James Jarvie wrote:
Rat, thanks for the reply.
Well, if you're willing to go the Linux/FreeBSD
route, you can use cdrecord, cdrdao, or xcdroast.
Can't do that...I don't know anything about Linux.
Have to stick with what I know, since I have precious
little time to play as it is.
las wrote:
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can
be
anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a
combination of
any of them...
Hopefully, more and more drives will start coming out with
PrinceGaz a ecri:
From: "J. van de Griek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all
that,
chances of burn errors or poorly readable result discs are higher.
And that is probably what the originator of this thread meant. So, in
t
Mike Burger wrote:
The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs
for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can
run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read
them.
You didn;t see that noted because it's
Jeanmougin schrieb:
I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more
read
errors.
Well, that would be a problem with the CD burner, not with the player.
If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all that,
chances of burn errors or poorly readable
las wrote:
Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
One could say the same thing about metre, litre, gram, Newton, or any
other
unit of measure that we use.
That may be true, but in the case of cps, we had something in place that
was
descriptive. Just because we use non descriptive terms for many
sherryl wrote:
The number of valves can make a difference. I have an old 1990 Pontiac
Grand AM that has a quad four engine (16 valves in four cylinders) that
will out perform many 6 cylinder cars.
I doubt it will outperform my 1987 Porsche 911 Carrera (3.2l flat six)...
:-)))
You have a
las wrote:
Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
Not like there is anything to convert. 1 Hertz = 1 cycle/second. They
just gave the unit of measurement a name (like Newton, Watt, etc).
But it makes no sense to me to take something that is descriptive and give
it a
name that tells you nothing.
J. Coon wrote:
Michael Stouffs wrote:
Please, STOP commenting our habits, you are *offending*.
You look like my 14 yr old cousin who *absolutely* has to be right and
*absolutely* won't admit he's wrong/partially wrong/a tad wrong/just a
little bit wrong no matter what.
You have
WTF!?
When did this happen? Everytime I try to access MiniDisc.org, I get a 404...
Did I miss some announcement, or is this a temporary thing?
,xtG
.tsooJ
--
Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
Here's some advice for you:
- Click this
Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
* las [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 23 Sep 2000
| Peter, I don't think that you should stop posting here. If there are
| many people who object to what you are doing, lets hear from them.
I'm one. No matter how you disguse it, unsolicited commercial advertising
J. Coon wrote:
That is good advice Peter, I have had to do the same thing when a
different company shipped something standard and it was supposed to be
Over Night. When I didn't get the merchandize, I called them and it had
been misrouted by UPS, and I wouldn't get it for another two
las wrote:
"Gordon, Richard" wrote:
Maybe eh - but not as much pain though as listening to RB music..
Rhythm and Blues is a very generic term. Unless you hate all rock and
only
listen to Classical music, I'm sure there are some songs that would
qualify
as as R B, that you never even
las wrote:
Larry, I completely agree with most of what you wrote about valuable
professions not being paid what they're actually worth.
Dan, if I gave the impression that artists should not be paid for their
work,
that is not what I meant to say. But do artists deserve the payments that
James S. Lee wrote:
Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
snip
But they are proportional to the "input" that stamped out the medium.
It
just so happens that what was stamped out a pattern of ones and zeros.
snip
Are you saying that the depth of the burn is proportional to the
intensity of the
J. Coon wrote:
oh.. btw. i agree with princegaz'sss comments backing up pierre.. never
apologise for your english.. it's many, many times better than my
french!
His English is readable and he gets his point across. What more can you
ask? About the only French I know is "Are you
The other day I recieved my company's new gift catalog, you know, a small
booklet with a list of things you can choose as presents for bringing in a
new employee. And lo and behold, there it was, one of the gifts: a Sony
portable MiniDisc recorder, MZ-R55. Wow. Strange thing is, they classified
On 13-08-2000 21:23, Taky Cheung wrote:
And why did SONY make their new Mavica use an entirely new 3-inch CD-R? The
capacity is approximately the same as a standard MD -- and the CD-R is even
a little larger, I think. The write speed can't be faster than an MD (both
generally go up to 4X
On 06-08-2000 07:15, las wrote:
MD could still be a big thing if a) People were educated. b) They started to
fill music stores with prerecorded MDs that were selling for the price of
cassettes, not CDs. c) They started offering recorders and players at
realistic and competitive prices.
Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
* Alexander Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 23 Jul 2000
| Oh no, I _like_ the clamshell mechanism ! Those Sharp portables
| look so damn ugly (hey, just my personal opinion).
Just for the sake of argument, how does the unit's appearance affect its
recording
mutt2004 wrote:
I've been looking to buy a MD portable recorder for quite a while but I
never had enough, but now I do.
What is the newest models out now?
Top dogs at the moment are the Sharp MD-MT831/832 and the Sony MR-Z90/91.
Which is the best brand and model?
Both are fine.
Jack Swindell wrote:
I had posted some musings about this on usenet a couple of weeks ago as
well. Maybe there are enough of us thinking about this now to make
something happen.
I agree, if not directly a practical thing, this might turn out to be a good
(and fun) brain exercise.
Francisco J. Montilla wrote:
[snipperdesnap]
I have a JA20ES w/ 2 outputs (TOSLink/Coax) and 3 inputs
(2TOSLink/Coax) and I use it as a "digital patching matrix", and yes, you
have to press the record button (try it w/o a MD :) so that it acts as a
-AD DA- or AD-DA converter. I also have a
24 matches
Mail list logo
