under BSD or GPL license. Whichever you decide suits you better.
Best regards,
Zvezdan Petkovic
under BSD or GPL license. Whichever you decide suits you better.
Best regards,
Zvezdan Petkovic
is that they are buying Apple computers
with Mac OS X more and more. They will not hurt Microsoft any time
soon, but I would say that is a progressive trend.
We may want to support that Mac OS X port with greater care.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
users in USA is that they are buying Apple computers
with Mac OS X more and more. They will not hurt Microsoft any time
soon, but I would say that is a progressive trend.
We may want to support that Mac OS X port with greater care.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
, for people who use BibTeX only databases, tkbibtex is
still unbeatable in terms of ease of installation. Just drop it in your
$HOME/bin and add exec permission to it. And it works on Windows too,
since Tcl/Tk is available for all platforms.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
in USA use it.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
ther. :-)
As an aside note, for people who use BibTeX only databases, tkbibtex is
still unbeatable in terms of ease of installation. Just drop it in your
$HOME/bin and add exec permission to it. And it works on Windows too,
since Tcl/Tk is available for all platforms.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan
people, at least in USA use it.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
in
the library. No other formats. Why? Because computer scientists use
LaTeX or even troff, not Word. Since BibTeX is richer format than
refer, that makes sense. troff users can convert BibTeX to refer as
already mentioned.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:15:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
but I know for sure that all computer scientists
a CV for my job
application in Word. PDF wasn't good enough. :-)
BTW, anyone has a job offer?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
BibTeX citation for each publication in
the library. No other formats. Why? Because computer scientists use
LaTeX or even troff, not Word. Since BibTeX is richer format than
refer, that makes sense. troff users can convert BibTeX to refer as
already mentioned.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:15:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > You mentioned scientific community before mentioning Word.
> > I do not know which scientific community you belong to,
> > but I know fo
fact, a few days ago I was asked to resubmit a CV for my job
application in Word. PDF wasn't good enough. :-)
BTW, anyone has a job offer?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
If you choose Layout-Document and in the dialogue that opens set Fonts
button to palatino (or some other non-default), there are no problems
with PDF whatsoever. Well, almost. Math is still
for this?
\usepackage{lmodern}. See
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=uselmfonts
Well, it's still not a part of teTeX distribution on Red Hat Linux 9,
and OpenBSD 3.4 that are available to me.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > If you choose Layout->Document and in the dialogue that opens set Fonts
> > button to "palatino" (or some other non-default), there are no problems
> > with PD
a much better type-1
> > > version of cm (though still beta and not yet perfect).
> >
> > Which package do you load for this?
>
> \usepackage{lmodern}. See
> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=uselmfonts
Well, it's still not a part of teTeX distributio
27aef000 rlib 1 /usr/lib/libpthread.so.2.1
Perhaps you can find something useful in my recent posts about changes I
had to do to compile it for OpenBSD.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdanl
netiquette:
http://www.trumpetpower.com/Rants/Netiquette/
Section: Don't do drive-by postings
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
367000 rlib 1 /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.12
07ae5000 27aef000 rlib 1 /usr/lib/libpthread.so.2.1
Perhaps you can find something useful in my recent posts about changes I
had to do to compile it for OpenBSD.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdanl
a subscriber to this list.
Well if you expect reply you should subscribe at least for a short time.
This guy explains well why this is not a proper netiquette:
http://www.trumpetpower.com/Rants/Netiquette/
Section: Don't do drive-by postings
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:24:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan Hello everybody, I've built a port of lyx-1.3.4 for OpenBSD.
Zvezdan Here are the fixes I had to apply.
Hi Zvezdan,
Following the discussion of your
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:24:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> Hello everybody, I've built a port of lyx-1.3.4 for OpenBSD.
> Zvezdan> Here are the fixe
gmake)
One of the OpenBSD ports committers replied today regarding the make
stuff. Quote:
You're going overboard here. Just depend on gmake.
I think that settles it. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
valents (notice that they were _not_ used in port, I simply
made it use gmake)
One of the OpenBSD ports committers replied today regarding the make
stuff. Quote:
"You're going overboard here. Just depend on gmake."
I think that settles it. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
John,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:11:02AM +, John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:45:15PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
automagically defined. The trouble is that LyX's configure doesn't
respect MOC and UIC environment variables and overwrites them.
The patch
, blah...
This is just a wild guess, I do not know really.
I just take it as a fact of life. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
will be happy, and you cover rather big user base
(Linux + {Free,Net,Open}BSD).
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
it. This
flavour of make does not understand the gnu-isms. Let's see if it
understands Zvezdan's alternative.
No joy :-(
Because it's System V Release 4 UNIX, I suppose.
And that make is quite another beast.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
in 1995.
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
is OK. It's clearly
preferable to hardcoding moc3-mt as another name to try anyway.
I absolutely agree. Because they may decide tomorrow that it should be
called only moc-mt or moc4-mt. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
this
distribution feature can be really helpful under condition that
configure really respects environment variables. It does respect LIBS,
I do not see any reason not to respect MOC or UIC. Just my 2 cents.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
John,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:11:02AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:45:15PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> >automagically defined. The trouble is that LyX's configure doesn't
> >respect MOC and UIC environment variables a
es the parser, which introduces more bugs, blah, blah...
This is just a wild guess, I do not know really.
I just take it as a fact of life. :-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
.for loop.
That way, both makes will be happy, and you cover rather big user base
(Linux + {Free,Net,Open}BSD).
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
g just run make
> maintainer-clean) and am using DEC/Compaq/HP make to build it. This
> flavour of make does not understand the gnu-isms. Let's see if it
> understands Zvezdan's alternative.
>
> No joy :-(
Because it's System V Release 4 UNIX, I suppose.
And that make is
Last time I used SysV make was back in 1995.
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
patch is OK. It's clearly
> preferable to hardcoding "moc3-mt" as another name to try anyway.
I absolutely agree. Because they may decide tomorrow that it should be
called only moc-mt or moc4-mt. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
can't (which is currently the case) then I think this
"distribution feature" can be really helpful under condition that
configure really respects environment variables. It does respect LIBS,
I do not see any reason not to respect MOC or UIC. Just my 2 cents.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
work.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
$OpenBSD$
--- config/qt.m4.orig 2002-12-19 18:41:18.0 -0500
+++ config/qt.m42004-02-22 16:29:24.0 -0500
@@ -199,11 +199,15 @@ AC_DEFUN(QT_DO_IT_ALL,
AC_SUBST(QT_INCLUDES
be all. Thanks, and keep the good work.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
$OpenBSD$
--- config/qt.m4.orig 2002-12-19 18:41:18.0 -0500
+++ config/qt.m42004-02-22 16:29:24.0 -0500
@@ -199,11 +199,15 @@ AC_DEFUN(QT
to produce multiple rpm binary packages from a single
source rpm. However, having two different executables would require two
compilations during the building of rpms. Also, the executables would
have to be called differently. One of them can be called lyx, the other
perhaps lyx-qt.
--
Zvezdan
It's fairly easy to produce multiple rpm binary packages from a single
source rpm. However, having two different executables would require two
compilations during the building of rpms. Also, the executables would
have to be called differently. One of them can be called lyx, the other
perhaps ly
I repeat my question from the last week since nobody bothered to reply.
Why the quote character doesn't get remaped properly?
See the explanation below. This has worked in 1.1.6. It doesn't in
1.2.3 and 1.3.0 (neither xforms nor qt)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:52PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic
whether other Linux distributions use the same
place to store .desktop files (on Red Hat it is /etc/X11/applnk), so I
left it out. If you think it can be useful I can send the patch for
that too.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
--- lyx.spec.orig
Please find attached the xforms.spec file. The changes I did are
described in its changelog.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
%define libname libforms
%define rel release
%define xdirX11R6
Summary: XForms library
Name: xforms
Version
I repeat my question from the last week since nobody bothered to reply.
Why the quote character doesn't get remaped properly?
See the explanation below. This has worked in 1.1.6. It doesn't in
1.2.3 and 1.3.0 (neither xforms nor qt)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:52PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic
now whether other Linux distributions use the same
place to store .desktop files (on Red Hat it is /etc/X11/applnk), so I
left it out. If you think it can be useful I can send the patch for
that too.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu
Please find attached the xforms.spec file. The changes I did are
described in its changelog.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
%define libname libforms
%define rel release
%define xdirX11R6
Summary: XForms library
Name: xforms
V
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Jade wrote:
I have found a package called jurabib, that can help doing this, but I
wondered if there was a way to include the package automatically using Lyx.
Did you try putting \usepackege{jurabib} in your LaTeX preamble?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Jade wrote:
> I have found a package called "jurabib", that can help doing this, but I
> wondered if there was a way to include the package automatically using Lyx.
Did you try putting \usepackege{jurabib} in your LaTeX preamble?
--
).
Where should I start looking for the bug (kbmap.C wasn't too
promising)? This was obviously introduced between 1.1.6 and 1.2.x.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
uotation signs << >>, instead of
capital C' (C acute).
Where should I start looking for the bug (kbmap.C wasn't too
promising)? This was obviously introduced between 1.1.6 and 1.2.x.
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 02:56:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to
Zvezdan enforce use of macros everywhere.
Could you send a proper version against lyx.spec.in from
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 02:56:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to
> Zvezdan> enforce use of macros everywh
.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:24:10PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:50:05AM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:24:17AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 03:53:44PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
It may be a good idea to set up
see if fix4 changes things in
any way.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:24:10PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:50:05AM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:24:17AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 03:53:44PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > &
with a
newer version of RH on his machine.
I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to enforce use of
macros everywhere.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
--- lyx-1.1.6.spec Fri Jan 11 19:31:16 2002
+++ lyx-1.1.6zp.specMon Jan 14 20:37:04
t, but I guess so can anybody else with a
newer version of RH on his machine.
I also propose a patch to spec file that is attached to enforce use of
macros everywhere.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
--- lyx-1.1.6.spec Fri Jan 11 19:31:16 2002
+++ lyx
RPM_BUILD_ROOT. You can pick up the
correct spec file (or rpms for that matter) at:
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/programs/RPMS/LyX/
[The lyx.spec changes from the above page have already been included in
LyX rpms]
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
.
--
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
source rpm because they did not use RPM_BUILD_ROOT. You can pick up the
correct spec file (or rpms for that matter) at:
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/programs/RPMS/LyX/
[The lyx.spec changes from the above page have already been included in
LyX rpms]
Regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PR
s), then it is a fair bet that you
> have installed the wrong version of XForms for your machine.
>
> --
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
to enter roman text in math is \mathrm{...}.
That works in LyX math mode too. Simply start typing \ and continue with
the rest. I do not know about CVS version though. Give it a shot...
Cheers,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
le in CVS version anymore.
>
The proper way in LaTeX to enter roman text in math is \mathrm{...}.
That works in LyX math mode too. Simply start typing \ and continue with
the rest. I do not know about CVS version though. Give it a shot...
Cheers,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
/lyxpipe.out
or if they are using (t)csh then in their .login put
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
xterms :-)
>
Then put in their .profile (or .bash_profile)
[ -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ] && rm -f ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
[ -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out ] && rm -f ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
or if they are using (t)csh then in their .login put
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
if ( -p ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out ) rm -rf ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
.
Hope this puts you on the right path. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
es, ...
All this is described in the above mentioned teTeX documentation (see
links to FAQ and TeX directory structure.
Hope this puts you on the right path. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Does that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
Yes. The DESTDIR is the autoconf (automake really) way of doing
staging directories/installs
ee neither that nor something as:
bindir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}.
Does that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Does that mean that DESTDIR takes care of all that through autoconf?
>
> Yes. The DESTDIR is the autoconf (automake really) way of doing
> staging
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:33:21AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mit, 2001-09-19 at 05:23, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
IMHO, you are exaggerating.
Well, of cause, I have to disagree :)
Primarily, it's just convenience for users/installers not wanting to use
the defaults.
The point
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If using %{_bindir} and %{_datadir} in %files sections and not
passing %{_bindir} and %{_datadir} to configure, users will have to
edit lyx.spec to a larger extent
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:33:21AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mit, 2001-09-19 at 05:23, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> >
> > IMHO, you are exaggerating.
> Well, of cause, I have to disagree :)
>
> Primarily, it's just convenience for users/installers not wanti
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If using %{_bindir} and %{_datadir} in %files sections and not
> >> passing %{_bindir} and
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:39:50AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Die, 2001-09-18 at 02:55, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Exactly, but on a properly configured system RPM follows /etc/man.conf.
This is an implementation detail
it. There are a few KDE
packages that are badly built and claim that they own /usr. We don't
want to be like them, do we?
Kayvan, please stick with the %files section from my spec file. It's
well defined.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
and $prefix/share to
something else for any $prefix?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:39:50AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Die, 2001-09-18 at 02:55, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Exactly, but on a properly configured system RPM follows /etc/man.conf.
> This is
and doesn't remove it. There are a few KDE
packages that are badly built and claim that they own /usr. We don't
want to be like them, do we?
Kayvan, please stick with the %files section from my spec file. It's
well defined.
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
tallation these things would be different. And a final question:
Who in the right mind would change $prefix/bin and $prefix/share to
something else for any $prefix?
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
/programs/RPMS/LyX/]
Current rpm files do not work well with the latest Linux distros = 7.x
as explained on the above web page.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
I'm ranting about this for the third time already, but obviously nobody
wants to take my spec files and make this as it should be.
I'm taking this back. I've just seen in another message that Kayvan is
working
/*/LC_MESSAGES/*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
...
--
Lgb
No, %{_mandir} is just fine since /usr/lib/rpm/i386-linux/macros define
_mandir as /usr/share/man just as /etc/man.conf does.
It seems to be a standard now since my old computer runs OpenBSD 2.9 and
it has man pages in /usr/share/man too.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
is as it should be.
[http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/programs/RPMS/LyX/]
Current rpm files do not work well with the latest Linux distros >= 7.x
as explained on the above web page.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> I'm ranting about this for the third time already, but obviously nobody
> wants to take my spec files and make this as it should be.
>
I'm taking this back. I've just seen in another message that Kayva
pplications/lyx.desktop
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man?/*
%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
t; I guess that %{_prefix}/man must be used in the spec file...
>
> --
> Lgb
No, %{_mandir} is just fine since /usr/lib/rpm/i386-linux/macros define
_mandir as /usr/share/man just as /etc/man.conf does.
It seems to be a standard now since my old computer runs OpenBSD 2.9 and
it ha
. It
was almost as listening to myself. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
of people from our region. It
was almost as listening to myself. :-)
Best regards,
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
it in the local (prefered language) mode ;)
No, we should use the language of the web page.
--
Lgb
And that is _ENGLISH_ -- not American.
And in England people write 3rd August 2001.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
gt; | of date-formats and output it in the local (prefered language) mode ;)
>
> No, we should use the language of the web page.
>
> --
> Lgb
And that is _ENGLISH_ -- not "American".
And in England people write 3rd August 2001.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
Output looks like:
Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
| Output looks like:
| Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
|
| Why not make it according to international
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
