08699b00e64181eb18cc6ce783 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Sat Jun 30 03:25:19 2012 +0200 tex2lyx: fix

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 30-6-2012 15:17, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 30.06.2012 11:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 1. This must be next_next_token() I also thought this first. But as \ is not found .asCharacter so that we have in case of +\+ + \+ current_token skipped next_token

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 30-6-2012 3:25, Uwe Stöhr schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 80884330d1221a08699b00e64181eb18cc6ce783 Author: Uwe Stöhr Date: Sat Jun 30 03:25:19 2012 +0200 tex2lyx: fix

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: fix handling of \verb

Op 30-6-2012 15:17, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 30.06.2012 11:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 1. This must be next_next_token() I also thought this first. But as "\" is not found .asCharacter so that we have in case of "+\+" + \+ current_token

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 28-6-2012 0:20, Liviu Andronic schreef: I concur. Even when I manage to convince people that LyX may be interesting and they indeed want to install it by themselves (not knowing anything LaTeX related), I still prefer to insist strongly that I perform the installation myself. If such users

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 27-6-2012 23:51, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 27.06.2012 10:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 27-6-2012 2:56, Uwe Stöhr schreef: I now finished the new Windows installer. It is the merge of my old one and Joost's. It still doesn't comply to my first demand, so I still won't accept it. I

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 28-6-2012 0:20, Liviu Andronic schreef: I concur. Even when I manage to convince people that LyX may be interesting and they indeed want to install it by themselves (not knowing anything LaTeX related), I still prefer to insist strongly that I perform the installation myself. If such users

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 27-6-2012 23:51, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 27.06.2012 10:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 27-6-2012 2:56, Uwe Stöhr schreef: I now finished the new Windows installer. It is the merge of my old one and Joost's. It still doesn't comply to my first demand, so I still won't accept it. I

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 27-6-2012 2:56, Uwe Stöhr schreef: I now finished the new Windows installer. It is the merge of my old one and Joost's. It still doesn't comply to my first demand, so I still won't accept it. I don't understand why I have to say this over and over again. I already have released a test

Re: [LyX master] texlyx: re-privatize a variable as suggested

Op 27 jun. 2012 22:33 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org het volgende: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit b6192b7c7f15b44e1f36074c60cc5fc645adcac2 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Wed Jun 27

Re: Windows installer for LyX 2.0.4

Op 27-6-2012 2:56, Uwe Stöhr schreef: I now finished the new Windows installer. It is the merge of my old one and Joost's. It still doesn't comply to my first demand, so I still won't accept it. I don't understand why I have to say this over and over again. I already have released a test

Re: [LyX master] texlyx: re-privatize a variable as suggested

Op 27 jun. 2012 22:33 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" het volgende: > > The branch, master, has been updated. > > - Log - > > commit b6192b7c7f15b44e1f36074c60cc5fc645adcac2 > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date:

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: support fontspec scale option

Op 26-6-2012 0:46, Uwe Stöhr schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 2e8ed3b3b5b8edefc0dc2a888ac0fa314f87618e Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Tue Jun 26 00:46:02 2012 +0200 tex2lyx: support

Re: Unable to Push New Tag

Op 26-6-2012 17:48, Richard Heck schreef: Anyone know how to fix this? Or am I doing something wrong? Richard You need to have permissions to create a new branch. Find the gitolite.conf file in the gitolite-admin.git repo and give yourself rights (RW - RWC). Vincent

Re: Unable to Push New Tag

Op 26-6-2012 20:32, Richard Heck schreef: On 06/26/2012 12:20 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 26-6-2012 17:48, Richard Heck schreef: Anyone know how to fix this? Or am I doing something wrong? Richard You need to have permissions to create a new branch. Find the gitolite.conf file

Re: [LyX master] tex2lyx: support fontspec scale option

Op 26-6-2012 0:46, Uwe Stöhr schreef: The branch, master, has been updated. - Log - commit 2e8ed3b3b5b8edefc0dc2a888ac0fa314f87618e Author: Uwe Stöhr Date: Tue Jun 26 00:46:02 2012 +0200 tex2lyx:

Re: Unable to Push New Tag

Op 26-6-2012 17:48, Richard Heck schreef: Anyone know how to fix this? Or am I doing something wrong? Richard You need to have permissions to "create a new branch". Find the gitolite.conf file in the gitolite-admin.git repo and give yourself rights (RW -> RWC). Vincent

<    10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   >