Is the Diablo extras promotion interface supposed to be working?
https://garage.maemo.org/promoter/diablo gives me a 404 error.
-Steven Luo
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:37 +0100, ext Benoit HERVIER wrote:
> Ed Bartosh a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:38 +0100, ext Benoit HERVIER wrote:
> >
> >> And mainly because some people doing onboard dev directly on tablet,
> >> can't upload as dput isn't available, and have too many
* Benoit HERVIER
| Yes ... but debsign isn't available on device ...
Debsign can sign remotely. Look at -r.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.
Benoit HERVIER wrote:
> And mainly because some people doing onboard dev directly on tablet,
> can't upload as dput isn't available, and have too many depandancies to
> be compiled for the tablet. For example, i use PyPackager to make my
> Package, but i can't upload it to extra.
Last I looked
Benoit HERVIER a écrit :
> Mikhail Sobolev a écrit :
>> Hi Benoit
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:40:31PM +0100, Benoit HERVIER wrote:
>>> How can i test it ?
>>>
>>> It seem's it s require a login and password which doesn't seem's to be
>>> the same as garage.
>> This is a bit strange. It requi
Mikhail Sobolev a écrit :
> Hi Benoit
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:40:31PM +0100, Benoit HERVIER wrote:
>> How can i test it ?
>>
>> It seem's it s require a login and password which doesn't seem's to be
>> the same as garage.
> This is a bit strange. It requires exactly the garage user/passwo
How can i test it ?
It seem's it s require a login and password which doesn't seem's to be
the same as garage.
Thx
Mikhail Sobolev a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:48:07PM +0300, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
Almost forgot to mention. The script does not really have a project
page any
Hi Benoit
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:40:31PM +0100, Benoit HERVIER wrote:
> How can i test it ?
>
> It seem's it s require a login and password which doesn't seem's to be
> the same as garage.
This is a bit strange. It requires exactly the garage user/password.
However you should have been gran
Ed Bartosh a écrit :
> Hi,
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:38 +0100, ext Benoit HERVIER wrote:
>
>> And mainly because some people doing onboard dev directly on tablet,
>> can't upload as dput isn't available, and have too many depandancies to
>> be compiled for the tablet.
>
> dput isn't mandatory
Ed Bartosh a écrit :
> Hi,
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:38 +0100, ext Benoit HERVIER wrote:
>
>> And mainly because some people doing onboard dev directly on tablet,
>> can't upload as dput isn't available, and have too many depandancies to
>> be compiled for the tablet.
>
> dput isn't mandatory
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:48:07PM +0300, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> > > Almost forgot to mention. The script does not really have a project
> > > page anywhere. It is also a toy project for me to see how well Bazaar
> > > DVCS
> > > supports my needs (so far, it does well enough), so you can find
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:38 +0100, ext Benoit HERVIER wrote:
> And mainly because some people doing onboard dev directly on tablet,
> can't upload as dput isn't available, and have too many depandancies to
> be compiled for the tablet.
dput isn't mandatory for aploading packages to extras*
Mikhail Sobolev a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:02:10PM +0200, (int) Eero Tamminen wrote:
>> ext Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:47:07AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
Comments:
* Is it necessary to separate each package into source/armel/i386/etc?
Why not just
On Feb 7, 2008 3:32 PM, Levi Bard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What do you propose to do with these comments? Include in
> > notifications, store somewhere, something else?
>
> At least include in notifications, and probably store for later review
> (i.e., when v2 is considered for promotion,
> > Things that might be nice for the future:
> > * Ability to add comments (e.g. "This package bends rule F, but
> > promoting for now...")
> What do you propose to do with these comments? Include in
> notifications, store somewhere, something else?
At least include in notifications, and probabl
Hi,
ext Graham Cobb wrote:
> On Thursday 07 February 2008 13:24:32 Eero Tamminen wrote:
>> If some specific package has issues on x86 due to its development
>> happening on ARM only, I don't see that as a problem except in a sense
>> that its developers not caring that much about quality in genera
On Thursday 07 February 2008 13:24:32 Eero Tamminen wrote:
> If some specific package has issues on x86 due to its development
> happening on ARM only, I don't see that as a problem except in a sense
> that its developers not caring that much about quality in general and
> wasting their time debugg
Hi,
ext Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:02:10PM +0200, (int) Eero Tamminen wrote:
>>> I do agree with you with respect to sources, however as for different
>>> architectures, the situation is a bit different: one architecture could
>>> be better supported than the other, so...
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:02:10PM +0200, (int) Eero Tamminen wrote:
> ext Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:47:07AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> >> Comments:
> >> * Is it necessary to separate each package into source/armel/i386/etc?
> >> Why not just display the package name (e.
Hi,
ext Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:47:07AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
>> Comments:
>> * Is it necessary to separate each package into source/armel/i386/etc?
>> Why not just display the package name (e.g. xmaeme), perhaps with a
>> link to click to view the contained files, a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:44:48AM +0100, Niels Breet wrote:
> > * to see if anything like this would really
> > encourage community developers to use central 'extras' repository
>
> We would also need to provide an easier way for developers to upload
> packages. If we can make a webinterface wher
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:47:07AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> > After quite some time of fighting with myself as well as getting
> > encouragement from certain members of this community, I'm humbly offer
> > to your attention a first {alpha,beta} release of a manual promotion
> > interface.
>
> Gre
> One requirement that I think is important is an archive mechanism. When a
> package is promoted, the previous version should be archived somewhere. It
> could remain in the repository or be placed in a special archive repository.
> It would be needed if a demotion rollback was needed but, also,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 14:47:07 Levi Bard wrote:
> > After quite some time of fighting with myself as well as getting
> > encouragement from certain members of this community, I'm humbly offer
> > to your attention a first {alpha,beta} release of a manual promotion
> > interface.
Today's em
> After quite some time of fighting with myself as well as getting
> encouragement from certain members of this community, I'm humbly offer
> to your attention a first {alpha,beta} release of a manual promotion
> interface.
Great! What's there so far seems to work well.
Comments:
* Is it necessa
Niels wrote:
> - Packages can not only be promoted, but also demoted if they
> are breaking
> things. (With the ability to tell the author why it was demoted)
How do you deal with packages that are already installed on people's
devices when they're demoted?
Personally, if I have bad software ins
> Hi
Hi Misha,
>
> After quite some time of fighting with myself as well as getting
> encouragement from certain members of this community, I'm humbly offer to
> your attention a first {alpha,beta} release of a manual promotion
> interface.
Thank you for actually turning ideas into code! This real
Hi
After quite some time of fighting with myself as well as getting
encouragement from certain members of this community, I'm humbly offer
to your attention a first {alpha,beta} release of a manual promotion
interface.
Currently the interface is in 'debug' mode, which means that no files
are real
28 matches
Mail list logo
