Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-08 Thread Keith Wilson
Yeah, but what if the soundcard has not been programmed to send the data correctly, it could just be sending NULLs to the unit, which it then defaults to UNLIMITED, this could explain why the track index marks are not sent either Keith - Senior Development Programmer Putting

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-07 Thread Brent Harding
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === The professional kind like what's listed on

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread J. Coon
LAS wrote: "J. Coon" wrote: If you made a recording to MD with microphones, it is an analog recording, and it will allow a digital copy to be made from it. However, if you make a digital copy of the MD to another MD, the SCMS bits will be set to not allow another digital copy to be

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread John Graham
David: G If I make an analogue recording to my hard disk it has no SCMS bits set, G or is classed as 'unlimited digital copy'. Er, no. Depending on your ripping software, usually it will be stored, regardless of whether the connection from your MD player to your hard disk was analog or

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread Brent Harding
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === how does that work, if you spend 3 or 4

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread LAS
Brent Harding wrote: === = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === how does that work,

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread J. Coon
John Graham wrote: OK, so my hard disc analogue recordings .wav files contain no SCMS information. Is it not surprising though that my soundcard drivers output these files over the optical out with SCMS set to unlimited? I'd have expected it to send something like "SCMS-unknown" so that the

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-06 Thread J. Coon
Brent Harding wrote: How does that work, if you spend 3 or 4 hundred bucks on one of those good ones that's usable for radio applications, maybe then scms is defeatable. I think the professional machines (Denon I believe) cost about a grand or more.

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-05 Thread J. Coon
Martin Schiff wrote: Larry, I believe you are correct, because this problem just bit me in the butt. I made original recordings to MD with microphones, and when I try to transfer them to the computer using a Hoontech soundcard with Yamaha drivers (which implement SCMS) it will not copy.

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-05 Thread LAS
"J. Coon" wrote: If you made a recording to MD with microphones, it is an analog recording, and it will allow a digital copy to be made from it. However, if you make a digital copy of the MD to another MD, the SCMS bits will be set to not allow another digital copy to be made. That's

RE: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-05 Thread Martin Schiff
, February 05, 2000 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!? Martin Schiff wrote: Larry, I believe you are correct, because this problem just bit me in the butt. I made original recordings to MD with microphones, and when I try to transfer them to the computer

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-05 Thread David W. Tamkin
Larry Sherry wrote, S If I remember correctly it is the MD recorder that adds the SCMS. No. An S/PDIF signal has SCMS bits in it. Whatever generates the signal generates those bits. The recorder decides what to do about them. John Graham wrote, G OK, I think I understand better now. G

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-04 Thread John Graham
David: | I had understood that making a recording from a digital source would | *always* set the SCMS copy status, thereafter allowing only one digital | copy. This seems to break that rule. That wasn't the rule. Yes, recording will always set the SCMS bits, but it won't necessarily set them

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-04 Thread LAS
"J. Coon" wrote: LAS wrote: Hi. If I remember correctly it is the MD recorder that adds the SCMS. If that is correct, then either you have a one of a kind recorder or the copy is not true digital. It is my understanding that computers aren't required to set the SCMS bits. They

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-04 Thread Brent Harding
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === But suppose, I do a digital copy of a CD, I

RE: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-04 Thread Martin Schiff
to the old drivers and live with the (minor) problem. Bummer. -- Martin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of LAS Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!? "J. Coon" wr

MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-03 Thread John Graham
Here's a weird one. I make hard disk recordings off the radio (using LOOPREC) and then digital copy tracks to my MZ-R55 using the optical lead. A digital recording I's sure, at least 'DIGITAL' appears in the window in the MD during the copy. I'm then able to take that disk to my other MD deck

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-03 Thread David W. Tamkin
John Graham asked, | I've read sometime that the SCMS bit can be set to 'COPY UNLIMITED', could | it be that the SBLive! is setting this condition? It could. Computer peripherals are not covered by SCMS (likewise the immunity from suit for non-commercial copying under the AHRA does not extend

Re: MD: Unlimited SCMS from SBLive!?

2000-02-03 Thread J. Coon
LAS wrote: Hi. If I remember correctly it is the MD recorder that adds the SCMS. If that is correct, then either you have a one of a kind recorder or the copy is not true digital. It is my understanding that computers aren't required to set the SCMS bits. They aren't cover under the law.