Re: [M100] M200 vs M100/2 RS232 Differences

2023-06-11 Thread Charlie Hoey
Thanks all! Being able to poll the status of CTS in BASIC was the missing link. I've been doing a similar mini BASIC "printer driver" that would just do garbage loops to delay enough to usually print. I'm going to read the ports as described above and see if I can get things humming on the M100. Wi

Re: [M100] M200 vs M100/2 RS232 Differences

2023-06-11 Thread Peter Noeth
On the M100 and T102, the only automatic flow control method for the RS-232 port is XON/XOFF (software flow control). Back in my HP pen plotter days (1985) I found that 2400 baud was fast enough between a RS Model 4p and any HP serial pen plotter. Just have to get your pen plotter to use XON/XOFF

Re: [M100] M200 vs M100/2 RS232 Differences

2023-06-10 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
To print to a printer that relies on hardware flow control on a m100 you need to write a program to print the file. Can be in BASIC or ML. In a loop you read the file to print and send the data a byte at a time, before sending each character use I/O command to check you're not flowed off. You just

Re: [M100] M200 vs M100/2 RS232 Differences

2023-06-10 Thread Brian K. White
There is definitely no (normal) access to rts/cts from BASIC unless you count BASIC with included/encoded machine language. The hardware exists in the machine. The uart has the pins and they are wired up to the db25, but there is no code anywhere in the main rom that uses them. No BASIC comman

Re: [M100] M200 vs M100/2 RS232 Differences

2023-06-09 Thread Gregory McGill
Why not wire dsr from the printer to CTS On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 5:23 PM Charlie Hoey wrote: > Apologies for the longish post, didn't have time to write a short one! > > *TL;DR* I've been happily serial printing on my 100/102, but my 200 > doesn't work, so I'm in search of a non-hardware solution t