Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I t
On 03/25/2010 06:20 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new environments and
character
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
>> I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new environments and
>> character styles might be to start a public collection of them. ...
>
Steve Litt wrote:
> It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
> editor, though I tried. If I'd been able to specify one, I'd have either
note that we did some specification already - year or two ago, just the coder
was not found ;) look on the archive if you want
On 03/22/2010 10:52 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt
> wrote:
> > On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
> >> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
> >> would it be to program one, but that would be one good
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
>> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
>> would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
>
> It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't ev
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas
wrote:
> Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
> on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
> finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
> wonders to convert our main targ
btw, a chrome extension that does the copy url thing...
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bijpdibkloghppkbmhcklkogpjaenfkg
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada
On
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> Oh Gawd no! That is if I understand you to mean that it will check my
> spelling as I type, and interrupt my creative flow to inform me that it
> thinks I misspelled something. {or even worse silently replacing
> misspelled or unknow
>
> > Sorry, but HTML has (or can be used for) a semantic markup in a quite
> > comparable way. So, keeping sections, links, emphasized text, quotes,
> > ... as an option would be an enhancement.
>
> What we could do is implement some extended paste option that runs a
> converter
> (HTML->LaTeX->Ly
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
> > point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
> > take
> > care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
> > braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
> would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I tried. If I'd been
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
> would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX, I don't really understand it
very well, so I'm not grasping th
On 03/22/2010 05:43 PM, Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
This has been discussed often, and I don't know how hard it would be,
either. I actually suspect that getting somethi
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition. The
second one I miss, mostly because I'm not a native English speaker, is
online spell checking, but that is coming in 2.0.
Again, I have to give my most sincere than
On Monday 22 March 2010 08:51:55 Walter van Holst wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
> From: Walter van Holst
> To: Jose Quesada
>
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada
>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
On 2010-03-22, Walter van Holst wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada
> wrote:
>> 7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
>>(clipboard integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses
>>formatting)
> Actuall, I prefer the current default o
Original Message
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst
To: Jose Quesada
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
>
> 1. incremental
19 matches
Mail list logo
