Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was
Uwe used which was once required by powerdot. Attached a better
Uwe patch.
I do not see the layout file in the new patch. Is it unchanged? If you
test for the presence of some
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was
Uwe> used which was once required by powerdot. Attached a better
Uwe> patch.
I do not see the layout file in the new patch. Is it unchanged? If you
test for the presence of
Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
packages in the file chkconfig.ltx but this is unproblematic I think.
Why are rotate-textures and listings required?
rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was used which was once required by
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I corrected all issues in the attached better patch.
Good. However, wait for Jean-Marc's comment before committing.
Jürgen
>> Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
>> packages in the file "chkconfig.ltx" but this is unproblematic I think.
>
> Why are rotate-textures and listings required?
rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was used which was once required by
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I corrected all issues in the attached better patch.
Good. However, wait for Jean-Marc's comment before committing.
Jürgen
Bo:
I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
José:
Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
and it follows our guidelines...
Attached is the patch. The
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
packages in the file chkconfig.ltx but this is unproblematic I think.
Why are rotate-textures and listings required? The powerdot documentation does
not list that in the dependencies table (but it does
Bo:
>> I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
José:
> Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
> adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
> and it follows our guidelines...
Attached is the patch. The
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
> packages in the file "chkconfig.ltx" but this is unproblematic I think.
Why are rotate-textures and listings required? The powerdot documentation does
not list that in the dependencies table (but it does
Hello LyXers,
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=12796
Changelog to last development snapshot:
Version LyX 1.5beta3-18-05-2007
- LyX 1.5 beta3 from 18-05-2007
- fix bug, introduced with last version, that all
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=12796
Hi, Uwe,
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo Hi, Uwe,
Bo As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
Bo installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc
Bo to upload it to the lyx server? Putting two installers side by
Bo side can confuse people, but also
Bo Peng schrieb:
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx server?
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server?
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server? If yes, there are two issues:
As long as your installers are not
On Friday 18 May 2007 6:30:56 pm Bo Peng wrote:
I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
and it follows our guidelines...
Bo Peng schrieb:
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
- I ship the powerdot.layout and maintain it also because I often got
requests for this, the last
time this week. I
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
AltInstaller...
Just for my insterest: When you can do this for Joost's installer it should be
possible also with
mine, right?
Hello LyXers,
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=12796
Changelog to last development snapshot:
Version LyX 1.5beta3-18-05-2007
- LyX 1.5 beta3 from 18-05-2007
- fix bug, introduced with last version, that all margin
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=12796
Hi, Uwe,
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx server?
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> Hi, Uwe,
Bo> As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
Bo> installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc
Bo> to upload it to the lyx server? Putting two installers side by
Bo> side can confuse
Bo Peng schrieb:
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx server?
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server?
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server? If yes, there are two issues:
As long as your installers are not
On Friday 18 May 2007 6:30:56 pm Bo Peng wrote:
> I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
and it follows our guidelines...
Bo Peng schrieb:
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
- I ship the powerdot.layout and maintain it also because I often got
requests for this, the last
time this week. I
> Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
> filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
AltInstaller...
Just for my insterest: When you can do this for Joost's installer it should be
possible also with
mine, right?
26 matches
Mail list logo
