"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I expect you as a proponent of scons to handle the main burden of
| > showing the rest of us that scons is acutally better than the
| > autotools.
|
| That is not my plan for now. I need feedbacks from you guys to improve
| it, and make it work on windows
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bo Peng a écrit :
>> On 5/8/06, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Where do I find this win32file?
>>
>> If you use official python, you need to install win32 module from
>> http://starship.python.net/crew/skippy/win32/Downloads.html . This is
>> for min
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jose' Matos a écrit :
>> On Monday 08 May 2006 15:19, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
scons: Configure: Checking for C header file sys/utime.h...
scons: Configure: Checking for C header file utime.h...
>>> Is it useful to have those two tests?
>>
>> Sometimes it ha
Jose' Matos a écrit :
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:19, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
scons: Configure: Checking for C header file sys/utime.h...
scons: Configure: Checking for C header file utime.h...
Is it useful to have those two tests?
Sometimes it happens that those headers can be found on diffe
Bo Peng a écrit :
On 5/8/06, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where do I find this win32file?
If you use official python, you need to install win32 module from
http://starship.python.net/crew/skippy/win32/Downloads.html . This is
for mingw only. Cygwin does not seem to need this.
I expect you as a proponent of scons to handle the main burden of
showing the rest of us that scons is acutally better than the
autotools.
That is not my plan for now. I need feedbacks from you guys to improve
it, and make it work on windows. (We have cygwin, mingw and
cygwin+mingw to worry abou
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:19, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > scons: Configure: Checking for C header file sys/utime.h...
> > scons: Configure: Checking for C header file utime.h...
>
> Is it useful to have those two tests?
Sometimes it happens that those headers can be found on different places
de
John Levon a écrit :
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
scons: Configure: Checking for main() in C library nsl...
What is this nsl library?
It's networking functions on certain UNIX types like Solaris.
Thanks for the info, it is used in LyX client I suppose?
On 5/8/06, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> File "SConstruct", line 763:
>info = '''# This is a log of commands used by scons to build lyx
> File "D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk\scons_utils.py", line 605:
>import win32file
> D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk>scons frontend=qt4 qt
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >scons: Configure: Checking for main() in C library nsl...
>
> What is this nsl library?
It's networking functions on certain UNIX types like Solaris.
regards
john
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| We will update scons by ourselves, we know that will be easy. We have
| promised to update Makefile.am if we know how to do it. What else you
| are expecting from us?
I expect you as a proponent of scons to handle the main burden of
showing the rest of us t
File "SConstruct", line 763:
info = '''# This is a log of commands used by scons to build lyx
File "D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk\scons_utils.py", line 605:
import win32file
D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk>scons frontend=qt4 qt_dir=d:/program/Qt/4.1
extra_inc_path=d:/mingw/include extra_
lib
> I know scons is not perfect right now, but I do not expect
> anyone who does not like it to use it either. Why cannot Lars and
> other autotools fans just *ignore* the scons stuff?
Because when someone tries to build with scons, and they have
a problem,
they are going to send an email to lyx
Forgot to put lyx-devel in copy. Sorry.
Lars, all. If this stuff does not interests you we can keep this
conversation private. Just tell us.
Abdel.
--- Begin Message ---
Bo Peng a écrit :
python setup.py install
Easy enough, right?
Yes very easy. I first tried their installer but it was b
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 07:44 -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> I will not have time to maintain a branch.
...
> I know scons is not perfect right now, but I do not expect
> anyone who does not like it to use it either. Why cannot Lars and
> other autotools fans just *ignore* the scons stuff?
Because when
python setup.py install
Easy enough, right?
Then I tried:
D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk>scons frontend=qt4 qt_dir=d:/program/Qt/4.1
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Checking for pkg-config...no
pkg-config >= 0.1.50 is not found
Checking for main() in C library z... no
Did not find libz or z
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The KDE project had lived with _four_ build system at the same time in
| svn for _months_ before they choose one. I reckon LyX could live with
| two during a couple of month and see how it goes.
But they _must_ work.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > > don't decide these things, it was (and still is) my personal
| > opinion.
| > | >
| > | > Nobody said otherwise, that's what I meant. Saying nothing is an
| > | > impli
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > don't decide these things, it was (and still is) my personal opinion.
| >
| > Nobody said otherwise, that's what I meant. Saying nothing is an
| > implicit approval, except for the project manager. An quite frankly I
| > d
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > don't decide these things, it was (and still is) my personal opinion.
| >
| > Nobody said otherwise, that's what I meant. Saying nothing is an
| > implicit approval, except for the project manager. An quite frankly I
| > don't understand what's so scarin
Bo Peng a écrit :
BTW, please use SCons >= 0.96.92.
I have downloaded and installed it with the following command at the
windows console as indicated by the readme:
python setup.py install
Then I tried:
D:\cygwin\home\yns\lyx\trunk>scons frontend=qt4 qt_dir=d:/program/Qt/4.1
scons: Reading
> don't decide these things, it was (and still is) my personal opinion.
Nobody said otherwise, that's what I meant. Saying nothing is an
implicit approval, except for the project manager. An quite frankly I
don't understand what's so scaring about having a parallel build system
that do not touch
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
If you say nothing it's difficult to listen to you Lars. _I_ think Bo
should have waited for your approval before committing. But there were a
general agreement in the list three days ago that if we promise to keep
the auto stuff up to date, A few S
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> If you say nothing it's difficult to listen to you Lars. _I_ think Bo
> should have waited for your approval before committing. But there were a
> general agreement in the list three days ago that if we promise to keep
> the auto stuff up to date, A few Sconscript in tru
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | Dear all,
| > | | | | The scons-based building system is now available from svn.
|
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > Do you want to replace the existing build system or do you just
| > want
| > | > to use scons for *your* builds?
| > | | At this point I don't care about linux/Un
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Do you want to replace the existing build system or do you just want
| > to use scons for *your* builds?
|
| At this point I don't care about linux/Unix because in any case
| autotools works fine for you. I would l
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | Dear all,
| > | | | | The scons-based building system is now available from svn.
| > Currently,
| > | | Please rev
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Do you want to replace the existing build system or do you just want
| > to use scons for *your* builds?
|
| At this point I don't care about linux/Unix because in any case
| autotools works fine for you. I would like to ease Windows development
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | Dear all,
| |
| | The scons-based building system is now available from svn. Currently,
|
| Please revert.
|
| We are not going to have two competing build systems!
A
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Dear all,
| > | | The scons-based building system is now available from svn.
| > Currently,
| > Please revert.
| > We are not going to have
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Dear all,
| > | | The scons-based building system is now available from svn.
| > Currently,
| > Please revert.
| > We are not going to have two competing build systems!
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dear all,
|
| The scons-based building system is now available from svn. Currently,
Please revert.
We are not going to have two competing build systems!
Bo, in order to avoid lengthy and unproductive discussions that str
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | Dear all,
| |
| | The scons-based building system is now available from svn. Currently,
|
| Please revert.
|
| We are not going to have two competing build systems!
And to expand a bit:
I do welcome
Bo Peng wrote:
> Attached is a log file, using cygwin, cygwin boost, cygwin qt with
> replaced moc.exe and uic.exe. I get a bunch of link errors. If
> possible, please help me identify the problem.
>
> BTW,
> 1. the vtable error, according to qt faq, is a sign of missing moc files.
Indeed. Don'
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dear all,
|
| The scons-based building system is now available from svn. Currently,
Please revert.
We are not going to have two competing build systems!
--
Lgb
No, it is not. The "-Wl,--script,/path/to/i386pe.x-no-rdata" option
is indeed meant for libtool which then translates it to
"-Wl,--script -Wl,/path/to/i386pe.x-no-rdata" when calling g++.
Please, don't forget "-Wl,--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc".
These options are passed.
Under cygwin, I just n
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:00:42PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> Windows troubles:
>
> 1. the ...rdata file used to build cygwin seems to be a libtool thing,
> I have tried to pass script=... option to g++ but failed. I guess one
> can run till the last step, get the link command from scons_lyx.log
> a
BTW, please use SCons >= 0.96.92.
Bo
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
