Jim coon wrote,
| I frined sent me a disk that he was recording and as the battery was
| giving out, he replaced the battery without stopping the unit so the TOC
| could be written. He wants me to recover the recording. I have a Sony
| 520 deck and a SOny R30 recorder. I have some
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/04/2036216
I'm sure some people from here could write some coherent pro-MD posts to
balance this out a bit :)
--
Simon
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unit. He is using this as an example, and has not
inferred that he supports doing this.
That's correct. I was just using that as an example. I was not
advocating any particular practice.
Ok. Didn't think you did that, but who knows.
--
JT
The price is right...
http://www.bestbuy.com/Detail.asp?m=58cat=61scat=248e=11000156
Now if they can only get the price of car audio and recorders similarly
as reasonable.
Shawn
1stUp.com - Free the Web
Jim Coon (whose capital C I managed to miss shifting on this new keyboard)
asked if he needs to know whether the material is mono or stereo in advance
before he starts to recover a disc for a friend. I answered, in part,
| It certainly helps; ask your friend if you can get in touch with him.
Dave, I just followed you instructions and I am listening to it now. I
will wait till it gets to the end and mark the un used part and delete
it. THanks for posting such great and easy to follow instructions. It
worked like a champ the first time I tried it.
"David W. Tamkin" wrote:
My guess? If you've been regularly using your MZ-R50 for a long time,
worn-out optical block. But first thing I'd check is your optical cable,
just to ensure there aren't any breaks, it's not being bent at too sharp an
angle (i.e. past its critical angle), etc.
Then assume the worst...
Adios,
Hi everyone!
Who remembers those cassette or 8-track tape players that were sold during
the 60s and 70s, which were designed to be mounted under the dashboard of a
car? A lot of these units didn't have a tuner and often played through a set
of speakers that were often sold with the unit.
Yes, but don't forget the timeline that all those 5 models have spanned
across! A lot had changed when they got to the C7900 model, and for the
better.
Personally, I'm absolutely chuffed with my C8900 and wouldn't give it up for
quids (unless someone offered me a C8970 for $100 as an upgrade to
MiniDisc Community Pages News for 30 October 2000
o Hot new find! Michael discovers a Japanese Sharp [1]press release
for their new portable recording MD unit, the MD-MT77 (currently
smallest in the world, MDLP-capable, USB connectable, flashy
multicolored LED lights built in).
Alan Dowds wrote:
I agree. I'm a journalist, and I love to use my 702 for interviews and note
taking, but it's a pain to have to plug a mic in. Seems like in the past
even the cheapest recording tape machines always had at least a cheap mono
mic built-in. Surely it wouldn't take up much
Heya guys,
Heh, again it's been to long since I last wrote or infact read the
md-l group. Alas my education takes a lot out of my life.
I'm looking at getting a minidisc deck and a cd deck for my hi-fi. I
was originally looking at getting seperate units. But lack of space in
my uni room, and
Not that I'm familiar with the letter you mention, but I've had my MDX-C8900
now for almost 3 years and it has been an absolute dream. My only problem
was a slightly dirty lens which would result in some of my MD's being spat
back out with "Error" after trying to read it for a while. This
I've finally replaced my Creative Labs CD burner with a drive which
actually works, the Ricoh MP9060A which can burn CD-R at up to 6x.
My question is, assuming the PC can get the data to the drive quick
enough to avoid under-runs (which it can) is there any disadvantage to
burning at 6x (the
Simon Mackay wrote:
Hi everyone!
Who remembers those cassette or 8-track tape players that were sold during
the 60s and 70s, which were designed to be mounted under the dashboard of a
car? A lot of these units didn't have a tuner and often played through a set
of speakers that were often
PrinceGaz wrote:
is there any disadvantage to
burning at 6x (the discs I have are rated for up to 8x burning) rather
than 4x?
I'd rather not go back to 2x burning but would a slightly slower than
max speed; 4x rather than 6x give better more readable discs and be
worth the extra six or so
16 matches
Mail list logo
