On 07-Dec-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ERTERTERTERTERTERT
>
> is converted to
>
> ordinary text.
Well Andre you're repeating yourself. I already answered this problem
and said that it is a fault of LyX's way reading old LaTeX Font code
and that we HAVE TO fix it. So you continue to complain ab
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:09:20PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> really _used_ LyX for a while now myself), but having more red than black
> text is not unusual. And that's no abuse of ERT for something that LyX
> could do but the only way to get it done _somehow_.
That makes you a power user, t
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>
>>no! If I delete the label, I want to have ONE ert inset!
>>
>>HErbert
>>
> That would mean that if I have [ert-inset1][ert-inset2] and insert a
> label, then delete it, I would collapse the two [ert-insets]. That is
> bad behaviour. I sometime
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Yes. And?
> I thought we handled this case.
It was sounding like "It's the user's fault, not ours, and we really don't
care since ERT is not our business anyway".
Maybe I should practice my mind-readins skills a bit again..
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> .lyx file please.
>
> I guess this is a case of misused ert in 1.1.6 (by the user)
> I bet the label is marked as ERT.
Yes. And?
Behaviour changed. We are not able to read 1.1.6 files. Latest stable.
Reminds me of some other
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:21:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If you want a label inside ERT write \label. If you want to do it the
> LyX way, close the ERT and insert a InsetLabel.
>
> in ERT _you_ are king. and you get (and we enforce this) no meddling
> from Lyx.
Than I'd like to hav
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:20:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What wrong way?
ERTERTERTERTERTERT
is converted to
ordinary text.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> | this is no argument to convert ert from 1.1.6 to 1.2
> | in a wrong way.
>
> What wrong way?
my label example. should be converted into one _real_
ert inset.
Herbert
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> | If you want a label there, well, write '\label{...}'. Not nice, you lose
> | all the LyX gimmicks.
>
> We do _not_ want using ERT to be nice. I want the users to be on
> their own when writing ERT.
this is no argument to convert er
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:03:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We do _not_ want using ERT to be nice. I want the users to be on
> their own when writing ERT.
I know. But I find that attitude strange as long as LyX does not support
everything that LaTeX does. And for various reasons (both
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> The rule is set! Before you where able to insert ANY inset inside of
> ERT text. Now we have the rule that you cannot. So we will read the
> code as described by Dekel (and we have to fix the problem reported).
> I don't think we will reinterpret good
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:42:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Well, InsetText can have nested insets, so we could have "real" labels in
> | InsetERT, real math etc...
>
> you are kidding I hope.
I don't think so.
Currently, once you have decided to go to ERT land (and there are a f
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:09:38AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > Should there be a conceptually difference between a TextInset and an
> > ERTInset except that the latter does not escape LaTeX's fancy characters?
> > (and maybe typewriter fonts on screen by default etc)
>
> InsetERT IS basically
On 07-Dec-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I just wondered:
>
> Should there be a conceptually difference between a TextInset and an
> ERTInset except that the latter does not escape LaTeX's fancy characters?
> (and maybe typewriter fonts on screen by default etc)
InsetERT IS basically a InsetTex
On 07-Dec-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> again: I inserted the label inside the ert with lyx
> because it is easier than to write \label{...}.
> in 1.2 there is no insert->label inside ert possible.
> therefore it makes sense to convert a label inside
> ert from 1.1.6 to 1.2 as \label{...}. than all
I just wondered:
Should there be a conceptually difference between a TextInset and an
ERTInset except that the latter does not escape LaTeX's fancy characters?
(and maybe typewriter fonts on screen by default etc)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PR
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 07-Dec-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> >> No it shouldn't. The result should be [ert-inset1][label-inset][ert-inset2]
> > no! If I delete the label, I want to have ONE ert inset!
>
> Well I'm sorry but this can't be!
again: I inserted the label insid
On 07-Dec-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
>> No it shouldn't. The result should be [ert-inset1][label-inset][ert-inset2]
> no! If I delete the label, I want to have ONE ert inset!
Well I'm sorry but this can't be!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>see attached file:
>>in 1.1.6 you can have a label inside ert.
>>1.2.0 end's with ert after the label.
>>
>
> You description is not accurate.
> The 1.1.6 file contains [label-inset]
> In 1.2.0 the result is
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> see attached file:
> in 1.1.6 you can have a label inside ert.
> 1.2.0 end's with ert after the label.
You description is not accurate.
The 1.1.6 file contains [label-inset]
In 1.2.0 the result is [ert-inset1][label-inset]ert-text2,
20 matches
Mail list logo
