On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
> The scaling changes are in, as well as the warning and the corresponding
> lines in
> api_changes and CHANGELOG. I also added the converted matlab demo I used to
> figure this stuff out. Now would probab
John,
I remember that "-" is also rendedered as a dot in the HTML output.
Using "\-" instead of "-" seems to work. But, I'm afraid that the help
(or similar) command, which I frequently use in interactive sessions,
may show "\-" instead of "-".
So, quoting seems to be a best option to me.
Regar
I've been looking for an elegant way to change, on a per-plot basis,
the font attributes of my x and y tick labels. The best I've come up
with is getting a list/collection of tick labels and looping through
it to change the font attributes. Is there an easy one or two line
way to do it?
In the Curve class of patches.py, where we are doing:
_style_list["-"] = Curve
and interpolating this into a rest table via patches._pprint_styles,
which looks like this::
== =
Class Name Attrs
==
John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My only other concern is whether this belongs in 0.98.x. This is a behavior
>> change from 0.98.3, not necessarily a bug fix. I'll defer to John, et al.
>> on whether this should go in 0.98.x or go in
On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> Chad Kidder wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>>> Chad Kidder wrote:
I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has
an additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What
I want to do
Chad Kidder wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
>> Chad Kidder wrote:
>>> I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
>>> additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want
>>> to do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot
Chad Kidder wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
>> Chad Kidder wrote:
>>> I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
>>> additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want
>>> to do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Chad Kidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
> Instead of getting a grayscale plot out, I'd like to use a colormap
> like jet() or winter(). Any ideas there?
How about?
import matplotlib.cm as cm
for ii in range(nlines):
color = cm.jet(z[i
On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> Chad Kidder wrote:
>> I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
>> additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want
>> to do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot can do
>> this just fin
John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My only other concern is whether this belongs in 0.98.x. This is a behavior
>> change from 0.98.3, not necessarily a bug fix. I'll defer to John, et al.
>> on whether this should go in 0.98.x or go in
Chad Kidder wrote:
> I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
> additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want to
> do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot can do this
> just fine), but with the additional scalar changing the color,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Chad Kidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
> additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want to
> do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot can do this
> just fine), but
I've got many series of data that I want to plot, and each has an
additional scalar that is valid for the whole series. What I want to
do is plot all these series on top of each other (plot can do this
just fine), but with the additional scalar changing the color,
efectively using color as
Dear Jeff,
2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro: That's because the default is not really a map projection at all -
> it just displays the data in lat/lon coordinates.The map scale really
> has no meaning in that case.
Sure, however some biological journals insist that author
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> Thanks Unfortunately, the map scale cannot be drawn for
> cylindrical projections like the Equirectangular default... :-(
>
Mauro: That's because the default is not really a map projection at all
- it just displays the data in lat/lon coordinates.
Dear Jeff,
Thanks Unfortunately, the map scale cannot be drawn for
cylindrical projections like the Equirectangular default... :-(
Best wishes,
2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
>>
>> Dear Jeff & ALL,
>>
>> Are there any examples of the use of the drawmap
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear Jeff & ALL,
>
> Are there any examples of the use of the drawmapscale() Basemap
> method? I can use this myself and will also add any examples to the
> forthcoming "Basemap Cookbook" website (for this, I am compiling all
> available examples).
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
Dear Jeff & ALL,
Are there any examples of the use of the drawmapscale() Basemap
method? I can use this myself and will also add any examples to the
forthcoming "Basemap Cookbook" website (for this, I am compiling all
available examples).
Thanks in advance!
Best wishes,
--
Dr. Mauro J. Cavalca
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> 2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Mauro: I just added a 'scale' keyword to bluemarble that downsamples the
>> image to speed things up. scale=1.0 (the default) gives the same answer as
>> before (the full resolution image). scale=0.5 do
Dear Jeff,
2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro: I just added a 'scale' keyword to bluemarble that downsamples the
> image to speed things up. scale=1.0 (the default) gives the same answer as
> before (the full resolution image). scale=0.5 downsamples the image to half
> the ori
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only other concern is whether this belongs in 0.98.x. This is a behavior
> change from 0.98.3, not necessarily a bug fix. I'll defer to John, et al.
> on whether this should go in 0.98.x or go in a later release.
It's a j
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear ALL,
>
> I am using Basemap version 0.90 with MPL version 0.98.3 under Linux
> Ubuntu, both installed from Andrew Straw repository (I just prefer to
> install from repositories via apt than directly from the sources,
> although in this case I do not have always the la
John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Fago, Matt - AES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So what is to be done here? It seems to me that at least the factor of two
>> should be
>> fixed for one-sided PSDs, and the 1/fs normalization difference with Matlab
>> documented. Ideally, I'd thi
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Fago, Matt - AES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So what is to be done here? It seems to me that at least the factor of two
> should be
> fixed for one-sided PSDs, and the 1/fs normalization difference with Matlab
> documented. Ideally, I'd think this normalization w
So what is to be done here? It seems to me that at least the factor of two
should be
fixed for one-sided PSDs, and the 1/fs normalization difference with Matlab
documented. Ideally, I'd think this normalization would be on by default, with
the
option to turn it off.
Are you planning to submit a
Cool! Thanks. pyplot.subplots_adjust seems to be some kind of "super"
function that controls margins for the entire figure as well as spacing
between the subplots.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 1:09 AM, Roy H. Han wrote:
>
> > I figu
Dear Jeff,
2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro: I realized that this is actually possible with the Cassini
> projection (the transverse aspect of the cylindrical equidistant).
>
> Don't know why you would actually do it though, if you want to show polar
> regions you should proba
Dear Jeff,
2008/12/8 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro: I just updated SVN basemap so you can specify just lon_0 for all
> cylindrical projections (cyl,gall,merc,mill) to get a global map centered on
> lon_0 (implying
> llcrnrlat=-90,urcrnrlat=90,llcrnrlon=lon_0-180,urcrnrlon=lon_0+180)
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> 2008/12/7 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Mauro: Just set the llrncrlat,urcrnrlon appropriately. For instance,
>> llcrnrlon=0, urcrnrlon=360 will produce a map centered on the dateline while
>> llcrnrlon=-180, urcrnrlon=180 will produce a map ce
Mauro Cavalcanti wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> 2008/12/7 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Mauro: Just set the llrncrlat,urcrnrlon appropriately. For instance,
>> llcrnrlon=0, urcrnrlon=360 will produce a map centered on the dateline while
>> llcrnrlon=-180, urcrnrlon=180 will produce a map ce
Dear Jeff,
2008/12/7 Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mauro: Just set the llrncrlat,urcrnrlon appropriately. For instance,
> llcrnrlon=0, urcrnrlon=360 will produce a map centered on the dateline while
> llcrnrlon=-180, urcrnrlon=180 will produce a map centered on Greenwich.
Thanks! I had n
32 matches
Mail list logo
