"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numbering would be
| useful, numbering the footnotes that exist on loading the document would
| be sufficient--these are the only ones that can already be on paper or
| in someone else's hands .
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
|
| > * You would like some on-screen way to differentiate between
| > different footnotes.
|
| Correct.
|
| > * Lars thinks that you really need footnote labels.
|
| False. I do n
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I have also created bug number 838 and added your patch as
> attachment.
Good.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> > This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...)
>
> Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug,
You need to change the default search setting to include closed bugs
too, it's quite
John Levon wrote:
> This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...)
Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug,
nor did I get sent the additional responses.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper
> corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx
> is a bit of a hassle...
It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numberin
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I will :-) I have also created bug number 838 and added your patch as
> attachment.
This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...)
regards
john
--
"When you start off by telling those who disagree with you that
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Here we go. Very quick&dirty and only barely functional (it takes a while
> after an insertion until the change has "propagated")
Thanks, I will try it out immediately :-) Great stuff, I
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> * You would like some on-screen way to differentiate between
> different footnotes.
Correct.
> * Lars thinks that you really need footnote labels.
False. I do not need these labels.
> * André and myself both think that preview-latex is
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> [...]
Here we go. Very quick&dirty and only barely functional (it takes a while
after an insertion until the change has "propagated")
Moritz could apply this in hid local tree and remind us during the 1.4
cycle to discuss
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 17:20, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> The argument goes like this:
>
> "Mr. Moeller-Herrmann, in footnote 477, your argument is wrong and you have
> to cite XYZ".
>
> At the moment I have to compile the lyx document, check the dvi, find
> footnote 477, look for and reme
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I am sick of getting this argument against implementing a fscking
> simple footnote counter in lyx. So after reading your very long
> answer, I can only conclude, that lyx does not and will never have a
> useful implementation to see the footnote number, either usin
José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits
>> > does it give?
>> One can e.g. make the (sequential!) numbers appear in print as well.
>> Going back from the proofs to the .lyx would be easy
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper
> corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx
> is a bit of a hassle...
One way to solve this problem is to implement "inverse search"
http://bugzilla.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes
>> | all of them labeled as "[foot]" in lyx, because lyx is unable to show
>> | the footnote number, you would see why it is helpf
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits
> > does it give?
>
> Actually I accept his argument that a sequential numbering of all footnotes
> might be some navigation help if the number of footnotes gets large.
>
even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper
corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx
is a bit of a hassle...
Ed.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes all
> | of them labeled as "[foot]" in lyx, because lyx is unable to show the
> | footnote number, you would see why it is helpful to see the footnote ma
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> >> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature
> >> myself?
> >
> > Two months.
>
> How long would it take you
Depends on the end of the feature freeze.
Probably less than two months.
> and how m
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
|
| > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
| >> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature
| >> myself?
| >
| > Two months.
|
| How long would it take you and
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > LyX uses a little box saying "foot" (possibly translated) to show a
| > footnote. Would you write better documents if LyX displayed some
| > symbol or other? I doubt it. Sure, we /could/ do it, at the cost of
| > complicating the code (read i
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature
>> myself?
>
> Two months.
How long would it take you and how much money would you
(or anyone else on this list) want for it?
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature myself?
Two months.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffer
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> It seems as if you can set \usepackage[footnotes]{preview} in Emacs
>> and have a preview of the footnote mark.
[...]
> LyX uses a little box saying "foot" (possibly translated) to show a
> footnote. Would you write better documents if Ly
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 04:12:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's just that, having done so, I'm not sure what /real/ benefit these
> previews provide for most people.
Welcome to the club ;-)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
>>> I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great
>>> so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the
>>> footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs.
>
>> I don't see a p
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great
>> so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the
>> footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs.
> I don't see a problem. Attached is a screenshot. Works both
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great
> so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the
> footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs.
>
> Thanks,
I don't see a problem. Attached is a screenshot. Works both when
t
Hi,
I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great so far.
Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the footnotes? It
seems to work in Emacs.
Thanks,
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wiss. Mitarbeiter, IMGB
La loi, dans un grand souci d'égal
29 matches
Mail list logo
