Hi,
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Indeed, I wasn't suggesting that it was insurmountable; just that each
vendor will want to enter into a device programme to get something in
return. The things they want in return will vary (I guess) depending
on the end-user readiness of the boards; their involvement
- Original message -
From: Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org
To: Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org
cc: Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com, MeeGo community
meego-community@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging the Community Device Program
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:35:18 +0100
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:35 +0100, ext Dave Neary wrote:
My least favourite methods (because lowest ROI as far as I can tell) are
giveaways where either (a) all attendees at a conference/session get a
device
Same here. This has been an interesting approach for a while but it is
not
- Original message -
From: Quim Gil quim@nokia.com
To: ext Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org
cc: MeeGo community meego-community@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging the Community Device Program
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:53:42 -0800
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:35
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
Same here. This has been an interesting approach for a while but it is
not sustainable. Some reasons:
snip some good reasons
It also results in a lot of unused/underused hardware.
On the other hand it is convenient to take some advantage from events,
since in one go
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 23:42, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
1) Device providers would agree to a single conduit/point-of-contact in MeeGo
community (preferrably Linux Foundation employee) to manage devices provided
exclusively to MeeGo community under the auspices of a MeeGo Device
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:18, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
I don't see anything in those comments that is a show-stopper for the Linux
Foundation fronting the program. As I mentioned earlier in this thread,
there's no 'one size fits all' so any program, even if run as a proxy for all
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 17:22 -0800, ext Foster, Dawn M wrote:
Intel and Nokia will, of course, want to put some budget together
to contribute our devices into the program :)
Since Nokia produces devices, usually what Nokia does is to provide them
to developers (instead of funds) being
- Original message -
From: Quim Gil quim@nokia.com
To: ext Foster, Dawn M dawn.m.fos...@intel.com
cc: Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com, MeeGo community
meego-community@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging the Community Device Program
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:19
- Meego-dev as per Dawn's suggestion.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
Jay, what I mean is, are all devices coming from a single pool and
available to any/all applicants, or might there be a certain number allotted
specifically to the MeeGo community?
I
Hi,
a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 December 2010 00:40, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
Now that we have a nice offer from TI to get Pandaboards into the hands of
developers [1] it's time as Quim suggested to get serious about the
Community Device Program [2]. I will repost some of the
Now that we have a�nice offer from TI to get Pandaboards into the hands
of developers [1] it's time as Quim suggested to get serious about the
Community Device Program [2].� I will repost some of the wiki content
here followed by my thoughts and questions:
Overview
* Community members will
Hi,
On 3 December 2010 00:40, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
Now that we have a nice offer from TI to get Pandaboards into the hands of
developers [1] it's time as Quim suggested to get serious about the
Community Device Program [2]. I will repost some of the wiki content here
followed
- Original message -
From: a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com
To: Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com
cc: MeeGo community meego-community@meego.com, MeeGo Dev List
meego-...@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging the Community Device Program
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 02
On Dec 2, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Randall Arnold wrote:
- Original message -
From: a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com
To: Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com
cc: MeeGo community meego-community@meego.com, MeeGo Dev List
meego-...@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com wrote:
I do disagree with the production device requirement though. Prototypes
should be allowed also, and if this program is to include Beagleboards,
Pandaboards, et al, then the requirement certainly needs to be broadened (or
Sorry for top-posting-- I can't write below the quoted section below.
Jay, what I mean is, are all devices coming from a single pool and
available to any/all applicants, or might there be a certain number
allotted specifically to the MeeGo community?
Sorry for being unclear.
Randy
-
- Original message -
From: Foster, Dawn M dawn.m.fos...@intel.com
To: Jayabharath, Goluguri jayabhar...@ti.com
cc: Randall Arnold tex...@ovi.com, MeeGo community
meego-community@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-community] Nudging the Community Device Program
Date: Thu, 2 Dec
18 matches
Mail list logo
