Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-11 Thread Rajiv Shah
Hi, Thanks. This is very helpful. Regards, Rajiv Original message >Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:31:56 -0500 >From: Mike Arrigo >Subject: Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office >To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > >Ok, I can get this to work, b

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-10 Thread Mike Arrigo
-0400 >> From: erik burggraaf >> Subject: Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> >> Hi, You wrote: >> >>> If you need to use Flash and DRM, use Windows. If you want to use other >>> stuff

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-10 Thread Mike Arrigo
I actually don't use fine reader express either, so I'm also basing things on what I have been told, oh yes, for scanning books, kurzweil 1000 works well, that's one of the very few things I still use windows for. I wish they would develop a mac version, but even if they did, I wonder if the sam

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-10 Thread Rajiv Shah
gt;Subject: Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office >To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > >Hi, You wrote: > >> If you need to use Flash and DRM, use Windows. If you want to use other >> stuff, use Mac. > >That's not accurate, right, or far

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-09 Thread Mary Otten
Hi Mike, What I need is something that will let me access the settings so I can change them if the defaults don't yield good recognition. I also need something that will let me scan a bunch of pages into the same file automatically, without me having to mess with combining files after having had

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-09 Thread Mike Arrigo
I guess it depends on what you need, the mac version will scan and recognize the page, as well as recognize image files, that should cover most things I think. On Aug 7, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Mary Otten wrote: > Has something changed such that there is now a full version of fine reader > for the Ma

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-09 Thread Ray Foret Jr
ouseOver event is there with VoiceOver? > > Rajiv > > Original message >> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:54:23 +1200 >> From: "Simon Fogarty" >> Subject: RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office >> To: >> >> both apple

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-09 Thread erik burggraaf
eOver > event. How do folks know that the onMouseOver event is there with VoiceOver? > > Rajiv > > Original message >> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:54:23 +1200 >> From: "Simon Fogarty" >> Subject: RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-09 Thread Rajiv Shah
than a mouseOver. THis is an onMouseOver event. How do folks know that the onMouseOver event is there with VoiceOver? Rajiv Original message >Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:54:23 +1200 >From: "Simon Fogarty" >Subject: RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen off

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-08 Thread Ricardo Walker
aken by google. > > > > -Original Message- > From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Shaw > Sent: Sunday, 8 August 2010 2:06 a.m. > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Re

RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-08 Thread Simon Fogarty
m] On Behalf Of Kevin Shaw Sent: Sunday, 8 August 2010 2:06 a.m. To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office Flash sucks. This is why Apple is pushing HTML 5. It's open, it's less bloated and less proprietary. For using Flash, you ma

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-08 Thread Annie Skov Nielsen
That's right, but it is based on an older version of finereader, and you are not allowed to adjust any settings. Best regards Annie. On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Mike Arrigo wrote: > As a matter of interest, fine reader is also available for the mac, and it is > accessible. > On Aug 7, 2010, at

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Ricardo Walker
Lol, I agree. I rather have 5 unknown buttons to press than, no button at all. On Aug 7, 2010, at 6:25 PM, erik burggraaf wrote: > HI, > > You wrote: > "Most of the time, flash content is not labeled, so even the windows screen > readers will just say button, button, button, etc. And if that'

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Mary Otten
Has something changed such that there is now a full version of fine reader for the Mac? last I knew, it was the express version which isn't as good as the Windows version in terms of features. Mary Otten motte...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread erik burggraaf
HI, You wrote: "Most of the time, flash content is not labeled, so even the windows screen readers will just say button, button, button, etc. And if that's all they're going to say, I would rather it not say anything since there's no label." I think that's probably not the most productive atti

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Mike Arrigo
l does not support Flash >> How many years have we had support in Windows. Eight, perhaps? How do folks >> who have made the near complete Windows-to-Mac transition work around this >> short of switching to Windows? >> >> Happy for folks' perspectiv

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Mike Arrigo
As a matter of interest, fine reader is also available for the mac, and it is accessible. On Aug 7, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Annie Skov Nielsen wrote: > Hi. > > I have had my mac for almost a year now, and I love it. > > I have never been good friends with flash, in my opinion flash also gives > some

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Mike Arrigo
ome one might know of > or be able to find a workaround. Flash isn't hopeless on the mac, only the > people who design and develop on it are. > >> Happy for folks' perspectives. >> > Yeh, sorry I couldn't be more immediate help. > >> Thanks. R

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Mike Arrigo
ssage >> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:33:52 +0200 >> From: Michael Busboom >> Subject: Re: Reopen office >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> >> Hello Rajiv, >> >> I partially share your sentiments. I am ecstatic about my Mac, love

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Barry Hadder
essage ---- >> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:33:52 +0200 >> From: Michael Busboom >> Subject: Re: Reopen office >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> >> Hello Rajiv, >> >> I partially share your sentiments. I am ecstatic about my Mac, love a lot

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Annie Skov Nielsen
Hi. I have had my mac for almost a year now, and I love it. I have never been good friends with flash, in my opinion flash also gives some problems on windows. I have a vmware windows xp, that I use when it is absolutely needed. There is only two thing that is not really good for me on the mac

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Kevin Shaw
Flash sucks. This is why Apple is pushing HTML 5. It's open, it's less bloated and less proprietary. For using Flash, you may still need to run Windows on a Mac and use it with JAWS. Kevin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.

RE: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Hunt
store my image and I'm good to go. -Original Message- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rajiv Shah Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:49 AM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reo

Re: Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-07 Thread erik burggraaf
Flash isn't hopeless on the mac, only the people who design and develop on it are. > Happy for folks' perspectives. > Yeh, sorry I couldn't be more immediate help. > Thanks. Rajiv > > ---- Original message >> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:33:52 +0200 &

Mac vs. Windows Accessibility was Re: Reopen office

2010-08-06 Thread Rajiv Shah
nks. Rajiv Original message >Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:33:52 +0200 >From: Michael Busboom >Subject: Re: Reopen office >To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > >Hello Rajiv, > >I partially share your sentiments. I am ecstatic about my Mac, love a lot of >its functio

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-05 Thread rossy
with >>>>> column headings efficiently. Despite all the declarations to the >>>>> contrary, this is one area where I really miss Windows for any reading >>>>> and, frankly, Parallels is not the answer for me. After all, this is why >>>>>

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-05 Thread Scott Howell
; this is one area where I really miss Windows for any reading and, frankly, >>>> Parallels is not the answer for me. After all, this is why I partially >>>> left Windows in the first place. >>>> >>>> Rajiv >>>> >>>> >>

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-05 Thread rossy koumanova
the answer for me. After all, this is why I partially left >>> Windows in the first place. >>> >>> Rajiv >>> >>> >>> >>> Original message >>>> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:36:26 +0200 >>>> From: Michael

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-04 Thread Sarah Alawami
; >> >> Original message >>> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:36:26 +0200 >>> From: Michael Busboom >>> Subject: Re: Reopen office >>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >>> >>> Just out of curiosity, Sarah, what text edit

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-04 Thread Michael Busboom
ws in the first place. > > Rajiv > > > > Original message >> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:36:26 +0200 >> From: Michael Busboom >> Subject: Re: Reopen office >> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com >> >> Just out of curiosity, Sara

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-03 Thread Rajiv Shah
partially left Windows in the first place. Rajiv Original message >Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:36:26 +0200 >From: Michael Busboom >Subject: Re: Reopen office >To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > >Just out of curiosity, Sarah, what text editor do you use when or if you

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-03 Thread Sarah Alawami
I use text edit. Take care. S On Aug 3, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Michael Busboom wrote: > Just out of curiosity, Sarah, what text editor do you use when or if you have > to produce DOC files? > > Thanks, > > Mike > On 3,Aug,2010, at 6:39 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote: > >> OPen office tends to have some

Re: Reopen office

2010-08-03 Thread Michael Busboom
Just out of curiosity, Sarah, what text editor do you use when or if you have to produce DOC files? Thanks, Mike On 3,Aug,2010, at 6:39 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote: > OPen office tends to have some odd issues since it is is written in java. I > don't get the clicking sound when it reads a paragrap

Reopen office

2010-08-03 Thread Sarah Alawami
OPen office tends to have some odd issues since it is is written in java. I don't get the clicking sound when it reads a paragraph but i can interact with th etext. I don't use open office for anything I do. Take care. On Aug 3, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Michael Busboom wrote: > Hello Erik, > > You ma