Doug McNutt wrote:
> At 15:29 +0100 10/16/07, David Cantrell wrote:
>> The one I'm most looking forward to is perl being relocatable. Current
>> versions of perl have the values for @INC hard-coded into the binary at
>> compile-time.
>
> You can add to @INC in perl 5 by defining an environment va
On Oct 16, 2007, at 3:56 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote:
So software updates are restricted to keep the size down.
Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software,
updates to command-line programs never make the cut
At 15:29 +0100 10/16/07, David Cantrell wrote:
>The one I'm most looking forward to is perl being relocatable. Current
>versions of perl have the values for @INC hard-coded into the binary at
>compile-time.
You can add to @INC in perl 5 by defining an environment variable PERL5LIB..
If you defin
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:28:48PM +0200, Johan Meskens CS3 jmcs3 wrote:
> > I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has some
> > very nice features that I am excited about.
> like what for example ?
The one I'm most looking forward to is perl being relocatable. Current
versions of perl have the values for
On 平成 19/10/16, at 19:56, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote:
So software updates are restricted to keep the size down.
Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software,
updates to command-line programs never make the cut
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote:
>So software updates are restricted to keep the size down.
> Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software,
> updates to command-line programs never make the cut (developer
> software has it own update
On 10/15/07, Johan Meskens CS3 jmcs3
snip
> > I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has some
> > very nice features that I am excited about.
>
> like what for example ?
snip
Here are some of the things that are coming in Perl 5.10.
* a switch statement:
given($string) {
when (/^
On Oct 15, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Robert Hicks wrote:
Cool and thanks for the answer. I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has
some very nice features that I am excited about. I will definitely
upgrade to 5.10 when it ships final.
Robert
5.10 is going to be really great. And you can always get some
Intrah onat Diria ..
, ** wrote "Revera y":
> I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has some
> very nice features that I am excited about.
like what for example ?
thanks
imegola
jmcs3
the following could be unreadable @ 1192462124 :::
devoiceso7/DluKEomriiaDDjOKJoMKo4oCew
Cool and thanks for the answer. I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has some
very nice features that I am excited about. I will definitely upgrade to
5.10 when it ships final.
Robert
Edward Moy wrote:
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
...
It's been at 5.8.8 for qu
On Oct 14, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of October 14, 2007 12:26:50 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is alleged to have said:
Why is that? Does Apple not provide the resources to make this
possible?
Personally I think they should because the Mac is a great development
platform. I
--As of October 14, 2007 12:26:50 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
alleged to have said:
Why is that? Does Apple not provide the resources to make this possible?
Personally I think they should because the Mac is a great development
platform. I think Apple would win more developers to the platform
On Oct 14, 2007, at 11:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject line was "Leopard Perl version",
Sorry, I misunderstood.
so I said it's been 5.8.8 for quite a while. It is no secret that
we (Apple) try our best to keep up-to-date with perl (and other
opensource pro
On Oct 13, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Bo Lindbergh wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Moy) wrote:
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
But still no 64-bit integers?
As long as Configure says:
Perl can be built to take advantage of 6
dly, a bit
ambiguous.)
But, unless, 10.4 is tracking a different version between uNTEL and
PPC, my system perl is 5.8.6 with all the current 10.4 updates
installed.
The subject line was "Leopard Perl version", so I said it's been 5.8.8
for quite a while. It is no secre
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Moy) wrote:
> % perl -v
>
> This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
But still no 64-bit integers?
/Bo Lindbergh
*ahem*
Go back and read Mr Moy'ss email address.
He may be in a position to answer this question definitively. :-)
FWIW, I didn't see Ed saying that it had been 5.8.8 in _10.4_ for
quite a while. (His mode of expression was, admittedly, a bit
ambiguous.)
But, unless, 10.4 is tracking a d
> "Borys" == Borys Sobieski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Borys> I just checked it on Leopard Developer Preview Build 9A559 and it is
Borys> Perl Ver. 5.8.8
This post is likely to be a violation of your NDA, is it not?
Good luck getting your ADC renewed. :(
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:51:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (5.10 is rumored to be frozen too, but don't hold your breath. :^) )
It isn't. Raphael was still applying patches earlier today.
--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:50:22 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Edward Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: MacPerl Perl
> Subject: Re: Leopard Perl version...
>
> Hmm, are you sure you did not update your perl yoursel
I just checked it on Leopard Developer Preview Build 9A559 and it is
Perl Ver. 5.8.8
Am 13.10.2007 um 20:52 schrieb Geoffrey F. Green:
Leopard.
On Oct 13, 2007, at 2:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, are you sure you did not update your perl yourself? I have a
Macmini from April 2007 (
Leopard.
On Oct 13, 2007, at 2:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, are you sure you did not update your perl yourself? I have a
Macmini from April 2007 (OS X 10.4.10) and it says:
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.6 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Edward Moy w
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Edward Moy wrote:
It's been at 5.8.8 for quite a while. 5.10 is just around the
corner, but too late for Leopard.
Neither one is out yet, but I assume Leopard is pretty well frozen?
(5.10 is rumored to be frozen too, but don't hold your breath. :^) )
Hmm, are you sure you did not update your perl yourself? I have a
Macmini from April 2007 (OS X 10.4.10) and it says:
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.6 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Edward Moy wrote:
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-mu
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
...
It's been at 5.8.8 for quite a while. 5.10 is just around the corner,
but too late for Leopard.
Ed
On Oct 12, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Robert Hicks wrote:
Is it being bumped up to 5.8.8? I am just curious...
Robert
Is it being bumped up to 5.8.8? I am just curious...
Robert
26 matches
Mail list logo
