> On 26 Nov 2022, at 7:08 am, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> Am 25.11.2022 um 18:50 schrieb José Matos :
>>
>> On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 11:36 +1100, Gordon Watson via lyx-users wrote:
>>> gordonwatson@iMac ~ % python3
>>> xcrun: error: invalid active developer path
>>> (/Library/Developer/CommandLineToo
Am 25.11.2022 um 18:50 schrieb José Matos :
>
> On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 11:36 +1100, Gordon Watson via lyx-users wrote:
>> gordonwatson@iMac ~ % python3
>> xcrun: error: invalid active developer path
>> (/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at:
>> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/u
On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 11:36 +1100, Gordon Watson via lyx-users wrote:
> gordonwatson@iMac ~ % python3
> xcrun: error: invalid active developer path
> (/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at:
> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun
This line shows that there is a problem
>
> Reconfigure which you can do manually any time.
>
> You should be able to run
>
> /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -o abc.lyx
> testfile.lyx
>
> directly (ie without the python call) as well.
>
> What do
>
> head -1 /A
run
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -o abc.lyx
testfile.lyx
directly (ie without the python call) as well.
What do
head -1 /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
and
which python
show?
greetings, el
On 2022-10-20 21:10 , Paul A. Ru
On 10/20/22 14:44, ahostmadsen--- via lyx-users wrote:
And to add. When I run the following command, which I think emulates
the converter as run from LyX:
python -tt
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -o
abc.lyx testfile.lyx
the conversion works perfectly. Yet, from
And to add. When I run the following command, which I think emulates the
converter as run from LyX:
python -tt /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -o abc.lyx
testfile.lyx
the conversion works perfectly. Yet, from inside lyx it doesn’t work.
Meanwhile, trying to edit
-1000, Gordon Watson , wrote:
> 1. I also seek to resolve the “lyx2lyx” problem when opening my old LyX
> files. Example message:
>
> /Users/gordonwatson/Desktop/LyX files/BTR19.lyx is from an older version of
> LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
>
> 2. I am usin
I appreciate the feedback I have received, but I’m still left with a somewhat
non-functioning LyX installation. To repeat
1. I cannot open older LyX formats.
2. Instant preview does not work.
This happened recently. Can anyone suggest how I can get LyX to work again?
--
lyx-users mailing list
l
, ahostmadsen--- via lyx-users wrote:
Thanks for the instructions. I ran lyx2lyx from the command line, and
it successfully converted the old file, and Lyx can open the converted
file. But if I try to open the old file from inside LyX I still get:
“...is from an older version of LyX and the
Thanks for the instructions. I ran lyx2lyx from the command line, and it
successfully converted the old file, and Lyx can open the converted file. But
if I try to open the old file from inside LyX I still get: “...is from an older
version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.” So
On the Mac (deduced from the icloud address)
find /Applications/LyX.app/ -name lyx2lyx -type f
tells us
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
Try the complete path/file name on the old file and see what that says.
Looks a little like a TeX installation
Thanks, you mean running lyx2lyx from the terminal? Then I get “command not
found"
When I run reconfigure, I get the message:
The system reconfiguration has failed.
Default textclass is used but LyX may
not be able to work properly.
Please reconfigure again if needed.
Perhaps I totally ne
Have you tried running lyx2lyx on them and see what that says? perhaps
with the --noisy option?
LyX will display, but can't convert. So you need to look what image you
are trying to display and whether there is a converter for that.
Sometimes just a Tools --> Reconfigure will do the t
Thanks, I checked. Yes, it’s on.
One further issue: LyX doesn’t display graphics: “error converting to loadable
format."
But I just mention these issues as symptoms. My main issue is that I cannot
open older LyX files, which is a serious headache.
(Sorry, I’m not sure about the right way to re
On 10/4/22 21:03, ahostmadsen--- via lyx-users wrote:
I have a problem with LyX on one of my Macs (OS 12.5.1).
1. Equations are not typeset inside lyx (compiling the document works
fine).
2. When I try to open older files I get: “…. is from an older version
of LyX and the lyx2lyx
I have a problem with LyX on one of my Macs (OS 12.5.1).
1. Equations are not typeset inside lyx (compiling the document works fine).
2. When I try to open older files I get: “…. is from an older version of LyX
and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.” This is true for many files I
tried
Excellent. Thanks Stephan and Paul.
/System/Volumes/Data/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
-v Contrast\ paper.lyx > Test.lyx
produced a document Test.lyx that could be read by LyX 2.3.6.2.
This converted document was fairly recent (2016) so fingers crossed it
wo
Am 21.08.2022 um 10:33 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> you have to change your command - lyx2lyx is a folder in Resources:
Sorry, this one sends the standard output to trash… this is useful in case of
lyx2lyx is logging errors separately (I’m not sure it works that way).
&g
Hi Tim,
you have to change your command - lyx2lyx is a folder in Resources:
$ /System/Volumes/Data/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
-v Contrast\ paper.lyx > /dev/null
…
In case it’s a python problem the following command and it’s output is of
interest:
$ /usr/bin/
Sorry, probably being dense here but this is what I get after finding
the function
/System/Volumes/Data/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx -v
Contrast\ paper.lyx
zsh: permission denied:
/System/Volumes/Data/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx
Thanks for helping out
Am 18.08.2022 um 18:07 schrieb Paul A. Rubin :
>
> On 8/18/22 11:15, Tim J Garrett wrote:
>> Running MacOS Monterrey and getting this error message trying to open old
>> lyx files as recent as 2016:
>>
>> “file.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx s
On 8/18/22 11:15, Tim J Garrett wrote:
Running MacOS Monterrey and getting this error message trying to open
old lyx files as recent as 2016:
“file.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script
failed to convert it.”
Unclear what to do from online forums. Any advice? I’m not
Running MacOS Monterrey and getting this error message trying to open
old lyx files as recent as 2016:
“file.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script
failed to convert it.”
Unclear what to do from online forums. Any advice? I’m not a
developer, so step-by-step would be
2.3.6.2 works on my 12.3.1 (x86 and arm)
I use hombrew's python but the stub will also work because homebrew
will ask for the Command Line Tools anyway :-)-O
el
On 2022-04-19 11:46 , Stephan Witt wrote:
[...]
> LyX is trying to use python3 while looking for python. This one
> (/usr/bin/python3
Am 19.04.2022 um 11:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda via lyx-users
:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:10:30AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
Now you have to install Python yourself. You may download it from
python.org (https://www.python.org/downloads/macos/). Alternatively you
may run python in
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:10:30AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> Now you have to install Python yourself. You may download it from
> >> python.org (https://www.python.org/downloads/macos/). Alternatively you
> >> may run python in a terminal window and choose to install it from Apple. I
> >> r
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:21:42AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Apple finally removed Python 2 in macOS 12.3 - sorry for LyX not being
> prepared. At the time LyX 2.3.6.2 was built it was announced already but not
> sure when it happens.
>
> Now you have to install Python yourself. You may downl
On the Mac I STRONGLY recommend using homebrew's python as it will
be updated any time you do a 'brew update'.
el
On 2022-04-17 10:21 , Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 16.04.2022 um 01:52 schrieb gelfand :
Just upgraded (from Mohave!) and when attempt to open any LyX 2.2 and earli
Am 16.04.2022 um 01:52 schrieb gelfand :
>
> Just upgraded (from Mohave!) and when attempt to open any LyX 2.2 and earlier
> get lyx2lyx script failed to convert. Also when attempt to reconfigure get
> system reconfiguration failed.
>
> Did see the warning message when first
Just upgraded (from Mohave!) and when attempt to open any LyX 2.2 and earlier
get lyx2lyx script failed to convert. Also when attempt to reconfigure get
system reconfiguration failed.
Did see the warning message when first launching LyX that in future OS versions
the application will no longer
; Can you send us the file (in PM if it is confidential)?
> >
> > Jürgen
> I used a small part of the book and used -to be on the safe side,
> Lyx 2.2.3 (17Mai2017).
I do not see a lyx2lyx error.
> I get errors, which seem to be due to
> \setkomafont{section}{\it}
>
Am 12.02.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag, den 12.02.2018, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I am trying to open an older lyx file (2016, not sure, which version
of lyx it was) with ~/lyx-2.3.0beta1$ src/lyx -dbg info
It won't export the pdf file, giving this:
File '/tm
Am Montag, den 12.02.2018, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> I am trying to open an older lyx file (2016, not sure, which version
> of lyx it was) with ~/lyx-2.3.0beta1$ src/lyx -dbg info
> It won't export the pdf file, giving this:
> File '/tmp/lyx_tmpdir.EZUiCirb6544/lyx_tmpbuf0/PBR-FINAL
t it inside the float, but to no avail.
Trying the pdf output again would not work.
A search seems to track this error down to a lyx2lyx problem.
Is this a known problem, and is there a work around, or should I try the
latest *stable* version instead?
Wolfgang
On 2018-02-01, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am 01.02.2018 um 15:33 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> Hallo,
>> I have several lyx files made under lyx-2.3.0beta1, but decided to use
>> lyx-2.3.0.
>> I moved the lyx2lyx folder of the beta1 folder to my 2.3.0, but did
>&g
Am 01.02.2018 um 15:33 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hallo,
I have several lyx files made under lyx-2.3.0beta1, but decided to use
lyx-2.3.0.
I moved the lyx2lyx folder of the beta1 folder to my 2.3.0, but did
not find in the lyx help books a description how to use it. Could
somebody point to a
Hallo,
I have several lyx files made under lyx-2.3.0beta1, but decided to use
lyx-2.3.0.
I moved the lyx2lyx folder of the beta1 folder to my 2.3.0, but did not
find in the lyx help books a description how to use it. Could somebody
point to a place where to find a description?
Thanks
2015-04-23 14:19 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann:
>
> By using trac? --->
>
You could download the file one by one via trac (I dno't think you can
download the folder at once). A better solution is to access the git
repository:
http://www.lyx.org/HowToUseGIT
Jürgen
Am 23.04.2015 um 10:01 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
2015-04-22 18:24 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann:
I have copied the lyx2lyx in a file. Is it correct to add .py to it?
No, you need to download the whole lyx2lyx folder.
By using trac? --->
* first install of the latest stable version T
Am 22.04.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
2015-04-22 17:54 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann:
Where can I find the latest lyx2lyx script?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxgit/lib/lyx2lyx
Jürgen
Wolfgang
Thanks, Jürgen,
I have copied the lyx2lyx in a file. Is it correct to
2015-04-22 17:54 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann:
> Where can I find the latest lyx2lyx script?
>
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxgit/lib/lyx2lyx
Jürgen
> Wolfgang
>
Where can I find the latest lyx2lyx script?
Wolfgang//
2014-11-10 14:40 GMT+01:00 Graham Smith:
> Hello Jurgen,
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying, I missed your response.
>
> It won't compile because of R code chunks which have been altered.
>
> What was originally:
>
>
> [image: Inline images 1]
>
> has been changed to:
>
> [image: Inline images 2]
f lyx
> and the lyx2lyx script failed to recover it.
>
> It is one of two documents created at the same time, and the second
> document opens fine.
>
> This one however, gives this error message in Mavericks and Ubuntu 14.04.
> The debug message just says the same as the error
file
is from a new version of Lyx and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert
it.
Is it possible to open the file using the older version of lyx?
I just change the \lyxformat specifier using a text editor and it
usually will work. just open your .lyx file and make the change to
see if it
lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
Is it possible to open the file using the older version of lyx?
I just change the \lyxformat specifier using a text editor and it
usually will work. just open your .lyx file and make the change to see
if it will open.
I try to open
> > the file I get and error message saying that the file is from a new
> version
> > of Lyx and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
> >
> > Is it possible to open the file using the older version of lyx?
>
> Only if you use 2.0.8 (the last releas
w version
> of Lyx and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
>
> Is it possible to open the file using the older version of lyx?
Only if you use 2.0.8 (the last release in the minor series can open
the next major format). You can alternatively copy the lyx2lyx scripts
from 2.0.8 or 2
I want to open a lyx file using lyx version 2.0.5 on Ubuntu 11.04. This
file was created using lyx version 2.1.0-1 on Ubuntu 14.04. When I try to
open the file I get and error message saying that the file is from a new
version of Lyx and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
Is it possible to
/lyx2lyx/, then copy this folder (entirely) to the system dir of
your LyX installation. On Linux this would usually be
/usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx. Make sure to first (re)move the existing
lyx2lyx folder. A word of caution: this is a hackish approach that
should work in many cases, but if you have have
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> Thanks, Liviu, but http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7121#comment:1
> leads to a mail without a reference for the source. Do you know it?
>
Yes. Download the src tarball of LyX [1], unpack and navigate to
/lib/lyx2lyx/, then
>
> I am now using my notebook for completing a paper in lyx. However, the lyx
> file from the pc tells me, the DesmodiumPaperF.lyx is from a newer
> LyX-Version, and the lyx2lyx-Script could not convert the document. The Lyx
> version of the PC was 2.2.2, the version of the notebook 2.0.
file from the pc tells me, the DesmodiumPaperF.lyx is from a newer
LyX-Version, and the lyx2lyx-Script could not convert the document.
The Lyx version of the PC was 2.2.2, the version of the notebook
2.0.0svn. I tried separately in a shell
lyx2lyx DesmodiumPaperF.lyx
bash: lyx2lyx: command
On 04/22/2011 06:15 AM, Stefan Janse van Rensburg wrote:
As for the errors, the main thing was that I was experiencing several
spontaneous crashes which I had not experienced with RC3. Nothing
that resulted in data loss, though.
Any hint at all when these were happening?
OK, re-upgraded t
On 04/22/2011 06:15 AM, Stefan Janse van Rensburg wrote:
As for the errors, the main thing was that I was experiencing several
spontaneous crashes which I had not experienced with RC3. Nothing that
resulted in data loss, though.
Any hint at all when these were happening?
The other issue (t
er version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it."
>
> I have my most important files exported as Lyx 1.6 files, so I can work on them, but I was wondering if there is an easy way for me to convert all my Lyx 2 RC3 files to a format that Lyx 2 Beta 3 will read, without m
is from a newer version of LyX and
> the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it."
>
> I have my most important files exported as Lyx 1.6 files, so I can work on
> them, but I was wondering if there is an easy way for me to convert all my
> Lyx 2 RC3 files to a format that Lyx 2 B
ments as LyX complains that "...file is from a newer version of LyX
and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it."
I have my most important files exported as Lyx 1.6 files, so I can work
on them, but I was wondering if there is an easy way for me to convert
all my Lyx 2 RC3 files to a fo
wrote:
> On 2/1/11 7:02 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
>
>> Thanks Richard,
>>
>> lyx2lyx was indeed missing in my .lyx. After moving it there this is what
>> I get:
>>
>> Sorry, you want it in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/, or wherever this is on
> your syste
On 2/1/11 7:02 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
Thanks Richard,
lyx2lyx was indeed missing in my .lyx. After moving it there this is
what I get:
Sorry, you want it in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/, or wherever this is on
your system.
rh
Thanks Richard,
lyx2lyx was indeed missing in my .lyx. After moving it there this is what I
get:
~/.lyx ♪ Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/quesada/.lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 23, in
import LyX
File "/home/quesada/.lyx/lyx2lyx/LyX.py", line 91, in
On 02/01/2011 01:34 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
Hi,
Quite often I have problems with lyx2lyx failing when updating from
svn and doing a make install. I've been trying to pinpoint the problem
to write a better report, but to no avail. Where should lyx2lyx go
normally? does it follow the --p
Hi,
Quite often I have problems with lyx2lyx failing when updating from svn and
doing a make install. I've been trying to pinpoint the problem to write a
better report, but to no avail. Where should lyx2lyx go normally? does it
follow the --prefix? it fails even when I rename my .lyx folde
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
> Nope, there's no lyx2lyx in .lyx.
> I installed using a --prefix. there, inside share, there's a lyx2lyx... but
> maybe the system doesn't see it, and it's using 1.6.8, which *maybe* can be
> found in the path.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the svn version for the last 6 months. Today I tried beta 2,
> and it seems to be incompatible with my templates and files produced with
> the svn version (!).
>
By chance, did you copy a spec
6.lyx
<http://exist.de/exist.de.16.lyx> is from an older version of LyX and
the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
Warning: 410: Format not supported.
Warning: Quitting.
Error: Conversion script failed
/home/quesada/.lyx/templates/defaults.lyx is fr
Hi,
I've been using the svn version for the last 6 months. Today I tried beta 2,
and it seems to be incompatible with my templates and files produced with
the svn version (!).
This is what I get:
/home/quesada/Dropbox/exist.de/exist.de.16.lyx is from an older version of
LyX and the ly
Le 21 sept. 10 à 19:49, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit :
this is the message from the command line:
wolfg...@wolfgang:~/Epigenetik$ tex2lyx EG-Ox.tex
Not overwriting existing file /home/wolfgang/Epigenetik/EG-Ox.lyx
wolfg...@wolfgang:~/Epigenetik$ tex2lyx EG-Oxy.tex
Creating file /home/wolfgang/Epige
Am Tuesday 21 September 2010 17:14:53 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 09/21/2010 05:22 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Monday 20 September 2010 21:03:24 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> >> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >>> however, Pavel (and the author of the ticket) ment to change the name
> >>> of the file
On 09/21/2010 05:22 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Monday 20 September 2010 21:03:24 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
however, Pavel (and the author of the ticket) ment to change the name of
the file (?).
no i didnt meant this, but by chance you solved your pr
Am Monday 20 September 2010 21:03:24 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > however, Pavel (and the author of the ticket) ment to change the name of
> > the file (?).
>
> no i didnt meant this, but by chance you solved your problem anyway...
actually, one of the three:
There is stil
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> however, Pavel (and the author of the ticket) ment to change the name of the
> file (?).
no i didnt meant this, but by chance you solved your problem anyway...
your problem is actually bug 3934 :)
pavel
Am Monday 20 September 2010 17:17:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > could it be that the lyx2lyx script or whatever does the job needs
> > something which is missing in my case?
>
> we already have one major bug concerning lyx2lyx, maybe its your case
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> could it be that the lyx2lyx script or whatever does the job needs something
> which is missing in my case?
we already have one major bug concerning lyx2lyx, maybe its your case
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6809
in other words have you tried to change th
:
How do I make the lyx/lyx export working?
I have a lyx file produced with lyx2.0 and want to work on it now
under lyx1.6.7.
I used
file>export>lyx1.6.x
but when trying to load it in lyx1.6.7 I am told,
it is from a different version of lyx.
lyx2lyx failed.
Are you su
/lyx export working?
> > > > I have a lyx file produced with lyx2.0 and want to work on it now
> > > > under lyx1.6.7.
> > > > I used
> > > > file>export>lyx1.6.x
> > > > but when trying to load it in lyx1.6.7 I am told,
> &g
ant to work on it now under
> > > lyx1.6.7.
> > > I used
> > > file>export>lyx1.6.x
> > > but when trying to load it in lyx1.6.7 I am told,
> > > it is from a different version of lyx.
> > > lyx2lyx failed.
> >
> > Are you su
file>export>lyx1.6.x
> > but when trying to load it in lyx1.6.7 I am told,
> > it is from a different version of lyx.
> > lyx2lyx failed.
>
> Are you sure you are opening the correct file? If so, then this is a bug.
>
> rh
Yes, pritty much. I saved the lyx2.0 fi
of lyx.
lyx2lyx failed.
Are you sure you are opening the correct file? If so, then this is a bug.
rh
How do I make the lyx/lyx export working?
I have a lyx file produced with lyx2.0 and want to work on it now under
lyx1.6.7.
I used
file>export>lyx1.6.x
but when trying to load it in lyx1.6.7 I am told,
it is from a different version of lyx.
lyx2lyx failed.
I tried lyx2lyx , but the comm
On Monday 25 January 2010 16:13:30 Stefano Franchi wrote:
> I am trying to open a lyx file produced by a conversion script and
> Lyx (1.6.5) fails claiming lyx2lyx could not convert it.
> The lyx file is in lyx format 2.16 (or so it claims in its header).
>
> Launching lyx2lyx f
I am trying to open a lyx file produced by a conversion script and
Lyx (1.6.5) fails claiming lyx2lyx could not convert it.
The lyx file is in lyx format 2.16 (or so it claims in its header).
Launching lyx2lyx from the console gives the following error:
Warning: An error ocurred in 225
Today I received a buggy tex document from a friend, and LyX could't import
it:
Warning: #LyX file created by tex2lyx 1.6.2
LyX Code: 8 name: unknown
../../../src/support/lassert.cpp(21): ASSERTION false VIOLATED
IN ../../src/insets/Inset.cpp:137
../../../src/support/lassert.cpp(21): ASSERTION b
On Monday 18 May 2009 06:18:42 pm Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Stefano Franchi schrieb:
> > 3. I opened the .lyx file in an editor and the preamble says:
> >
> > LyX file created by tex2lyx 1.6.2
> > \lyxformat 247
>
> So tex2lyx run successfully, but lyx2lyx failed to con
Stefano Franchi schrieb:
3. I opened the .lyx file in an editor and the preamble says:
LyX file created by tex2lyx 1.6.2
\lyxformat 247
So tex2lyx run successfully, but lyx2lyx failed to convert it further from format 247 to 345. Can
you provide a small TeX file to be able to reproduce the
I am encountering a strange problem:
I am trying to import a LaTex file but I cannot get lyx to properly import it,
because lyx2lyx (which I didn't know was used in this process) fails to
convert the .lyx file produced by latex2lyx
Here is what I did:
File>Import>Latex(plain)
Er
. However,
> it has not been maintained since 2000 and it produces lyx files in the 2.16
> format.
Could you send me (privately) a small lyx file that fails?
Previous lyx versions were quite lenient in the accepted lyx files, they
accepted files that could never be formed by lyx. lyx2lyx trie
the 2.16 format.
When I tried to open the files in my current version of Lyx (1.6.1) lyx2lyx
failed to convert the file to the new format.
I don't know if the failed conversion is due to the old format or to an error
by the mif2lyx conversion script. I tried to download an older version o
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Maybe someone with right permission could change the topic to
> "LyX should have an option of where to export".
or somebody with the right permissions could give long standing
contributors bigger rights in bugzilla.
pavel
On 2009-03-11, Richard Heck wrote:
> M-L wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400
>> rgheck wrote:
>>> M-L wrote:
rgheck wrote:
> As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But
> you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.
>> But maybe not many are so stu
M-L wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400
rgheck wrote:
M-L wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400
rgheck wrote:
As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But
you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.
Thank you for that. I w
which I can import the latest changes to my laptop, then I suppose
> that the version of the script on the linux with the lyx ver 1.6.1
> could also" mv ${filename}.lyx ${filename}-v161.lyx, then invoke
> lyx2lyx to save the lyx 1.5.6 version as ${filename}.lyx... That way
> m
rent linux box.
> > But the available version of lyx was only 1.5.6 and when I
> > tried to open the document I was informed that it had been
> > created by a different version of lyx. And that the
> > lyx2lyx script had failed.
> LyX 1.5.6 pre-dates 1.6.1 and hence the
On 2009-03-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Guenter Milde schrieb:
>> As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers
>> and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser
>> (save-file dialogue) with export.
> I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx" ins
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400
rgheck wrote:
> M-L wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400
> > rgheck wrote:
> >
> >> As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But
> >> you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.
> >>
> >>
> > Thank you for that. I will
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Guenter Milde schrieb:
As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file
managers
and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a
destination-chooser
(save-file dialogue) with export.
I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx" instead to "name.lyx15"
Y
Guenter Milde schrieb:
As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers
and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser
(save-file dialogue) with export.
I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx" instead to "name.lyx15"
regards Uwe
On 2009-03-09, M-L wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400
> rgheck wrote:
>> As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you
>> have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.
> Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows.
> It seems that was the
M-L wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400
rgheck wrote:
As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you
have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.
Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows.
It seems that was the problem and I did
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
