Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:24:01PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
| >> Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to console:
| >> André, isn't this all handled gracefully now by mathed?
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:24:01PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to console:
>> André, isn't this all handled gracefully now by mathed?
>
> \ensuremath, \sb and \sp are not handled afaik
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:24:01PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to console:
>
> Math command | translation
> \to \rightarrow
> \vert |
>
>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to
Angus> console: Math command | translation \to \rightarrow \vert | \ge
Angus> \geq \le \leq \ \,\, \sb _ \ensuremath \sp ^ \| \Ve
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, may I submit this patch to reLyX please. It simply adds a
| paranoia
ok
--
Lgb
Lars, may I submit this patch to reLyX please. It simply adds a paranoia
check that we don't attempt to access an element beyond the end of the
array.
It therefore removes a warning message generated because reLyX tries to
access a non-existent column when reading the test case to bu
Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to console:
Math command | translation
\to \rightarrow
\vert |
\ge \geq
\le \leq
\\,\,
\sb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
| Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
| > This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX
| > file).
|
| If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file:
|
| \layout Enumerate
| + \begin_deeper
| \begin_float tab
| - \begin_deeper
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is the cut down version.
>
> | @@ -1400,7 +1400,8 @@ sub ConvertToLayout {
> | print "\nChanging $dummy $name to layout $layout" if $debug_on;
> |
> | # Nest if the layout stack has more than just "Standard" in it
> | -if ($#{$CurrentLayoutStack} >
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX
> file).
If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file:
\layout Enumerate
+ \begin_deeper
\begin_float tab
- \begin_deeper
\layout Standard
\align center
\LyXTable
...
then lyx reads the file
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am not a reLyX people :-), but I see the logic of your change and I say go
| with it. To be on the safe side you need Kayvan's opinion. :-)
Some more testing on tex files is also needed.
--
Lgb
nd_deeper \begin_deeper in the LyX file. It's sloppy
> | # but it works, and LyX will get rid of it when it
> | # resaves the file.
> | -if ($#{$CurrentLayoutStack} > 0) {
> | +if ($#{$CurrentLayoutStack} > 0
> | + && $CurrentLayoutSt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
|
| | Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this
| | patch has any relevance?
| |
| | It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until
| | I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this
| patch has any relevance?
|
| It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until
| I have confirmations.
? relyx.diff
Index: BasicL
Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this
patch has any relevance?
It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until
I have confirmations.
--
Lgb
ot;\\begin_inset LatexCommand \\listof", i)
> > if i == -1:
> > break
> > -type = lines[i][33:-3]
> > +type = lines[i][33:-1]
> > lines[i] = "\\begin_inset FloatList "+type
> > i = i+1
In principle, we
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:40:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Index: lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py,v
> retrieving revision 1.28
> diff -u -r1.28 lyxconvert_218.py
Hi,
below please find two patches for lyx2lyx and reLyX. I have already
posted the patch for reLyX but I am not sure whether I used plain text
when sending the email.
The following two bugs are fixed:
- lyx2lyx does not translate listoffigures/listoftables correctly
- reLyX fails if there
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/reLyXmain.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 reLyXmain.pl
--- reLyXmain.pl2001/08/31 07:54:05 1.4
+++ reLyXmain.pl2003/01/15 18:59:47
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@
# Read personal syntax.default, or system-wide
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 14:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> José> I agree with you when you say that we should discover when did
> José> the file format changed to have a real fix. But for now your fix
> José> is enough. :-)
>
> Are you sure that the file format ever changed in this regar
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 13:03, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> My conclusion is that we should suppress the import. Please find a
>> patch below.
>>
>> Jose, could you please check the patch and commit it afterwards?
José> Since Jean-
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 13:03, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> My conclusion is that we should suppress the import. Please find a patch
> below.
>
> Jose, could you please check the patch and commit it afterwards?
Since Jean-Marc agrees with you (and I don't disagree ;-) I commited the
fix.
I
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> My conclusion is that we should suppress the import. Please
Michael> find a patch below.
Michael> Jose, could you please check the patch and commit it
Michael> afterwards?
This seems reasonable to me too.
JMarc
3. reLyX creates a "makeindex" entry in the LyX file header which is not
accepted by LyX
This entry is created by
MakePreamble.pm-282-"graphics" => "\\graphics default",
MakePreamble.pm-283-"rotating" => "",
3. reLyX creates a "makeindex" entry in the LyX file header which is not
accepted by LyX
This entry is created by
MakePreamble.pm-282-"graphics" => "\\graphics default",
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:45, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I wanted to convert a TeX document of a colleague of mine to LyX
> (1.3.0cvs) but I failed for several reasons:
[...]
> 4. reLyX produces an old file format; when converting a fig inset into
> the Ly
Hi folks,
I wanted to convert a TeX document of a colleague of mine to LyX
(1.3.0cvs) but I failed for several reasons:
1. reLyX fails if there is a subdirectory with the same (base) name as
a TeX file
2. reLyX fails if the full path starting with the main document
directory is
A little more poking shows that \noindent before a \begin{tabular}
is ignored. Lyx will include it if the paragraph dialog is used,
and export tex with it--but retrieving its own tex, it loses it.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTE
OK, I'm now happily importing tabulars. Well, mostly. I'm having
trouble with the left borders on multicolumnts. I start with:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin {tabular}
{|p{1.5in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|p{.4in}|
A round trip with a 2x2 table inserts extra spaces at all cells in the last
column.
This is already in the reLyX output, so reLyX is to blame.
Not a very serious issue, though...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they de
> "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 20:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Why doesn't the figure properties editor let me rearrange Here
Darren> Top and Bottom into the order
Hi
I was trying to convince a friend to change from latex to lyx and tried
running reLyX on one of her .tex-files. Running reLyX on the following
(a much reduced example) produces a problem in the .lyx-file that's
difficult to find...
\documentclass{article}
\begin{doc
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 20:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Darren> Why doesn't the figure properties editor let me rearrange Here
> Darren> Top and Bottom into the order I want? It seems to me that
> Darren> checkboxes aren't the best U
>>>>> "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> One comment though is that reLyX imports \begin{figure}[htb]
Darren> as \begin{figure} so I will have to add htb myself to the
Darren> figure
Darren> I suppose that's because it
Dear list,
forgive me if this seems obvious but I don't know much about LaTeX.
I'm importing an example .tex file to use a .cls I'm supposed to be
using.
My aim is to clean up the reLyX output to give something resembling the
original .tex when I export as LaTeX. So far it'
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:35:57AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
[snip!]
> new XMLish .lyx. In order to avoid regressions we'd e.g. need a flawless
> .tex -> .lyx -> .tex roundtrip for math, which is easiest achieved by
> storing the .tex represantation in the .lyx - at least as a temporary
> solut
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The question is, of course, how much .tex will be retained even in the
> new XMLish .lyx. In order to avoid regressions we'd e.g. need a flawless
> .tex -> .lyx -> .tex roundtrip for math, which is easiest achieved by
> storing the .tex represantation
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:27:34AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> It looks to me that this is totaly independent of the .lyx format, i.e.,
> if you support .tex natively, conversion to .lyx is not necessary. Anyway,
> if one wants to convert .tex to .lyx in this case, opening the .tex an
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:39:58AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > On the other hand, implementing latex parsing right inside the lyx kernel
> > would save the .lyx format "rendering", so no translation is needed, just
> > parsing. Right?
>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:39:58AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand well what you have said. AFAIK, reLyX should not
> touch math, so any latex math expression is already good .lyx code (am I
> right?)
Not all, but quite a bit of it. Definitely
> > a separate executable even named reLyX if one think it is cute.
>
> One could. But in fact half or so of the math parser is the part that stuffs
> LyX internal stuctures, so this part has to be "in" anyway. Building a
> separate binary out of the second 700 lines does not
.lyx syntax), the next one thinks
> > reLyX is cute (especially if nobody understands it), the third one does not
> > want to break anything that happens to work (somehow, for a few people) and
> > the fourth camp likes to completely stall work for three months twice a
> >
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I don't think it is too much work, but there are a few political brakes.
> One camp does not want too tight .tex integration in the core (and rather
> spend the same amount of code on parsing .lyx syntax), the next one thinks
&
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:41:53AM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Yeah, I agree with you. What would you suggest for a better approach to
> parsing .tex files?
Fix the math parser to do the tokenization the same way TeX does and use
that.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order
> Parsing .tex like this is impossible to get right. Macros do not have to
> nest properly. Moreover, it uses fixed values for deliminiters, so this
> can't work except for some class of "reasonably well-behaved LaTeX" - and
> we have reLyX for this job already. A
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:47:51AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Does your patch solve the $a$$b$ problem?
Andre> No.
Andre> And removing begtranstable/endtranstable does not cut it, even
Andre> removing the entry f
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:47:28AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Looks pretty sketchy:
Furthermore, the project is dead: no commit for 4 months plus, no
mailing list. A pity.
Especially as we could have converted from the XML output into lyx with
XSLT.
regards
john
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:47:51AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Does your patch solve the $a$$b$ problem?
No.
And removing begtranstable/endtranstable does not cut it, even removing the
entry for $$ does not help.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:15:22AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Should I?
>> I think you should, but we may want to ask lars first.
Andre> Lars wanted _your_ approval on this one IIRC
Is that so? Then I think you
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:15:22AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Should I?
>
> I think you should, but we may want to ask lars first.
Lars wanted _your_ approval on this one IIRC
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do th
t; Sure enough, these "canonical substitutions" must be performed,
>>
Andre> Probably not. The math parser understands $$ nowadays...
>> Andre', did you ever apply your relyx patch?
Andre> No.
Andre> I think I could, though.
Andre> Should I?
I think you should, but we may want to ask lars first.
JMarc
The math parser understands $$ nowadays...
>
> Andre', did you ever apply your relyx patch?
No.
I think I could, though.
Should I?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
math parser understands $$ nowadays...
Andre', did you ever apply your relyx patch?
JMarc
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:09:49AM +, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I have some friends over there (in Germany) and they confirmed me
> that it is not yet friday. Actually they have stated clearly that
> today is monday. Are you sure that you are in the correct time frame?
Yes, I have
ax), the next one thinks
> reLyX is cute (especially if nobody understands it), the third one does not
> want to break anything that happens to work (somehow, for a few people) and
> the fourth camp likes to completely stall work for three months twice a
> year...
>
> Andre'
I
Macros do not have to
nest properly. Moreover, it uses fixed values for deliminiters, so this
can't work except for some class of "reasonably well-behaved LaTeX" - and
we have reLyX for this job already. At it seems to have the same broken
two-stage process full tokenization/full parsin
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Sure enough, these "canonical substitutions" must be performed,
Probably not. The math parser understands $$ nowadays...
> but making
> them in a separate phase before parsing (as relyx does) see
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:53:34PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > >
> > > I think Kayvan wants to write a relyx in python
> > >
> >
> > Yes.
>
> You mentioned pylatex some time
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> >
> > I think Kayvan wants to write a relyx in python
> >
>
> Yes.
You mentioned pylatex some time ago. Is it any good ?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:45:52PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
> > Considering that now there is support for regular expressions in C++,
> > complete rewrite of reLyX in C++ is also a good option
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Considering that now there is support for regular expressions in C++,
> complete rewrite of reLyX in C++ is also a good option. Is there someone
> working on this? Or at least planning to work? If so, I woul
Hi,
I recently found a bug in reLyX that I think is related to th infamous
underscore bug in labels: reLyX simply crash if you have two inline maths
not separed by any character, like $a$$b$ (wich is somewat common in .tex
files generated by scientific workplace). Latex understands this as two
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said
>> did not work would actually work.
Andre> I tried again, and now it does not transla
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said did
> not work would actually work.
I tried again, and now it does not translate tables anymore.
Actually, this starts to piss me off, and I think I'd just
le
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't
>> it do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Andre> Because I'
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't it
> do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Because I've not seen that part...
Yes, this can go as well.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to
% equivalent command that it *does* support, then we might as well
% translate it.
%While copying things in math mode, reLyX will replace anything of the
% following commands with (exactly) whatever text is in braces, so, e.g.,
% $x\sb{a}$ will be converted to $x_{a}$ in the LyX file.
%In most
ex: BUGS
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/BUGS,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 BUGS
--- BUGS29 Mar 2000 23:02:35 - 1.2
+++ BUGS16 Oct 2002 10:52:58 -
@@ -12,16 +12,11 @@ is probably simplest to fix in t
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> So is it ok to apply what I have?
I tend to think so. We'll see what kind of further cleanup is needed.
Unless somebody is willing to do some extensive testing from your
patch.
Can you post it again, BTW?
JMarc
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:07:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the "unfixed"
> Andre> math produced by the "new" reLyX.
>
> Andre> But then, why should a 1.1.6 user use a reLyX tha
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But maybe are we safe by setting the lyxformat to the oldest
>> construct contained in the file.
Andre> I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the "unfixed"
And
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Forget about that. I am probably confused.
>
> Now, of course we will have the problem that relyx produces a
> \lyxformat 2.15 file which is not really suitable for old lyxen. This
> is going to get
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: All of them are handled.
>> But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
Andre> I n
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> All of them are handled.
>
> But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
I never touched reLyX before as far as I remember. So, no.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Fr
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: These seem to work ok.
>> Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Andre> Hm, could we do this in small steps?
Yes, but at le
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> These seem to work ok.
>
> Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Hm, could we do this in small steps?
> Other things I see by a cursory grep:
>
> BasicLyX.pm:
>
> - update the $MathEnvi
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> but those may need support:
>>
>> \sb {_} \sp {^} \ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath
>> is unnec.
Andre> These seem to work ok.
Fine
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> but those may need support:
>
> \sb{_}
> \sp{^}
> \ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath is unnec.
These seem to work ok.
The only glitch I found is the translation of {\cal X}
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Then you will need to update the BUGS file (probably just removing
> text :) and also take a look at what the man page says. It is probable
> that only you know what things reLyX still needs to do about math.
Actual
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize
Andre> some math stuff from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores
Andre> in labels bug".
You should also probably
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd like someone more into the reLyX code to say "yes", but I am very
> positive.
It might be that we have too leave the line with the '&' in, but currently
I am unable to say whether
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
| from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores in labels bug".
>
| Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
| list o
The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores in labels bug".
Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
list of "symbols known to mathed", so this can't
> update_tabular(body)
> File "/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_216.py", line 71, in
> upda
> e_tabular
> cell_info.append(cell_re.match(lines[i]).groups())
> AttributeError: 'None' object has no attribute 'groups'
> Bye.
This error is on my working list. Hawk presented s
Just for fun try
de_Userguide.lyx -> *.tex (relyx) -> 2.15 .lyx -> read with CVS LyX
poenitz@millo:/usr/src/lyx/lyx-build/lib/reLyX > ../../src/lyx de_UserGuide.lyx
LyXComm: Pipe /tmp/lyxpipe.in already exists.
If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pipe by hand a
orks just
> fine for this, if it is written in Perl,Python or C++ does not matter.
If it works, yes. The perl LaTeX parser package we are using in reLyX
currently just "does not the Right Thing". It does not read tokens as LaTeX
does but rather stings that look like LaTeX tokens in m
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>>
>> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
| I think I'll have a look a
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>
> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX in the 1.3.0
series. So
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> - If it is not realistic that a bug will be fixed within a reasonable
> time-frame, mark it as "LATER" or "REMIND".
For a bugzilla as small as LyX's, I'd be happy with resolving as LATER
where appropriate, although thi
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:15:28AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
> You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
> for a week or two, but I will get it done.
I've assigned them all to you. Don't worry it doesn
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
> >
> > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
> You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
> for a week or two, but I will
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>
> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
You can go ahead and assign a few to
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
--
Lgb
So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how this
feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land."
- Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers
> The same file was smoothly translated into LyX-code when using reLyX
> from WITHIN
> LyX ! Of course you'll be asking: why is this guy then using the
> command-line
> version of reLyX ???
>
> Simply put: because I have a bunch of source-files to incorporate into a
&
Hi,
Tried to lyx the following LaTeX-source:
-
\documentclass[a4paper,twoside]{article}
\begin{document}
<>=
@
\end{document}
-
using the command:
reLyX -d search.ltx sear
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:54:06PM -0800, Eddie Benowitz wrote:
> Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
> import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
> outputs after an export latex. This would be really
> useful. Thanks.
I will look to this issue but I don
Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
outputs after an export latex. This would be really
useful. Thanks.
Eddie.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
>
> I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
>
> I'm trying to add language support to reLyX. That is both \selectlanguage{}
> and \foreignlanguage{}{}, where should I look to? Basic_Lyx.pm?
Don't forget \R{} and \L{}
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:30:52PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> As long as we're at it,
> what's the current support for \mbox?
Non-existent in mathed I have to admit. I have thought about it, but even
with the new text insets it is non-trivial as math insets work a bit
differently (they don't hav
201 - 300 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
