Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-05 Thread Charles de Miramon
jezZiFeR wrote: > And there I put all the folders that come with biblatex-dw? There?s a > doc- and a tex-folder, that also have folders inside them. Or is it > enough to copy the content of the biblatex-dw-folder (doc->latex- > >biblatex-dw). Yes. The best introduction to biblatex is the two a

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-05 Thread jezZiFeR
The problem now is, that I don?t get an index. I have inserted a BibTex-Index and tried different styles. As far as I understood it doesn?t matter, which one I choose. Or do I have to install a style also? We are getting there You must now follow step 4 and 5 of the wiki http://wiki.

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-05 Thread jezZiFeR
Sorry, I forgot to enter the "\printbibliography"-ERT. I also removed the problem with the false references. Now I at least get an index, but a totally empty one. It seems, that I have to install the styles also. I have downloaded this, which should work for me: http://biblatex.dominik-wassenhove

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-05 Thread Charles de Miramon
jezZiFeR wrote: >> If you want to use Dominik Wassenhoven's styles you must also >> download and >> install them on your computer because, the styles are not included >> in the >> standard biblatex. But you can do that later... > > So it doesn?t matter which style I choose? > In the wiki is menti

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-05 Thread Charles de Miramon
jezZiFeR wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to enter the "\printbibliography"-ERT. I also removed > the problem with the false references. Now I at least get an index, > but a totally empty one. It seems, that I have to install the styles > also. I have downloaded this, which should work for me: > > http:

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
If you want to use Dominik Wassenhoven's styles you must also download and install them on your computer because, the styles are not included in the standard biblatex. But you can do that later... So it doesn´t matter which style I choose? In the wiki is mentioned, that I have to enter this

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread cmiramon
jezZiFeR wrote: >>> error: >>> LaTeX Error: File `biblatex.sty' not found. >>> >> >> Did you install biblatex on your computer ? >> >> If not and you are using MacTeX follow the instructions here : >> >> http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/archives/2008/05/11/mla-bibliographies-in-mactex/ >

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
error: LaTeX Error: File `biblatex.sty' not found. Did you install biblatex on your computer ? If not and you are using MacTeX follow the instructions here : http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/archives/2008/05/11/mla-bibliographies-in-mactex/ Thanks – I assumed it was installed with M

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
error: LaTeX Error: File `biblatex.sty' not found. Did you install biblatex on your computer ? If not and you are using MacTeX follow the instructions here : http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/archives/2008/05/11/mla-bibliographies-in-mactex/ Thanks – I assumed it was installed with M

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread cmiramon
jezZiFeR wrote: > Thank you. The problem is, that Lyx still produces errors. What could > be the problem then? > This is the error-message: > > error: > LaTeX Error: File `biblatex.sty' not found. > Did you install biblatex on your computer ? If not and you are using MacTeX follow the instruct

1.6.1

2009-01-04 Thread Frederick Noronha [फ़रेदरिक नोरोनया]
Just shifted to Lyx 1.6.1 today and it's very nice! I particularly liked its superior NAVIGATE functions, that allows you to reach to specific footnotes, etc. Thanks guys and ladies, who worked on it! FN http://goa1556.goa-india.org -- FN * Independent Journalist http://fn.goa-india.org

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
jezZiFeR wrote: I found that location, thanks. So I should save my BibDesk-files there? It seems a little strange for me, as I save them in a documents- folder generally. Or where should I enter the absolute path? I´m also confused, because I have a folder "texmf". Is this the folder, where t

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
jezZiFeR wrote: > I found that location, thanks. So I should save my BibDesk-files   > there? It seems a little strange for me, as I save them in a documents- > folder generally. Or where should I enter the absolute path? > > I´m also confused, because I have a folder "texmf". Is this the   > folde

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
-Script)]{report (KOMA-Script) (with biblatex)} Format 11 # Load the report (KOMA-Script) class Input report (KOMA-Script).layout Input scrreprt.layout Thanks, this works! What does "Format 11" mean (I use this one, because I use Lyx 1.6.1)? This is the current version of the

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Format 11 > > > > # Load the report (KOMA-Script) class > > Input report (KOMA-Script).layout > > Input scrreprt.layout BTW, with LyX 1.6, you do not need such a dedicated layout file. You can also use a module that can be loaded for any class without further modific

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
eport (KOMA-Script)]{report (KOMA-Script) (with > biblatex)} > > Format 11 > > # Load the report (KOMA-Script) class > Input report (KOMA-Script).layout Input scrreprt.layout > # this is biblatex actually > Provides natbib 1 > > What does "Format 11" me

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
) (with biblatex)} Format 11 # Load the report (KOMA-Script) class Input report (KOMA-Script).layout # this is biblatex actually Provides natbib 1 What does "Format 11" mean (I use this one, because I use Lyx 1.6.1)? 2) I still don´t get article-class working. After reconfiguring I

Re: biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
jezZiFeR wrote: > I tried to create a new file "bblarticle.layout" (for article-class)   > with Textedit and Lyx, but both are not able to save with the layout- > suffix. I was not able to figure out, if it works with Texshop, I   > really don´t get it. Could somebody please tell me how to create t

biblatex for Lyx 1.6.1, OSX

2009-01-04 Thread jezZiFeR
Hello, I´m trying to install biblatex, following the instructions of http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex I tried to create a new file "bblarticle.layout" (for article-class) with Textedit and Lyx, but both are not able to save with the layout- suffix. I was not able to figure out, if it works

svn for version control on Mac LyX 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread John T. Hale
lso a mention (point 29) in the LyX 1.6 release notes of support for svn, as well. I'm not sure how to unleash Pavel's functionality, though. Presumably some option needs to be altered to issue commands like "svn checkout" rather than "co". Is there a way to use

Re: Errormessages with Jurabib in Lyx 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
jezZiFeR wrote: > Bibliography-style is »gerunsrt«. It works fone with natbib. Jurabib only works with its own styles, e.g. "jurabib" or "jurunsrt". Cf. http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background Jürgen

Re: Errormessages with Jurabib in Lyx 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
jezZiFeR wrote: > I get those errormessages with other encodings also. I choosed them in > Bibdesk->prefs->files->string encoding (open and export bibtex files using > encoding…) > i have tried windows latin, western (ascii) and western (macos roman). > > the other encodings are asian, which one sh

Re: Errormessages with Jurabib in Lyx 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread jezZiFeR
I get those errormessages with other encodings also. I choosed them in Bibdesk->prefs->files->string encoding (open and export bibtex files using encoding…) i have tried windows latin, western (ascii) and western (macos roman). the other encodings are asian, which one should I choose? Or do you me

Re: Errormessages with Jurabib in Lyx 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
jezZiFeR wrote: > Mac OSX: > In a document (report) I use citations from BibDesk, which string   > encoding I already puton utf-8. This works fine, when I use natbib,   > but as soon as I choose jurabib You cannot use utf8-encoded BibTeX files in general (Bibtex does not support multibyte encodin

Re: [LyX 1.6.1] lyx2lyx don't work

2008-12-24 Thread Marcus Glöder
Marcus Glöder schrieb: Hello and a nice day, Hello, now I have solved my problem. I had installed LyX 1.6.1 by LyX-161-4-16-AltInstaller-Small.exe After I deleted LyX 1.6.1 and reinstalled it with the installation file LyX-1.6.1-1-Installer.exe, it works. Both installation files you can

Errormessages with Jurabib in Lyx 1.6.1

2008-12-24 Thread jezZiFeR
Mac OSX: In a document (report) I use citations from BibDesk, which string encoding I already puton utf-8. This works fine, when I use natbib, but as soon as I choose jurabib – and yes, I inserted this into the preamble: \jurabibsetup{% titleformat=italic,% titleformat=commasep,% commabefore

[LyX 1.6.1] lyx2lyx don't work

2008-12-23 Thread Marcus Glöder
Hello and a nice day, on a non-productive system (Windows XP) I have installed by way of trial a German-language version of LyX 1.6.1. Now I can't load my LyX-1.4.x- or 1.5.x-documents into LyX 1.6.1. The (German-language) error message reads: --- \begin{quote} --- LyX

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.1 is released

2008-12-21 Thread Liviu Andronic
Dear all, I've just built LyX 1.6.1 on my system, and wanted to thank for the devel's efforts. Per all the application does not feel that different from the 1.5.x series, however it feels much more usable. And beamer documents compile, so I'm happy. Happy holidays, Liviu PS Only a

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.1

2008-12-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello LyXers, I forgot to announce the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.1, that is available since a few days. This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing LyX 1.6.0 installation to LyX 1.6.1. NOTE: To be able to use this installer version, LyX 1.6.0 must

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:44:33AM -0500, E. Kaplan wrote: > I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository, > and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the > 32 bit and 64 bit architectures. And this is how related to missing tex styles in D

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-19 Thread Nina Lafayette
er Menzel wrote: > >> On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: > >>> Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > >>> > >>>> Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 > >>>> === > >>&g

bug in 1.6.1 display png image

2008-12-18 Thread asm23
hi all: it seems in 1.6.1 , in windows, the png image was not converting properly and can't be displayed. I close lyx and reopen it, but the problem still exist. I suspect I have the long folder name, but I eliminated this case. see the attachment of the screen shot. But the jpg image

Re: problem of update to 1.6.1 on windows

2008-12-18 Thread asm23
asm23 wrote: So, I should manually change to "d:\Program Files\LyX 1.6.0\etc\ImageMagick" Sorry for my typo, it should be "1.6.1"

problem of update to 1.6.1 on windows

2008-12-18 Thread asm23
Hi,everyone. I have download the "LyX-161-4-16-AltInstaller-Update.exe" to update my previous 1.6.0 version. It seems that the "D:\Program Files\LyX 1.6.0" were renamed to "D:\Program Files\LyX 1.6.1". But there is a problem. In the menu Tools->preference-&g

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-18 Thread E. Kaplan
I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository, and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the 32 bit and 64 bit architectures. Ehud Kaplan Sven Hoexter wrote: On Thu

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-18 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles > > that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part > > of Ubuntu. That's not

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-18 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan wrote: >> > Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64? >> >> Well - it is not only 94 bit -

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-18 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan wrote: > > Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64? > > Well - it is not only 94 bit - > It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-17 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan wrote: > Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64? Well - it is not only 94 bit - It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I would prefer not to compile from source). Is there a chance to build the binaries for

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-17 Thread E. Kaplan
Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64? Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote: It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit Kubuntu (8.10

RE: Lyx 1.6.1 can't see my Bibtex references!

2008-12-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Piero Faustini wrote: > 100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed. > LyX 1.6.0, same file, no problems. I'm 99% sure is a v1.6.1 issue. I found > that if I select In Documents - options - language the options "default > language encoding", Lyx can find the references i

RE: Lyx 1.6.1 can't see my Bibtex references!

2008-12-17 Thread Piero Faustini
> Piero Faustini wrote: > > The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file? > > > > > And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this? 100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed. LyX 1.6.0, same file, no problems. I&#x

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-17 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote: > It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit > Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it? Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates that use dpkg. dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install)

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-17 Thread E. Kaplan
install, having installed texlive-full first using synaptic package manager. Nick Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to

Re: Lyx 1.6.1 can't see my Bibtex references!

2008-12-17 Thread Manveru
a UTF extended encoding for my Document. > I can't remember why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner > everything worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that > LyX can't read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue >

Re: Lyx 1.6.1 can't see my Bibtex references!

2008-12-17 Thread rgheck
Piero Faustini wrote: The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file? And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this? rh

Lyx 1.6.1 can't see my Bibtex references!

2008-12-17 Thread Piero Faustini
ember why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner everything worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that LyX can't read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue doesn't show anything) although BibLaTeX can read everything

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-16 Thread Christopher Menzel
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-16 Thread Nick Bell
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on the Web? Quick Google search turns up: http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591 That's for Int

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-15 Thread Christopher Menzel
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

2008-12-15 Thread Fritz Bein
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller >Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 >=== Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on the Web? Kind regards,

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.6.1 is released

2008-12-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.1. This is the first maintenance release in the brand-new 1.6.x series, and as such, it mainly focuses on bug fixes. We have ironed out some major problems that slipped into

Re: LyX 1.2.1 and R 1.6.1 eps Figures won't display in LyX

2002-11-14 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
ery figure has "Error converting to loadable format." Yet it displays the figures in the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper="special" arguments. This used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX. There

LyX 1.2.1 and R 1.6.1 eps Figures won't display in LyX

2002-11-14 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
es in the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper="special" arguments. This used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX. Another problem has to do with ps2pdf reporting for one document in particular: [lrb0r

<    1   2   3