Re: 0.2

I suppose I have volunteered for the release. What does it entail, making the release? I don't knowledge of this. ... or MAHOUT-114 or what it means to sign these jars? If info is available I can try to figure these out. On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > OK.  The Sparse

Re: LDA for multi label classification was: Mahout Book

Sorry, this slipped out of my inbox and I just found it! On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Robin Anil wrote: > Posting to the dev list. > Great Paper Thanks!. Looks like L-LDA could be used to create some > interesting examples. Thanks! > The Paper shows L-LDA could be used to creating word-tag

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-165) Using better primitives hash for sparse vector for performance gains

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766231#action_12766231 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on MAHOUT-165: Shashi's vectors are at: http://people.a

Re: 0.2

OK. The Sparse vector improvements we have now are already a lot faster than what was in 0.1, so that is good. I'd suggest that whoever is the Release Mgr. for this release takes care of the signing stuff. I'll look at the Label (LLR) stuff by Monday. On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Ea

Re: 0.2

I'd vote to delay 165 for 0.3 but do it in trunk asap after 0.2 so folks can get their hands on it. Sean Owen wrote: It still sounds somewhat significant to me. Either it's rushed or takes a while and both seem negative. +1 This is why I think it is vital, at least, to put a schedule on th

Re: 0.2

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >> >>> MAHOUT-165 Using better primitives hash for sparse vector for performance gainsOpen1

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-138) Convert main() methods to use Commons CLI for argument processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isabel Drost resolved MAHOUT-138. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.3) 0.2 The last ci changed

Re: 0.2

It still sounds somewhat significant to me. Either it's rushed or takes a while and both seem negative. I think it is vital, at least, to put a schedule on this, or else we are basically saying 0.2 is to not be released indefinitely, and that's no good. Last time we said we'd finish up and release

Re: 0.2

On Oct 15, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Sean Owen wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: MAHOUT-165 Using better primitives hash for sparse vector for performance gainsOpen14/Oct/09 Per discussion, move the remainder (migration to Colt or som

Re: 0.2

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>        MAHOUT-165      Using better primitives hash for sparse vector for >> performance gains                Open    14/Oct/09 >> >> Per discussion, move the remainder (migration to Colt or something) to 0.3 > > I will try to get to this,

Re: 0.2

On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Sean Owen wrote: Here's what is marked 0.2 plus suggested actions. I am basically suggesting the things that are 'pretty ready' be submitted and published -- if they're 85% done, definitely good enough for an 0.2 release, and worth getting them play-tested. (Or else

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-157) Frequent Pattern Mining using Parallel FP-Growth

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766030#action_12766030 ] Isabel Drost commented on MAHOUT-157: - The patch looks good to me. Good work Robin. >

Re: 0.2

Here's what is marked 0.2 plus suggested actions. I am basically suggesting the things that are 'pretty ready' be submitted and published -- if they're 85% done, definitely good enough for an 0.2 release, and worth getting them play-tested. (Or else, decide they need another month or two, and mark