Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-12-05 Thread Philip Paeps via mailop
On 2023-11-17 22:37:58 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: Since about September, we're hitting the rate limiter ~70% of the time every couple of days. Since ~15 November we're hitting the rate limiter for almost all mail we send. Anyone else noticing this? The problem went away last

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-21 Thread Yiorgos [George] Adamopoulos via mailop
We have been experiencing a similar issue since November 19 also. Mail from bounces.amazon.com (do-not-re...@amazon.com) is rate limited when it reaches google and the same happens with email originating from em2895.mirakl.net directed to our G-Suite domain. This means that if you are a merchant

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100) Alessandro Vesely via mailop is rumored to have said: I don't think someone can drop almost all mail and still call itself a mail server. Were you running a mail system in the early-mid 2000s? At that time, I tracked the

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Sun 19/Nov/2023 00:15:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we don't want to

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-18 Thread Philip Paeps via mailop
On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we don't want to frustrate our users ability to use third-party mailing lists that don't

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-18 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we don't want to frustrate our users ability to use third-party mailing lists that don't mitigate it). If you publish p=none you're enabling DMARC without

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-17 Thread Philip Paeps via mailop
On 2023-11-18 01:58:36 (+0800), Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote: I "feel" like there's been an increase but I'm not sure if the numbers support my gut feeling. Here's some stats I just pulled if you want to look at them:

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-17 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 17.11.2023 o godz. 22:37:58 Philip Paeps via mailop pisze: > For the past couple of days, mx2.FreeBSD.org is queuing more mail to > Google than usual. > > This is the 421: > > 421-4.7.28 Gmail has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail. > To protect 421-4.7.28 our users from spam,

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-17 Thread Jarland Donnell via mailop
I "feel" like there's been an increase but I'm not sure if the numbers support my gut feeling. Here's some stats I just pulled if you want to look at them: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14RfO9_RBnQBu4i2lzP4zYMGaQfTDGtNLmcC_E0xQeP4/edit?usp=sharing On 2023-11-17 08:37, Philip Paeps

[mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-17 Thread Philip Paeps via mailop
For the past couple of days, mx2.FreeBSD.org is queuing more mail to Google than usual. This is the 421: 421-4.7.28 Gmail has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail. To protect 421-4.7.28 our users from spam, mail has been temporarily rate limited. Please 421-4.7.28 visit 421-4.7.28