Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:29:00PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I uploaded all necessary packages for building old version of lyx into > wiki-uploads and created the page https://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Flashback with > instructions for building. I also uploaded already built packages for those >

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:07:45PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:02:03AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > This could go either to our wiki (with deps and packages into wiki-uploads.git) > or it could go into https://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/ >

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:50:48AM GMT, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Occassionally I see someone (maybe Enrico or JMarc?) mention they > > checked something on a very old version of LyX to see if some behavior > > is how it's

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:02:03AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > This could go either to our wiki (with deps and packages into > > wiki-uploads.git) > > or it could go into https://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/ > > (www-user.git:/misc/archaeology/), up to you. > > Please, explain how to do

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Could you make it available with few comments about build/install? Sure. This could go either to our wiki (with deps and packages into wiki-uploads.git) or it could go into https://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:50:48AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Of course, you also need Qt3 and corresponding development files. However, > if you are interested, I can provide everything is necessary: > $ ls -l /usr/local/src/pkgs/qt3/ > totale 9344 > -rw-r--r-- 1 ef 137708 6 ago 2015

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Occassionally I see someone (maybe Enrico or JMarc?) mention they checked something on a very old version of LyX to see if some behavior is how it's always been. How do you do that? Does that version fun on your current

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 08:25:01AM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:55:32PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another option. > > > > Sorry for my ignorance---it's another option intead of docker, or for the > > archive of packages? > > The

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:54:33PM GMT, José Matos wrote: > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 22:38 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > If it's not on mirrors anymore it get's moved to archive.debian.org > > and stays there forever. So you need to change URL for apt. > > https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:55:32PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another option. > > Sorry for my ignorance---it's another option intead of docker, or for the > archive of packages? The latter. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:38:04PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:22:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Thanks, this is all very helpful. Another question: for "build-dep lyx", > > the image will need to download packages from a repository. But for old > > Debian, are

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 22:38 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > If it's not on mirrors anymore it get's moved to archive.debian.org > and stays there forever. So you need to change URL for apt. > https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another option. > > Pavel FWIW the same applies for Fedora after the

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:22:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks, this is all very helpful. Another question: for "build-dep lyx", the > image will need to download packages from a repository. But for old Debian, > are there still repositories that have the right packages for it? If

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 09:49:01PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I don't know anything about containers but I want to learn. From what I > > understand of your description, the docker image you started with was a > > docker image

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I don't know anything about containers but I want to learn. From what I > understand of your description, the docker image you started with was a > docker image of very old debian and, it had nothing to do specifically with >

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:49:18PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I have also docker image with the lyx tree which I was using while ago > > > when bisecting some gcc compatibilty issue heading back into qt4 > > > territory... > >

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I have also docker image with the lyx tree which I was using while ago when > > bisecting some gcc compatibilty issue heading back into qt4 territory... > > I'm very interested in the details of this. Did you do the actual

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:16:43PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Thinking ahead, how can I run 2.4.0 in several years when it will be hard > > to compile it (because of changes to compilers or availa

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thinking ahead, how can I run 2.4.0 in several years when it will be hard to > compile it (because of changes to compilers or available Qt versions)? For the 2.4 there was recent flatpack package build. I did not try on

Re: How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 12:05 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm guessing the answer has to do with containers? > > Scott I have also thought about this a lot (because of the file format and to have the original lyx to generate it) and my conclusion is similar to yours. Apologies for not adding

How can I run LyX 2.4.0 on Ubuntu 30.04 ?

operating system installed? Thinking ahead, how can I run 2.4.0 in several years when it will be hard to compile it (because of changes to compilers or available Qt versions)? I'm guessing the answer has to do with containers? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel

Re: Can I backport this commit to 2.3.x for cat.po?

scott/lyxbuilds/2.3.x/CMakeBuild/po/lyx2.3.cat_tmp.pot > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > >File "/home/scott/lyxbuilds/2.3.x/repo/development/cmake/po/cat.py", > > > line 34, in > > > fil = open(f, "rU") > > >

Re: Can I backport this commit to 2.3.x for cat.po?

d.make:1384: po/lyx2.3.cat.pot] Error 1 Can I cherry-pick to 2.3.x? Additionally to build I needed to cherry-pick 8c4d6bbb. Is that OK also? Yes, go ahead. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Can I backport this commit to 2.3.x for cat.po?

: invalid mode: 'rU' > make[2]: *** [po/CMakeFiles/translations.dir/build.make:1384: > po/lyx2.3.cat.pot] Error 1 > > Can I cherry-pick to 2.3.x? Additionally to build I needed to cherry-pick 8c4d6bbb. Is that OK also? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Can I backport this commit to 2.3.x for cat.po?

repo/development/cmake/po/cat.py", line 34, in fil = open(f, "rU") ^ ValueError: invalid mode: 'rU' make[2]: *** [po/CMakeFiles/translations.dir/build.make:1384: po/lyx2.3.cat.pot] Error 1 Can I cherry-pick to 2.3.x? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Can I check, if a class component is overridden? Help for #12783

Am Thu, 18 May 2023 10:56:21 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 5/18/23 10:26, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Specifically I would like to know if the component toString() in class > > Inset is > > overridden. > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_same > > > > To solution for

Re: Can I check, if a class component is overridden? Help for #12783

On 5/18/23 10:26, Kornel Benko wrote: Specifically I would like to know if the component toString() in class Inset is overridden. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_same To solution for #12783 would be ATM the attached, but I'd like to have it done for other insets too. Why does

Can I check, if a class component is overridden? Help for #12783

Specifically I would like to know if the component toString() in class Inset is overridden. To solution for #12783 would be ATM the attached, but I'd like to have it done for other insets too. Kornel diff --git a/src/Paragraph.cpp b/src/Paragraph.cpp index b8819fdf1b..6ce3ce08ff 100644

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:04:44PM +0100, Daniel wrote: > I am surprised there is a beta1. There is none here: > > https://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Where can one download it? Well, it never really took off, except of brief tarball availibility on google drive which is no more

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On 2022-12-10 14:52, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:48:24AM +, José Matos wrote: On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 06:00:29PM +, José Matos wrote: > On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 12:28 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > This commit used the LyX binary to write the new .lyx files since > > lyx2lyx does not apply semantic linefeeds. > > This is something that needs to be done. It is not high

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 12:28 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > This commit used the LyX binary to write the new .lyx files since > lyx2lyx does not apply semantic linefeeds. This is something that needs to be done. It is not high priority but it should be done to keep to output of lyx2lyx as similar

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 12:08:55AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:11:28PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:48:24AM +, José Matos wrote: > On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new > > alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7 tarball this > > weekend. > > > > Riki

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new > alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7 tarball this > weekend. > > Riki If you do this (for 2.4) please call it beta-2 since we already have a

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:11:28PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > OK to push? > > > I'm not happy about

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: OK to push? I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > OK to push? > > I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have > up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from updates. Makes sense. I'll exclude

Re: Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > OK to push? I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from updates. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Can I push this 20MB commit to update the format of the docs?

I wanted to check before pushing the commit, because even if I revert that will be a non-trivial weight in the commit history. Here is the commit message: --- Update format of docs using LyX binary Especially after the change to use semantic linefeeds

Re: Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 18 May 2017 at 09:09, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > For me - on Mac - it has always been like this. It’s not a big deal IMO to > > choose anonymous and proceed. Therefore I didn’t complain :) > > OTOH how

Re: Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

On 20/05/2017 10:37 p.m., Christian Ridderström wrote: On 18 May 2017 at 09:09, Stephan Witt > wrote: For me - on Mac - it has always been like this. It’s not a big deal IMO to choose anonymous and proceed. Therefore I didn’t complain :)

Re: Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

On 18 May 2017 at 09:09, Stephan Witt wrote: > For me - on Mac - it has always been like this. It’s not a big deal IMO to > choose anonymous and proceed. Therefore I didn’t complain :) > OTOH how would you connect in case you want using a name/password if > you’re not asked for?

Re: Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

Am 17.05.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Christian Ridderström : > > On 17 May 2017 at 23:02, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 17 May 2017 at 22:47, Fan Zhang wrote: > I was asked for a username and password from ftp://ftp.lyx.org > > I don’t know how I

Re: Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:06:08PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 17 May 2017 at 23:02, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > > On 17 May 2017 at 22:47, Fan Zhang wrote: > > > >> I was asked for a username and password from ftp://ftp.lyx.org > >> > >> I

Asked for username/password when going to ftp.lyx.org from www.lyx.org/Download. (Was: can I get a username and password to download lyx?(

On 17 May 2017 at 23:02, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 17 May 2017 at 22:47, Fan Zhang wrote: > >> I was asked for a username and password from ftp://ftp.lyx.org >> >> I don’t know how I can get that. Can you please help? >> > > Hi Fan, > > Thanks for

Re: can I get a username and password to download lyx?

On 17 May 2017 at 22:47, Fan Zhang wrote: > I was asked for a username and password from ftp://ftp.lyx.org > > I don’t know how I can get that. Can you please help? > Hi Fan, Thanks for letting us know you still have the problem. I think I was able to reproduce your

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is currently bound to

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also > >> bound to

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> > > >> It is

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> >> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >>>

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which will move the tab up one spot (and similar

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also >> bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which >> will move the tab up one spot

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C-S-PageDown. This feature and keybinding would be consistent

Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C-S-PageDown. This feature and keybinding would be consistent with tab behavior in Chromium, Firefox, and

Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C-S-PageDown. This feature and keybinding would be consistent with tab behavior in Chromium, Firefox, and

Re: Can I take over C-S-PageUp binding for tab moving?

On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C-S-PageDown. This feature and keybinding would be consistent

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 11:14:35, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 10:22:32, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in entering

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 13/10/2014 10:16, Kornel Benko a écrit : If I use a fresh userdir, then there is no such effect. Copying the preferences over my own, the effect vanishes. It is, oh wonder, \kbmap true \kbmap_primary slovak So, problem solved. Very good :) JMarc

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 11:14:35, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 10:22:32, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > > Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 13/10/2014 10:16, Kornel Benko a écrit : If I use a fresh userdir, then there is no such effect. Copying the preferences over my own, the effect vanishes. It is, oh wonder, \kbmap true \kbmap_primary "slovak" So, problem solved. Very good :) JMarc

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in entering number keys (the ones at the main keyboard, not the numeric ones) Entering the string 1234567890 gives me +ľščťžýáíé. (But it is OK on the normal console) The GUI is slovak, and

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 10:22:32, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in entering number keys (the ones at the main keyboard, not the numeric ones) Entering the

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in entering number keys (the ones at the main keyboard, not the numeric ones) Entering the string "1234567890" gives me "+ľščťžýáíé". (But it is OK on the normal console) The GUI is slovak,

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 um 10:22:32, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 02/08/2014 14:38, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Now that the merging is done, I see a different behaviour in entering > > number keys (the ones > > at the main keyboard, not the numeric ones) > > > >

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 um 10:06:46, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org On 07/25/2014 07:24 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 um 10:06:46, schrieb Richard Heck > On 07/25/2014 07:24 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >> Hello, > >> > >> The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in > >>

Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining cursor positioning problem that was haunting me. I do not feel that it gets much testing now, and I am going to leave

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 25/07/2014 10:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Seriously, does anyone have some reservations against merging this work to branch now? Of course, I will rewrite history a last time before doing that. JMarc

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 um 10:49:35, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining cursor positioning problem

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 25/07/2014 11:27, Kornel Benko a écrit : Seriously, does anyone have some reservations against merging this work to branch now? I am for merging it. The longer it lasts, the more work is to be done IMHO. I think the remaining problems may be for bidi text, but I am not sure how many

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining cursor positioning problem that was haunting me. I

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

On 07/25/2014 07:24 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining

Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining cursor positioning problem that was haunting me. I do not feel that it gets much testing now, and I am going to leave

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 25/07/2014 10:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Seriously, does anyone have some reservations against merging this work to branch now? Of course, I will rewrite history a last time before doing that. JMarc

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 um 10:49:35, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Hello, > > The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in > master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going > to solve the remaining cursor positioning

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Le 25/07/2014 11:27, Kornel Benko a écrit : Seriously, does anyone have some reservations against merging this work to branch now? I am for merging it. The longer it lasts, the more work is to be done IMHO. I think the remaining problems may be for bidi text, but I am not sure how many

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Hello, > > The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in > master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going > to solve the remaining cursor positioning problem that was haunting me.

Re: Str-metrics branch: can I land now?

On 07/25/2014 07:24 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 10:49:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Hello, The str-metrics branch has come to a point where I thing it should be in master. I have two more commits at home (forgot to push) that are going to solve the remaining

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 02:10:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Should be easy. Ah yes you're right. You are convincing me more and more that out-of-source builds have many advantages and no disadvantages. So all is needed is just to copy the .lyx file there.

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 02:10:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Should be easy. Ah yes you're right. You are convincing me more and more that out-of-source builds have many advantages and

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 09:12:44, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org I would change the file, there is also no need to remove, on next test it will be overwritten anyway and we can check the result too. TestBegin ../bug-8523.lyx lyx-log.txt 21 KK: \[Home]

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 03:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org ... OK, I will change this. I am in the habit of writing copies of the form cp filename folder1/folder2/ because (1) this prevents type errors such as cp filename folder1/folder2/fielname and (2) the reader of

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 03:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org ... OK, I will change this. I am in the habit of writing copies of the form cp filename folder1/folder2/ because (1) this prevents type

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 10:13:59, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org I don't understand. First, on opening bug-8523.lyx you should immediately see a warning which must be addressed. This is where the \[Return] works if XVKBD_HACKED is not automatically set. I will check.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 04:42:25, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org if output is a directory, I would not count on working in later versions of cmake. That command explains it: If output names an existing directory the input file is placed in that directory with its original

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 10:13:59, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org I don't understand. First, on opening bug-8523.lyx you should immediately see a warning which must be addressed. This is where the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 04:51:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org I got the crash if called manually. Once. I am not able to get the crash again Maybe I should stop trying to get this test to work. I don't think that tests should be this complicated. I'm very

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 04:51:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org I got the crash if called manually. Once. I am not able to get the crash again Maybe I should stop trying to get this test

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add an autotest for #8523 (but how can I get a path for a helper lyx file?)

Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 um 02:10:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> > >> Should be easy. > > > > Ah yes you're right. You are convincing me more and more that > > out-of-source builds have many advantages and no disadvantages. So all > > is needed is just to copy the

  1   2   3   >