==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-23, at 11:55 AM, Einde O'Callaghan wrote:
>> http://uk.reuters.com/art
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE70M0QC20110123
__
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-23, at 6:45 AM, Lenin's Tomb wrote:
> The reality is that unionisation
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(The link to this New Yorker article was posted to the lists moderated by Julio
Hua
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-13, at 1:58 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
> Loughner was *not* a terrorist.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-12, at 9:55 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
...if someone stabbed a
> stranger
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-12, at 6:51 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
> ...I describe him as schizophr
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
While there is no clear indication that Loughner was directly influenced by
right-w
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-10, at 6:47 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>> In fact, how can a young white
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-10, at 5:50 PM, Mark Lause wrote:
> I think it's hard to take the issue
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Without describing it in these blunt terms, Financial Times economic columnist
Mart
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
1. A biting satire on the ubiquitous charge of "anti-semitism":
http://www.youtube.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-06, at 12:52 PM, James Holstun wrote:
>
> As the Fiscal Policy Institut
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2011-01-04, at 4:24 AM, r...@riseup.net wrote:
> ==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Wall Street Warms to China Story
By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
Wall Street Journal
January 2
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
China Squeezes Foreigners for Share of Global Riches
By SHAI OSTER, NORIHIKO SHIROUZ
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(Long article with many links)
Underneath the Happy Talk, Is This As Bad as the Gre
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A Solitary Jailhouse Lawyer Argues His Way Out of Prison
By SEAN GARDINER
Wall Stree
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Polling showed large majorities in favor of the Roosevelt administration,
federal p
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Beginning of the End of Dollar Hegemony
By RANDALL W. FORSYTH
Barron's
December
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(Pethokoukis is the Money & Politics columnist for Reuters Breakingviews news
servi
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-07, at 11:00 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
>
> The long period of expansion an
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-07, at 7:00 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-07, at 8:58 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
> Obama: On the way to a failed
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
>>
>> But so fa
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-06, at 1:14 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
>
> This is essentially the EU versi
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-05, at 3:12 PM, DW wrote:
> The term "Client State" is a bit in-exact. I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-05, at 11:31 AM, S. Artesian wrote:
> As for China. China was unaff
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(The PA is using the threat of a unilateral declaration of independence next
year a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-12-03, at 8:17 PM, S. Artesian wrote:
>
> The Fed has released the details
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-16, at 12:45 PM, Intense Red wrote:
>
> One can find many aspects of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
China's 'State Capitalism' Sparks a Global Backlash
By JASON DEAN, ANDREW BROWNE And
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-12, at 7:48 AM, Fred Feldman quoted Paul Krugman:
> It's no mystery wha
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-07, at 10:56 AM, S. Artesian wrote:
> "The financial crisis of 2008 enc
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Chinese leadership has been desperately trying to diversify away from the
dolla
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Here's one Marine Corps Major General I'd be prepared to posthumously absolve:
"I s
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-11-02, at 9:50 PM, sobuadha...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
> The anguished liber
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Send list submissions to: Marxism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/10/21/obama-cancels-trip-because-americans
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-10-21, at 10:57 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> Of course, the most "powerful
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Lucid five part series, with links...
http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/for
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
An interesting if politically unrealizable proposal to avert a trade war from
Micha
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-09-07, at 4:50 PM, Eli Stephens wrote:
> Actually much more interesting th
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
> On 2010-09-07, at 9:00 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>> Louis,
>>
>> […]
>>
>> The
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, co-authors of numerous studies on the
aftermath
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-30, at 4:02 PM, Andrew Pollack wrote:
>
> Pathetic.
> After a very prec
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
World Bank data shows investment by state-run companies accounted for a bigger
shar
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yet another "magic bullet we have always been hoping for", this time from the
inter
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-21, at 11:50 AM, Michael Perelman wrote:
>
>
> The accusations have be
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Angry flight attendant swears at passenger, quits, and leaves plane by
emergency ch
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Fed appears poised to resume quantitative easing both because legitimate
fears
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-08-04, at 12:01 AM, michael perelman wrote:
>
> The New York Times Headli
replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
> On 8/2/10 3:56 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
>> Thank Hans, Les. I'll revert to my previous email acct in order to get
>> copies...
>
>
> according to google:
>
> """When you send a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Below, standard boilerplate from the Tory economic columnist Ambrose
Evans-Pritchar
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-07-26, at 10:26 AM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> So?
==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-07-25, at 7:19 PM, MICHAEL YATES wrote:
> Full at
> http://blog.cheapmote
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-16, at 9:12 AM, Mark Lause wrote:
> Lajany Otum is reading far too much
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At the Tea Party
By Jonathan Raban
New York Review of Books
March 25, 2010
People w
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
My wife and I saw the Hurt Locker on cable last night. I must have missed Louis
P's
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-09, at 6:16 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
>> On 2010-03-09, at 4:21 PM, Loui
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-05, at 3:30 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:
> I can this now that the phrase
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-03-04, at 5:50 PM, Gary MacLennan wrote:
> I thought the reference to Isra
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
sent in error...
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Marv Gandall
> Date: Fe
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/technology/12chip.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&page
:
> ==
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
> Marv Gandall wrote:
>> The effect:
>>
>> Obama Doesn’t ‘Begru
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The effect:
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for Blankfein, Dimon
By Julianna Gold
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 2010-02-06, at 12:48 PM, Greg McDonald wrote:
> ===
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
(Posted by Mike Ballard on the LBO list)
The following is reprinted from The Zinn R
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
U.S. Keeps Foreign Ph.D.s
Despite Fears of a Post-9/11 Drop, Most Science, Engineeri
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis wrote:
> The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you are going to l
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis wrote:
> ...an open letter signed by some high-profile Obama
> supporters in
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Ralph Johansen writes:
> "S. Artesian" wrote
>
> From the FRB Beige Book:
>
> Ov
Matt Russo posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/business/economy/09econ.html?ref=business
A widening gap between data and reality is distorting the government’s
picture of the country’s economic health, overstating growth and
productivity in ways that could affect the political debate on is
Thomas Bias writes:
> The Fourth International was launched to combat Stalinism and social
> democracy in the working class, with the belief that without doing so
> socialist revolution was not possible.
It's a little more complicated than that. The Trotskyists
Tom Cod writes:
> I note the CP, for all its faults, had a different approach and was in the
> thick of solidarity with them and made political gains in that milieu...
===
The CP was uniformally opposed to the Panthers' program and tactics in much
the sa
>From a speech to the Senate by Delaware Senator Ted Kaufman, published in
yesterday's Huffington Post:
(High frequency or flash trading refers to the growing practice of
investment houses like Goldman Sachs to locate and program servers next to
exchanges, giving them split second advance access t
Artesian writes:
> From the Financial Times of 19 October:
>
> Russian plans to raise $18bn with international bond
>
> Russia is to launch its first international bond in a decade to bolster
> its
> public finances and take advantage of the surge in demand for emerging
> market debt.
> __
Bhaskar writes:
> That .pdf that I linked to is still recommended...
=
Yes, well worth reading. "...the concept of instrumentalism that is so
closely associated with Ralph Miliband’s theory of the state is not merely
an oversimplication and caricature of Miliban
Artesian writes:
>I no more deny that apartheid was broken than I would deny that segregation
> by race has been dismantled in the South.
>
> My last word on the subject but as you know I say that often, usually
> after I have already given assurances of my last word on the subject.
==
Artesian writes:
[...]
> No, I don't consider the end of apartheid a joke-- never said any such
> thing-- but the sort of Mandela-de Klerk deal does not bring democracy, or
> secularism, or socialism.
Thanks for clarifying.
> Does anyone think the Afrikaners made this deal out of the goodness o
Artesian writes:
[...]
> If, however, you're referring to the the type of deal struck by de Klerk,
> Botha with Mandela, then preserving "cultural identity" of the minority is
> a
> non-issue at best, a joke at worst, as the economic and social power of
> the
> minority has been preserved.
=
-
From: "Louis Proyect"
To: "Marv Gandall"
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] self determination for oppressors
> Marv Gandall wrote:
>> It's not possible to conceive of a socialist revolution in
>> Palestine/Israel
>&
Artesian writes:
> Dennis is quite write to point out that there is no such thing as
> self-determination for the Afrikaners in South Africa, for the Israelis in
> the Middle East, just as the French in Algeria were not entitled to, nor
> struggling for self-determination.
=
-
From: "Louis Proyect"
To: "Marv Gandall"
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] self determination for oppressors
> Marv Gandall wrote:
>> It's not possible to conceive of a socialist revolution in
>> Palestine/Israel
>&
Dennis Brasky writes:
If the Israeli Jews are offered self determination after the coming
socialist revolution, what form will that take? Won't it be a Jewish state
in Palestine - where the Palestinians would want their state? But the Jews
already have such a state, so why do they need a revolutio
Artesian writes:
...so I wouldn't
> rush out and buy shares in Baosteel based on the WSA article, know what I
> mean?
==
Jeez, Artesian, anyone following your investment advice would have been
short China and long the US market since 2000, and we know where they'd
Luko writes "one might say, that China is saving world wide capitalism from
deeper
crises, but I prefer China growing than starving so that the working masses
in
the imperialist countries fall into misery. I have never been a follower of
the
"the worse the better" strategy."
===
ltaneously overproduction of commodities and overproduction of capital
(overaccumulation)."
-Ernest Mandel, "Marx's Theory of Crisis"
http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article289
- Original Message -----
From: "S. Artesian"
To: "Marv Gandall"
(Rich is another principled liberal whose plaintive appeals to Obama - see
his last paragraph - increasingly lack conviction)
October 4, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
The Rabbit Ragu Democrats
By FRANK RICH
New York Times
IN the annals of American excess, there often arrives a moment when those
with too m
("The emerging prize economy, according to some labor market analysts, does
carry the danger of being a further shift in the balance of power toward the
buyers — corporations — and away from most workers.")
***
September 22, 2009
A $1 Million Research Bargain for Netflix, and Maybe a Mode
Finance Overhaul Falters as '08 Shock Fades
By DAVID ENRICH and DAMIAN PALETTA
Wall Street Journal
September 9 2009
Nearly one year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers sent shock waves
across the globe, the world is a different place.
The investment bank's messy death intensified the deepest re
Lehman's collapse almost brought down the money-market industry
By Sam Mamudi, MarketWatch
September 9 2009
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- As the threat of a Lehman Brothers bankruptcy grew
last September, many money-market fund managers were wary but not worried.
Their industry had quietly grown over
Louis posted:
> http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/22515
==
Along the same lines, but from a right-wing source:
"China is running away with the green technology prize. It has conquered a
third of the world market for solar cells and is on a breakneck course to
build
Artesian writes:
> As for your "spark a run on the dollar would lead to a grave international
> economic and political crisis whose outcome would more likely than not be
> catastrophic rather than positive for both the Chinese and American
> working
> classes," that is simply absurd...
It's th
Artesian writes:
> Exactly how do you know that there is no opposition to FDI, to the
> government trade and currency policies?
[...]
> There is ongoing debate outside the party, in the universities, and
> institutions for special studies, about the course being followed.
=
Louis writes:
> Marv Gandall wrote:
>> The truly revolutionary changes such a government would introduce - the
>> ones
>> he has called for - would be to abruptly expel foreign capital and to
>> stop
>> financing the US trade deficit.
>>
>> These acti
Dennis Brasky writes:
> So it's a which comes first - the chicken or the egg. We desperately need
> a
> new party that is willing to stand up to corporate rule, but until that
> party emerges - and with instant mass support! - Blacks, immigrants, etc
> will look to the Democrats and what do w
Dennis Brasky writes:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Marv Gandall
> wrote:
>
>>
>> At present, as between the two parties, a split within the Republicans
>> seems
>> more likely, with the rich patrician wing which formerly controlled the
>> party now
Dennis Brasky writes:
>
> Of course, "the proof is in the eating". If it's Obama vs a real "greater
> evil" - Palin or Huckerbee in 2012, we'll see if the Lindorffs and
> Greenwalds continue to "hold their noses" and vote lesser evil "to stop
> impending fascism".
=
Maybe s
ontext, they are not as "incomprehensible" as
they have appeared to many outraged liberals and even radicals.
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect"
To: "Marv Gandall"
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Guess What
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo