On 2024/07/17 00:09, postfix--- via mailop wrote:
> P.S.: reply to list only is enough. I don't need
> double-copy. only write directly to me if you prefer to
> reply privately.
Standard etiquette on many technical mailing lists is specifically to CC
the sender, as a courtesy to the person
On 2024/07/17 06:34, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024, postfix--- via mailop wrote:
>
> > On 2024-07-16 14:36, Bjoern Franke via mailop wrote:
> > > Which iPhone / Android clients do you mean?
> >
> > last time I tested Apple Mail, my IMAP server logged
> > requests
On 2024/06/27 17:46, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:27:53 -0400
> schrieb "Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop" :
>
> > Why the hard bounce?
>
> Some postmasters decide not to accept them. IIRC Google had that
> behavior in some cases in the past.
> I assume this is the case
On 2024/06/24 12:16, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am 24.06.2024 um 12:03:49 Uhr schrieb Alessandro Vesely via mailop:
>
> > IME, large sending times are often caused by IMAP. Most clients
> > operate by first sending the message and then saving it in the Sent
> > IMAP folder. Just changing
On 2024/06/20 10:13, Jeff Pang via mailop wrote:
> Hello
>
> Recently i got a lot of spams like this one:
> https://cloud.hostcache.com/spam.eml
>
> They have two features:
> 1. arabic language
> 2. from google groups (though i never joined those groups)
I've reported a bunch of these over the
On 2024/04/24 12:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
> Make sure nobody did spam/mailbomb from your domain while having matching
> SPF/DKIM. I guess that could include forwarding of spam messages or
> creating mail loop etc.
AFAIK forwarding mail into gmail is generally not good for
On 2024/04/09 09:21, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> Is this something new that Google will attempt to relay out another
> companies email servers with authentication?
New in 2014 or so.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
On 2024/03/14 10:28, Julian Bradfield via mailop wrote:
> Their latest daftness (latest in my noticing it, anyway) is
> rate-limiting on the basis of too many recipients for a single
> message-id, where "too many" varies from 6 to 30. You'd think they'd
> never heard of organization mailing lists.
On 2023/12/21 11:44, John R Levine via mailop wrote:
> > On Thu 21/Dec/2023 10:37:52 +0100 John Levine via mailop wrote:
> > > Yes, your code should handle them. No, that doesn't mean you should
> > > sign with them.
> >
> > Yup. The question was why Gmail doesn't /verify/ ed25519 signatures.
>
On 2023/10/30 20:28, Peter Nicolai Mathias Hansteen via mailop wrote:
>
> On 30 Oct 2023, at 20:01, Michael W. Lucas via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to not reinvent the wheel here.
>
> I want to create an allow list of the big providers that retry from
> multiple
On 2023/10/11 15:05, Giovanni Bechis via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
> starting from 02/2024 Gmail will require authenticated email for senders who
> send 5,000 or more messages a day to Gmail accounts.
> However, authenticated email requirements seems to have started today, in the
> past days those
On 2023/10/06 13:08, Marco via mailop wrote:
> Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Bjørn Bürger via mailop :
>
> > 15 yrs ago I would have agreed to Wietse Venemas view, but nowadays
> > this kind of "solution" is just adding confusion and makes debugging
> > harder for everyone, unfortunately.
>
> And sadly
On 2023/10/06 11:13, Marco via mailop wrote:
> Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Stuart Henderson :
>
> > Networks single-homed behind cogent can't connect to networks
> > single-homed behind he.net and vice-versa.
>
> Is that related to PMTU-blackhole?
> Who is guilty for t
On 2023/10/06 11:01, Marco wrote:
> Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Stuart Henderson :
>
> > On 2023/10/06 10:09, Marco via mailop wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I have an IPv6 and IPv4 accessible server, both protocols work and I
> > > receive mails with I
On 2023/10/06 10:09, Marco via mailop wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have an IPv6 and IPv4 accessible server, both protocols work and I
> receive mails with IPv6 too.
> Although, I see that certain IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 in
> some cases.
> I am not aware of any outages and the strange things
On 2023/02/16 07:17, MRob via mailop wrote:
> Forgive if its already been discused but is googel already aware of ongoing
> Google Groups spam? Will they stop this? Lots of recurring mails with arabic
> subject and body from nonsense group names like "hghgjhghjgb":
>
>
On 2022/12/06 16:43, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
>
> People who 'gather' or require information on the opt-out pages, even if it
> is just the email address (you already sent to our email address)
And this is made worse because there are plenty of cases where the
recipient won't know the
On 2022/11/21 13:55, Taejoong (tijay) Chung via mailop wrote:
> Please note that we do NOT collect any personal information, thus
> the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Virginia Tech determined the
> survey as Non-Human Subjects Research.
eh, that doesn't make any kind of sense.
On 2022/11/21 10:07, Julian Bradfield via mailop wrote:
> So my question is, if it is certificates (rather than ciphers - my
> cipher suites are all gnutls default, so should be current), what do I
The type of alert should indicate ahether it's ciphers or certs.
> need to do to get everybody to
On 2022/09/13 09:20, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
> Nice! Good catch about the dns-0x20 implementation! I must have copy/pasted
> some properties
> without looking much into it.
That is unlikely to be causing an actual problem here though.
> > 2. The other issue is even weirder. SA is
On 2022/08/19 10:31, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
>
> Who thinks managing and refreshing client TLS certificates is easier than
> OAUTH2?
It's certainly easier than getting client IDs registered with whichever
providers might be used.
___
mailop
On 2022/08/20 06:55, Alexander Huynh via mailop wrote:
> Shameless plug: this discussion has gotten me to open-source my Office 365
> OAuth script, which should be plug-and-play compatible with mail systems
> that can run python3 scripts and receive XOAUTH2 JWTs via stdin.
>
> If you'd like to
On 2022/08/19 09:08, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
> Hello,
> IMAP, SMTP etc are still being supported with Office365. What gets
> disabled is Basic Auth for some services. Microsoft announced the
> decomission of Basic Authentication three years ago and all tenant
> administrators have been
On 2022/08/16 02:03, Ángel via mailop wrote:
> On 2022-08-13 at 18:46 -0400, John Levine wrote:
> > Subject: IP address blacklisted(Child Pornography Act 1996 violated)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have found instances of child pornography accessed from your IP
> > address. This is a punishable
On 2022/08/03 14:01, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> > The MTA-MTA encryption is weak at best: because the client doesn't
> > (can't, actually) verify that the certificate is appropriate for that
> > MTA, any MITM attack is easily accomplished. End users get virtually no
> > indication that
On 2022/07/02 20:00, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote:
> Spammers in the middle east and Pakistan seem to love doing this. I finally
> set my google
> settings to “don’t add me to any google group without my requesting to join
> it” and that solved
> the issue, at least from the POV of
On 2022/06/20 15:39, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> I've seen it work but frankly, I don't bother with it anymore. No MX for
> sender or recipient, I don't send it. This rspamd module right here:
> https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/mx_check.html
That is not what mx_check does at all. It looks
On 2022/06/16 19:42, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> However, I am not sure if Google Groups sends an email to the user who is
> being added informing him/her about that if you do not enter any "welcome
> message" in the appropriate field when adding users. In my opinion, for
> users who are
On 2021/08/10 10:28, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>
> > https://nostarttls.secvuln.info/
> >
> > Their conclusion is that all vulnerabilities rely on the transition of
> > an insecure connection to a secure connection.
>
> If
On 2021/08/06 11:31, Stephen Frost via mailop wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We have quite a few folks with @free.fr addresses, and a few with the
> other domains listed in $subject, on the @postgresql.org mailing lists
> and recently we've started getting bounces back for some of the emails
> we send
On 2021/06/16 09:04, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have a setup with 2 MX :
>
> domain.tld mx 10 mx1.domain.tld
> domain.tld mx 30 mx3.domain.tld
>
> For some operational reason mx3 replys all mail with a 454 which is TEMPORALY
> error... :
> Jun 14 23:22:55 mx3
On 2021/06/10 15:48, Moritz Müller via mailop wrote:
> Together with researchers from Seoul National University, Virginia Tech and
> the University of Twente, we would like to understand which challenges
> operators face when deploying DANE for SMTP.
> Also, we would like to understand how
On 2021/04/21 10:23, Neil Youngman via mailop wrote:
> On 21/04/2021 11:00, Chris wrote:
> > Aside from the possibility that the message is simply wrong, or the
> > implementation broken, is your mail server acting like most other
> > servers when presented with a failure (soft or hard)?
> >
> >
On 2021/04/21 12:55, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> Like fire up an exim?
This exim?
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/21/1
"The current Exim versions (and likely older versions too) suffer from
several exploitable vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities were reported
by Qualys
On 2021/04/15 10:58, Odhiambo Washington via mailop wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:44 PM Stuart Henderson via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> I don't know specifically about gmail, but generally support for
> ed25519
> in DKIM is still a bit
On 2021/04/13 11:11, Wolfgang Rosenauer via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing issues with GMail not recognizing a valid DKIM signature.
>
> Message is correctly signed like:
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256;
>
> GMail reports
> dkim=neutral (no key)
>
> while most DKIM validators
On 2021/02/04 16:20, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> Is anyone aware of autoresponder code that works with UTF8SMTP mail? It's
> not hard
> to write one, but why reinvent a wheel if I can steal the code.
Not sure about this, but..
> Also, has anyone ever written down in one place the best
On 2020/12/16 09:03, Dr. Christopher Kunz via mailop wrote:
> We are still using Spam Assassin on our main setup, but I feel that it's not
> aggressive enough to cope with current spam patterns, especially with
> regards to its rather conservative bayesian learning parameters.
>
> Is it generally
On 2020/12/15 00:28, Mary via mailop wrote:
>
> Indeed, I am not blocking it for two reasons:
>
> 1) I was never sure why 50% of all gmail spam seem to originate from
> trix.bounces.google.
>
> 2) The other 50% has regular gmail received headers.
>
>
> For example, trix.bounces.google spam
On 2020/12/08 13:09, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> On 08/12/2020 12:32, Mary via mailop wrote:
> > A solid idea, but you would have to avoid modifications to DKIM signed
> > emails that sign the From header field via the h= tag as specified by
> > RFC6376 secton 5.4 and 5.4.1.
>
> They aren't
On 2020/11/21 13:59, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 21.11.20 12:54, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> > You can configure your MTA to disable IPv6 only for delivery to Google - at
> > least with Postfix it should be possible.
>
> how would one do that?
On 2020/11/19 13:47, Paul Waring via mailop wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:29:48PM +, Chris Woods wrote:
> > I dropped the TTL on the MX, SPF, DKIM and DMARC records to 300 about 36
> > hours before starting the migration, and published the new DKIM key as
> > well. I left the
On 2020/07/07 10:27, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
> On 07/07/2020 01:01, Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
>
>
> I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
> problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presentation on how
> they statistically identify users
On 2020/06/04 12:05, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Benoît Panizzon via mailop wrote:
>
> [ Not replying to the list as this may be off topic,
> but you are welcome to bring it back on list if you wish. ]
Unfortunately this is one of those mailing lists using
On 2020/06/02 14:35, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> My question to mailchimp et al:
>
> Is there way I could force my email address to be double opt in? Like
> register with you, confirm my address, and then any of your customers who
> try to add me, I get a `please confirm` email.
This, but
On 2020/06/02 10:37, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
> <<< 550-5.7.1 [2001:4060:dead:beef::1 19] Our system has detected that
> this
> <<< 550-5.7.1 message is likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of
> the
> <<< 550-5.7.1 sending domain.
"due to the very low reputation of the
It seems that if gmail has a problem making a TLS connection to the
highest priority MX, it does not fallback to lower priority ones.
Is this common with other senders too?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
On 2020/02/07 14:36, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> On 2020-02-07 14:32:50 (-0800), Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/02/07 13:41, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> > > I think the only viable solution will be to set up forwarders
> >
> > Or pass it t
On 2020/02/07 13:41, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> I think the only viable solution will be to set up forwarders
Or pass it through a proxy which knows how to authenticate. I'm not
aware of any that have been written yet but it shouldn't be too complex.
> Unless fetchmail starts supporting
On 2020/02/06 17:02, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 16:04, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
>
> > Dnia 6.02.2020 o godz. 12:43:52 Philip Paeps via mailop pisze:
> > >
> > > Why are there still setups in 2020 that don't support this?
> >
> > Especially that all main MTAs have
On 2020/01/27 13:57, Lennert Van Alboom via mailop wrote:
> Alternatives?
fastmail
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 2020/01/24 21:07, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> So, I have now solved the problem (sort of). On my other box, I had
> no trouble connecting to at least one of those servers and so I had to
> figure out why. So, I looked at the /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf and compared
> them on both systems and
On 2020/01/14 12:32, Laura Atkins wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2020, at 11:58, Stuart Henderson via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On 2020/01/14 11:37, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 10:44 +, J Orlando Letra via mailop wrote:
>
>
On 2020/01/14 11:37, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 10:44 +, J Orlando Letra via mailop wrote:
> > does any one have this problem?
> >
>
> As per https://www.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=64.57.183.53 the IP was
> detected sending or relaying IP traffic which matches a
On 2019/12/16 12:42, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> As for tools, last year I added support for OAUTHBEARER to mutt but by
> shelling out to https://
> github.com/google/gmail-oauth2-tools/blob/master/python/oauth2.py for
> generating tokens. The
> sasl level code to send the tokens is pretty
On 2019/12/10 08:31, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> So, what would be an appropriate replacement for procmail, I think in
> my distro its a hard dependency of sendmail, but maybe there is
> something better?
If you use software which already implements Sieve (Dovecot and Cyrus
are probably the
On 2019/12/09 14:16, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Well... I'd rather do such things in procmail
Be aware, procmail's last maintainer said, "the code is not safe and
should not be used as a basis for any further work".
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=141634350915839=2
On 2019/07/01 15:39, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 12:55 +0100, Simplelists - Andrew Beverley via mailop
> wrote:
> > Would it be better to go for the brand new block? Obviously any
> > existing block could be checked in DNSBLs etc, but are there any
> > advantages of
On 2019/06/05 17:20, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
> The fix for CVE-2019-10149 is public now.
>
> https://git.exim.org/exim.git
> Branch exim-4_91+fixes.
>
> Thank you to
> - Qualys for reporting it.
> - Jeremy for fixing it.
> - you for using Exim.
>
> Sorry for
On 2019/05/15 19:30, Yiorgos [George] Adamopoulos via mailop wrote:
> I just tried to reply to a Hetzner support request from our GSuite
> account and got back this:
>
> 550 Unfortunately we cannot currently accept your e-mail due to the
> amount of spam we are receiving from your server. Please
On 2019/01/11 10:07, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> For the record, we aren't speaking about 'Friendly Names', but the userpart
> of the addr-spec address
>
> But a pointer to an RFC where it is permitted, that I don't find..
RFC5322 and predecessors. Either dot-atom or quoted-string are permitted
61 matches
Mail list logo
