I have done a complete build of GFortran, with a new snapshot of GFortran,
with the new patched MAKE and all has worked fine.
Thanks,
Angelo.
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:35:31 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], make-w32@gnu.org
>
> The new MAKE works fine in building GFortran!
Thanks, both to you and to William, for your help in resolving this
issue.
___
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:49:50 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > I have downloaded http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe (20061005
> > 14:44)
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:49:50 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > I have downloaded http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe (20061005
> > 14:44)
> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:49:50 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, make-w32@gnu.org
>
> I have downloaded http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe (20061005
> 14:44) and with that I have done a quick test:
>
> $ cd ~/
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:51:54 -0400
> > From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I have re-built and this time config.h has the right PATH_SEPARATOR:
> >
> > /* Define to the character that separates directories in PATH. */
> > #defi
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:51:54 -0400
> > From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I have re-built and this time config.h has the right PATH_SEPARATOR:
> >
> > /* Define to the character that separates directories in PATH. */
> > #defi
> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:51:54 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have re-built and this time config.h has the right PATH_SEPARATOR:
>
> /* Define to the character that separates directories in PATH. */
> #define PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR ':'
Thanks!
> All tests still pas
The easiest thing to do is run "autoreconf". That's a script that comes
with autoconf and runs all the different auto* tools necessary, in the
right order.
--
---
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU
At 12:18 AM 10/5/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>.
>
>For all this magic to happen, you must run autoheader and autoconf
>(not automake) after you apply the patch to the sources, and before
>you run the configure script.
I must have missed autoheader. I think I only ran autoconf
Hey, I am a CMake
Quoting Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What am I missing?
Sorry, it was I who was missing something. I was thinking other
packages that use make, not make itself.
Earnie Boyd
--
--
**
* The user of this ser
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:39:43 -0400
> From: Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > If config.h does NOT set PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR to `:', then make.h will
> > set it to `;' because HAVE_DOS_PATHS is def
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:33:46 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I do not see a PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR in the config.h. or in the config.h.in.
> Maybe I did not run automake correctly? How is that supposed to be set?
The way it's supposed to be set is this:
. autohea
Quoting Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If config.h does NOT set PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR to `:', then make.h will
set it to `;' because HAVE_DOS_PATHS is defined. If that's what
happens, then I can definitely understand why vpath is not working,
since vpath.c uses PATH_SEPARATOR_CHAR to break t
At 03:21 PM 10/4/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:11:04 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>>
>> It looks like my guess about vpath was correct: the failing Make
>> doesn't see it. That's quite strange, since I cannot see anything in
>>
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:11:04 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> It looks like my guess about vpath was correct: the failing Make
> doesn't see it. That's quite strange, since I cannot see anything in
> the code that could explain the problem. Obviousl
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:58:53 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, make-w32@gnu.org
>
> The attached file contains the logs obtained with cygdos-test.mk using the
> TAB instead spaces. The new cygdos-test.mk is also contained in
The attached file contains the logs obtained with cygdos-test.mk using the
TAB instead spaces. The new cygdos-test.mk is also contained in the
tar.bz2.
Angelo.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:30:38 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECT
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:30:38 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> The attached file contains the logs requested.
Thanks.
The failure is different, but I think that's because the TAB character
at the beginning of the command was somehow conver
The attached file contains the logs requested.
Cheers,
Angelo.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:12:08 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > The attached file contains the new logs obatined as
> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:12:08 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> The attached file contains the new logs obatined as follow:
> -
> $ ls -lrt /bin/make.*
> ... 151552 Jul 10
ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwin/release/make/make-3.81-1-src.tar.bz2
angelo.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
> > From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:23:39 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ftp://ftp.ale.org/pub/mirrors/cygwin/release/make
Thanks, I'm downloading it now.
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
At 12:03 PM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~". Diffing
>> those
>> with their non-.foo~ counterparts shows the differences.
>
>Thanks, but wh
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~". Diffing those
> with their non-.foo~ counterparts shows the differences.
Thanks, but where do I find the Cygwin source tarball? I don't want
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:43:18 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I guess another point of reference would be an un-patched make 3.81 from
> ftp.gnu.org.
Or produce a patched Cygwin binary by patching the sources from the
Cygwin source tarball.
___
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:28:31PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> - Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>>
>> From: Angelo Graziosi
>> To: cygwin
>> Subject: Problems with
At 07:55 AM 10/2/2006, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>At 07:28 AM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>\
>>William, when you built the binary you provide on
>>http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe, did you patch the sources
>>prepared by Chris for Cygwin, or did you patch the official sources of
>>Ma
At 07:28 AM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>\
>William, when you built the binary you provide on
>http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe, did you patch the sources
>prepared by Chris for Cygwin, or did you patch the official sources of
>Make 3.81 as found on ftp.gnu.org?
I used the source fro
> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Angelo Graziosi
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch
> for gnu make
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:26:18 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> (Who is 'TIA' ?)
TIA = Thanks In Advance.
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:30:13 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> Should I run "make -p --debug=i" just after 'configure' or shouls I run
>
>configure
>make
>cd ../.build/gcc
>"make -p --debug=i"
>...
The latter one.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I need the results of "make -p --debug=i" from this directory:
>
> `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc'
>
> (This is the directory where the build fails.) This could help me
> understand the cause of the failure.
>
> Could you please
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:52:21 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: make-w32@gnu.org
> > >
> > > If nothing gives the clue, I guess posting here the full output of
> > > "make -d" in both cases would be the way to go.
I need the results of "make -p --debug=i" from this directory:
`/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc'
(This is the directory where the build fails.) This could help me
understand the cause of the failure.
Could you please post what that produces, with both unpatched and
patched ve
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:52:21 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > If nothing gives the clue, I guess posting here the full output of
> > "make -d" in both cases would be the way to go.
> >
>
> I will try but you should to have in mind tha
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
> >
> > I use this since Sep 08, but now I have found a problem with
> > http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe.
>
> What is this URL? Are you sure this is the binary compiled from
> official Make 3.81 dist
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:27:23 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> My crystal ball says that VPATH or vpath might be the culprit, so
> please try to look at those
Running "make -p" will print the VPATH database, so you could see if
there's something diffe
> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Angelo Graziosi
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch
> for gnu make
- Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Angelo Graziosi
To: cygwin
Subject: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch
for gnu make)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:35:52 +0200 (MET DST)
I use this since Sep 08, but now I have found a prob
40 matches
Mail list logo
