the footer, I'd appreciate knowing (and will
upgrade). Or if there are any other nifty ideas to get around this
problem in 2.1.5, I'd appreciate knowing that as well!
Thanks,
Allan Trick
Principia College
Elsah, Illinois
--
Mailman-Users mailing
, is there?
Otherwise Mailman is performing normally. Can't figure this out!
Thanks,
Allan Trick
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
I think I solved my own problem. Instead of just restarting qrunner,
I did a stop and then a start. That did it.
The clue was when I ran
ps auxww | egrep 'p[y]thon'
as FAQ 3.14 suggests, instead of there being eight processes there,
there were only two.
So I'm back in business. Any
Our Mailman 2.1.5 system (on a Red Hat Linux server w/sendmail)
hasn't been working all week. I just discovered it, and the first
thing I did was ./mailmanctl restart ---
It appears to have done what I told it:
Feb 02 09:43:31 2007 (1541) Master watcher caught SIGINT. Restarting.
Feb 02
At 11:15 AM 2/2/2007, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Look at Mailman's error and qrunner logs from the time that the
lists stopped for clues as to why the other seven qrunners died (or
why they all died and only RetryRunner was restarted).
There's nothing in the error log. But qrunner's might have a
those people
that Mailman didn't think we could communicate with? Do I need to go
in to each one and manually do it? Also, should I reset the bounce
count for those folks? If so, how is that done?
Thank you!
Allan Trick
--
Mailman-Users
I've got some lists which go two deep, and two footers (saying how to
unsubscribe, etc.). A group of parents (we're a school) are on
different lists, depending on if their child is boarding in our dorms
or if they are a day student. So we have a group of senior parents
whose children are
Mark Sapiro wrote:
So the 2007 list is an umbrella list. It should be so indicated on
its General Options page so that adinistrative messages such as
password reminders for its members get sent to, e.g.,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and not to the whole [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Correct. It's an umbrella
Following on to what I read in the archives of a problem Elizabeth
Schwartz was having, I'm having the same thing happen to me.
The last message that made it to any of our lists went out last
Wednesday. There are a bunch of .pck files in the qfiles/out
directory, so I think there are messages
At 03:23 PM 10/15/2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is OutgoingRunner running? If not, are there any messages in
Mailman's 'qrunner' log indicating why or when it stopped?
I think so. See below.
Have you tried 'bin/mailmanctl restart'?
Yes, to no avail. When I do that, this is what is logged in the
At 05:19 PM 10/15/2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
OutgoingRunner is missing. there are no 'caught SIGINT', 'exiting',
'[restarting]' or 'started' entries for it.
What is in the qrunner log prior to this? Presumably there are entries
from last Wednesday indicating its 'restart limit' was reached.
At 09:18 AM 8/25/2006, Barry Finkel wrote:
I have seen many posts on this list from people who are running
2.1.5 (or earlier). I am wondering why someone would recently
upgrade to 2.1.5 instead of to 2.1.8, which is the current release?
Barry,
I know one reason we don't upgrade every time
I'm just reporting back that in the scenario I was describing earlier
in this thread, I've checked logs and it appears that Mailman did do
what it was supposed to and deliver a message to all 20 of our
lists. So the fact that any given user who is subscribed to all
those lists only receives
I was trying to determine if a message was sent to the lists it
should have been sent to, and see two different types of entries in
my SMTP log:
Aug 24 16:23:57 2006 (18946)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp for 41
recips, completed in 8.864 seconds
Aug 24 16:23:58 2006 (18946)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp
Sorry to post so many questions in the space of a week to this
list. I work at a school and all the changes we make to our mailing
lists tend to take place just once a year--now. So in a few days
I'll probably go away and you won't hear from me again till next summer. :-)
My question this
At 04:30 PM 8/25/2006, Dragon wrote:
You can do this easily from the web interface and not have to change
the setting for each individual user.
On the Privacy Options-Sender Filters page there is a setting to
control if new members are moderated by default. You would want to
set this to No
Forgot to mention -- I'm running Mailman 2.1.5.
Allan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
Anyone have a clue as to why one of our people might not be receiving
messages he is sending to lists to which he is subscribed? I've
checked and see his address on the membership list for each
list. The mod box is unchecked. (I'm also subscribed to these
lists and received all the messages
At 03:20 PM 8/24/2006, Dan wrote:
1) There IS a setting to choose whether or not to receive one's own
posts on the users options page. On the administrative membership
management page it's the not metoo column. Check to see if that's checked.
not metoo is not checked. However, no dupes WAS
Getting more reports now of other internal users (we have people
subscribed within our firewall on our Exchange mail server as well as
people outside with all other kinds of email addresses) not getting
all messages. In each case, it sounds like they get ONE message,
whereas they're on
At 05:53 PM 8/24/2006, Dan Phillips wrote:
That's what the nodupes setting is supposed to prevent. IIRC, you
said you cleared that flag?
Actually, looks like the nodupes box is checked on most if not all of
our user records. Each school year we dump and reimport all the
addresses for all our
Help! I set some lists up a year ago and on most of them a note I append
appears like this (it's entered into msg_footer on the Non-digest Options
page):
Changes to your subscription may be made by visiting
http://www.prin.edu/mailman/options/2014/atrick%40prin.edu. If you are on
more
At 02:35 AM 8/29/2004, Jim Tittsler wrote:
On Aug 29, 2004, at 13:45, Allan Trick wrote:
I set up a new list just now and the footer appears this way on this new
list:
Changes to your subscription may be made by visiting
%(user_optionsurl)s. If you are on more than one such Principia
At 11:17 AM 8/29/2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
See FAQ article 3.15 at
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.015.htp
I had set:
VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes
but missed:
OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION = Yes
After adding that to my mm_cfg.py and restarting qrunner, the
Yesterday I wrote:
admin_notify_mchanges is set to yes on our lists (MM 2.1.4), but admins
aren't getting the email notifications.
What might be preventing those messages from being received?
For the record, I'll answer my own question!
qrunner wasn't running...
We used the rc script
admin_notify_mchanges is set to yes on our lists (MM 2.1.4), but admins
aren't getting the email notifications.
What might be preventing those messages from being received?
Thanks,
Allan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We just upgraded MM from 2.1.3 to 2.1.4. How can I find out what is
different between those two versions? The CVS online doesn't list these
versions, just alphas and betas...
Thanks,
Allan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got some users who are non-moderated members of lists that are part of
an umbrella list. They can post to their own list, but when they try to
post to the umbrella list, their message goes in the holding bin waiting
approval.
Since these people aren't technically members of the umbrella
I need a little help. I've got an installation of Mailman (2.0.13) that we
put up last October. Everything was running fine until a couple of days
ago when our system admin ran some updates on the RH Linux server that
hosts Mailman. The next morning Mailman was down and we determined that
Hi,
I assumed that if someone's an administrator, they'd be able to post to a
list. However, if they're also a member of the list, and the Mod bit is
checked, then their messages are moderated like everyone else's, and they
must approve their own posts before they go out. (This is an
Is there anything we can do to remedy this in our own installations of
Mailman? It'd be nice if AOL would fix it, but I don't think we can count
on that. It's clearly not a situation any of us can live with. So what
shall we do?
Allan
--
Someone emailed me to point out that this form of Sender: and Errors to:
address is only used if you have personalization turned on.
I couldn't live without personalization now that I have it on.
Would removing the RFC 2369 headers make any difference to AOL?
Allan
Hi,
I've read in the mail archive about some problems people have had creating
umbrella lists. So I wanted to just check and make sure I'm doing this the
right way before I make a mess on my own server!
I work at a school and I have a list of parents at each grade level for the
teachers to
My lists are configured so that only the list admin can view subscriber
info on the listinfo page. But quite a few people have been calling asking
what the admin password is so they can view the list (even though it says
right there on the page in ITALICS that this is for the administrator
Has anyone worked out problems with getting mail through to AOL users? I
have some members of our lists that claim they are not getting our
messages, but they're also not returning bounced to Mailman. So I'm not
sure what to do. I suspect there are some kind of filtering options in AOL
and
We're getting some people wanting to check their address in Mailman to see
how we subscribed them (we seeded lists with extracts from our main
database), and they don't know what address we used for them.
The only way I can think of is to have them type in one at a time and ask
for a password
At 04:44 PM 10/13/2003, Skip wrote:
This is kinda techno-nerdy which might not match your user population very
well, but in many/most situations people should be able to look at the
Received: headers (when the personalization footer is absent) and work
their way from bottom to top to see what
At 12:56 PM 10/7/2003, Paul Byerly wrote:
the site list is required for Mailman to start - if it's missing or lost
you must create or find it. The list is in prefix/mailman/lists and is
called mailman. If you don't have that, you need to create it. If it's
there, then some alias or pointer
I'm curious if anyone has had success creating a new list from the Web
browser instead of ./newlist on the command line. I keep getting an error
saying Error: You are not authorized to create new mailing lists. But
I'm using the site password. Maybe I missed a setting somewhere that says
At 02:59 PM 10/7/2003, Jim Drash wrote:
Something must be mis-configured somewhere. This is how I create all my
lists. You might want to re-set the site password.
Yeah, that worked! I changed the pw with mmsitepass, put it in the field
at the bottom of the newlist form where it says, List
I've hunted all over and haven't found the spot. I need to fix the way the
send questions and comments link on our main admin web page is displayed
(it now says [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and also in the emails the system
generates, it's telling list owners and new subscribers things like:
You can
In the FAQ, it says:
4.30. How do I configure the admin webpage to show more members per page?
Change the setting in DEFAULT_ADMIN_MEMBER_CHUNKSIZE in mm_cfg.py The
description is in Defaults.py.
And mine is set for 30 (same as it was in 2.0.x). But it doesn't look like
name are displayed in
While I haven't found a way to *display* chunks of names any more in the
new Mailman, I thought I would post in response to my own question that if
anyone else has the same question, the command sent back to the
list-request address with who followed by the list password, returns a
complete
Anyone know what this means?
Mailman CGI error!!!
The Mailman CGI wrapper encountered a fatal error. This entry is being
stored in your syslog:
Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the CGI
wrapper script to be executed as group www, but
the system's web server executed the CGI script as
At 09:15 PM 10/5/2003, Todd wrote:
Group mismatch error. Mailman expected the CGI
wrapper script to be executed as group www, but
the system's web server executed the CGI script as
group apache. Try tweaking the web server to run the
script as group www, or re-run configure,
providing the
Sorry to be bombarding this list with so many questions lately! I promise
I'll pipe down pretty soon. :-)
Now that I've got 2.1.3 installed, I have that empty name field on every
record since it didn't exist in the previous version. My lists can all be
reloaded, but I'm not sure what format
The readme's for Mailman 2.1.3 say to use Python 2.2.1 (the latest version
when this version of Mailman came out). But now there's a Python
2.3. Does anyone know if Mailman would have a problem with an even later
version of Python than existed when 2.1.3 was put together? Or should I go
I need to clean up a private archive, and followed the instructions someone
posted in a previous thread here: edited the mbox file to remove the
messages not wanted in the archive, deleted the html files in the
listname/2003 directory, and then ran ./arch listname.
It recreates the html files
to my installation. Do I need to write the code
to do that myself or has someone described how to do this somewhere?
Thanks for any help!
Allan Trick
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
Ah. We're on 2.0.13!
I think I read that 2.1.2 is the latest stable release. Has that now
been upgraded to 2.1.3?
We just started using Mailman. Is an upgrade from where I'm at to 2.1.x
going to be pretty straightforward?
Thx,
Allan
--
Shame on me. I didn't read the FAQ thoroughly enough:
Q. I want to get rid of some messages in my archive. How do I do this?
A. David Rocher posts the following recipe:
# remove $prefix/archives/private/listname
# edit $prefix/archives/private/listname.mbox/listname.mbox [optional]
# run
51 matches
Mail list logo
