Hello, everybody.
I'm paying my once-per-year visit to ms windows to see what's up. Today
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex.. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I can process latex files from Texmacs, for example. Texmacs
Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I tried out once to use latex under cygwin, but the compilation of the
documents takes a lot of time. Using MikTeX was much faster.
Hello, everybody.
I'm paying my once-per-year visit to ms windows to see what's up. Today
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex.. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I can process latex files from Texmacs, for example. Texmacs
Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I tried out once to use latex under cygwin, but the compilation of the
documents takes a lot of time. Using MikTeX was much faster.
Hello, everybody.
I'm paying my once-per-year visit to ms windows to see what's up. Today
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex.. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I can process latex files from Texmacs, for example. Texmacs
Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm wondering if I really have to install MikTeX when I already have a
working latex. I have a full cygwin install and latex works in there.
I tried out once to use latex under cygwin, but the compilation of the
documents takes a lot of time. Using MikTeX was much faster.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, robin wrote:
That's not a problem anyway - a GPLed program can utilise external
proprietary programs (xforms wasn't GPLed until very recently).
A GPL'd program can link to a non-free library _only_ if the non-free
library is part of the operating system. LyX has always had a
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL (but no LGPL!), so you can use it with
GPL applications.
Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
non-commercial version of Qt 2.x.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
non-commercial version of Qt 2.x.
Of course, anyone is free to port the GPL'd version of Qt to Windoze...
then again, why bother?
of you
experienced guys imagine that, and explain if there is hope for such a
native Windows LyX?
Cheers,
Lucian
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL,
right?), so maybe QT port will run without problems?
John There are patches from somebody (sorry I've forgotten
A solution to your whole cygwin install party, might be:
take one unix machine, make accounts, and let the windows users use an x server like
xwin32.
You can make a nice x-login with xdmcp, or just give them putty also, so they can ssh,
and set the DISPLAY to the remote ip_addess:0 in their
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, robin wrote:
That's not a problem anyway - a GPLed program can utilise external
proprietary programs (xforms wasn't GPLed until very recently).
A GPL'd program can link to a non-free library _only_ if the non-free
library is part of the operating system. LyX has always had a
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL (but no LGPL!), so you can use it with
GPL applications.
Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
non-commercial version of Qt 2.x.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
non-commercial version of Qt 2.x.
Of course, anyone is free to port the GPL'd version of Qt to Windoze...
then again, why bother?
of you
experienced guys imagine that, and explain if there is hope for such a
native Windows LyX?
Cheers,
Lucian
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL,
right?), so maybe QT port will run without problems?
John There are patches from somebody (sorry I've forgotten
A solution to your whole cygwin install party, might be:
take one unix machine, make accounts, and let the windows users use an x server like
xwin32.
You can make a nice x-login with xdmcp, or just give them putty also, so they can ssh,
and set the DISPLAY to the remote ip_addess:0 in their
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, robin wrote:
>That's not a problem anyway - a GPLed program can utilise external
>proprietary programs (xforms wasn't GPLed until very recently).
A GPL'd program can link to a non-free library _only_ if the non-free
library is part of the operating system. LyX has always had
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL (but no LGPL!), so you can use it with
GPL applications.
Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
"non-commercial" version of Qt 2.x.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>Only the UNIX version is GPL-ed. For windows there's a binary only
>"non-commercial" version of Qt 2.x.
Of course, anyone is free to port the GPL'd version of Qt to Windoze...
then again, why bother?
brary? Can any of you
experienced guys imagine that, and explain if there is hope for such a
native Windows LyX?
Cheers,
Lucian
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
>> AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL,
>> right?), so maybe QT port will run without problems?
John> There are patches from somebody (sorry
A solution to your whole cygwin install party, might be:
take one unix machine, make accounts, and let the windows users use an x server like
xwin32.
You can make a nice x-login with xdmcp, or just give them putty also, so they can ssh,
and set the DISPLAY to the remote ip_addess:0 in their
Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server).. reason I ask is I made a
presentation on LyX (actually, more of a demo) in my department here and
a LOT of
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:24:49PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server)..
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
There are patches from somebody (sorry I've forgotten your name !) but
we haven't heard from them for a while
Jacek Popawski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL (but no
Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server).. reason I ask is I made a
presentation on LyX (actually, more of a demo) in my department here and
a LOT of
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:24:49PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server)..
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
There are patches from somebody (sorry I've forgotten your name !) but
we haven't heard from them for a while
Jacek Popawski wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
maybe QT port will run without problems?
Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL (but no
Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server).. reason I ask is I made a
presentation on LyX (actually, more of a demo) in my department here and
a LOT of
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:24:49PM -0500, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. I'm guessing someone's asked this before but anyways - is there any
> plan to have a Windows version of LyX, i.e. a native Win version (so
> that one doesn't need Cygwin and an X server)..
AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
> AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
> maybe QT port will run without problems?
There are patches from somebody (sorry I've forgotten your name !) but
we haven't heard from them for a while
Jacek Popawski wrote:
> AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
> maybe QT port will run without problems?
Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > AFAIK you can use QT for Windows in GPL projects (LyX _is_ GPL, right?), so
> > maybe QT port will run without problems?
>
> Isn't Qt for Windows commercial (or not free in terms of beer)?
AFAIK there are two versions, one is GPL
39 matches
Mail list logo
