Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

Pretty sure we accept mail to just postmaster: 220 mx.google.com ESMTP 1si76040pfp.214 - gsmtp ehlo foo 250-mx.google.com at your service, [172.31.148.80] 250-SIZE 157286400 250-8BITMIME 250-STARTTLS 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-CHUNKING 250 SMTPUTF8 mail

Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

> Are you serious? or simply joking? Serious. No one is beholden to RFCs. They are guidelines for interoperability. I don't care if one postmaster@ address is staffed by a human response 24/7, or if another is staffed 8x5 and at other times auto-responds with "we'll investigate and get back to

Re: [mailop] Google NS servers listed in Spamhaus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 14:11 +, Andrew Wingle wrote: > Anyone else encountering this mess? It came to light due to a > SpamAssassin rule "Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the SBL blocklist > [URIs: googleapis.com]." Any message using

Re: [mailop] All Yahoo! FBLs stopped

Can confirm we are seeing the same thing. Thanks for the updates all. Nick Schafer Technical Account Manager, Mailgun Add me on LinkedIn On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Mohammed Ahmed

Re: [mailop] All Yahoo! FBLs stopped

I got an update from Yahoo that they are aware of this problem and they are looking at it. No eta yet. Thanks, Mohammed. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Al Iverson wrote: > We've gotten a few Y! FBL complaints today, but the volume is much lower > than usual. > > >

Re: [mailop] All Yahoo! FBLs stopped

We've gotten a few Y! FBL complaints today, but the volume is much lower than usual. -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com www.spamresource.com On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Luke Martinez via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > Yup...Yahoo spam reports stopped last night at a bout 6pm MST for

Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

On 18 August 2017 at 19:25, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > As a postmaster or abuse contact, I'm not clicking on random links > sent to me by robots to verify anything. ;) > > There's a difference between *rejecting* mail sent to an address and > *accepting* it and routing it to

Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

As a postmaster or abuse contact, I'm not clicking on random links sent to me by robots to verify anything. ;) There's a difference between *rejecting* mail sent to an address and *accepting* it and routing it to /dev/null. > "Pretending that this is for the "RFC" good sounds like a joke" If I

Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

It is not difficult to detect addresses that never respond.. you send them a link to a page protected by captcha, if they don't clic or fails the captcha then the email is unsupervisioned. They do something similar to "unlist".. Please note that I wrote: > Maybe there should be a dnsbl for

Re: [mailop] Does anyone have a contact at RegisteredSite / Netsol?

Aloha Michael! I'll ping you offlist with a contact. Udeme On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: > > > Some folks at work are asking, and I couldn’t remember anyone offhand. ☹ > > Our China datacenter has got some IPs listed. > > Would be grateful

Re: [mailop] Alice.it contact

On 7 August 2017 at 17:27, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > It exists: http://rfc-clueless.org/ :) I confirm it doesn't work: http://rfc-clueless.org/lookup/alice.it I submitted it to the postmaster last time I didn't get an answer... it shown as pending for a while and then

Re: [mailop] Are SNDS colors still reliable?

I've heard many senders with similar issues to Microsoft in the last months, so I'm convinced there is a change on microsoft side. I saw shared IPs with no changes in senders drop from 25% (unique) open rates of the last May to 15% since June. (FYI: Gmail opens for the same IPs are in the 30-35%

Re: [mailop] Are SNDS colors still reliable?

Thanks for the replies, @Michael> I've seen such behavior on 5.63.28.29 or 5.63.27.210 for instance (two distinct cases). We already opened a ticket for one of these when traffic was deferred but I'll follow your suggestion and open a new one for this specific question! > They mean nothing.